Monoclonal antibody-purged bone marrow transplantation therapy for multiple myeloma

Evolution of cellular immunotherapy: from allogeneic transplant to dendritic cell vaccination as treatment for multiple myeloma

The promise of cellular therapy as treatment for multiple myeloma is highlighted by the observation that allogeneic transplantation results in durable remissions in a subset of patients. The potency of the graft-versus-myeloma effect is supported by the decreased risk of relapse seen in patients with graft-versus-host disease and disease response following donor lymphocyte infusions. However, the lack of specificity of the alloreactive lymphocytes limits their therapeutic efficacy and results in significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality. A major area of investigation is the development of cancer vaccines to generate myeloma-specific immunity that selectively targets malignant cells while minimizing toxicity to normal tissues. Critical elements required to develop an effective vaccine strategy involve the identification of myeloma-associated antigens, enhancement of antigen presentation, and reversing the immunosuppressive milieu induced by the disease. Dendritic cells are potent APCs that represent an ideal platform for vaccination. Strategies for vaccine design include the loading of individual antigens as well as the use of whole tumor cells as a source of myeloma antigens. Vaccination has been examined in the postautologous transplant setting in which disease cytoreduction and depletion of Tregs is associated with enhanced vaccine response. Recent efforts have also included exploration of immune modulatory agents that target inhibitory pathways to enhance vaccine response and create a more durable antitumor immunity.

The conserved scavenger receptor cysteine-rich superfamily in therapy and diagnosis

The scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) superfamily of soluble or membrane-bound protein receptors is characterized by the presence of one or several repeats of an ancient and highly conserved protein module, the SRCR domain. This superfamily (SRCR-SF) has been in constant and progressive expansion, now up to more than 30 members. The study of these members is attracting growing interest, which parallels that in innate immunity. No unifying function has been described to date for the SRCR domains, this being the result of the limited knowledge still available on the physiology of most members of the SRCR-SF, but also of the sequence versatility of the SRCR domains. Indeed, involvement of SRCR-SF members in quite different functions, such as pathogen recognition, modulation of the immune response, epithelial homeostasis, stem cell biology, and tumor development, have all been described. This has brought to us new information, unveiling the possibility that targeting or supplementing SRCR-SF proteins could result in diagnostic and/or therapeutic benefit for a number of physiologic and pathologic states. Recent research has provided structural and functional insight into these proteins, facilitating the development of means to modulate the activity of SRCR-SF members. Indeed, some of these approaches are already in use, paving the way for a more comprehensive use of SRCR-SF members in the clinic. The present review will illustrate some available evidence on the potential of well known and new members of the SRCR-SF in this regard.

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a malignant disease of plasma cells that manifests as one or more of lytic bone lesions, monoclonal protein in the blood or urine, and disease in the bone marrow. Treatment for myeloma has changed beyond recognition in the past decade, and now includes state of the art supportive treatment and infusional chemotherapy courses, followed for younger patients by high-dose melphalan and an autologous transplant. Patients younger than 70 years can now expect a doubling of median survival to 5 years, a 20% chance of surviving longer than 10 years, and a 50% chance of attaining complete morphological and biochemical remission. Bisphosphonate control of bone disease is essential. Exploitation of the understanding of the biology of myeloma has led to the development of biological treatments, such as thalidomide, CC-5013, and bortezomib, which target the myeloma cell and the bone-marrow microenvironment, which plays a crucial part in the disease's pathogenesis. These treatments will hold the key to future success.

Recent Developments and Future Directions in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a B cell neoplasia affecting approximately 14,400 new individuals in the United States each year. Although MM remains an incurable disease, encouraging advances have been made in its therapy in the recent past. High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown in randomized controlled trials to improve survival in MM and is currently considered the first line treatment for all patients except those with advanced age of co-morbidities. For such patients, conventional chemotherapy with melphalan and steroids continue to be the treatment of choice. The use of tandem stem cell transplants and the use of both myeloablative and nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains investigational. Thalidomide is a new therapeutic option with promising results; however, it is associated with significant side effects including deep venous thrombosis and peripheral neuropathy. Its use in combination with other chemotherapy agents is still under investigation. Novel promising agents are currently under clinical trials including Proteosome Inhibitors and much more potent thalidomide analogs or immunomodulators. This review summarizes recent developments in the therapy and supportive care of MM and introduces the newer drugs in preclinical and early clinical trials.

