The many facets of WT1 in acute myeloid leukemia: clarity remains elusive

Prognostic significance of Wilms' tumor gene 1 expression in children with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Introduction

The prognostic role of Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene expression at diagnosis in children with B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is still controversial.

Methods

We detected the WT1 transcript levels of 533 de novo pediatric BCP-ALL patients using TaqMan-based real-time quantitative PCR and analyzed their clinical features.

Results

The WT1 transcript levels differed among the distinct molecularly defined groups, with the highest levels in the KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2A-r) group. According to the results of the X-tile software, all patients were divided into two groups: WT1/ABL ≥ 0.24% (group A) and <0.24% (group B). The proportions of patients whose age was ≥10 years old, with immunophenotype of Pro-B, belonging in high-risk group, or with minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥ 0.01% at week 12 were significantly higher in group A than in group B. In the B-other group, WT1 overexpression was an independent risk factor of overall survival (OS) rate (P = 0.042), and higher MRD ≥ 0.01% at week 12 was associated with lower OS rate (P<0.001) and event-free survival rate (P<0.001). Moreover, the subgroup analysis revealed that, in patients with initial WBC<50 × 109/L or MRD<0.1% at day 33 or MRD<0.01% at week 12 or in the standard-risk group, WT1 overexpression led to a poorer outcome in comparison with those with WT1 downexpression (P<0.05).

Discussion

Therefore, pediatric BCP-ALL with WT1 overexpression had unique clinico-pathological characteristics and poor treatment response. In B-other patients, WT1 overexpression at diagnosis predicted an inferior prognosis. The WT1 gene may serve as a biomarker for monitoring residual disease in the B-other population, especially in children in the standard-risk group.

The molecular mechanisms behind activation of FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia and resistance to therapy by selective inhibitors

Acute myeloid leukemia is an aggressive cancer, which, in spite of increasingly better understanding of its genetic background remains difficult to treat. Mutations in the FLT3 gene are observed in ≈30% of the patients. Most of these mutations are internal tandem duplications (ITDs) of a sequence within the protein coding region, an activation mechanism that is almost non-existent with other genes and cancers. As patients each carry their own unique set of mutations, it is challenging to understand how ITDs activate the protein, and ascertain the risk for each individual patient. Available treatment options are limited due to development of drug resistance. Here, recent studies are reviewed that help to better understand the molecular mechanism behind activation of the FLT3 protein due to mutations. It is argued that difference in mutation sequences and especially location might be coupled to prognosis. When it comes to FLT3 inhibitors, key differences between them can be attributed to the mode of inhibition (type-1 and type-2 inhibitors), effective inhibitory coefficient in the blood plasma and off-target binding. Accounting for the position and length of insertions may in the future be used to predict prognosis and rationalise treatment. Development of new inhibitors must take into account the potential for resistance mutations. Inhibitors aimed at multiple specific targets are currently being developed. These, and as well as combination therapies will hopefully lead to longer periods during which targeted FLT3 therapy will remain effective.

Low WT1 transcript levels at diagnosis predicted poor outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) who received chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) is a heterogeneous disease. Identifying AML patients with t(8;21) who have a poor prognosis despite achieving remission is important for determining the best subsequent therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Wilm tumor gene-1 (WT1) transcript levels and cellular homolog of the viral oncogene v-KIT receptor tyrosine kinase (C-KIT) mutations at diagnosis, and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels after the second consolidation chemotherapy cycle on outcomes.

Methods

Eighty-eight AML patients with t(8;21) who received chemotherapy only or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) were included. Patients who achieved remission, received two or more cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, and had a positive measureable residual disease (MRD) test result (defined as <3-log reduction in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels compared to baseline) after 2–8 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy were recommended to receive allo-HSCT. Patients who had a negative MRD test result were recommended to receive further chemotherapy up to only 8 cycles. WT1 transcript levels and C-KIT mutations at diagnosis, and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels after the second consolidation chemotherapy cycle were tested.

Results

Patients who had a C-KIT mutation had significantly lower WT1 transcript levels than patients who did not have a C-KIT mutation (6.7% ± 10.6% vs. 19.5% ± 19.9%, P < 0.001). Low WT1 transcript levels (≤5.0%) but not C-KIT mutation at diagnosis, a positive MRD test result after the second cycle of consolidation chemotherapy, and receiving only chemotherapy were independently associated with high cumulative incidence of relapse in all patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.53, 2.30, and 11.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64–7.62, 1.82–7.56, and 4.43–29.82; P = 0.002, 0.034, and <0.001, respectively); these conditions were also independently associated with low leukemia-free survival (HR = 3.71, 2.33, and 5.85; 95% CI 1.82–7.56, 1.17–4.64, and 2.75–12.44; P < 0.001, 0.016, and <0.001, respectively) and overall survival (HR = 3.50, 2.32, and 4.34; 95% CI 1.56–7.82, 1.09–4.97, and 1.98–9.53; P = 0.002, 0.030, and <0.001, respectively) in all patients.

Conclusions

Testing for WT1 transcript levels at diagnosis in patients with AML and t(8;21) may predict outcomes in those who achieve remission. A randomized study is warranted to determine whether allo-HSCT can improve prognosis in these patients.