Comparison between stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonist protocol

Comparative effectiveness of gonadotropins used for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in France: A real-world observational study from the French nationwide claims database (SNDS)

This comparative non-interventional study using data from the French National Health Database (Système National des Données de Santé) investigated real-world (cumulative) live birth outcomes following ovarian stimulation, leading to oocyte pickup with either originator recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) products (alfa or beta), r-hFSH alfa biosimilars, or urinaries including mainly HP-hMG (menotropins), and marginally u-hFSH-HP (urofollitropin). Using data from 245,534 stimulations (153,600 women), biosimilars resulted in a 19% lower live birth (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.86) and a 14% lower cumulative live birth (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.89); and urinaries resulted in a 7% lower live birth (adjusted OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96) and an 11% lower cumulative live birth (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87-0.91) versus originator r-hFSH alfa. Results were consistent across strata (age and ART strategy), sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching, and with r-hFSH alfa and beta as the reference group.

Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Biological Products: Does Potency Predict Clinical Efficacy?

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), together with luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), plays a fundamental role in human reproduction. The discovery of FSH and other gonadotropins was a defining moment in our understanding of reproduction and led to the development of many treatments for infertility. In this regard, exogenous FSH has been used to treat infertility in women for decades. Today, several recombinant and highly purified urinary forms of FSH are used in medically assisted reproduction (MAR). However, differences in the macro- and micro-heterogeneity of FSH result in a variety of FSH glycoforms, with glycoform composition determining the bioactivity (or potency), pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles, and clinical efficacy of the different forms of FSH. This review illustrates how the structural heterogeneity of FSH glycoforms affects the biological activity of human FSH products, and why potency does not predict effects in humans in terms of PK, PD, and clinical response.

[Timing of HMG supplementation and clinical outcomes of advanced-age patients with diminished ovarian reserve receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect and timing of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) supplementation in advancedage patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol.

OBJECTIVE

A total of 682 patients with DOR aged over 35 years undergoing IVF-ET treatment were included in this study. All the patients underwent a GnRH antagonist protocol, and controlled ovarian stimulation was initiated on day 2-3 of the menstrual cycle with follicle stimulation hormone (FSH). According to the timing of HMG supplementation, the patients were divided into no supplementation group (n=371) without HMG supplementation; early supplementation group (n=139), in which daily HMG supplementation started on the first day till the trigger day; and late supplementation group (n=172), in which HMG supplementation started when the leading follicle reached 10-14 mm in diameter and lasted until the trigger day. The pregnancy outcomes of the patients were compared among the 3 groups.

OBJECTIVE

The 3 groups showed no significant difference in hCG trigger day E2 and P levels, endometrial thickness, or the number of follicles with comparable fertilization rate and cleavage rate (P>0.05). Gn dose used was the lowest in no supplementation group, and the average number of oocytes retrieved was significantly smaller in early supplementation group than in late supplementation group (P < 0.05). The mean number of mature oocytes and embryos available were significantly higher in late supplementation group than in early supplementation group (P < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate of fresh embryo transfer cycle was significantly higher in late supplementation group than in no supplementation group (27.7% vs 45.1%, P < 0.05), but the implantation rate, early miscarriage rate, heterotopic pregnancy rate and live birth rate were comparable among the 3 groups (P>0.05). No significant differences were found among the 3 groups in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, heterotopic pregnancy rate or live birth rate of the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle with a freeze-all strategy (P>0.05).

OBJECTIVE

HMG supplementation in the middle and late follicular phase can improve the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and increase the clinical pregnancy rate of fresh embryo transfer cycle in advanced-age patients with DOR undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol.

Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF

One of the most widely used types of assisted reproduction technology is the in vitro fertilization (IVF), in which women undergo controlled ovarian stimulation through the administration of the appropriate hormones to produce as many mature follicles, as possible. The most common hormone combination is the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues with recombinant or urinary-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). In the last few years, scientists have begun to explore the effect that different gonadotropin preparations have on granulosa cells' maturation and apoptosis, aiming to identify new predictive markers of oocyte quality and successful fertilization. Two major pathways that control the ovarian development, as well as the oocyte-granulosa cell communication and the follicular growth, are the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and the Hippo signaling. The purpose of this article is to briefly review the current knowledge about the effects that the different gonadotropins, used for ovulation induction, may exert in the biology of granulosa cells, focusing on the importance of these two pathways, which are crucial for follicular maturation. We believe that a better understanding of the influence that the various ovarian stimulation protocols have on these critical molecular cascades will be invaluable in choosing the best approach for a given patient, thereby avoiding cancelled cycles, reducing frustration and potential treatment-related complications, and increasing the pregnancy rate. Moreover, individualizing the treatment plan will help clinicians to better coordinate assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs, discuss the specific options with the couples undergoing IVF, and alleviate stress, thus making the IVF experience easier.

DuoStim - a reproducible strategy to obtain more oocytes and competent embryos in a short time-frame aimed at fertility preservation and IVF purposes. A systematic review

Recent evidence suggests that follicular development occurs in a wave-like model during the ovarian cycle, where up to three cohorts of follicles are recruited to complete folliculogenesis. This understanding overtakes the previous dogma stating that follicles grow only during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Therefore, in in vitro fertilization (IVF), novel protocols regarding ovarian stimulation have been theorized based on the use of gonadotrophins to prompt the growth of antral follicles at any stage of the menstrual cycle. These unconventional protocols for ovarian stimulation aim at a more efficient management of poor-prognosis patients, otherwise exposed to conflicting outcomes after conventional approaches. DuoStim appears among these unconventional stimulation protocols as one of the most promising. It combines two consecutive stimulations in the follicular and luteal phases of the same ovarian cycle, aimed at increasing the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos produced in the short time-frame. This protocol has been suggested for the treatment of all conditions requiring a maximal and urgent exploitation of the ovarian reserve, such as oncological patients and poor responders at an advanced maternal age. At present, data from independent studies have outlined the consistency and reproducibility of this approach, which might also reduce the drop-out between consecutive failed IVF cycles in poor-prognosis patients. However, the protocol must be standardized, and more robust studies and cost-benefit analyses are needed to highlight the true clinical pros and cons deriving from DuoStim implementation in IVF.

Comparison of Highly Purified HMG versus Recombinant FSH with Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responder Patients

Background:Luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation may have beneficial effect on the maturity and fertilizability of oocytes in poor ovarian reserve (POR) and may influence the progesterone level, thus increasing the pregnancy rate. However, previous studies on the effect of LH activity supplementation on poor responders have shown conflicting results. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of two different forms of gonadotropin (highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-HMG) vs. recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH)-only) in Indonesian population.

Methods: Women diagnosed with poor ovarian response who received gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with either HP-HMG or r-hFSH-only were investigated. Women who underwent freeze all cycles, mini stimulation, and natural stimulation were excluded. Multiple logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) + human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)-driven LH activity combination in HP-HMG to pregnancy event adjusting for progesterone level, demographic variables, and clinical characteristic variables.

Results: A total of 101 subjects in the HP-HMG treatment group and 89 subjects in r-hFSH-only treatment group were involved in the study. There was no significant difference of clinical pregnancy rate between HP-HMG group and r-hFSH-only group (adjusted OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.39–2.25; p-value: 0.890).

Conclusion: Compared to r-hFSH-only group, combination of FSH + HCG-driven LH activity in HP-HMG group had similar effectiveness in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) using the antagonist protocol.

Gonadotropin versus Follicle-Stimulating Hormone for Ovarian Response in Patients Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison

•

Compared treatment outcomes for hp-hMG and rFSH in poor ovarian response patients undergoing IVF/ICSI with GnRH antagonist protocol.

•

Higher serum IGF-1 level on the day of oocyte retrieval associated with hp-HMG vs rFSH might suggest a superior endocrine environment.

•

hp-HMG and rFSH did not lead to significantly different treatment outcomes in POR patients.