Therapy strategies for multiple myeloma: current status

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by infiltration of bone marrow with a clone of neoplastic plasma cells. Impaired hematopoiesis and reduced production of functional immunoglobulins, as well as the induction of pathognomonic osteolytic lesions primarily contribute to the morbidity of patients with MM. Conventional chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for older patients, whereas those under 60 years benefit significantly from high-dose therapy followed by stem-cell rescue. The use of tandem transplantation, developed to further escalate the conditioning dose, has achieved additional improvement in survival. Interferon-alpha and glucocorticoids are effective as maintenance measures in MM but remain controversial because of their associated high costs and considerable toxicity. The resurrection of an old drug, thalidomide, for the therapy of MM and the development of potent immunomodulatory derivatives are highly promising new treatments that target MM cell-host interactions and the bone-marrow microenvironment, as well as the myeloma cell itself. The importance of the use of bisphosphonates for the prevention or amelioration of skeletal complications and hypercalcemia is well established. New generations of bisphosphonates show potent antitumor activity, again emphasising the importance of targeting the microenvironment of the plasma-cell clone.

Autologous blood cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: impact of CD34+ cell selection with long follow-up

Positive CD34(+) selection to purge blood cell harvests is one way to attempt to reduce the high relapse risk after high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) supported by autologous blood cell transplantation (ABCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Until recently, however, the impact of CD34(+) selection, if any, on long-term clinical outcome in MM has remained obscure. We have analyzed engraftment kinetics, response to HDT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for 64 consecutive MM patients who have been treated with up-front HDT plus ABCT at our institution between 1993 and 1998. Nonrandomized comparisons were made between transplants with unselected (39 patients) and CD34(+)-selected (25 patients) grafts. The engraftment kinetics, need of blood product support, discharge time from hospital, and response to HDT were similar for both unselected and selected transplants. The median PFS was also similar (26 and 30 months, respectively) for the both groups. With a median follow-up time for the survivors of 67.5 months, the median OS (78 and 75 months, respectively) did not differ between transplants with unselected and selected grafts. In conclusion, this nonrandomized study suggests that positive CD34(+) selection has no beneficial impact on long-term outcome of patients with MM.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of multiple myeloma: an evidence-based review

Evidence supporting the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published medical literature and for grading the quality of the evidence, the strength of the evidence, and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence presented in the review were made unanimously by a panel of MM experts. Recommendations for SCT as an effective therapy for MM include the following: SCT is preferred to standard chemotherapy as de novo therapy; SCT is preferred as de novo rather than salvage therapy; autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is preferred to bone marrow transplantation (BMT); and melphalan is preferred to melphalan plus total body irradiation as the conditioning regimen for autologous SCT. Recommendations that SCT is not effective include the following: current purging techniques of bone marrow. Recommendations of equivalence include the following: PBSCT using CD34+ selected or unselected stem cells. No recommendation is made for indications or transplantation techniques that have not been adequately studied, including the following: SCT versus standard chemotherapy as salvage therapy, tandem autologous SCT, autologous or allogeneic SCT as a high-dose sequential regimen, allogeneic BMT versus PBSCT, a preferred allogeneic myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning regimen, and maintenance therapy post-autologous SCT with interferon alpha post-SCT. The priority area of needed future research is maintenance therapy posttransplantation with nothing versus interferon alpha versus other agents such as corticosteroids or thalidomide or its derivatives.

Novel biologically based therapeutic strategies in myeloma

Multiple myeloma remains incurable despite advances in conventional chemotherapy and wider applicability of high dose chemotherapy with single and/or tandem autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although a complete remission rate of 41% and an event-free survival of 43 months have been reported after tandem transplantation, it is highly unlikely that further improvements in the outcome of multiple myeloma will be achieved by escalating cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. Novel biologically based therapies are therefore urgently required. Targeted therapeutic approaches based on: identification of genetic abnormalities in malignant plasma cells; interrupting growth of myeloma cells; triggering apoptotic signaling cascades in tumor cells; modulating growth and survival of multiple myeloma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment, i.e. angiogenesis and cytokine networks; enhancing allogeneic and autologous antimyeloma immunity; and characterizing newer myeloma antigens for serotherapy are under development. These therapies offer great promise, used alone/or in combination with conventional treatment approaches, to improve the outcome in this disease in newly diagnosed/refractory or relapsed patients with multiple myeloma.

