Comparison of a blocking vs. a flare-up protocol in poor responders with a normal and abnormal clomiphene citrate challenge test

[Premature ovarian failure: which protocols?]

This review shows the results of the various studies concerning the protocols applied to the women presenting a premature ovarian failure. Will be thus analyzed the natural cycles (or semi-natural), the increase in the dose of gonadotrophins, the clomiphene citrate and the anti-aromatases, the protocols with GnRH agonists long, short, stop or microdoses, the protocols with GnRH antagonists and the adjuvant treatments: aspirin, nitric oxyde, recombinant LH recombining, growth hormone and androgens. The interest of several protocols is to collect a sufficient number of oocytes (and thus of embryos to be transferred), making it possible to obtain reasonable rates of pregnancy. However, it arises that the rates of pregnancy observed among these women depend not only on their ovarian reserve and their age, but are also function of the type of infertility, of the cycle number and the uterus.

Management of the poor responder: the role of GnRH agonists and antagonists

PURPOSE

Evaluate the relative benefit of various doses and regimens of GnRH agonists (GnRHa) and antagonists (GnRHant) in the management of the poor responder.

METHODS

Review of English language publications with an emphasis on prospective randomized trials where available.

RESULTS

The lack of a uniformly applied definition of the poor responder and dearth of prospective randomized trials make data analysis difficult. Traditional GnRHa flare and long luteal phase protocols do not appear to be beneficial. Reduction of GnRHa doses, "stop" protocols, and microdose GnRHa flare regimes all appear to enhance outcomes, although the relative benefit of one approach over another has not been conclusively demonstrated. GnRHant does improve outcomes in this patient population, although, in general, pregnancy rates appear to be lower in comparison to microdose GnRHa flare regimes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no one controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol which is best suited for all poor responders. Low dose GnRHa regimes appear to be most advantageous. Prediction of compromised response prior to cycle initiation by a thorough assessment of ovarian reserve as well as a careful review of past response should allow for selection of an appropriate COH protocol for each individual patient.

Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve

PURPOSE

To review the available treatments for women with significantly diminished ovarian reserve and assess the efficacy of different ovarian stimulation protocols.

METHODS

Literature research performed among studies that have been published in the Pubmed, in the Scopus Search Machine and in Cohrane database of systematic reviews.

RESULTS

A lack of clear, uniform definition of the poor responders and a lack of large-scale randomized studies make data interpretation very difficult for precise conclusions. Optimistic data have been presented by the use of high doses of gonadotropins, flare up Gn RH-a protocol (standard or microdose), stop protocols, luteal onset of Gn RH-a and the short protocol. Natural cycle or a modified natural cycle seems to be an appropriate strategy. Low dose hCG in the first days of ovarian stimulation has promising results. Molecular biology tools (mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been also considered to assist the management of this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal stimulation for these patients with diminished ovarian reserve remains a great challenge for the clinician, within the limits of our pharmaceutical quiver.

The clomiphene citrate challenge test for the prediction of poor ovarian response and nonpregnancy in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the value of the clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCCT) in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy in IVF.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

All studies that evaluated the CCCT in the prediction of poor ovarian response or pregnancy after IVF.

PATIENT(S)

Infertility population undergoing an IVF treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Poor ovarian response, nonpregnancy.

RESULT(S)

From the literature we identified and analyzed 12 studies on the CCCT according to preset criteria. In predicting poor response, the sensitivity and specificity of the CCCT varied from 35% to 93% and 47% to 98%, respectively. In predicting nonpregnancy, the sensitivity and specificity varied from 13% to 66% and 73% to 97%, respectively. Because of heterogeneity among studies, a summary receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve could not be estimated. Back-to-back comparison of the CCCT with basal FSH was possible in six studies. In predicting poor response, the sensitivity of the CCCT increased to some extent, whereas specificity did not increase or even diminished. In predicting nonpregnancy, the CCCT also showed an increase in sensitivity, counteracted by a decrease in specificity.

CONCLUSION(S)

Summary estimates of test accuracy for the CCCT in IVF are not possible, because of heterogeneity among individual studies. A subanalysis of studies comparing basal FSH and the full CCCT showed that the CCCT has hardly any additional value.

Treatment-associated serum FSH levels in very poor responders to ovarian stimulation

PURPOSE

To compare treatment-associated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) response in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with either microdose flare (MDF) leuprolide acetate or clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin (CC/hMG).

METHODS

Thirteen patients who were deemed poor responders underwent stimulation with one of two poor responder stimulation protocols (MDF group: n = 8; CC/hMG group: n = 5). Serum FSH, estrone (E1), estrone sulfate (E1S), and estradiol (E2) levels were measured at baseline, day 5 of medication, and on day of hCG administration. Ovarian and uterine responses were evaluated by ultrasound.

RESULTS

Treatment-associated FSH levels were consistently higher in the group that took CC/hMG. However, serum E1, E1S, and E2 values were similar in both groups as were the number of oocytes retrieved and the endometrial echo complex. There were no differences between the two groups with regards to the quality of the oocytes obtained, fertilization rate, or the quality of the embryos.

CONCLUSION

Clomiphene citrate, when administered in conjunction with exogenous hMG, is a more potent stimulator of FSH production than MDF leuprolide acetate among poor responders to ovarian stimulation. However, the number of oocytes is not increased.

Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimens in the prior poor-responder patient preparing for assisted reproductive techniques.

DESIGN

English-language literature review.

PATIENT(S)

Candidates for assisted reproductive techniques who had been defined as having a prior suboptimal response to standard COH regimens.

INTERVENTION(S)

A variety of regimes are reviewed, including increased gonadotropin doses, change of gonadotropins, adjunctive growth hormone (GH), luteal phase (long) GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) initiation, early follicular phase (flare) GnRH-a initiation, low-dose luteal phase (ultrashort) GnRH-a initiation, progestin pretreatment, and microdose flare GnRH-a initiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Maximal serum E(2) levels, follicular development, dose, and duration of gonadotropin therapy, cycle cancellation rates, oocytes retrieved, embryos transferred, and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

A lack of uniformity in definition of the poor responder and of prospective randomized trials make data interpretation somewhat difficult. Of the varied strategies proposed, those that seem to be more uniformly beneficial are microdose GnRH-a flare and late luteal phase initiation of a short course of low-dose GnRH-a discontinued before COH.

CONCLUSION(S)

No single regimen will benefit all poor responders. General acceptance of uniform definitions and performance of large-scale prospective randomized trials are critical. Development of a reliable precycle screen will allow effective differentiation among normal responders, poor responders, and those who will not conceive with their own oocytes.