Cultured epithelial allografting of leg ulcers

Skin grafting for venous leg ulcers

BACKGROUND

Venous leg ulceration is a recurrent, chronic, disabling condition. It affects up to one in 100 people at some time in their lives. Standard treatments are simple dressings and compression bandages or stockings. Sometimes, despite treatment, ulcers remain open for months or years. Sometimes skin grafts are used to stimulate healing. These may be taken, or grown into a dressing, from the patient's own uninjured skin (autografts), or applied as a sheet of bioengineered skin grown from donor cells (allograft). Preserved skin from other animals, such as pigs, has also been used (xenografts).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of skin grafts for treating venous leg ulcers.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update we modified the search strategies and conducted searches of The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 27 July 2012); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 7); Ovid MEDLINE (2008 to July Week 3 2012); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, July 26, 2012); Ovid EMBASE (2008 to 2012 Week 29); and EBSCO CINAHL (2008 to 26 July 2012). We did not apply date or language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of skin grafts in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

For this update of the review, we identified one new trial, bringing the total to 17 trials (1034 participants) - all of which were generally at moderate or high risk of bias. In 12 trials participants also received compression bandaging.Eleven trials compared a graft with standard care in which no graft was used. Two of these trials (102 participants) compared a dressing with an autograft; three trials (80 participants) compared frozen allografts with dressings, and two trials (45 participants) compared fresh allografts with dressings. Two trials (345 participants) compared tissue-engineered skin (bilayer artificial skin) with a dressing. In two trials (97 participants) a single-layer dermal replacement was compared with standard care.Six trials compared alternative skin grafting techniques. The first trial (92 participants) compared autografts with frozen allograft, a second (51 participants) compared a pinch graft (autograft) with porcine dermis (xenograft), the third (110 participants) compared growth-arrested human keratinocytes and fibroblasts with placebo, the fourth (10 participants) compared an autograft delivered on porcine pads with an autograft delivered on porcine gelatin microbeads, the fifth trial (92 participants) compared a meshed graft with a cultured keratinocyte autograft, and the sixth trial (50 participants) compared a frozen keratinocyte allograft with a lyophilised (freeze-dried) keratinocyte allografts.Significantly more ulcers healed when treated with bilayer artificial skin than with dressings. There was insufficient evidence from the other trials to determine whether other types of skin grafting increased the healing of venous ulcers.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Bilayer artificial skin, used in conjunction with compression bandaging, increases venous ulcer healing compared with a simple dressing plus compression. Further research is needed to assess whether other forms of skin grafts increase ulcer healing.

Skin grafting for venous leg ulcers

BACKGROUND

Venous leg ulceration is a recurrent, chronic, disabling condition. It affects up to one in 100 adults at some time. Standard treatments are simple dressings and compression bandages or stockings. Sometimes, despite treatment, ulcers remain open for months or years. Sometimes skin grafts are used to stimulate healing. These may be taken, or grown into a dressing, from the patient's own uninjured skin (autografts), or applied as a sheet of bioengineered skin grown from donor cells (allograft). Preserved skin from other animals, such as pigs, has also been used (xenografts).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of skin grafts for treating venous leg ulcers.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (February 2006) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of skin grafts in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 15 trials - generally of poor methodological quality - involving 768 participants. In 11 trials participants also received compression bandaging. One trial (31 participants) compared a dressing with an autograft. Three trials (74 participants) compared frozen allografts with dressings, and three trials (47 participants) compared fresh allografts with dressings. Two trials (345 participants) compared tissue-engineered skin (bilayer artificial skin) with a dressing. In two trials (71 participants) a single-layer dermal replacement was compared with standard care. Four trials compared skin grafting techniques: one trial (92 participants) compared autografts with frozen allograft, a second (51 participants) compared a pinch graft (autograft) with a porcine dermis (xenograft), the third (seven participants, 12 ulcers) compared tissue-engineered skin with a split-thickness graft, the fourth (10 participants) compared a fresh allograft with a frozen allograft. The trials comparing bilayer artificial skin with a dressing reported a significantly higher proportion of ulcers healing with artificial skin. There was not enough evidence from the other trials to determine whether other types of skin grafting increased the healing of venous ulcers.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Bilayer artificial skin, used in conjunction with compression bandaging, increases the chance of healing a venous ulcer compared with compression and a simple dressing. Further research is needed to assess whether other forms of skin grafts increase ulcer healing.

