1
|
Zheng M, Lin Y, Wang W, Zhao Y, Bao X. Application of nucleoside or nucleotide analogues in RNA dynamics and RNA-binding protein analysis. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS. RNA 2022; 13:e1722. [PMID: 35218164 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Cellular RNAs undergo dynamic changes during RNA biological processes, which are tightly orchestrated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Yet, the investigation of RNA dynamics is hurdled by highly abundant steady-state RNAs, which make the signals of dynamic RNAs less detectable. Notably, the exert of nucleoside or nucleotide analogue-based RNA technologies has provided a remarkable platform for RNA dynamics research, revealing diverse unnoticed features in RNA metabolism. In this review, we focus on the application of two types of analogue-based RNA sequencing, antigen-/antibody- and click chemistry-based methodologies, and summarize the RNA dynamics features revealed. Moreover, we discuss emerging single-cell newly transcribed RNA sequencing methodologies based on nucleoside analogue labeling, which provides novel insights into RNA dynamics regulation at single-cell resolution. On the other hand, we also emphasize the identification of RBPs that interact with polyA, non-polyA RNAs, or newly transcribed RNAs and also their associated RNA-binding domains at genomewide level through ultraviolet crosslinking and mass spectrometry in different contexts. We anticipated that further modification and development of these analogue-based RNA and RBP capture technologies will aid in obtaining an unprecedented understanding of RNA biology. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Recognition RNA Structure and Dynamics > RNA Structure, Dynamics and Chemistry RNA Methods > RNA Analyses in Cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meifeng Zheng
- Center for Cell Lineage and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, GIBH-HKU Guangdong-Hong Kong Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Centre, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yingying Lin
- Center for Cell Lineage and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, GIBH-HKU Guangdong-Hong Kong Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Centre, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- The Center for Infection and Immunity Study, School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangming Science City, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Center for Biosafety, Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Zhao
- Molecular Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xichen Bao
- Center for Cell Lineage and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, GIBH-HKU Guangdong-Hong Kong Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Centre, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Center for Cell Lineage and Atlas, Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qi H, Wang F, Tao SC. Proteome microarray technology and application: higher, wider, and deeper. Expert Rev Proteomics 2019; 16:815-827. [PMID: 31469014 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2019.1662303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Protein microarray is a powerful tool for both biological study and clinical research. The most useful features of protein microarrays are their miniaturized size (low reagent and sample consumption), high sensitivity and their capability for parallel/high-throughput analysis. The major focus of this review is functional proteome microarray. Areas covered: For proteome microarray, this review will discuss some recently constructed proteome microarrays and new concepts that have been used for constructing proteome microarrays and data interpretation in past few years, such as PAGES, M-NAPPA strategy, VirD technology, and the first protein microarray database. this review will summarize recent proteomic scale applications and address the limitations and future directions of proteome microarray technology. Expert opinion: Proteome microarray is a powerful tool for basic biological and clinical research. It is expected to see improvements in the currently used proteome microarrays and the construction of more proteome microarrays for other species by using traditional strategies or novel concepts. It is anticipated that the maximum number of features on a single microarray and the number of possible applications will be increased, and the information that can be obtained from proteome microarray experiments will more in-depth in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Qi
- Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Fei Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Sheng-Ce Tao
- Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jung Y, El-Manzalawy Y, Dobbs D, Honavar VG. Partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins: A critical assessment. Proteins 2018; 87:198-211. [PMID: 30536635 PMCID: PMC6389706 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
RNA-protein interactions play essential roles in regulating gene expression. While some RNA-protein interactions are "specific", that is, the RNA-binding proteins preferentially bind to particular RNA sequence or structural motifs, others are "non-RNA specific." Deciphering the protein-RNA recognition code is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions and for developing new therapies for many diseases. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein-RNA interfaces, there is a need for computational methods to identify RNA-binding residues in proteins. While most of the existing computational methods for predicting RNA-binding residues in RNA-binding proteins are oblivious to the characteristics of the partner RNA, there is growing interest in methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins. In this work, we assess the performance of two recently published partner-specific protein-RNA interface prediction tools, PS-PRIP, and PRIdictor, along with our own new tools. Specifically, we introduce a novel metric, RNA-specificity metric (RSM), for quantifying the RNA-specificity of the RNA binding residues predicted by such tools. Our results show that the RNA-binding residues predicted by previously published methods are oblivious to the characteristics of the putative RNA binding partner. Moreover, when evaluated using partner-agnostic metrics, RNA partner-specific methods are outperformed by the state-of-the-art partner-agnostic methods. We conjecture that either (a) the protein-RNA complexes in PDB are not representative of the protein-RNA interactions in nature, or (b) the current methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins fail to account for the differences in RNA partner-specific versus partner-agnostic protein-RNA interactions, or both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Jung
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,Artificial Intelligence Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
| | - Yasser El-Manzalawy
- Artificial Intelligence Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,College of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania
| | - Drena Dobbs
