Sarpogrelate hydrochloride, a selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist, improves skin perfusion pressure of the lower extremities in hemodialysis patients with peripheral arterial disease

Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet agents are widely used to prevent cardiovascular events. The risks and benefits of antiplatelet agents may be different in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for whom occlusive atherosclerotic events are less prevalent, and bleeding hazards might be increased. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of antiplatelet agents in people with any form of CKD, including those with CKD not receiving renal replacement therapy, patients receiving any form of dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 July 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials of any antiplatelet agents versus placebo or no treatment, or direct head-to-head antiplatelet agent studies in people with CKD. Studies were included if they enrolled participants with CKD, or included people in broader at-risk populations in which data for subgroups with CKD could be disaggregated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors independently extracted data from primary study reports and any available supplementary information for study population, interventions, outcomes, and risks of bias. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from numbers of events and numbers of participants at risk which were extracted from each included study. The reported RRs were extracted where crude event rates were not provided. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 113 studies, enrolling 51,959 participants; 90 studies (40,597 CKD participants) compared an antiplatelet agent with placebo or no treatment, and 29 studies (11,805 CKD participants) directly compared one antiplatelet agent with another. Fifty-six new studies were added to this 2021 update. Seven studies originally excluded from the 2013 review were included, although they had a follow-up lower than two months. Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were at low risk of bias in 16 and 22 studies, respectively. Sixty-four studies reported low-risk methods for blinding of participants and investigators; outcome assessment was blinded in 41 studies. Forty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias, 50 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias, and 57 studies were at low risk of other potential sources of bias. Compared to placebo or no treatment, antiplatelet agents probably reduces myocardial infarction (18 studies, 15,289 participants: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, I² = 0%; moderate certainty). Antiplatelet agents has uncertain effects on fatal or nonfatal stroke (12 studies, 10.382 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.59, I² = 37%; very low certainty) and may have little or no effect on death from any cause (35 studies, 18,241 participants: RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.84 to 1.06, I² = 14%; low certainty). Antiplatelet therapy probably increases major bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with haemodialysis (HD) (29 studies, 16,194 participants: RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.65, I² = 12%; moderate certainty). In addition, antiplatelet therapy may increase minor bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with HD (21 studies, 13,218 participants: RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.90, I² = 58%; low certainty). Antiplatelet treatment may reduce early dialysis vascular access thrombosis (8 studies, 1525 participants) RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.70; low certainty). Antiplatelet agents may reduce doubling of serum creatinine in CKD (3 studies, 217 participants: RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.86, I² = 8%; low certainty). The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents on stroke, cardiovascular death, kidney failure, kidney transplant graft loss, transplant rejection, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, dialysis access failure, loss of primary unassisted patency, failure to attain suitability for dialysis, need of intervention and cardiovascular hospitalisation were uncertain. Limited data were available for direct head-to-head comparisons of antiplatelet drugs, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, different doses of clopidogrel, abciximab, defibrotide, sarpogrelate and beraprost.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet agents probably reduced myocardial infarction and increased major bleeding, but do not appear to reduce all-cause and cardiovascular death among people with CKD and those treated with dialysis. The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents compared with each other are uncertain.

Effects of sarpogrelate hydrochloride on peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate hydrochloride by comparing the effects of sarpogrelate with conventional treatment on the improvement of symptoms in PAD patients.

METHODS

The search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library database, CNKI, CBM for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) before January 1st, 2019. Inclusion and exclusion of studies, assessment of quality, outcome measures, data extraction and synthesis were completed by two reviewers independently. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Totally, 12 eligible RCTs were included in our analysis. Comparing the results of sarpogrelate group and control group, sarpogrelate significantly improved ankle-brachial index (ABI) levels (SMD = 0.05, [95%CI 0.20 to 0.74, P = .0005]), dorsalis pedis artery blood flow (MD = 0.16, [95%CI 0.09 to 0.23, P < .001]) and pain-free walking distance (PFWD) (MD = 201.86, [95%CI 9.34 to 394.38, P = .04]). The pooled analysis showed that a significant decrease in hsCRP (MD = -0.57, [95%CI -1.12 to -0.02, P = .04]) and IL-6 (MD = 1.48,[95%CI 0.39 to 2.56, P = .008]) was observed in the sarpogrelate treatment.

CONCLUSION

Sarpogrelate was effective for improving the symptoms of PAD and showed good tolerability without significant adverse events.

