Significant reduction of Tacrolimus trough level after conversion from twice daily Prograf to once daily Advagraf in Chinese renal transplant recipients with or without concomitant diltiazem treatment

High Intrapatient Variability in Tacrolimus Exposure Calculated Over a Long Period Is Associated With De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Development and/or Late Rejection in Thai Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Concomitant CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

High intrapatient variability in tacrolimus trough levels (Tac IPV) is associated with poor allograft outcomes. Tac IPV was previously calculated using trough levels 6-12 months after kidney transplantation (KT). Data on the accuracy of Tac IPV calculation over a longer period, the association between high Tac IPV and donor-specific antibody (DSA) development after KT in Asian patients, and the role of IPV in patients receiving concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4/5 inhibitors (CYPinh) are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent KT at our center in 2005-2015, and who received Tac with mycophenolate during the first 2 years after KT was performed. IPV was calculated using Tac levels adjusted by dosage. DSA was monitored annually after KT using a Luminex microbead assay.

RESULTS

In total, 236 patients were enrolled. CYPinh were prescribed to 189 patients (80.1%): 145 (61.4%), 31 (13.1%), and 13 (5.5%) received diltiazem, fluconazole, and ketoconazole, respectively. Mean IPV calculated from adjusted Tac levels for 6-12 months (IPV6-12) and 6-24 months (IPV6-24) after KT were 20.64% ± 11.68% and 23.53% ± 10.39%, respectively. Twenty-six patients (11%) showed late rejection and/or DSA occurrence, and had significantly higher IPV6-24 (29.42% ± 13.78%) than others (22.77% ± 9.64%; P = 0.02). There was no difference in IPV6-12 (24.31% ± 14.98% versus 20.17% ± 10.90%; P = 0.18). IPV6-12 and IPV6-24 were comparable in patients who did and did not receive CYPinh. When using mean IPV6-24 as a cutoff, patients with higher IPV6-24 had a higher probability of developing DSA and/or late rejection (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Tac IPV6-24 was higher and more significantly associated with DSA development and/or late rejection than Tac IPV6-12, independent of Tac trough level. This is the first study to demonstrate the impact of high IPV on DSA development in Asian patients, and that Tac IPV is comparable between patients with and without CYPinh.

Effect on Dosage Change and Intrapatient Variability After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Among Thai Kidney Transplant Patients With and Without CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Converting to once-daily tacrolimus (Advagraf [Adv]) among renal transplant patients results in better drug adherence. Data regarding dosage and intrapatient variability changes after conversion among patients with CYP3A4/5 inhibitors (CYPinh) is lacking.

METHOD

A retrospective chart review among all kidney transplant recipients at Siriraj Hospital was performed. Patients were enrolled who had been on standard release twice-daily tacrolimus and subsequently replaced it with Adv for at least 6 months with no change in CYPinh type or dosage.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were eligible. Conversion occurred at a mean time after transplant of 51.25 (SD, 40.30) months. Ten patients (18.9%) did not receive CYPinh, while 19 (35.8%), 21 (39.6%), and 3 (5.7%) received diltiazem, ketoconazole or fluconazole, and both diltiazem and ketoconazole, respectively. After conversion, median increment of tacrolimus dosage was 14.29% (-50% to 167%), while no significant change in IPV was demonstrated (17.46% [SD, 11.25%] vs 14.83% [SD, 6.78]; P = .11). Patients receiving azole had less dosage increment than those not receiving CYPinh (P = .02). After conversion, 14 of 22 patients with IPV > 17% (63.6%) had reduced IPV to ≤ 17%, while 25.8% of patients with lower IPV had an increase in IPV > 17%.

CONCLUSION

Conversion to Adv required a dosage increment of 30% to achieve the same trough level. Concomitant use of CYPinh significantly reduced tacrolimus dose increment. A trend was noted toward improved IPV after conversion. Conversion to Adv resulted in better IPV among patients with high IPV while receiving twice-daily tacrolimus.

Conversion from Twice-Daily Prograf® to Once-Daily Advagraf® in Multi-ethnic Asian Adult Renal Transplant Recipients With or Without Concomitant Use of Diltiazem: Impact of CYP3A5 and MDR1 Genetic Polymorphisms on Tacrolimus Exposure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus is the mainstay of immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Given that once-daily administration improves patient compliance, 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily Prograf^® to once-daily Advagraf^® is recommended. Although cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and multi-drug resistance 1 (MDR1) polymorphisms influence tacrolimus concentrations, it is unknown if these impact on conversion. This study investigated the change in the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after conversion from Prograf^® to Advagraf^® and examined the impact of CYP3A5 and MDR1 C3435T polymorphisms on those pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

A prospective open-label pharmacokinetic study of 1:1 conversion from Prograf^® to Advagraf^® with or without diltiazem was conducted on 26 stable renal transplant recipients. Blood samples were collected over 24 h during each phase, tacrolimus concentrations were assayed, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. All participants were genotyped for CYP3A5*3 and MDR1 C3435T.

RESULTS

After conversion, without diltiazem, the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state from 0 to 24 h after dose administration (AUC_{ss, 0-24}) was significantly reduced [median 224 (range 172-366) vs. 184 (104-347) ng·h/mL, p = 0.006, n = 26]. A decrease in tacrolimus exposure (median 21%) was only evident among CYP3A5 expressors [227 (172-366) vs. 180 (104-347) ng·h/mL, p = 0.014, n = 18], not among non-expressors [215 (197-290) vs. 217 (129-281) ng·h/mL, p = 0.263, n = 8]. In contrast, among CYP3A5 expressors receiving diltiazem, AUC_{ss, 0-24} did not change significantly upon conversion [229 (170-296) vs. 221 (123-342) ng·h/mL, p = 0.575, n = 10]. An independent effect was not evident for MDR1 C3435T polymorphism.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of CYP3A5 polymorphism among Asians may lead to a significant reduction in tacrolimus exposure with 1:1 dose conversion of Prograf^® to Advagraf^®. These results advocate for CYP3A5 determination prior to conversion, and suggest that 1:1.25 conversion should be used for CYP3A5 expressors and 1:1 conversion for other patients.

Tacrolimus in preventing transplant rejection in Chinese patients--optimizing use

Tacrolimus is a product of fermentation of Streptomyces, and belongs to the family of calcineurin inhibitors. It is a widely used immunosuppressive drug for preventing solid-organ transplant rejection. Compared to cyclosporine, tacrolimus has greater immunosuppressive potency and a lower incidence of side effects. It has been accepted as first-line treatment after liver and kidney transplantation. Tacrolimus has specific features in Chinese transplant patients; its in vivo pharmacokinetics, treatment regimen, dose and administration, and adverse-effect profile are influenced by multiple factors, such as genetics and the spectrum of primary diseases in the Chinese population. We reviewed the clinical experience of tacrolimus use in Chinese liver- and kidney-transplant patients, including the pharmacology of tacrolimus, the immunosuppressive effects of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine, effects of different factors on tacrolimus metabolism on Chinese patients, personalized medicine, clinical safety profile, and patient satisfaction and adherence. This article provides guidance for the rational and efficient use of tacrolimus in Chinese organ-transplant patients.