An Improved Model for the Induction of Experimental Adhesions

Research progress on animal models of peritoneal adhesion

Peritoneal adhesion is a common complication of abdominal and pelvic surgery that can cause various clinical symptoms, including abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, and female infertility, significantly impacting patient quality of life. Animal models of peritoneal adhesion are important tools for studying the mechanisms of adhesion formation and evaluating the effectiveness of prevention and treatment. Various methods for constructing animal models of peritoneal adhesion include physical injury, chemical injury, ischemia, infection, foreign body stimulation, and simulated surgery; however, none can fully simulate peritoneal adhesion in patients clinically. Therefore, this review aimed to explore previous methods used to construct peritoneal adhesion animal models and summarize their principles, characteristics, and applications. Similarly, it summarizes macroscopic and microscopic evaluation indicators, such as peritoneal adhesion gross assessment, histological scoring, and molecular markers. On the basis of this, we proposed a new animal model of peritoneal adhesion that simulates the factors contributing to peritoneal adhesion formation in clinical surgery. peritoneal adhesion formation was stable and standardized using our proposed model, providing a foundation for the establishment and application of peritoneal adhesion animal models.

A Scoping Review of Animal Models for Development of Abdominal Adhesion Prevention Strategies

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal adhesions represent a chronic postsurgical disease without reliable prophylaxis. Animal modeling has been a cornerstone of novel therapeutic development but has not produced reliable clinical therapies for prevention of adhesive small bowel obstruction. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyze animal models for abdominal adhesion generation by key considerations of external validity (i.e., fidelity, homology, and discrimination).

METHODS

A literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Peer-reviewed publications were included that described the development or quality assessment of experimental animal models for abdominal adhesions with inclusion of a scoring system. Studies that focused on treatment evaluation, implantation of surgical devices, models of nonsurgical etiologies for abdominal adhesions, non-in vivo modeling, and investigations involving human subjects were excluded.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifteen (n = 415) articles were identified by prespecified search criteria. Of these, 13 studies were included for review.

CONCLUSIONS

Translation of investigational therapeutics for abdominal adhesion prevention is dependent upon high-quality experimental animal models that reproduce the clinical adhesions seen in the operating room as a disease of the entire abdomen.

Establishment and evaluation of a stable and reliable rat model of peritoneal adhesions

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to establish a stable and standardized animal model of peritoneal adhesions.

METHODS

Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided (n = 12 each) into blank control, classic cecum sidewall, ischemic button, and cecum-sidewall suture groups. The modified American Fertility Society adhesion score was used on postoperative day 7 to evaluate adhesions. Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were used to dynamically observe the adhesion characteristics of cecum-sidewall ischemic injury suture model at different time points (n = 60, randomly divided into groups a-e with 12 rats each). The modified American Fertility Society and Zühlke histologic scoring systems, hematoxylin-eosin staining, Masson staining, and computed tomography of the abdomen were used to evaluate adhesions on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14.

RESULTS

No peritoneal adhesions were observed in the blank control group on postoperative day 7. In the classic cecum sidewall group, 8 rats had inconsistent adhesions, which had a modified American Fertility Society adhesion score of 2.25 ± 1.96. All rats in the ischemic button and cecum-sidewall suture groups developed significant adhesions with modified American Fertility Society scores of 3.08 ± 1.31 and 4.67 ± 0.78, respectively. When the modified American Fertility Society score was used, statistically significant differences were observed between the classic cecum sidewall groups and cecum-sidewall suture groups and between the ischemic button groups and cecum-sidewall suture groups. All animals in groups a-e developed adhesions; adhesion scores increased gradually with time.

CONCLUSIONS

The cecum-sidewall ischemic injury suture model is a stable and standardized animal model of peritoneal adhesions.

Comparison of the preventive effect of colchicine versus diphenhydramine, prednisolone, and a combination therapy on intraperitoneal adhesion bands: an experimental study in rats

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal adhesion formation is an inevitable consequence of abnormal repair of the peritoneum following different peritoneal injuries of intra-abdominal operations with the subsequent morbidity that they represent. Vast efforts have been made to elucidate the cause and prevent the development of abdominal adhesions. The aim of our study is to compare the capability of colchicine versus diphenhydramine (DPH) and methylprednisolone (MP), and also prednisolone in adhesion prevention.