Targeted therapy for multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable with conventional treatment approaches, and novel biologically based therapies are therefore urgently needed. Targeted therapies are either under development or already undergoing clinical evaluation predicated upon: identifying genetic abnormalities in myeloma cells to enhance chemoradiosensitivity; interrupting growth or triggering apoptotic signaling cascades in tumor cells; treating both the tumor cell and its microenvironment; enhancing allogeneic and autologous antimyeloma immunity; and characterizing new myeloma antigens for serotherapy. These therapies, alone or in combination with conventional treatments, offer great promise to improve the outcome for patients with MM.

High-dose melphalan with G-CSF-stimulated whole blood rescue followed by stem cell harvesting and busulphan/cyclophosphamide with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

In 90 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma, we investigated the feasibility of administering a tandem high-dose therapy regimen, using whole blood for rescue after the first and leucapheresis harvested between the two high doses, for rescue after the second high dose. After 5 days of G-CSF 1 litre of whole blood (WB) was obtained, left undisturbed at 4 degrees C and reinfused 24 h after HDM (140 mg/m(2)). Patients not in progression after 3-6 months were again mobilised, leucapheresed and treated with busulphan 16 mg/kg and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg (Bu/Cy) and reinfusion. In 90 patients, WB contained a mean (range) of 0.57 (0.02-3.22) x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. Recovery after HDM was in 13 days for granulocytes and in 18 days for platelets, with 11 patients not recovering within 3 months. There were three toxic deaths. Sixty-six patients qualified for harvesting after HDM. In the first 11, marrow was harvested. The subsequent 55 patients were mobilised and in 45 the preset minimum of 1.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells was obtained. Forty-nine patients actually received Bu/Cy. Recovery after Bu/Cy and marrow reinfusion was in 35 days for granulocytes and 20 days for platelets, with two of five patients not recovering after 3 months. After Bu/Cy and leucapheresis reinfusion, recovery was in 17 days for granulocytes and in 34 days for platelets. Nine patients did not recover within 3 months. There were four toxic deaths. The median overall survival from diagnosis for patients receiving HDM was 49 months and for patients also receiving Bu/Cy, 84 months. We conclude that WB rescue after HDM followed by leucapheresis and a second transplant is feasible in the majority of patients. Better mobilisation techniques are required to increase the number of patients who can receive the second transplant.

Peripheral blood monoclonal B-cells predict the event free survival in multiple myeloma

Reinfusion of myeloma progenitor cells may contribute to relapse of multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation. The aim of our study was to investigate whether monoclonal B-cells are present in the apheresis product and to evaluate the clinical relevance of these cells. Leukapheresis products of 55 patients were purged with anti-B-cell-Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) and immunobeads. Monoclonal B-cells were found in 85% of patients within the B-cell population. In one third of all myeloma patients, the majority of B-cells was represented by monoclonal myeloma progenitor B-cells, whereas in two thirds of patients monoclonal cells only represented a small part of the entire B-cell population. As shown by sequence analysis, monoclonal precursor B-cells and malignant plasma cells had the identical genetic CDR III sequence. The purging efficacy, using a negative selection system, was a median of 3 logs (range 1,5-3,5). No statistical difference in the purging efficacy was found when 3, 4 or 5 MoAbs against B-cells antigens were used. However, a tumor specific signal could be detected in the purged harvest of all patients, when the highly sensitive ASO-PCR approach was used. Furthermore, we found a direct correlation between the amount of remaining monoclonal cells after negative selection and the event free survival of myeloma patients. 10/15 patients with a median of 20 x 10(3) monoclonal cells in the purged product relapsed at a median of 1,4 years, whereas only 6/24 patients with an oligoclonal pattern including a low number of remaining monoclonal cells relapsed at a median of 2,2 years. The event free survival (EFS) was statistically different between the two groups (p = 0,014).

