Perinatal outcomes in oocyte donor pregnancies

Pre-eclampsia in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation, natural conception or IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

What is the prevalence of pre-eclampsia (PE) in pregnancies after oocyte donation (OD) compared to natural conception (NC) and to IVF with autologous oocytes (AO)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Overall the prevalence of PE after OD was 4-5 times higher than after NC and 2-3 times higher than after IVF with AO.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The indication for OD is expanding to lesbian women requesting shared lesbian motherhood. Previous reviews have shown that the risk of PE is higher in pregnancies after OD than after NC and after IVF with AO. Classification on the severity of PE is lacking as is the relationship with known risk factors such as maternal age and multiple gestations. Furthermore the actual prevalence of PE in pregnancies resulting from OD is not known.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL, OpenGrey and Greynet from January 1980 through July 2020.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We included retrospective and prospective cohort studies. The study population consisted of pregnancies after OD and NC or IVF and data had to be available about prevalence of PE. We compared the risk of (severe) PE in OD versus NC and IVF pregnancies, subgrouped by plurality and maternal age. We calculated individual and pooled odds ratios (OR) and prevalence estimates with 95% CI using a random effect model, while heterogeneity was assessed by the I2.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 27 studies comprising of 7089 OD pregnancies, 1 139 540 NC pregnancies and 72 742 IVF pregnancies were available for analysis. The risks of PE and severe PE was increased in OD pregnancies compared to NC pregnancies (pooled OR of all subgroups: 5.09, 95% CI: 4.29-6.04; I2 = 19% and OR: 7.42, 95% CI: 4.64-11.88; I2 = 49%, respectively). This suggests that compared to a PE risk of 2.9% with NC, the risk with OD was between 11.5% and 15.4%. Compared to a severe PE risk of 0.5% with NC, the risk with OD was between 2.3% and 5.6%. The pooled adjusted OR for PE was 3.24 (95% 2.74-3.83) for OD versus NC pregnancies. The risks of PE and severe PE were also increased in OD pregnancies compared to IVF pregnancies (pooled OR of all subgroups: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.49-3.53; I2 = 51% and OR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.15-4.11; I2 = 0%, respectively). This suggests that compared to a PE risk of 5.9% with IVF, the risk with OD was between 13.5% and 18.0%. Compared to a severe PE risk of 3.3% with IVF, the risk with OD was between 6.8% and 12.2%. The pooled adjusted OR for PE was 2.67 (95% 2.28-3.13) for OD versus IVF. The pooled prevalence of PE in singleton pregnancies after OD was 10.7% (95% CI 6.6-15.5) compared to 2.0% (95% CI 1.0-3.1) after NC and 4.1% (95% CI 2.7-5.6) after IVF. The prevalence in multiple pregnancies was 27.8% (95% CI 23.6-32.2) after OD, 7.5% (95% CI 7.2-7.8) after NC and 9.7% (95% CI 6.2-13.9) after IVF.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The precise definition of PE is still a matter of debate. The different criteria could have affected the prevalence estimate.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Nearly one in six women will suffer PE after OD. Although it is uncertain whether these risks are consistent for lesbian couples undergoing shared motherhood, we feel that women who can conceive naturally could be advised to reconsider. In women with primary ovarian insufficiency, we feel that factors that may increase risk of PE ever further, such as double embryo transfer, should be avoided whenever possible.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding or competing interests.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020166899.

Abnormal placental pathological findings and adverse clinical outcomes of oocyte donation

We sought to assess chronic inflammatory responses in patients who achieved pregnancy by oocyte donation and non-oocyte donation-assisted reproductive technology and delivered at The Ottawa Hospital. Data describing maternal health, obstetrical outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and placental pathology were collected and analyzed from electronic medical records. An increased frequency of adverse obstetrical outcomes was observed. In the oocyte donation-assisted reproductive technology group, placental pathology data demonstrated increased frequency of fetal vascular malperfusion (p = 0.02) and placenta accreta (p < 0.001), representing a chronic inflammatory response. Placental pathology reflecting dysregulated immune processes and vasculopathy is associated with oocyte donation.

