Effect of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension

Unaltered neurocardiovascular reactions to mental stress after renal sympathetic denervation

Background: The impact of renal denervation (RDN) on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) at rest remains controversial. Mental stress (MS) induces transient changes in sympathetic nerve activity, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). It is not known whether RDN modifies these changes.Purpose: The main objective was to assess the effect of RDN on MSNA and BP alterations during MS.Methods: In 14 patients (11 included in analysis) with resistant hypertension multi-unit MSNA, BP (Finometer ®) and HR were assessed at rest and during forced arithmetics at baseline and 6 months after RDN.Results: Systolic office BP decreased significantly 6 months after RDN (185 ± 29 vs.175 ± 33 mmHG; p = 0.04). No significant changes in MSNA at rest (68 ± 5 vs 73 ± 5 bursts/100hb; p = 0.43) were noted and no significant stress-induced change in group averaged sympathetic activity was found pre- (101 ± 24%; p = 0.9) or post-intervention (108 ± 26%; p = 0.37). Stress was associated with significant increases in mean arterial BP (p < 0.01) and HR (p < 0.01) at baseline, reactions which remained unaltered after intervention. We did not note any correlation between sympathetic nerve activity and BP changes after RDN.Conclusion: Thus, in our group of resistant hypertensives we find no support for the hypothesis that the BP-lowering effect of RDN depends on altered neurovascular responses to stress.

Effect of renal denervation on coronary flow reserve in patients with resistant hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a potential modality in the treatment of patients with resistant hypertension (RH) and has shown beneficial effect on a variety of cardiovascular surrogate markers. Coronary flow reserve, as assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TDE-CFR) is impaired in patients with hypertension and is an independent predictor of cardiac morbidity. However, data on the effect of RDN on TDE-CFR are scarce. The main objective of this study was to assess the effect of RDN on TDE-CFR. Twenty-six consecutive patients with RH (9 female and 17 male; mean age 62 ± 8 years; mean number of antihypertensive drugs 4·2 ± 1·6) underwent bilateral RDN. CFR was assessed at baseline and 6 months after intervention. Mean flow velocity was measured in the left anterior descending artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography at baseline and during adenosine infusion (TDE-CFR). Systolic office blood pressure was reduced at follow-up (174 ± 24 versus 162 ± 27 mmHG; P = 0·01). Mean systolic ambulatory blood pressure decreased from 151 ± 21 to 147 ± 18 (P = 0·17). TDE-CFR remained unchanged 6 months after intervention (2·7 ± 0·6 versus 2·7 ± 0·7; P = 0·67). In conclusion, renal denervation was not associated with any changes in regard to coronary flow reserve at 6-month follow-up.

Renal denervation for the management of resistant hypertension

Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) as a therapy for patients with resistant hypertension has attracted great interest. The majority of studies in this field have demonstrated impressive reductions in blood pressure (BP). However, these trials were not randomized or sham-controlled and hence, the findings may have been overinflated due to trial biases. SYMPLICITY HTN-3 was the first randomized controlled trial to use a blinded sham-control and ambulatory BP monitoring. A surprise to many was that this study was neutral. Possible reasons for this neutrality include the fact that RSD may not be effective at lowering BP in man, RSD was not performed adequately due to limited operator experience, patients’ adherence with their anti-hypertensive drugs may have changed during the trial period, and perhaps the intervention only works in certain subgroups that are yet to be identified. Future studies seeking to demonstrate efficacy of RSD should be designed as randomized blinded sham-controlled trials. The efficacy of RSD is in doubt, but many feel that its safety has been established through the thousands of patients in whom the procedure has been performed. Over 90% of these data, however, are for the Symplicity™ system and rarely extend beyond 12 months of follow-up. Long-term safety cannot be assumed with RSD and nor should it be assumed that if one catheter system is safe then all are. We hope that in the near future, with the benefit of well-designed clinical trials, the role of renal denervation in the management of hypertension will be established.