Early elevation of lipoprotein(a) levels in chronic renal insufficiency

Lipoprotein (a): structure, pathophysiology and clinical implications

The chemical structure of lipoprotein (a) is similar to that of LDL, from which it differs due to the presence of apolipoprotein (a) bound to apo B100 via one disulfide bridge. Lipoprotein (a) is synthesized in the liver and its plasma concentration, which can be determined by use of monoclonal antibody-based methods, ranges from < 1 mg to > 1,000 mg/dL. Lipoprotein (a) levels over 20-30 mg/dL are associated with a two-fold risk of developing coronary artery disease. Usually, black subjects have higher lipoprotein (a) levels that, differently from Caucasians and Orientals, are not related to coronary artery disease. However, the risk of black subjects must be considered. Sex and age have little influence on lipoprotein (a) levels. Lipoprotein (a) homology with plasminogen might lead to interference with the fibrinolytic cascade, accounting for an atherogenic mechanism of that lipoprotein. Nevertheless, direct deposition of lipoprotein (a) on arterial wall is also a possible mechanism, lipoprotein (a) being more prone to oxidation than LDL. Most prospective studies have confirmed lipoprotein (a) as a predisposing factor to atherosclerosis. Statin treatment does not lower lipoprotein (a) levels, differently from niacin and ezetimibe, which tend to reduce lipoprotein (a), although confirmation of ezetimibe effects is pending. The reduction in lipoprotein (a) concentrations has not been demonstrated to reduce the risk for coronary artery disease. Whenever higher lipoprotein (a) concentrations are found, and in the absence of more effective and well-tolerated drugs, a more strict and vigorous control of the other coronary artery disease risk factors should be sought.

Kidney transplantation candidates and cardiovascular risk factors

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors among chronic renal failure (CRF) patients on the transplantation waiting list.

METHODS

Fifty CRF patients on chronic hemodialysis who underwent evaluation for transplantation were compared with 60 hypertensive patients matched for age. We used Framingham scoring to calculate the absolute risk; relative risk was calculated based on the low-risk Framingham cohort.

RESULTS

According to traditional risk factors, a significant difference was observed in systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol (greater in the hypertensive group), and in the prevalence of the male gender, smoking, and diabetes, which were greater in the CRF group. The latter had a greater degree of left ventricular hypertrophy, lower diastolic blood pressure, and a lower prevalence of familial history of cardiovascular disease and obesity. Patients with CRF had a greater relative risk compared with the Framingham control population, but it did not differ from that observed in the group of hypertensive individuals.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and traditional risk factors is high among renal transplantation candidates. The Framingham equations do not adequately quantify the real cardiovascular risk; other risk factors specific for that population probably contribute to their greater cardiovascular risk.

Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with renal failure. Patients with chronic kidney disease have significant CVD, and carry a high cardiovascular burden by the time they commence renal replacement therapy (RRT). The severity of CVD that has been observed in dialysis patients lead to a growing body of research examining the pathogenesis and progression of CVD during the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (ie, predialysis phase). Multiple factors are involved in the development of CVD in CKD. More importantly, critical and key factors seem to develop early in the course of CKD, and result in preventable worsening of CVD in this patient population. Anemia is common in patients with CKD, and has been shown to have an independent role in the genesis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and subsequent CVD. Unfortunately, it is underdiagnosed and undertreated in patients with CKD. Early intervention, and better correction of anemia, seems to gain a great momentum in the prevention and management of CVD in CKD. Hypertension is another risk factor that has been targeted by the National Kidney Foundation Task Force on CVD in chronic kidney disease. This article reviews the different factors involved in the pathogenesis of CVD in CKD and the evidence supporting early and aggressive intervention.

Association of kidney function with serum lipoprotein(a) level: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1991-1994)

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels have been observed in patients on dialysis therapy. However, few studies explored the relationship between kidney function and Lp(a) levels in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We examined the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with Lp(a) level in 7,675 participants in the second phase of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

RESULTS

There was no association between Lp(a) level and estimated GFR in the overall sample (geometric mean, 10.4 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.2 to 11.8] in the group with a GFR of 90 to 149 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 9.3 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0] in the group with a GFR of 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 12.1 mg/dL [95% CI, 9.0 to 15.9] in the group with a GFR of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.77 for linear trend) or non-Hispanic whites (geometric mean, 8.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.8 to 10.2] versus 8.5 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.1 to 10.2] versus 10.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 8.1 to 14.7]; P = 0.54 for linear trend). However, non-Hispanic blacks (geometric mean, 30.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 28.0 to 33.0] versus 35.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 31.4 to 39.4] versus 40.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 27.7 to 58.2]; P = 0.01 for linear trend) and Mexican Americans (geometric mean, 6.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2] versus 7.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5] versus 11.0 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.7 to 20.3]; P = 0.04 for linear trend) showed modestly, but significantly, greater Lp(a) levels with lower GFRs. In a weighed quantile regression model adjusted for age, sex, and race, a lower GFR was associated with greater 95th percentile serum Lp(a) values in the overall sample and non-Hispanic whites and with greater median Lp(a) levels in Mexican Americans.

CONCLUSION

In a cross-section of the US population, a low GFR is associated with only moderately greater Lp(a) levels, and this association may differ by race-ethnicity.

ApoA- and apoB-containing lipoproteins and Lp(a) concentration in non-dialyzed patients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

End-Stage renal disease is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and a high incidence of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

The serum levels of lipids and apolipoproteins and Lp(a) were determined in 51 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) with various advancement, without interference of factors which might disturb Lp(a) metabolism and with proteinuria less than 0.5 g/24 h. The patients studied were divided into two groups: patients with moderate renal failure (CRF-M) and creatinine levels of 2-6mg/dL n = 27; and predialysis patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and creatinine levels higher than 8.5 mg/dL n=24.