Self-reported physical health status of donor sperm-conceived adults

Donor-conceived neonates have poorer birth outcomes, including low birth weight and preterm delivery that are associated with poorer long-term health in adulthood through the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) theory. The aim of this study was to conduct the first investigation of the adult health outcomes of donor-conceived people. An online health survey was completed by 272 donor sperm-conceived adults and 877 spontaneously conceived adults from around the world. Donor and spontaneously conceived groups were matched for age, sex, height, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, own fertility and maternal smoking. Donor sperm-conceived adults had significantly higher reports of being diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (P = 0.031), thyroid disease (P = 0.031), acute bronchitis (P = 0.008), environmental allergies (P = 0.046), sleep apnoea (P = 0.037) and having ear tubes/grommets surgically implanted (P = 0.046). This is the first study to investigate the health outcomes of adult donor sperm-conceived people. Donor sperm-conceived adults self-reported elevated frequencies of various health conditions. The outcomes are consistent with birth defect data from donor sperm treatment and are consistent with the DOHaD linking perturbed early growth and chronic disease in adulthood.

Impact of oocyte donation on obstetric and perinatal complications in twin pregnancies

Aim: To evaluate obstetric and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies obtained after in vitro fertilization with donated oocytes.Methods: This is a case-control study comparing 50 women with twin pregnancies after oocyte donation (OD) and 50 women after in vitro fertilization with autologous oocytes. Clinical records were reviewed and obstetric and perinatal outcome variables including rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm delivery, premature rupture of membranes, cesarean delivery, birth weight, Apgar score, pH test were compared.Results: Women in the OD group were significantly older than those in the AO group (mean 40.8 versus 36 years old, p < .001). There were a higher risk of preeclampsia (OD 24% versus AO 8%), cesarean delivery (OD 90% versus AO 66%), and preterm birth before 37 weeks (OD 52% versus AO 32%). After adjustment for maternal age, only the risk of preterm birth remained significantly higher (OR 3.2 (1.15-8.86); p = .025). Comparing neonatal outcomes, there were no differences in birth weight, pH or Apgar score at birth.Conclusions: Twin pregnancies after OD are associated with a higher risk of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation. However, this did not translate into increased rate of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Risk of Lower Birth Weight and Shorter Gestation in Oocyte Donation Pregnancies Compared With Other Assisted Reproductive Technology Methods: Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Oocyte donation (OD) is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension, but the evidence of an association between OD and infant outcomes, including birth weight and gestational age, is conflicting. This study sought to determine the associations between oocyte donation and birth weight or gestational age compared with other forms of autologous oocyte assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the CENTRAL Trials Registry of the Cochrane Collaboration were searched using a comprehensive search strategy. Studies of women over 24 weeks gestation compared infant outcomes among OD pregnancies versus other ART. Study quality was assessed, and a meta-analysis of mean birth weight and gestational age was conducted using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included. Four studies showed a significant association between OD and lower birth weights, and five studies found significant differences in gestational age between OD and autologous oocyte ART. The pooled difference in birth weight means between OD and autologous ART was -42 (-88, 4) . The pooled difference in gestational age was -0.4 weeks (-0.8, 0.0 weeks).

CONCLUSION

A high degree of interstudy heterogeneity exists, and the association between OD and infant outcomes remains unclear.

Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus following assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis of 59 cohort studies

OBJECTIVE

The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in previous studies, but its risk has not been consistent. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the risk of GDM in women who conceived with ART via a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

METHODS

ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched to identify studies that evaluated the risk of GDM through May 2017 using the relevant keywords. Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model.

RESULTS

The search yielded 957 records relating to GDM and use of ART, from which 59 eligible cohorts were selected for meta-analysis (n = 96,785). There was evidence of substantial heterogeneity among these studies (χ₍₅₈₎² = 3072.34, p < .001; I²=98.1%). The pooled estimate of GDM risk using the random effects model was 9.00% (95% CI: 7.90-10.20). Visual inspection of the funnel plot indicated the presence of low publication bias, but Egger's test did not reveal publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings revealed that the risk of GDM was very high among women who conceived with ART treatment. GDM screening, management, and improved care are vital in ART pregnancy.

Postpartum hemorrhage: not only hypertensive disorders in oocyte donation pregnancies

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to compare the obstetric outcome between single pregnancies obtained by medically-assisted procreation using oocyte donors (MAP-E) versus homologous gametes (MAP-O) and single spontaneous conception pregnancies (SC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study on pregnancy outcome of consecutive singleton live birth pregnancies from MAP-E between January 2011 and August 2017 referred to Careggi University Hospital, Florence. The control group includes singleton pregnancies from MAP-O and pregnancies from spontaneous conceptions in the same period. The pregnancy outcomes considered were: postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), cesarean section (CS), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders including preeclampsia (HDP), preterm birth ≤34 weeks (PTB), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses.