Background

Poor ovarian responders generally refer to patients who respond poorly to ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) such as in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and hence experience low live birth rate. Various controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols have been developed during the past 3 decades for IVF/ICSI to improve oocyte quality and ultimately live birth rate, to increase ovarian response in POR patients, and to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Both highly puri?ed human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) have been widely used for COS during IVF/ICSI. Their in?uence on treatment outcome in women undergoing IVF/ICSI hasbeen actively debated.

Objectives

To compare highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) in patients with poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients with poor ovarian response (30 received hp-hMG and 30 received rFSH) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. Pregnancy-related outcomes, ovarian response, oocyte, and embryo parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Additionally, serum insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 levels on the day of oocyte retrieval were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The 2 treatments resulted in comparable numbers of oocytes retrieved and embryos, comparable oocyte retrieval rate, mature oocyte rate, and fertilization rate, and also comparable clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and miscarriage rate. However, hp-hMG led to statistically insignificant higher viable embryo rate (54.0% vs 44.8%; P = 0.174) and live birth rate per pregnancy (16.7% vs 10%) versus rFSH. Finally, statistically significantly higher serum insulin-like growth factor-1 level (178.53 [13.70] ng/mL vs 164.93 [12.17] ng/mL; P = 0.01) and statistically insignificantly lower serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 level (19.53 [3.56] ng/mL vs the lower insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 level SD is (2.76 [20.83] ng/mL; P > 0.05) on the day of oocyte retrieval were associated with hp-hMG versus rFSH.

Conclusions

hp-HMG and rFSH did not lead to significantly different treatment outcomes in patients with poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol, although significantly higher serum insulin-like growth factor-1 level and insignificantly lower serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 level on the day of oocyte retrieval associated with hp-HMG might suggest a beneficial endocrine environment. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 81:XXX–XXX)

Highly Purified Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (Menopur®): A Profile of Its Use in Infertility

Menopur^® is a highly purified, urine-derived, human menopausal gonadotropin containing both follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) activity. It is an effective option for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in assisted reproductive technology protocols and for ovulation induction (OI) in anovulatory infertility, and is associated with a different endocrine profile from that of recombinant (r) FSH in these settings (in terms of serum levels of FSH, androgens and/or estradiol). When used for COS in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), Menopur^® was as good as rFSH in terms of pregnancy rates (despite being associated with a lower oocyte yield) and was found to improve some aspects of embryo quality in the IVF (but not ICSI) setting; using Menopur^® in combination with highly purified urinary FSH resulted in similar reproductive outcomes as Menopur^® alone. Data for Menopur^® in OI are limited, but suggest ovulation rates may be as good as those with rFSH + rLH (in type 1 anovulation) and rFSH (in type 2 anovulation). Moreover, compared with rFSH, Menopur^® appeared to be associated with a less pronounced follicular response and a lower risk of ovarian overstimulation.

Repeated doses of GnRH antagonist at midcycle in artificial frozen embryo transfer cycles may not affect pregnancy outcomes

No significant differences in outcomes have been found between protocols of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer (FET), though gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists may have detrimental effects on the endometrium. We conducted a retrospective cohort noninferiority study at a single academic center of women receiving multiple doses of mid-cycle GnRH antagonist (GAnt) to those receiving GnRH agonist (GAg) to determine if there are detrimental effects of GnRH antagonists. 1047 FET cycles were identified, detailed data was available in 840 cycles: 610 GAg and 230 GAnt cycles. Patients undergoing GAnt cycles were older (40 ± 6.6 versus 37 ± 5.1 years, p < 0.0001), more often used donor oocyte (36% versus 18.6%, p < 0.0001), and more often exhibited diminished ovarian reserve (49.1% versus 36.2%, p = 0.0009). Clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) per transfer and implantation rates (IRs) were similar for GAnt and GAg cycles. There was a trend for higher pregnancy and IRs with GAg cycles in younger women (CPR 38.8% versus 26.7%, p = 0.16; IR 36% versus 23.3%, p = 0.07). Stratifying by diagnosis, CPR and IR were similar in GAnt and GAg cycles. A GAnt protocol of endometrial preparation for FET is not inferior to a GAg protocol regardless of patient age, use of donor oocyte, or infertility diagnosis.