Uptake of yttrium-90 into lipid vesicles

Nanoparticles and Radioisotopes: A Long Story in a Nutshell

The purpose of this narrative review was to assess the use of nanoparticles (NPs) to deliver radionuclides to targets, focusing on systems that have been tested in pre-clinical and, when available, clinical settings. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases using the following terms: “radionuclides” AND “liposomes” or “PLGA nanoparticles” or “gold nanoparticles” or “iron oxide nanoparticles” or “silica nanoparticles” or “micelles” or “dendrimers”. No filters were applied, apart from a minimum limit of 10 patients enrolled for clinical studies. Data from some significant studies from pre-clinical and clinical settings were retrieved, and we briefly describe the information available. All the selected seven classes of nanoparticles were highly tested in clinical trials, but they all present many drawbacks. Liposomes are the only ones that have been tested for clinical applications, though they have never been commercialized. In conclusion, the application of NPs for imaging has been the object of much interest over the years, albeit mainly in pre-clinical settings. Thus, we think that, based on the current state, radiolabeled NPs must be investigated longer before finding their place in nuclear medicine.

Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy

Nanomaterials offer unique physical, chemical and biological properties of interest for medical imaging and therapy. Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing effort to translate nanomaterial-based medicinal products (so-called nanomedicines) into clinical practice and, although multiple nanoparticle-based formulations are clinically available, there is still a disparity between the number of pre-clinical products and those that reach clinical approval. To facilitate the efficient clinical translation of nanomedicinal-drugs, it is important to study their whole-body biodistribution and pharmacokinetics from the early stages of their development. Integrating this knowledge with that of their therapeutic profile and/or toxicity should provide a powerful combination to efficiently inform nanomedicine trials and allow early selection of the most promising candidates. In this context, radiolabelling nanomaterials allows whole-body and non-invasive in vivo tracking by the sensitive clinical imaging techniques positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Furthermore, certain radionuclides with specific nuclear emissions can elicit therapeutic effects by themselves, leading to radionuclide-based therapy. To ensure robust information during the development of nanomaterials for PET/SPECT imaging and/or radionuclide therapy, selection of the most appropriate radiolabelling method and knowledge of its limitations are critical. Different radiolabelling strategies are available depending on the type of material, the radionuclide and/or the final application. In this review we describe the different radiolabelling strategies currently available, with a critical vision over their advantages and disadvantages. The final aim is to review the most relevant and up-to-date knowledge available in this field, and support the efficient clinical translation of future nanomedicinal products for in vivo imaging and/or therapy.

Radiolabeled liposomes and lipoproteins as lipidic nanoparticles for imaging and therapy

Radiolabeled lipidic nanoparticles, particularly liposomes and lipoproteins, are of great interest as agents for imaging and therapy, due not only to their peculiar physicochemical and biological properties, but also to their great versatility and the ability to manipulate them to obtain the desired properties. This review provides an overview of radionuclide labeling strategies for preparing diagnostic and therapeutic nanoparticles based on liposomes and lipoproteins that have been developed to date, as well as the main quality control methods and in vivo applications.

Nuclear imaging of liposomal drug delivery systems: A critical review of radiolabelling methods and applications in nanomedicine

The integration of nuclear imaging with nanomedicine is a powerful tool for efficient development and clinical translation of liposomal drug delivery systems. Furthermore, it may allow highly efficient imaging-guided personalised treatments. In this article, we critically review methods available for radiolabelling liposomes. We discuss the influence that the radiolabelling methods can have on their biodistribution and highlight the often-overlooked possibility of misinterpretation of results due to decomposition in vivo. We stress the need for knowing the biodistribution/pharmacokinetics of both the radiolabelled liposomal components and free radionuclides in order to confidently evaluate the images, as they often share excretion pathways with intact liposomes (e.g. phospholipids, metallic radionuclides) and even show significant tumour uptake by themselves (e.g. some radionuclides). Finally, we describe preclinical and clinical studies using radiolabelled liposomes and discuss their impact in supporting liposomal drug development and clinical translation in several diseases, including personalised nanomedicine approaches.

Molecular imaging and therapy of cancer with radiolabeled nanoparticles

This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art of radiolabeled nanoparticles for molecular imaging and internal radiotherapy applications targeting cancer. With the capacity to provide enormous flexibility, radiolabeled nanoparticles have the potential to profoundly impact disease diagnosis and patient management in the near future. Currently, the major challenges facing the research on radiolabeled nanoparticles are desirable (tumor) targeting efficacy, robust chemistry for both radionuclide encapsulation/incorporation and targeting ligand conjugation, favorable safety profile, as well as certain commercial and regulatory hurdles.