RESULTS

In both studied groups serum concentrations of triglycerides (TG), total apoCIII, apoCIIInonB, apoB:CIII were statistically increased, (except total cholestrol (TC) and LDL-cholestrol (LDL-C), apoB, total apoE, apoEnonB, apoB:E), while the levels of HDL-cholestrol (HDL-C) and apoAl significantly decreased. Lipid and lipoprotein ratios as risk factors of atherosclerosis were similar in both groups. The TC/HDL-C ratio increased, while that of HDL-C/ apoAI and apoAI/apoCIII decreased. Serum Lp(a) concentrations were significantly increased in both studied groups. The medians and ranges of Lp(a) concentration were similar in both groups. Serum Lp(a) levels correlated with total cholesterol (r=0.295; p < 0.05), LDL-C (r = 0.312; p < 0.05) and apoB (r = 0.215; p < 0.05). In addition, no correlation was found between Lp(a) levels and albumin concentrations (r = 0.126; p = 0.421).

CONCLUSION

Our results may indicate that the reduced levels of apoA-containing lipoproteins and increased TG-rich apoB-containing lipoproteins and Lp(a) indicated a clear atherogenic pattern in early renal disease. Increased Lp(a) concentration may result in nonspecific synthesis or catabolism disturbances. Measurement and monitoring of lipoprotein family profiles offers a new means for selecting appropriate therapies targeted for normalizing dyslipidemia in non-dialyzed patients.

Lipoprotein(a) serum concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in mild and moderate renal failure

High lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) serum concentrations and the underlying apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) phenotypes are risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the general population as well as in patients with renal disease. Lp(a) concentrations are markedly elevated in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, nothing is known about the changes of Lp(a) depending on apo(a) size polymorphism in the earliest stages of renal impairment. In this study, GFR was measured by iohexol technique in 227 non-nephrotic patients with different degrees of renal impairment and was then correlated with Lp(a) serum concentrations stratified according to low (LMW) and high (HMW) molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes. Lp(a) increased significantly with decreasing GFR. Such an increase was dependent on apo(a) phenotype. Only renal patients with HMW apo(a) phenotypes expressed higher median Lp(a) concentrations, i.e., 6.2 mg/dl at GFR >90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 14.2 at GFR 45 to 90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 18.0 mg/dl at GFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2. These values were markedly different when compared with apo(a) phenotype-matched control subjects who had a median level of 4.4 mg/dl (ANOVA, linear relationship, P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant differences were observed at different stages of renal function in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes when compared with phenotype-matched control subjects. The elevation of Lp(a) was independent of the type of primary renal disease and was not related to the concentration of C-reactive protein. Multiple linear regression analysis found that the apo(a) phenotype and GFR were significantly associated with Lp(a) levels. Non-nephrotic-range proteinuria modified the association between GFR and Lp(a) levels. In summary, an increase of Lp(a) concentrations, compared with apo(a) phenotype-matched control subjects, is seen in non-nephrotic patients with primary renal disease even in the earliest stage when GFR is not yet subnormal. This change is found only in subjects with HMW apo(a) phenotypes, however.

Lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and proteinuria in patients with moderate renal failure

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic diseases are a major cause of death in patients with renal failure. Increased serum concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been established as a genetically controlled risk factor for these diseases and have been demonstrated in patients with moderate renal failure, suggesting that this lipoprotein contributes to the increased cardiovascular risk seen in these patients. Variable alleles at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus are the main determinants of the serum Lp(a) level in the general population. The purpose of this study was to investigate apo(a) isoforms in patients with moderate renal failure and mild proteinuria (less than 1.0 g/day).

METHODS

In 250 consecutive subjects recruited at a hypertension clinic, we assessed the renal function by 24-hour creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and microalbuminuria, as well as the prevalence of atherosclerotic disease, and we also measured apo(a) isoforms, serum albumin, and Lp(a) concentrations.

RESULTS

Moderate impairment of renal function (creatinine clearance, 30 to 89 ml/min per 1.73 m2 of body surface area) was found in 97 patients. Lp(a) levels were significantly greater in patients with moderate renal failure (21.7+/-23.9 mg/dl) as compared with patients with normal renal function (15.6+/-16.4 mg/dl, P<0.001), and an inverse correlation was observed between log Lp(a) and creatinine clearance (r = -0.181, P <0.01). However, no difference was found in the frequency of low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms between patients with normal (25.5%) and impaired (27.8%) renal function. Only patients with the smallest size apo(a) isoforms exhibited significantly elevated levels of Lp(a), whereas the large-size isoforms had similar concentrations in patients with normal and impaired renal function. No significant relationship was found between serum Lp(a) and proteinuria. Clinical and laboratory evidence of one or more events attributed to atherosclerosis was found in 9.8% of patients with normal renal function and 25.8% of patients with moderate renal failure (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that renal failure per se or other genes beside the apo(a) gene locus are responsible for the elevation of serum Lp(a) levels in patients with moderate impairment of renal function. The elevation of Lp(a) levels occurs independently of the level of proteinuria and may contribute to the risk for atherosclerotic disease in these patients.

Homocysteine, lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen: metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular complications of chronic renal disease

High plasma concentrations of homocysteine, lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen are accompanied by an increased risk for cardiovascular complications in the general population. All three parameters are markedly elevated in patients with renal disease, a group with a high prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular complications. This review discusses these parameters in such patients in relation to the occurrence of atherosclerotic complications.