Increase in skin perfusion pressure predicts amputation-free survival after lower extremity bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia

The objective of this study was to determine how postoperative skin perfusion pressure (SPP) as a measure of blood flow after revascularization affects limb prognosis in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). We retrospectively reviewed 223 consecutive bypass surgery cases performed in 192 patients with CLI during a 10-year period. SPP was measured 1–2 weeks before and after the procedure. An SPP of 40 mmHg was set as the cut-off value for revascularization. Patients were grouped according to their postoperative SPPs, and amputation-free survival (AFS) was analyzed. An SPP of ≥ 40 mmHg was recovered in 75% of the patients, but no significant difference was found between this group and the group that did not reach 40 mmHg. On the other hand, the values increased by ≥ 20 mmHg from the preoperative values in 70% of the patients. This group had a significantly better AFS than the group that did not increase by 20 mmHg. Logistic regression analysis revealed that (1) a preoperative SPP of < 20 mmHg and (2) a high serum albumin level (> 3.0 g/dL) were significant factors in increasing SPP by 20 mmHg. These results showed that an increase in SPP of ≥ 20 mmHg after bypass surgery was associated with better limb prognosis.

Skin perfusion pressure as a predictor of ischemic wound healing potential

Skin perfusion pressure (SPP) is the blood pressure that is the requisite for the restoration of microcirculatory or capillary flow following controlled occlusion and subsequent flow return. The purpose of the current review was to evaluate the value of SPP for the prediction of wound healing in patients with limb ischemia. Articles published up to January 31, 2017 were searched in the PubMed database and Chinese database CNKI, using the keywords of 'skin perfusion pressure', 'limb ischemia' and 'wound healing'. Articles were obtained and reviewed to analyze the predictive value of SPP with regard to the healing potential of ischemia wounds on limbs. Three different types of techniques are currently used for the measurement of SPP, namely radioisotope clearance, photoplethysmography and laser Doppler, with laser Doppler as the most widely applied technique, due to its noninvasiveness and ease of operability. SPP may effectively assess wound healing potential in ischemic limbs with high sensitivity and specificity; however, its optimum cut-off point remains uncertain. Compared with other noninvasive microcirculatory assessment tools including ankle-brachial index, toe blood pressure and transcutaneous oxygen pressure, SPP has its advantages including that it is not affected by vascular calcification, anatomical structure or patient condition. In conclusion, SPP may be used as an index to accurately predict wound healing in patients with limb ischemia. However, it is difficult to determine the optimum cut-off of SPP due to the limitations of current data. Further study is necessary to confirm the optimum cut-off value of SPP in predicting wound healing potential.

Cardiovascular Events in Hemodialysis Patients: Challenging against Vascular Calcification

Particularly in patients with hemodialysis, cardiovascular mortality rate is extremely high. Polyvascular diseases develop at an early stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pathophysiology includes insulin resistance and/or imbalance between nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin bioavailability as well as oxidative stress. The understanding in pathophysiology of vascular calcification and strategic treatment is a critical issue to achieve favorable outcome for the patients with CKD. In this article, we aim to review the cardiovascular disease for the patients with CKD with a particular emphasis on the clinical aspects of polyvascular disease. Finally, we address to detect microcirculatory impairment and eradicate vascular calcification as early as possible prior to renal replacement therapy. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2016; 25: 359-365.).

Effects of Sarpogrelate Combined with Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy in China: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing carotid artery stenosis who are prescribed aspirin, clopidogrel, or sarpogrelate as treatment options to inhibit platelet aggregation continues to increase. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel combined with aspirin (CA) versus sarpogrelate combined with aspirin (SA) treatment in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 197 CEA patients (mean age 61.4 years, mean follow-up time 42.5 months), who were divided into a CA group (Group A: 65 male and 44 female patients) and an SA group (Group B: 58 male and 30 female patients). Preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative results were compared between the 2 groups and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics, transfusions, hospital stay, occurrence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction, restenosis, general or life-threatening bleeding, and 30-day mortality showed no significant differences between the 2 CEA patient groups. However, the mean operative blood loss (P = 0.023) and the operative time (P = 0.040) were significantly higher in Group A compared with Group B. A highly significant incidence of neck hematoma (P = 0.024) was observed in patients of Group A.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study on CEA patients, antiplatelet treatment with CA resulted in a significant risk of developing neck hematoma, increased operative blood loss, and operative time compared with SA treatment. Long-term prospective studies with larger study populations are needed to further confirm the utility of SA treatment for CEA patients.