RESULTS

The study group included 290 MAP-E pregnancies that were compared with 290 MAP-O and 870 singleton spontaneous conception pregnancies. The three groups did not show significant differences in maternal traits except for mean age (43.4±2.9 vs. 37.7±2.4 vs. 33.6±5.5, P<0.001), including a higher percentage of patients over 45 years (41.3% vs. 5% vs. 0.8%, P<0.001) and higher incidence of obesity (7.2% vs. 1.7%, P=0.02) in MAP-E than in MAP-O. The risk of HDP is increased in singleton pregnancies by oocyte donation with a significantly increased risk if compared to MAP-O (12% vs. 1%, P<0.001, OR=12.6). The risk of PPH in singleton pregnancies from oocyte donation is higher than in MAP-O (22% vs. 9% P<0.0001, OR=2.87). When we considered severe PPH (blood loss >1000 mL) the risk for MAP-E was higher if compared to MAP-O (OR=2.1, P=0.2) and mostly to SC (OR=14, P<0.005). Compared to SC, MAP-E pregnancies showed increased OR for all the outcomes: CS (78% vs. 30.8%, P<0.001, OR=7.91); GDM (26.1% vs. 10.8%, P<0.001, OR=2.92); HDP (12% vs. 2.2%, P<0.001, OR=5.99); PPH (22% vs. 8.5%, P<0.0001, OR=3.0); SGA (16% vs. 11%, P<0.05, OR=1.16); PTB ≤34 weeks (9.4% vs. 1%, P<0.001, OR=7.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Most women who undergo MAP-E are in advanced age, representing a high-risk population for obstetric complications, like HPD and PPH, which stands as the main worldwide cause of maternal mortality.

Risk of preeclampsia following assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis of 72 cohort studies

Objective: Previous studies have indicated that women with assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy have an increased risk of preeclampsia. The aim of this current study was to estimate, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, the risk of preeclampsia in women who conceived with ART.Materials and methods: We searched ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline/PubMed, Scopus and Embase up to August 2017 for English-language articles pertaining to risk of preeclampsia in ART pregnancy using standard keywords. Data extraction was conducted by two authors and quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.Results: In total, 72 cohort studies (n = 164 870) were included. The results of Cochran test and I² statistic indicated considerable heterogeneity among studies (Q = 15 415.61, df = 71, p < .001, I²=99.5%). The pooled estimate of preeclampsia risk using the random effects model was 10.8% (95% CI: 9.10-12.5). Furthermore, the funnel plot and Begg's test showed evidence of publication bias.Conclusions: We found that the risk of preeclampsia was very high among women who conceived with ART. Women should be counseled carefully before undergoing ART treatment.

Risk of preeclampsia in pregnancies resulting from double gamete donation and from oocyte donation alone

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancies after gamete donation are at higher risk of developing pre-eclampsia (PE) than those achieved by IVF with patient's own gametes. We aim to assess whether pregnancies achieved with both oocyte and sperm donation (double donation, DD) are at an increased risk of developing PE and gestational hypertension (GH) compared to those achieved by oocyte donation alone (OD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 433 patients who reached the 20th week of gestation with either DD (n = 81) or OD (n = 352) between March 2013 and April 2016 at a fertility clinic. The risk of preterm PE, term PE, and gestational hypertension (GH) are presented as unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

DD have a higher risk of preterm PE than OD, with an OR of 3.02 (95%CI 1.11-8.24; p = 0.031). We found no difference in the risk of term PE (OR 0.26, 95%CI 0.03-1.98; p = 0.19) or of GH (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.63-2.43; p = 0.55).

DISCUSSION

Pregnancies with DD are at higher risk of developing preterm PE than OD alone. Patients, and physicians treating them, should be made aware of the elevated risk of PE in these gestations, in order to start prophylactic measures during the first weeks of pregnancy.

Pregnancy Achieved Using Donor Eggs in Cancer Survivors with Treatment-Induced Ovarian Failure: Obstetric and Perinatal Outcome

BACKGROUND

Egg donation is a common fertility treatment in female cancer survivors with reproductive wish and iatrogenic ovarian failure. We examined whether women previously treated for cancer have a higher risk of pregnancy complications after egg donation treatments when compared to women without cancer history.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort treated during 2003-2015 at a single center, 31 women with previous history of cancer achieved 25 deliveries and 212 women without cancer history achieved 244 deliveries. All egg donor treatments were performed with a strict policy of single embryo transfer to reduce pregnancy and perinatal complications. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with adjustment for relevant confounders, to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for perinatal and obstetric outcomes. Women without previous history of cancer were used as the reference group in the regression models.

