Quantitative detection of IDH2 mutation for minimal residual disease monitoring in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and its comparison with mutations in NPM1 gene

Current and Emerging Techniques for Diagnosis and MRD Detection in AML: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comprises a group of hematologic neoplasms characterized by abnormal differentiation and proliferation of myeloid progenitor cells. AML is associated with poor outcome due to the lack of efficient therapies and early diagnostic tools. The current gold standard diagnostic tools are based on bone marrow biopsy. These biopsies, apart from being very invasive, painful, and costly, have low sensitivity. Despite the progress uncovering the molecular pathogenesis of AML, the development of novel detection strategies is still poorly explored. This is particularly important for patients that check the criteria for complete remission after treatment, since they can relapse through the persistence of some leukemic stem cells. This condition, recently named as measurable residual disease (MRD), has severe consequences for disease progression. Hence, an early and accurate diagnosis of MRD would allow an appropriate therapy to be tailored, improving a patient's prognosis. Many novel techniques with high potential in disease prevention and early detection are being explored. Among them, microfluidics has flourished in recent years due to its ability at processing complex samples as well as its demonstrated capacity to isolate rare cells from biological fluids. In parallel, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy has shown outstanding sensitivity and capability for multiplex quantitative detection of disease biomarkers. Together, these technologies can allow early and cost-effective disease detection as well as contribute to monitoring the efficiency of treatments. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of AML disease, the conventional techniques currently used for its diagnosis, classification (recently updated in September 2022), and treatment selection, and we also aim to present how novel technologies can be applied to improve the detection and monitoring of MRD.

Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring by Locked Nucleic Acid Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for IDH1/2 Mutation in Adult AML

Locked nucleic acid quantitative Real-Time PCR (LNA-qPCR) for IDH1/2 mutations in AML measurable residual disease (MRD) detection is rarely reported. LNA-qPCR was applied to quantify IDH1/2 mutants MRD kinetics in bone marrow from 88 IDH1/2-mutated AML patients, and correlated with NPM1-MRD, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. The median normalized copy number (NCN) of IDH1/2 mutants decreased significantly from 53,228 (range 87−980,686)/ALB × 106 at diagnosis to 773 (range 1.5−103,600)/ALB × 106 at first complete remission (CR). IDH1/2 LNA-qPCR MRD was concordant with remission status or NPM1-MRD in 79.5% (70/88) of patients. Younger patients and patients with FLT3 mutations had higher concordance. The Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) and concordance rate between the log reduction of IDH1/2 LNA-qPCR and NPM1-MRD were 0.68 and 81% (K = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50−0.74), respectively. IDH1/2-MRD > 2 log reduction at first CR predicted significantly better relapse-free survival (3-year RFS rates 52.9% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.007) and cumulative incidence of relapse (3-year CIR rates 44.5% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.012) compared to IDH1/2-MRD ≤ 2 log reduction. IDH1/2-MRD > 2 log reduction during consolidation is also associated with a significantly lower CIR rate than IDH1/2-MRD ≤ 2 log reduction (3-year CIR rates 42.3% vs. 68.8%, p = 0.019). LNA-qPCR for IDH1/2 mutation is a potential MRD technique to predict relapse in IDH1/2-mutated AML patients, especially for those with IDH1/2 MRD > 2 log reduction at first CR or a concurrent FLT3 mutation.

Clinical values of gene alterations as marker of minimal residual disease in non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of the hematopoietic system. Residual leukemic cells after treatment are associated with relapse. Thus, detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) is significant. Major techniques for MRD assessment include multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). At a molecular level, AML is the consequence of collaboration of several gene alterations. Some of these gene alterations can also be used as MRD markers to evaluate the level of residual leukemic cells by PCR and NGS. However, when as MRD markers, different gene alterations have different clinical values. This paper aims to summarize the characteristics of various MRD markers, so as to better predict the clinical outcome of AML patients and guide the treatment.

Strategies for minimal residual disease detection: current perspectives

Currently, the post-remission treatment in acute leukemia is based on the genetic profile of leukemic cells at diagnosis (ie, FLT3 ITD positivity) and on the level of measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction and consolidation chemotherapy. Two methods are currently preferred for MRD evaluation in many centers: multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative PCR. Additional methods such as next-generation sequencing and digital PCR are under investigation, in an attempt to increase the sensitivity and thus allowing the detection of small clones. Many studies suggest that MRD positivity after chemotherapy is associated with negative prognosis, and the reappearance of MRD during follow-up allows impending relapse to be identified and consequently enables early intervention. Finally, MRD positivity before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is predictive of the outcome. Although the significance of MRD in acute leukemia has been widely explored, the assessment of molecular MRD is not yet a routine practice. In this review, we describe the significance of MRD in different settings and the main markers and methods used for MRD detection.