METHODS

Sixty-one male Wistar stock rats were divided into four groups. The first group attended as the control group. Groups 2, 3, and 4 received oral combination of MP + DPH solution (20 mg/kg), colchicine (0.02 mg/kg), and prednisolone (1 mg/ kg), respectively. Adhesion bands were induced by standardized abrasion of the peritoneum through a midline laparotomy. All rats were sacrificed on the 15^th-day post medication administration and the subjects underwent an exploratory laparotomy. The presence of adhesions was evaluated with the modified using Nair's classification.

RESULTS

The proportion of the control group with substantial adhesion bands (73.3%) was significantly higher than that of the MP + DPH (13.3%), colchicine (33.3%), and prednisolone (31.3%) groups. There were significant differences between the scores of the control and the MP + DPH, colchicine, and prednisolone groups (P = 0.001, 0.028, and 0.019, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference to favor colchicine against MP + DPH (P = 0.390) or MP + DPH against prednisolone (P = 0.394).

CONCLUSIONS

Both colchicine and combination of DPH + MP prevented postoperative abdominal adhesions separately in our study. However, the lowest adhesion formation rate was observed in the DPH + MP group, even lower than the prednisolone group.

Advancement of Biomaterial-Based Postoperative Adhesion Barriers

Postoperative peritoneal adhesion (PPA) is a prevalent incidence that generally happens during the healing process of traumatized tissues. It causes multiple severe complications such as intestinal obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, and female infertility. To prevent PPA, several antiadhesion materials and drug delivery systems composed of biomaterials are used clinically, and clinical antiadhesive is one of the important applications nowadays. In addition to several commercially available materials, like film, spray, injectable hydrogel, powder, or solution type have been energetically studied based on natural and synthetic biomaterials such as alginate, hyaluronan, cellulose, starch, chondroitin sulfate, polyethylene glycol, polylactic acid, etc. Moreover, many kinds of animal adhesion models, such as cecum abrasion models and unitary horn models, are developed to evaluate new materials' efficacy. A new animal adhesion model based on hepatectomy and conventional animal adhesion models is recently developed and a new adhesion barrier by this new model is also developed. In summary, many kinds of materials and animal models are studied; thus, it is quite important to overview this field's current progress. Here, PPA is reviewed in terms of the species of biomaterials and animal models and several problems to be solved to develop better antiadhesion materials in the future are discussed.

Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions by a hyaluronic acid gel; an experimental study in rats

BACKGROUND

In 80% to 90% of the patients intra-abdominal adhesions occur after abdominal surgery, which can cause small-bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, female infertility and difficulty during reoperation. A novel crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel is evaluated regarding its anti-adhesive capacities in an ischemic button model in rats.

METHOD

51 adult, male Wistar rats from a registered breeder, received eight ischemic buttons each and were treated with hyaluronic acid gel (HA, HyaRegen^©), hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC, Seprafilm^©) or no anti-adhesive barrier. After 14 days, the animals were sacrificed and adhesions were scored macroscopically. The number of buttons and organs involved in adhesions were recorded. Per animal, one button with adhesions and one without adhesions was explanted for qPCR analysis. Mann-Whitney U, Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for data analysis. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Macroscopic evaluation of adhesion formation did not differ between the groups. The number of organs involved in adhesions in the HA gel group was significantly lower compared to HA-CMC (p = .041) and the control group (p = .012). A significantly, 1.36-fold higher clec10a (p = 0.25), 1.80-fold higher cd163 (p = 0.003) and 5.14-fold higher mmp1 expression (p = 0.028) was found in ischemic buttons with adhesions compared to buttons without adhesions.

CONCLUSION

HA gel application reduces the number of organs involved in adhesions in an ischemic button model, but no overall reduction in adhesion formation was encountered. Macrophage subtype 2 polarization and high mmp1 expression are associated with adhesion formation. Further investigation is needed in the exact pathophysiologic process of adhesion formation and the role of macrophage polarization.