High-Activity Radio-Iodine Labeling of Conventional and Stealth Liposomes

A new method to label preformed liposomes with high activities of radiohalogenated compounds has been developed. It uses activated esters of simple synthetic molecules that may be readily halogenated, such as Bolton-Hunter reagent (BH), and arginine-containing liposomes. BH, in the form of an activated ester, crosses the liposome membrane to react with arginine inside the liposomes, as demonstrated by thin-layer chromatography and by the fact that saline-containing liposomes, or hydrolyzed BH or the water soluble sulfo-BH afforded only marginal encapsulation yields. Under optimized conditions, between 37 and 55 degrees C, 62 +/- 4% (mean +/- SD) of radiolabeled BH were consistently encapsulated in the liposomes within 30 min. In molar amounts, this corresponds to a mean of 56 nmol of BH per micromol of lipids. Based on achievable specific activity, up to 2.8 GBq of iodine-131 could be entrapped per micromol of lipids. Leakage of radioactivity was very low, with less than 5% of the encapsulated activity released within 6 days at 4 degrees C in phosphate-buffered saline and less than 50% within 24 h in human serum at 37 degrees C. The labeling stability, and the fact that both conventional and PEGylated liposomes can be readily labeled with high doses of radioactivity, will make this technique useful for in vivo targeting applications, such as tumor detection (using iodine-123 or iodine-124) or therapy (with iodine-131 or astatine-211).

Radionuclides delivery systems for nuclear imaging and radiotherapy of cancer

The recent developments of nuclear medicine in oncology have involved numerous investigations of novel specific tumor-targeting radiopharmaceuticals as a major area of interest for both cancer imaging and therapy. The current progress in pharmaceutical nanotechnology field has been exploited in the design of tumor-targeting nanoscale and microscale carriers being able to deliver radionuclides in a selective manner to improve the outcome of cancer diagnosis and treatment. These carriers include chiefly, among others, liposomes, microparticles, nanoparticles, micelles, dendrimers and hydrogels. Furthermore, combining the more recent nuclear imaging multimodalities which provide high sensitivity and anatomical resolution such as PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) and SPECT/CT (combined single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography system) with the use of these specific tumor-targeting carriers constitutes a promising rally which will, hopefully in the near future, allow for earlier tumor detection, better treatment planning and more powerful therapy. In this review, we highlight the use, limitations, advantages and possible improvements of different nano- and microcarriers as potential vehicles for radionuclides delivery in cancer nuclear imaging and radiotherapy.

Doubly radiolabeled liposomes for pretargeted radioimmunotherapy

The aim of this study was to design liposomes as radioactivity carriers for pretargeted radioimmunotherapy with favorable pharmacokinetic parameters. To monitor the liposomes integrity in vivo, their surface was radiolabeled with indium-111 bound to DTPA-derivatized phosphatidylethanolamine (DSPE-DTPA) and the aqueous phase was labeled by using an original active loading technique of radioiodinated Bolton-Hunter reagent (BH) that reacts with pre-encapsulated arginine to form a positively charged conjugate ((125)I-BH-arginine). Different formulations of doubly radiolabeled liposomes were tested in vitro and in vivo to evaluate radiolabeling stability, integrity of the vesicles and their pharmacokinetics. Radiolabeling yields were high (surface >75%, encapsulation >60%) and stable (>85% after 24 h in serum 37 degrees C). In vivo, the pharmacokinetic behavior of doubly radiolabeled liposomes was strongly dependant on the formulation. Blood clearance of PEGylated liposomes (DSPC/Chol/DSPE-DTPA/DSPE-PEG5%) was 0.15 mL/h compared to a conventional formulation (DSPC/Chol/DSPE-DTPA: clearance 1.44 mL/h). Non-encapsulated BH-arginine conjugate was quickly eliminated in urine (clearance 6.04 mL/h). Blood kinetics of the two radionuclides were similar and radiochromatographic profiles of mice serum confirmed the integrity of circulating liposomes. The significant reduction of activity uptake in organs after liposome catabolism (liver and spleen), achieved by the rapid renal elimination of (125)I-BH-arginine, should bring significant improvements for targeted radionuclide therapy with sterically-stabilized liposomes.