Digital PCR in Myeloid Malignancies: Ready to Replace Quantitative PCR?

New techniques are on the horizon for the detection of small leukemic clones in both, acute leukemias and myeloproliferative disorders. A promising approach is based on digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Digital PCR (dPCR) is a breakthrough technology designed to provide absolute nucleic acid quantification. It is particularly useful to detect a low amount of target and therefore it represents an alternative method for detecting measurable residual disease (MRD). The main advantages are the high precision, the very reliable quantification, the absolute quantification without the need for a standard curve, and the excellent reproducibility. Nowadays the main disadvantages of this strategy are the costs that are still higher than standard qPCR, the lack of standardized methods, and the limited number of laboratories that are equipped with instruments for dPCR. Several studies describing the possibility and advantages of using digital PCR for the detection of specific leukemic transcripts or mutations have already been published. In this review we summarize the available data on the use of dPCR in acute myeloid leukemia and myeloproliferative disorders.

Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring in NPM1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Clinical Viewpoint and Perspectives

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1 gene mutations is currently recognized as a distinct entity, due to its unique biological and clinical features. We summarize here the results of published studies investigating the clinical application of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with NPM1-mutated AML, receiving either intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Several clinical trials have so far demonstrated a significant independent prognostic impact of molecular MRD monitoring in NPM1-mutated AML and, accordingly, the Consensus Document from the European Leukemia Net MRD Working Party has recently recommended that NPM1-mutated AML patients have MRD assessment at informative clinical timepoints during treatment and follow-up. However, several controversies remain, mainly with regard to the most clinically significant timepoints and the MRD thresholds to be considered, but also with respect to the optimal source to be analyzed, namely bone marrow or peripheral blood samples, and the correlation of MRD with other known prognostic indicators. Moreover, we discuss potential advantages, as well as drawbacks, of newer molecular technologies such as digital droplet PCR and next-generation sequencing in comparison to conventional RQ-PCR to quantify NPM1-mutated MRD. In conclusion, further prospective clinical trials are warranted to standardize MRD monitoring strategies and to optimize MRD-guided therapeutic interventions in NPM1-mutated AML patients.

IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Suitable targets for minimal residual disease monitoring?

OBJECTIVES

Molecular screening plays a major role in prognostic categorization and subsequent definition of treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia. The possibility of using IDH1/2 mutations as a marker for the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is still under investigation and remains unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we evaluated 90 patients with de novo AML using Sanger sequencing (exon 4, IDH1 and IDH2). For subsequent MRD monitoring were used both methods, massive parallel sequencing and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).

RESULTS

We identified 22 patients (24%) who harboured mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 genes. Fourteen (64%) of them had other commonly used MRD markers (insertion in NPM1 and partial tandem duplication of MLL, MLL-PTD). Eight of the 22 patients had IDH1 mutations, 13 had IDH2 mutations and 1 had both IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. In our cohort, this IDH1/2 marker responded to the treatment in all of the patients and reflected the onset of the relapse very well. NPM1 mutation based MRD monitoring was more sensitive and predicted relapse earlier but IDH1/2 based monitoring was more sensitive than a method based on MLL-PTD. Both massive parallel sequencing and ddPCR were competent to monitor MRD using IDH1/2. Nevertheless, ddPCR was able to achieve a higher sensitivity in some cases and moreover this method can analyse a single sample without significant price increases.

CONCLUSION

Given these data, we conclude that IDH1/2 mutations can be used as a reliable and cost-effective marker for MRD monitoring.

Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review for the Practicing Clinician

Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in acute myeloid leukemia is increasingly being used to assess treatment response and stratify the risk of relapse for individual patients. Molecular methods for MRD testing began with PCR-based assays for individual recurrent mutations. To date, there is robust evidence for testing NPM1, CBFB-MYH11, and RUNX1/RUNXT1 mutations using this approach, though the best timing and threshold level for each mutation varies. More recent approaches have been with PCR-based multigene panels, occasionally combined with flow cytometric techniques, and next-generation sequencing techniques. This review outlines the various techniques used in molecular approaches to MRD, the evidence behind individual mutation testing, and the novel approaches for evaluating multigene MRD so that clinicians can understand and incorporate these evaluations into their practice.