Skin grafting for venous leg ulcers

BACKGROUND

Venous leg ulceration is a common and disabling condition which often recurs. It affects up to one in 100 adults at some time. The usual treatments are simple dressings and compression bandages or stockings. Unfortunately, in some cases this treatment is unsuccessful, with ulcers remaining open for months or years. Sometimes skin grafts are used to stimulate healing. These skin grafts may be taken from the patient's own uninjured skin, may be grown from the patient's skin cells into a dressing (autografts), or applied as a sheet of bioengineered skin grown from donor cells (allograft). Preserved skin from other animals, such as pigs, has also been used; these grafts are known as xerografts.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of skin grafts for treating venous leg ulcers.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (June 2004) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of skin grafts in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials of skin grafts for venous leg ulcers were identified, involving 579 participants. The trials were generally of poor methodological quality. In eight trials participants also received compression bandaging. Two trials (98 participants) evaluated split thickness autografts (one against a dressing and one against a xerograft), four trials (119 participants) evaluated cultured keratinocyte grafts (3 allografts and 1 autograft) , two compared tissue engineered skin (bilayer artificial skin) with a dressing (345 participants), and one compared it with a split thickness skin graft (7 participants, 13 ulcers). The trials comparing bilayer artificial skin with a dressing reported a significantly higher proportion of ulcers healing with artificial skin. There was not enough evidence from the other trials to determine whether other types of skin grafting increased the healing of venous ulcers.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that a bilayer artificial skin, used in conjunction with compression bandaging, increases the chance of healing a venous ulcer compared with compression and a simple dressing. Further research is needed to assess whether other forms of skin grafts increase ulcer healing.

Skin grafting

No longer an option of last resort, skin grafting has become a technique that is routinely and sometimes preferentially considered as skin replacement for burns, chronic ulcers, and skin defects after cutaneous surgical procedures. When selected as the best alternative for wound closure, autologous skin grafts are commonly considered the gold standard. Availability of autologous grafts is a major obstacle, however, and the search for a manufactured skin replacement has continued. In cases in which autologous grafts cannot be performed, skin substitutes have become an attractive alternative.

The development of bioengineered skin

Driven by the need for donor tissue for patients suffering from extensive burns, alternatives to autologous and cadaver-derived tissue have been under development for the past 20 years. Unilayered and bilayered models representing the skin's epidermal and/or dermal components have been developed using both cells and matrix materials. In addition to their use in patients with extensive burns, trials using these products on refractory and challenging patients with both acute and chronic wounds have led to the commercial availability of some of these products.

Tissue engineering and the development of Apligraf, a human skin equivalent

In recent years, skin grafting has evolved from the initial autograft and allograft preparations to biosynthetic and tissue-engineered living skin replacements. This review details the pioneering work of numerous investigators that led to the following precursors of tissue-engineered skin replacement: cultured autologous keratinocyte grafts, cultured allogeneic keratinocyte grafts, autologous/allogeneic composites, acellular collagen matrices, and cellular matrices. It also discusses the rationale for the development of the newer products and describes the technical advances leading to the development of Apligraf, a tissue-engineered human skin product.

Split-thickness skin grafting for lower extremity ulcerations

BACKGROUND

Leg ulcers are often refractory to conservative treatment, often mandating the use of skin grafting.

OBJECTIVES

This review article discusses skin grafts, with special emphasis on split-thickness grafts for lower extremity ulcerations.

METHODS

Historical background, proposed mechanisms of action, biology of skin grafts, techniques for skin grafting, and results after grafting are discussed separately.

RESULTS

Skin grafting has been performed for centuries. However, how skin grafts work, whether solely as tissue replacement or, additionally, as a stimulus for healing, is still not fully known. After placement, the grafted skin proceeds through a series of phases by which nutrients are supplied and neovascularization occurs. Adherence to the ulcer bed through interactions between the graft and the ulcer bed appear critical. When meshed split-thickness skin grafts are properly performed, success rates from 50% to 75% have been reported for refractory venous ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Better understanding of the biologic and clinical aspects of skin grafting should lead to improved patient care.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, participant should be able: 1. To understand the various types of skin grafts. 2. To learn the potential mechanisms of action of how skin grafts work. 3. To appreciate the benefit of skin grafts for lower extremity ulcerations.