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.,Department of Genetics, Development, and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
| | - Vasant G Honavar
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,Artificial Intelligence Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,Institute for Cyberscience, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,College of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Newman RH, Zhang J. Integrated Strategies to Gain a Systems-Level View of Dynamic Signaling Networks. Methods Enzymol 2017; 589:133-170. [PMID: 28336062 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In order to survive and function properly in the face of an ever changing environment, cells must be able to sense changes in their surroundings and respond accordingly. Cells process information about their environment through complex signaling networks composed of many discrete signaling molecules. Individual pathways within these networks are often tightly integrated and highly dynamic, allowing cells to respond to a given stimulus (or, as is typically the case under physiological conditions, a combination of stimuli) in a specific and appropriate manner. However, due to the size and complexity of many cellular signaling networks, it is often difficult to predict how cellular signaling networks will respond under a particular set of conditions. Indeed, crosstalk between individual signaling pathways may lead to responses that are nonintuitive (or even counterintuitive) based on examination of the individual pathways in isolation. Therefore, to gain a more comprehensive view of cell signaling processes, it is important to understand how signaling networks behave at the systems level. This requires integrated strategies that combine quantitative experimental data with computational models. In this chapter, we first examine some of the progress that has recently been made toward understanding the systems-level regulation of cellular signaling networks, with a particular emphasis on phosphorylation-dependent signaling networks. We then discuss how genetically targetable fluorescent biosensors are being used together with computational models to gain unique insights into the spatiotemporal regulation of signaling networks within single, living cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Newman
- North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, United States.
| | - Jin Zhang
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Experimental methods for identifying protein(s) bound by a specific promoter-associated RNA (paRNA) of interest can be expensive, difficult, and time-consuming. This chapter describes a general computational framework for identifying potential binding partners in RNA-protein complexes or RNA-protein interaction networks. Protocols for using three web-based tools to predict RNA-protein interaction partners are outlined. Also, tables listing additional webservers and software tools for predicting RNA-protein interactions, as well as databases that contain valuable information about known RNA-protein complexes and recognition sites for RNA-binding proteins, are provided. Although only one of the tools described, lncPro, was designed expressly to identify proteins that bind long noncoding RNAs (including paRNAs), all three approaches can be applied to predict potential binding partners for both coding and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla M Mann
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA
| | - Usha K Muppirala
- Genome Informatics Facility, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA
| | - Drena Dobbs
- Genetics, Development and Cell Biology Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jazurek M, Ciesiolka A, Starega-Roslan J, Bilinska K, Krzyzosiak WJ. Identifying proteins that bind to specific RNAs - focus on simple repeat expansion diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:9050-9070. [PMID: 27625393 PMCID: PMC5100574 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
RNA–protein complexes play a central role in the regulation of fundamental cellular processes, such as mRNA splicing, localization, translation and degradation. The misregulation of these interactions can cause a variety of human diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Recently, many strategies have been developed to comprehensively analyze these complex and highly dynamic RNA–protein networks. Extensive efforts have been made to purify in vivo-assembled RNA–protein complexes. In this review, we focused on commonly used RNA-centric approaches that involve mass spectrometry, which are powerful tools for identifying proteins bound to a given RNA. We present various RNA capture strategies that primarily depend on whether the RNA of interest is modified. Moreover, we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of in vitro and in vivo approaches. Furthermore, we describe recent advances in quantitative proteomics as well as the methods that are most commonly used to validate robust mass spectrometry data. Finally, we present approaches that have successfully identified expanded repeat-binding proteins, which present abnormal RNA–protein interactions that result in the development of many neurological diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Jazurek
- Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland
| | - Adam Ciesiolka
- Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland
| | - Julia Starega-Roslan
- Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Bilinska
- Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland
| | - Wlodzimierz J Krzyzosiak
- Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reyes-Herrera PH, Ficarra E. Computational Methods for CLIP-seq Data Processing. Bioinform Biol Insights 2014; 8:199-207. [PMID: 25336930 PMCID: PMC4196881 DOI: 10.4137/bbi.s16803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2014] [Revised: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are at the core of post-transcriptional regulation and thus of gene expression control at the RNA level. One of the principal challenges in the field of gene expression regulation is to understand RBPs mechanism of action. As a result of recent evolution of experimental techniques, it is now possible to obtain the RNA regions recognized by RBPs on a transcriptome-wide scale. In fact, CLIP-seq protocols use the joint action of CLIP, crosslinking immunoprecipitation, and high-throughput sequencing to recover the transcriptome-wide set of interaction regions for a particular protein. Nevertheless, computational methods are necessary to process CLIP-seq experimental data and are a key to advancement in the understanding of gene regulatory mechanisms. Considering the importance of computational methods in this area, we present a review of the current status of computational approaches used and proposed for CLIP-seq data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula H Reyes-Herrera
- Facultad de Ingeniería Electrónica y Biomédica, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Elisa Ficarra
- Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, TO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|