The Communication Supports Inventory-Children & Youth (CSI-CY), a new instrument based on the ICF-CY

Demands Associated With an Augmentative and Alternative Communication System in Relation to Alternative Forms of Access for Individuals With Motor Impairments

PURPOSE

Successful adoption and use of aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) must address how to promote fluid, efficient, and organized execution of the motor behavior needed to access the AAC system. A substantial number of people who use AAC have significant motor impairments and require "alternative" access options, such as eye gaze or switch use. Such individuals may be particularly vulnerable to interference from a poorly designed system. However, the inherent demands of alternative access methods have received little direct study. The goal of this tutorial is to offer a clinically and theoretically guided framework for considerations concerning AAC access, with the hope of spurring further discussion and empirical research.

METHOD

A framework that draws upon dynamic systems theory was used to illustrate the interactions between the various elements of importance to AAC access. Information and research from the fields of motor learning, developmental dynamic systems theory, AAC, and assistive technology was integrated into this tutorial to examine their applications for alternative AAC access methods.

RESULTS

The framework illustrated that AAC access involves a complex coordination between individual skills, the demands of the communication environment, the activity being undertaken, and the supports and demands inherent in the AAC system itself.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of the many demands that alternative forms of access place on the person who uses them can guide clinicians during assessment and intervention decision making regarding access options for individuals with significant motor impairments. Specific directions for future research are considered.

Using the ICF Framework to Assess Communicative Competence in Dyadic Communication among Children and Adolescents Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices in Taiwan

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices enable children and adolescents (CAD) with communication disorders to communicate competently and develop friendships through communicative competence (CC). Existing assessment tools are unable to indicate whether CAD aged 0 to 18 years would competently use the subsidized AAC devices provided by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan. This study, thus, aimed to develop an assessment tool by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to measure CC in dyadic communication among CAD using AAC devices. Five speech-language pathologists (SLPs), five special education teachers, and four AAC experts (14 in total) selected codes relevant to the four domains of CC via the Delphi method. Next, they categorized the selected codes into one of the four domains of CC through a face-to-face expert panel. A total of 112 codes were listed in the tool and fully classified into the four domains of CC. Among these, seven codes were concurrently placed under two domains of CC. Consequently, this study developed an assessment tool by employing the ICF for children and youth core set using universal qualifiers to measure the relative levels of CC in dyadic communication among CAD who use AAC devices in their daily life.

Augmentative and Alternative Communication – Scoping Review / Unterstützte Kommunikation – Scoping Review

Introduction

The effective use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication is challenging, not only for persons with complex communication needs, but also for their significant others. There is a need, therefore, for interprofessional collaboration in order to effectively assess, provide, and evaluate services.

Aim

The aim of this scoping review was to summarize current evidence in the field of Augmentative and Alternative Communication and reveal the demands for further research.

Method

We searched in the electronic databases Pubmed, AMED, and CINAHL using following keywords child*, disability, cerebral palsy, augmentative and alternative communication, intervention, and therapy to identify relevant literature. We summarised the content of the included studies.

Results

We included 16 literature reviews and 36 studies in this review. The 36 studies included 11 intervention studies, 20 descriptive studies, two experimental studies, and three studies evaluating assessments. Most of the studies were focussing on children with cerebral palsy and autism in the contexts of home, hospital, and primary school. There were no intervention studies, focusing on secondary and/or tertiary level of education or work. Moreover, we have not found any evidence from German speaking Europe.

Conclusion

In order to support the use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication and to enable participation of persons with complex communication needs, various endeavours are needed: in the practice of care settings interprofessional collaboration is required. Further research is needed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, focussing on youth and the contexts of secondary and/or tertiary education or work, or on assessments.

[Use of the ICF in medical rehabilitation in Germany: claims and reality]

BACKGROUND

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is being used in the medical rehabilitation practice in different ways. The World Health Organization (WHO) and many other stakeholders have formulated claims and expectations for its use.

OBJECTIVES

A comparative presentation of the claims of various stakeholders for the use of the ICF with examples in current practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Database searches (PubMed, REHADAT, and Google Scholar) were conducted for studies concerning claims and the current use of the ICF in practice.

RESULTS

There are different requirements regarding the use of the ICF. While lawmakers and social insurance agencies remain very cautious and vague, other stakeholders (research institutions, organizations, stakeholders, service providers) formulate higher expectations and call for greater use of the ICF. In practice, the ICF is used in the form of a bio-psycho-social model, a common language and many different adaptations.

CONCLUSIONS

The different requirements for the use of ICF demonstrate the motivations and interests of the stakeholders. Signals must now be sent both by politics and by social insurance agencies that go far beyond non-binding declarations. Furthermore it is necessary to systematize and evaluate the many use adaptations that are primarily being used by service providers. Research is needed on the concrete use of ICF-based instruments and its intended and unintended effects.