Multiple Myeloma: New Insights and Therapeutic Approaches

This review discusses the evolution of novel diagnostic and treatment strategies for multiple myeloma based upon increased understanding of basic disease pathogenesis. Although myeloma has remained an incurable illness to date, these new developments will derive treatments to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.

In Section I, Dr. Kyle reviews the results of current therapy for multiple myeloma, including high dose therapy and stem cell transplantation which have proven to achieve improved response rates, event-free, and overall survival. Supportive therapy, such as erythropoietin to treat disease-related anemia, and methods of prophylaxis against infection, which both lessen toxicities of treatment and improve quality of life for patients, are also addressed.

In Section II, Dr. Dalton with Drs. Landowski, Shain, Jove and Hazlehurst discusses mechanisms of drug resistance in myeloma, with emphasis on novel treatment approaches to prevent development of drug resistance and to overcome drug resistance. Laboratory studies delineating mechanisms whereby myeloma cells resist drug-induced apoptosis provide the framework for related treatment protocols for patients with refractory disease.

In Section III, Dr. Berenson reviews the management of complications in bone, which occur in the majority of patients with myeloma and are the major cause of decreased quality of life. New insights into the mediators of bone resorption and new bone formation in the marrow milieu have already derived effective bisphosphonate therapy. These drugs not only reduce bone complications and related pain, thereby improving quality of life, but also may have intrinsic anti-tumor activity by virtue of inducing tumor cell adherence to marrow, reducing interleukin-6 secretion, inducing tumor cell apoptosis, or inhibiting angiogenesis.

In the last section, Dr. Anderson explores the potential for future therapies which offer great promise to improve patient outcomes. First, drugs which alter the marrow microenvironment include thalidomide and its derivative immunomodulatory drugs, which act directly on tumor cells to induce apoptosis or G1 growth arrest, alter tumor cell adhesion to marrow stroma, inhibit angiogenesis, and trigger a cellular anti-tumor response. The proteasome inhibitors both act directly on tumor cells and also inhibit the transcription factor NFκB-dependent upregulation of IL-6 secretion triggered by tumor cell adhesion. Second, delineation of both growth and apoptotic pathways has derived novel treatment strategies. Third, the preclinical basis and early clinical trial results using vaccination and adoptive immunotherapy to harness autoimmune and alloimmune anti-myeloma responses are presented. This review sets the stage for an evolving new biologically based treatment paradigm in myeloma targeting both the tumor and its microenvironment to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.

Multiple Myeloma: New Insights and Therapeutic Approaches

This review discusses the evolution of novel diagnostic and treatment strategies for multiple myeloma based upon increased understanding of basic disease pathogenesis. Although myeloma has remained an incurable illness to date, these new developments will derive treatments to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.

In Section I, Dr. Kyle reviews the results of current therapy for multiple myeloma, including high dose therapy and stem cell transplantation which have proven to achieve improved response rates, event-free, and overall survival. Supportive therapy, such as erythropoietin to treat disease-related anemia, and methods of prophylaxis against infection, which both lessen toxicities of treatment and improve quality of life for patients, are also addressed.

In Section II, Dr. Dalton with Drs. Landowski, Shain, Jove and Hazlehurst discusses mechanisms of drug resistance in myeloma, with emphasis on novel treatment approaches to prevent development of drug resistance and to overcome drug resistance. Laboratory studies delineating mechanisms whereby myeloma cells resist drug-induced apoptosis provide the framework for related treatment protocols for patients with refractory disease.

In Section III, Dr. Berenson reviews the management of complications in bone, which occur in the majority of patients with myeloma and are the major cause of decreased quality of life. New insights into the mediators of bone resorption and new bone formation in the marrow milieu have already derived effective bisphosphonate therapy. These drugs not only reduce bone complications and related pain, thereby improving quality of life, but also may have intrinsic anti-tumor activity by virtue of inducing tumor cell adherence to marrow, reducing interleukin-6 secretion, inducing tumor cell apoptosis, or inhibiting angiogenesis.