Clinical relevance of IDH1/2 mutant allele burden during follow-up in acute myeloid leukemia. A study by the French ALFA group

Assessment of minimal residual disease has emerged as a powerful prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia. In this study, we investigated the potential of IDH1/2 mutations as targets for minimal residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia, since these mutations collectively occur in 15–20% of cases of acute myeloid leukemia and now represent druggable targets. We employed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assays to quantify IDH1R132, IDH2R140, and IDH2R172 mutations on genomic DNA in 322 samples from 103 adult patients with primary IDH1/2 mutant acute myeloid leukemia and enrolled on Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) - 0701 or -0702 clinical trials. The median IDH1/2 mutant allele fraction in bone marrow samples was 42.3% (range, 8.2 – 49.9%) at diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia, and below the detection limit of 0.2% (range, <0.2 – 39.3%) in complete remission after induction therapy. In univariate analysis, the presence of a normal karyotype, a NPM1 mutation, and an IDH1/2 mutant allele fraction <0.2% in bone marrow after induction therapy were statistically significant predictors of longer disease-free survival. In multivariate analysis, these three variables remained significantly predictive of disease-free survival. In 7/103 (7%) patients, IDH1/2 mutations persisted at high levels in complete remission, consistent with the presence of an IDH1/2 mutation in pre-leukemic hematopoietic stem cells. Five out of these seven patients subsequently relapsed or progressed toward myelodysplastic syndrome, suggesting that patients carrying the IDH1/2 mutation in a pre-leukemic clone may be at high risk of hematologic evolution.

Enhancing acute myeloid leukemia therapy - monitoring response using residual disease testing as a guide to therapeutic decision-making

INTRODUCTION

Current standards for monitoring the response of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are based on morphologic assessments of the bone marrow and recovery of peripheral blood counts. A growing experience is being developed to enhance the detection of small amounts of AML, or minimal residual disease (MRD). Areas covered: Available techniques include multi-color flow cytometry (MFC) of leukemia associated immunophenotypes (LAIP), quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) for detecting fusion and mutated genes (RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFB-MYH11, and NPM1), overexpression of genes such as WT1, and next generation sequencing (NGS) for MRD. Expert commentary: While MRD monitoring is standard of care in some leukemia subsets such as acute promyelocytic leukemia, this approach for the broader AML population does not universally predict outcomes as some patients may experience relapse in the setting of undetectable leukemia while others show no obvious disease progression despite MRD positivity. However, there are instances where MRD can identify patients at increased risk for relapse that may change recommended therapy. Currently, prospective investigations to define clinically relevant MRD thresholds are ongoing. Risk-adapted trials are needed to best define the use of MRD in the follow up of AML patients after initial induction therapy.

Novel multiplex bead-based assay for detection of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in myeloid malignancies

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH) mutations are frequently found in various cancer types such as gliomas, chondrosarcomas and myeloid malignancies. Their molecular detection has recently gained wide recognition in the diagnosis and prognosis of these neoplasms. For that purpose various molecular approaches have been used but a universally accepted method is still lacking. In this study we aimed to develop a novel bead-based liquid assay using Locked nucleic acids (LNA)-modified oligonucleotide probes for multiplexed detection of the most frequent IDH1 (p.R132C, p.R132G, p.R132H, p.R132L, p.R132S) and IDH2 (p.R140Q, p.R172K) mutations. The method includes four steps: 1) PCR amplification of the targeted fragments with biotinylated primers; 2) Direct hybridization to barcoded microbeads with specific LNA-modified oligonucleotide probes; 3) Incubation with phycoerythrin coupled streptavidin; 4) Acquisition of fluorescent intensities of each set of beads on a flow platform (LuminexCorp., USA). We tested the performance of the assay on both artificial plasmid constructs and on clinical samples from 114 patients with known or suspected myeloid malignancies. The method appeared to be superior to direct sequencing having a much higher sensitivity of 2.5% mutant alleles. Applying this method to patients' samples we identified a total of 9 mutations (one IDH1 p.R132C, seven IDH2 p.R140Q and one IDH2 p.R172K). In conclusion, this method could be successfully implemented in the diagnostic work-up for various tumors known to harbor IDH1/2 mutations (e.g. myeloid malignancies, gliomas, etc.). International initiatives are needed to validate the different existing methods for detection of IDH1/2 mutations in clinical settings.