1
|
Burgess J, Ferdousi M, Gosal D, Boon C, Matsumoto K, Marshall A, Mak T, Marshall A, Frank B, Malik RA, Alam U. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Epidemiology, Pathomechanisms and Treatment. Oncol Ther 2021; 9:385-450. [PMID: 34655433 PMCID: PMC8593126 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-021-00168-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This review provides an update on the current clinical, epidemiological and pathophysiological evidence alongside the diagnostic, prevention and treatment approach to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). FINDINGS The incidence of cancer and long-term survival after treatment is increasing. CIPN affects sensory, motor and autonomic nerves and is one of the most common adverse events caused by chemotherapeutic agents, which in severe cases leads to dose reduction or treatment cessation, with increased mortality. The primary classes of chemotherapeutic agents associated with CIPN are platinum-based drugs, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib and thalidomide. Platinum agents are the most neurotoxic, with oxaliplatin causing the highest prevalence of CIPN. CIPN can progress from acute to chronic, may deteriorate even after treatment cessation (a phenomenon known as coasting) or only partially attenuate. Different chemotherapeutic agents share both similarities and key differences in pathophysiology and clinical presentation. The diagnosis of CIPN relies heavily on identifying symptoms, with limited objective diagnostic approaches targeting the class of affected nerve fibres. Studies have consistently failed to identify at-risk cohorts, and there are no proven strategies or interventions to prevent or limit the development of CIPN. Furthermore, multiple treatments developed to relieve symptoms and to modify the underlying disease in CIPN have failed. IMPLICATIONS The increasing prevalence of CIPN demands an objective approach to identify at-risk patients in order to prevent or limit progression and effectively alleviate the symptoms associated with CIPN. An evidence base for novel targets and both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments is beginning to emerge and has been recognised recently in publications by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and analgesic trial design expert groups such as ACTTION.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Burgess
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, The Pain Research Institute, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
- Clinical Sciences Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
| | - Maryam Ferdousi
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR/Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Manchester, UK
| | - David Gosal
- Department of Neurology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Cheng Boon
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Kohei Matsumoto
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, The Pain Research Institute, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anne Marshall
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, The Pain Research Institute, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tony Mak
- Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Andrew Marshall
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
- Department of Pain Medicine, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, L9 7LJ, UK
| | - Bernhard Frank
- Department of Pain Medicine, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, L9 7LJ, UK
| | - Rayaz A Malik
- Research Division, Qatar Foundation, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Doha, Qatar
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Uazman Alam
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, The Pain Research Institute, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
- Clinical Sciences Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bonomo R, Cavaletti G. Clinical and biochemical markers in CIPN: A reappraisal. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2021; 177:890-907. [PMID: 33648782 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The increased survival of cancer patients has raised growing public health concern on associated long-term consequences of antineoplastic treatment. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a primarily sensory polyneuropathy, which may be accompanied by pain, autonomic disturbances, and motor deficit. About 70% of treated cancer patients might develop CIPN during or after the completion of chemotherapy, and in most of them such complication persists after six months from the treatment. The definition of the potential risk of development and resolution of CIPN according to a clinical and biochemical profile would be certainly fundamental to tailor chemotherapy regimen and dosage on individual susceptibility. In recent years, patient-reported and clinician-related tools along with quality of life instruments have been featured as primary outcomes in clinical setting and randomized trials. New studies on metabolomics markers are further pursuing accurate and easily accessible indicators of peripheral nerve damage. The aim of this review is to outline the strengths and pitfalls of current knowledge on CIPN, and to provide a framework for future potential developments of standardized protocols involving clinical and biochemical markers for CIPN assessment and monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bonomo
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - G Cavaletti
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|