In the last section, Dr. Anderson explores the potential for future therapies which offer great promise to improve patient outcomes. First, drugs which alter the marrow microenvironment include thalidomide and its derivative immunomodulatory drugs, which act directly on tumor cells to induce apoptosis or G1 growth arrest, alter tumor cell adhesion to marrow stroma, inhibit angiogenesis, and trigger a cellular anti-tumor response. The proteasome inhibitors both act directly on tumor cells and also inhibit the transcription factor NFκB-dependent upregulation of IL-6 secretion triggered by tumor cell adhesion. Second, delineation of both growth and apoptotic pathways has derived novel treatment strategies. Third, the preclinical basis and early clinical trial results using vaccination and adoptive immunotherapy to harness autoimmune and alloimmune anti-myeloma responses are presented. This review sets the stage for an evolving new biologically based treatment paradigm in myeloma targeting both the tumor and its microenvironment to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.

The relationship between monoclonal myeloma precursor B cells in the peripheral blood stem cell harvests and the clinical response of multiple myeloma patients

The aim of this study was to determine the presence of monoclonal myeloma precursor B cells in peripheral blood stem cell harvests and to investigate their role in the clinical outcome of multiple myeloma patients. A total of 39 multiple myeloma patients were treated with a sequential therapy including double high-dose melphalan therapy followed by a double transplant procedure. The apheresis products for the second transplant were purged using a panel of four or five different mouse monoclonal antibodies against B-cell antigens (CD10, CD19, CD20, CD22 and CD37). In 19/39 patients a tumour-specific CDR III signal was identified in the diagnostic bone marrow. Gene scan analysis after CDR III PCR of the magnetic bead isolated B-cell fraction from the apheresis products in these 19 patients revealed three different patterns: 32% of patients had a predominantly monoclonal B-cell population; 63% of patients had an identifiable monoclonal signal within an oligoclonal B-cell population. In only 1/19 patients were no monoclonal B cells identified in the B-cell population of the apheresis product. A correlation between the clonal pattern and the clinical response after sequential chemotherapy was found. Patients with a predominance of monoclonal myeloma or myeloma precursor B cells had an early relapse or achieved a minimal response or a partial remission. Patients with an oligo- and/or polyclonal pattern achieved a high percentage of partial as well as complete remissions.

Adenovirus Vector-Based Purging of Multiple Myeloma Cells

Adenoviruses are efficient gene delivery agents for a variety of neoplasms. In the present study, we have investigated the use of adenoviruses for the delivery of the thymidine kinase(tk) gene into multiple myeloma (MM) cells. We first demonstrated that MM cell lines and MM patient cells express both adenovirus receptors as well as the DF3/MUC1 protein, thus providing a rationale for using adenoviruses to selectively deliver genes under the control of the DF3 promoter. By using an adenoviral construct containing β-galactosidase (β-gal) gene driven by the DF3 promoter (Ad.DF3-βgal), we demonstrate greater than 80% transduction efficiency in OCI-My5 and RPMI 8226 MM cell lines at a multiplicity of infection of 1 to 100. Importantly, transduction with the tk gene driven by the DF3 promoter (Ad.DF3-tk)followed by treatment with 50 μmol/L ganciclovir (GCV) purged ≥6 log of contaminating OCI-My5 and RPMI 8226 MM cells within bone marrow mononuclear cells. In contrast, normal human hematopoietic progenitor cell number was unaffected under these conditions. Selectivity of DF3/MUC1 promoter was further confirmed, because Ad.DF3-βgalor Ad.DF3-tk did not transduce MUC1-negative HeLa cervical carcinoma cells. In addition, GCV treatment of Ad.DF3-tk–transduced RPMI 8226 MM cells did not induce a significant bystander effect. These findings demonstrate that transduction with Ad vectors using a tumor-selective promoter provides a highly efficient and selective approach for the ex vivo purging of MM cells.