Baseline performance of the ischaemic button model for induction of adhesions in laboratory rats

The ischaemic button model is frequently used for the induction of adhesions in laboratory rats. Male rats are often used because of the common belief that the peritesticular (intra-abdominal) fat in males facilitates adhesion formation, although this theory is not evidence based. Comparing the model’s performance in both sexes is an important aspect of refining animal experiments. The aim of this study is to compare baseline performance of the modified ischaemic button model in both male and female rats. Follow-up was 1 week and noted endpoints were intra-abdominal adhesion formation and differences in welfare assessment. A total of 192 ischaemic buttons (96 male/96 female) were created in 24 Wistar Han rats (12 male/12 female). After 1 week of follow-up, 93 buttons survived in the male group (96.9%) compared with 91 in the female group (94.8%) (p = 0.409). In the male group, 85 out of 93 (91.4%) buttons induced adhesions compared with 84 out of 91 (92.3%) in the female group (p = 0.881). All but one animal had a Zühlke score of 3. There were no clinically relevant differences in welfare scores. Male animals increased in weight significantly faster compared to females (p < 0.001), after correcting for physiological growth. The ischaemic button model resulted in equal quality and quantity of intra-abdominal adhesions in both male and female Wistar Han rats. Both male and female Wistar Han rats are suitable for the induction of experimental adhesions in the ischaemic button model.

Creation of Abdominal Adhesions in Mice

Abdominal adhesions consist of fibrotic tissue that forms in the peritoneal space in response to an inflammatory insult, typically surgery or intraabdominal infection. The precise mechanisms underlying adhesion formation are poorly understood. Many compounds and physical barriers have been tested for their ability to prevent adhesions after surgery with varying levels of success. The mouse and rat are important models for the study of abdominal adhesions. Several different techniques for the creation of adhesions in the mouse and rat exist in the literature. Here we describe a protocol utilizing abrasion of the cecum with sandpaper and sutures placed in the right abdominal sidewall. The mouse is anesthetized and the abdomen is prepped. A midline laparotomy is created and the cecum is identified. Sandpaper is used to gently abrade the surface of the cecum. Next, several figure-of-eight sutures are placed into the peritoneum of the right abdominal sidewall. The abdominal cavity is irrigated, a small amount of starch is applied, and the incision is closed. We have found that this technique produces the most consistent adhesions with the lowest mortality rate.

The TCA Pathway is an Important Player in the Regulatory Network Governing Vibrio alginolyticus Adhesion Under Adversity

Adhesion is a critical step in the initial stage of Vibrio alginolyticus infection; therefore, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms governing the adhesion of V. alginolyticus and determine if environmental factors have any effect. A greater understanding of this process may assist in developing preventive measures for reducing infection. In our previous research, we presented the first RNA-seq data from V. alginolyticus cultured under stress conditions that resulted in reduced adhesion. Based on the RNA-seq data, we found that the Tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA pathway) might be closely related to adhesion. Environmental interactions with the TCA pathway might alter adhesion. To validate this, bioinformatics analysis, quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR), RNAi, and in vitro adhesion assays were performed, while V. alginolyticus was treated with various stresses including temperature, pH, salinity, and starvation. The expression of genes involved in the TCA pathway was confirmed by qPCR, which reinforced the reliability of the sequencing data. Silencing of these genes was capable of reducing the adhesion ability of V. alginolyticus. Adhesion of V. alginolyticus is influenced substantially by environmental factors and the TCA pathway is sensitive to some environmental stresses, especially changes in pH and starvation. Our results indicated that (1) the TCA pathway plays a key role in V. alginolyticus adhesion: (2) the TCA pathway is sensitive to environmental stresses.

Ghrelin ameliorates adhesions in a postsurgical mouse model

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal adhesion formation is a well-recognized consequence of abdominal and pelvic surgery, causing infertility, chronic pelvic pain, and intestinal obstruction. We hypothesized that ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide predominantly found in the stomach, plays an important role in preventing postoperative surgical adhesions. The purpose of this study was to develop a new surgical peritoneal adhesion model to define the role that ghrelin plays in wound healing and adhesion formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C57BL/6 wild-type mice (n = 40) and growth hormone secretagogue receptor-knockout (GHSR KO) mice (n = 20) underwent a midline laparotomy to establish a peritoneal adhesion model characterized by the combination of two different techniques: ischemic peritoneal buttons and cecal multiple abrasion. All mice received intraperitoneal injections with ghrelin (0.16 mg/kg) or saline twice daily for 20 d after surgery. Peritoneal ischemic buttons were harvested to determine protein expression of collagen (Masson trichrome, picrosirius red stain, and Western blot).

RESULTS

The novel mouse model demonstrated consistent and easily reproducible formation of intra-abdominal adhesions. Ghrelin administration significantly reduced postoperative adhesion formation (P < 0.001) in wild-type mice. The antifibrotic effect of ghrelin in wild-type mice was confirmed by measuring collagen I protein levels via Western blot analysis. The anti-adhesion effect of ghrelin seen in wild-type mice was not detected in GHSR KO mice demonstrating that this effect is mediated by the GHSR-1a receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

Ghrelin administration may improve surgical outcome by reducing peritoneal adhesion formation and fibrotic response in a mouse model.

Does long intestinal tube splinting aggravate intestinal adhesions?

OBJECTIVE

Long intestinal tube splinting (LITS) is useful for clinically reducing the recurrence of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). However, a controversy exists whether LITS aggravates intestinal adhesions. This study evaluated the postoperative effects of LITS relative to simple enterolysis on intestinal adhesions in an experimental porcine model.

METHODS

A porcine model (n = 24) of dense intestinal adhesion was established by abrading the ileal wall with sterile P240 sandpaper. Enterolysis was performed on postoperative day 14. Animals were randomly divided into a group that underwent enterolysis only (control; n = 12) and those who underwent LITS as well as enterolysis (LITS; n = 12). The long intestinal tube was removed on post-LITS day 14, after abdominal radiography. All animals were euthanized on postenterolysis day 28 for assessment of intestinal adhesions using a semiquantitative macroscopic grading scale, hematoxylin-eosin histology, and hydroxyproline assay.

RESULTS

Prior to enterolysis, the experimentally induced intestinal adhesions of the two groups were similar in extent and severity. On postenterolysis day 28 the LITS and control groups were comparable with regard to adhesion loop length (p = .440), macroscopic adhesion severity (p = .820), serosal fibrosis grading (p = .450), and hydroxyproline content of the adhesion ileal segment (p = .630).

CONCLUSION

Placement of the long intestinal tube did not aggravate intestinal adhesions over that of simple enterolysis in this intestinal adhesion porcine model.

New hepatectomy-induced postoperative adhesion model in rats, and evaluation of the efficacy of anti-adhesion materials

PURPOSE

Repeated hepatic resections are not uncommon during the surgical management of liver tumors. Postoperative adhesions induced by hepatectomies can have a significant negative impact on subsequent surgeries. We recently developed a new hepatectomy-induced postoperative adhesion animal model to evaluate the anti-adhesion efficacy of commercially available sheet materials (Seprafilm(®) and Interceed(®)) and the recently reported hyaluronan-based in situ cross-linkable hydrogels.

METHODS

The median lobe (ML) and the left lateral lobe (LLL) of the liver (approximately 70 % of the total liver) of 43 male Sprague-Dawley rats were resected based on the classical procedure; anti-adhesion materials were then applied. A relaparotomy was performed 1 week later to evaluate the adhesions and histopathological findings.

RESULTS

The rats without the application of anti-adhesion materials (n = 14) showed the most severe adhesions (grade 3) between the cut surface of the liver and the small bowel or omentum. All the barrier materials produced slight anti-adhesion effects. Adhesions between the liver surface and the diaphragm and adhesions around the hepatic hilum were less severe, but were not remarkably reduced, by the anti-adhesion materials.

CONCLUSION

We successfully established a new hepatectomy-induced animal adhesion model, which may be useful for the development of new anti-adhesion materials.

Intraperitoneal adhesions--an ongoing challenge between biomedical engineering and the life sciences

Peritoneal adhesions remain a relevant clinical problem despite the currently available prophylactic barrier materials. So far, the physical separation of traumatized serosa areas using barriers represents the most important clinical strategy for adhesion prevention. However, the optimal material has not yet been found. Further optimization or pharmacological functionalization of these barriers could give an innovative input for peritoneal adhesion prevention. Therefore, a more complete understanding of pathogenesis is required. On the basis of the pathophysiology of adhesion formation the main barriers currently in clinical practice as well as new innovations are discussed in the present review. Physiologically, mesothelial cells play a decisive role in providing a frictionless gliding surface on the serosa. Adhesion formation results from a cascade of events and is regulated by a variety of cellular and humoral factors. The main clinically applied strategy for adhesion prevention is based on the use of liquid or solid adhesion barriers to separate physically any denuded tissue. Both animal and human trials have not yet been able to identify the optimal barrier to prevent adhesion formation in a sustainable way. Therefore, further developments are required for effective prevention of postoperative adhesion formation. To reach this goal the combination of structural modification and pharmacological functionalization of barrier materials should be addressed. Achieving this aim requires the interaction between basic research, materials science and clinical expertise.