Adenovirus Vector-Based Purging of Multiple Myeloma Cells

Adenoviruses are efficient gene delivery agents for a variety of neoplasms. In the present study, we have investigated the use of adenoviruses for the delivery of the thymidine kinase(tk) gene into multiple myeloma (MM) cells. We first demonstrated that MM cell lines and MM patient cells express both adenovirus receptors as well as the DF3/MUC1 protein, thus providing a rationale for using adenoviruses to selectively deliver genes under the control of the DF3 promoter. By using an adenoviral construct containing β-galactosidase (β-gal) gene driven by the DF3 promoter (Ad.DF3-βgal), we demonstrate greater than 80% transduction efficiency in OCI-My5 and RPMI 8226 MM cell lines at a multiplicity of infection of 1 to 100. Importantly, transduction with the tk gene driven by the DF3 promoter (Ad.DF3-tk)followed by treatment with 50 μmol/L ganciclovir (GCV) purged ≥6 log of contaminating OCI-My5 and RPMI 8226 MM cells within bone marrow mononuclear cells. In contrast, normal human hematopoietic progenitor cell number was unaffected under these conditions. Selectivity of DF3/MUC1 promoter was further confirmed, because Ad.DF3-βgalor Ad.DF3-tk did not transduce MUC1-negative HeLa cervical carcinoma cells. In addition, GCV treatment of Ad.DF3-tk–transduced RPMI 8226 MM cells did not induce a significant bystander effect. These findings demonstrate that transduction with Ad vectors using a tumor-selective promoter provides a highly efficient and selective approach for the ex vivo purging of MM cells.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder with a median survival of three years. Despite the development of numerous conventional chemotherapy regimens and interferons, there has been little progress in improving the survival of patients with MM. Very high-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can result in high complete remission rates, even in patients with advanced disease. METHODS: A prospective, randomized study has shown that autologous HSCT results in superior response rates, progression-free survival, and disease-free survival compared with conventional chemotherapy. This is the first real advance in the treatment of this disease in 30 years. Unfortunately, few, if any, patients with MM who receive autologous HSCT are cured. RESULTS: Allogeneic HSCT can be curative for a fraction of patients with MM. However, very high transplant-related morbidity and mortality limit the application of allografts to younger patients with compatible donors. CONCLUSIONS: Challenges for the future include the development of less intensive or more disease-specific chemotherapy regimens that preserve the antitumor activity but are less toxic, improvement in the control of graft-vs-host disease in the case of allografts and, for autologous graft recipients, the development of vaccines and cytotoxic lymphocytes to augment a graft vs myeloma effect.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy (with or without total body irradiation) followed by allogenic marrow transplantation is curative for some patients with advanced multiple myeloma. A relatively high transplant-related mortality, however, limits the wider application of this approach. The challenge for future studies will be to develop less toxic preparative regimens, more efficient ways to prevent infection and graft-versus-host disease, and methods to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect of allografts.

The contribution of animal models to the development of treatments for hematologic recovery following myeloablative therapy: a review

This review describes the role that animal models have played in the development of clinical procedures for growth factor and hematopoietic cell therapies following high-dose cancer chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both. Data are discussed describing animal models that add to the understanding of human hematopoiesis, including myeloid and lymphoid lineage localization and in vivo maturation. Finally, current animal models of cytokine and cell therapies are presented in the context of their contributions to early clinical trials and future therapies. These studies underscore the past and current contributions animal investigations have made to improving clinical therapies.

Multiple Myeloma: An Overview in 1996

Multiple myeloma (MM) has an incidence of approximately four per 100,000 per year. Ninety-nine percent of patients with MM have a monoclonal (M-) protein in the serum or urine during the course of their disease. MM must be differentiated from smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), which has an M-protein value of more than 30 g/l and more than 10% plasma cells in the bone marrow, but no other features of MM. The plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) and the presence of circulating plasma cells in the peripheral blood help to differentiate monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and SMM from MM. The current median duration of survival with chemotherapy is about three years. Patients with low PCLI and low β2-microglobulin values have a median duration of survival of approximately six years. Melphalan and prednisone produce an objective response in 50% to 60% of patients. Combinations of chemotherapy produce a higher response rate, but the survival rate is not different. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is associated with a mortality rate of 25% within six months and an actuarial survival rate of 28% at seven years. Autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation is applicable to more patients and is reported to produce a higher response rate and longer survival than chemotherapy, but most patients will eventually have relapse.