RESULTS

Women with a history of cancer presented with a significantly increased risk of pregnancy complications, including preterm birth (aOR 5.54, 95% CI 2.01-15.31) and preeclampsia (aOR 2.79, 95% CI 1.07-7.34), compared to women without cancer history.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that the risks of preterm birth and preeclampsia in women with prior cancers who become pregnant by egg donor treatment significantly exceed those of women without cancer history undergoing similar treatments. As pregnancies using donor eggs are already acknowledged of higher risk for hypertensive pathologies, this study alerts toward characterization of specific increased risks in women who are cancer survivors to provide adapted pregnancy monitoring.

Is the risk of preeclampsia higher in donor oocyte pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Preeclampsia (PE) occurs in 4.6% of pregnancies worldwide. The social phenomenon of increasing maternal age has raised the demand for donor oocytes. Egg donation has allowed women with poor ovarian reserve, premature ovarian failure, genetic disorders or surgical menopause to get pregnant. Recipients provide a unique model of immune response because of the differences in the genetic makeup of mothers and fetuses. In PE, immune tolerance may be impaired as a result of having non-autologous eggs implanted. Egg donation is a highly successful assisted reproductive technology, despite the significant number of issues arising from the implantation of non-autologous eggs. This study aimed to determine whether there is an association between egg donation and preeclampsia.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature available in PubMed and Google Scholar was carried out from January of 1995 to August of 2016 using the terms 'oocyte donation, preeclampsia', 'oocyte donation, in vitro fertilization, preeclampsia', 'oocyte donation, preeclampsia, outcomes pregnancies', 'oocyte donation, obstetric outcome.' Only six retrospective cohort studies met the selection criteria.

Result

The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant association between egg donation and onset of preeclampsia (OR 4.50; 95% CI: 3.28-6.19; p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Oocyte donation is associated with increased risk of preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies. Therefore, it is crucial to properly record and assess this finding when egg donation is the chosen assisted reproductive technology to attain pregnancy.

Comparison of Obstetric Outcomes of Pregnancies after Donor-Oocyte In vitro Fertilization and Self-Oocyte In vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Aims:

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare multiple obstetric and perinatal outcomes between donor-oocyte in vitro fertilization (IVF) and self-oocyte IVF group.

Settings and Design:

This study was done in a tertiary care center with ART unit. This was a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Materials and Methods:

The present study comprised all women between 20 and 45 years who conceived from oocyte donation (n = 78) between December 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, and compared with all women who underwent self-oocyte IVF (n = 112). The process involved controlled ovarian stimulation and retrieval of the donor oocytes, preparation of recipient endometrium, and pregnancy management. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were compared.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Analysis for confounding variables was performed using multivariable linear and logistic regression analysis.

Results:

Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. Miscarriage, first-trimester bleeding, pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), and gestational diabetes mellitus were significantly higher in donor-oocyte IVF group compared to self-oocyte cycles (P = 0.001). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, age class adjusted PIH incidence was significantly higher in donor-oocyte group as compared to self-oocyte group (P = 0.010). There was no significant variation in perinatal outcomes between the donor- and self-oocyte IVF cycles (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Oocyte donation should be treated as an independent risk factor for PIH.

Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation: a cohort study in Sweden

Background

Pregnancies resulting through oocyte donation have been associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes for the mother, such as gestational hypertensive disorders. However, little is known about possible neonatal complications of such pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neonatal health outcomes among singleton pregnancies in a population of relatively young and healthy oocyte recipients in Sweden, taking into account the medical indication leading to treatment.

Methods

This cohort study involved 76 women conceiving with donated oocytes, 149 age-matched nulliparous women conceiving spontaneously and 63 women conceiving after non-donor IVF. Participants were recruited during 2005–2008 and followed up until delivery. Data on neonatal outcomes were retrieved from the National Birth Medical Register and the medical records of oocyte recipients from seven Swedish University Hospitals with IVF clinics. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association of mode of conception and neonatal outcomes, adjusted for maternal age and BMI, gestational age and delivery by cesarean section.

Results

Infants conceived through oocyte donation had higher odds for premature delivery [OR 2.36, 95 % CI (1.02–5.45)], for being small for gestational age [OR 4.23, 95 % CI (1.03–17.42)] and having Apgar score below 7 at 5 min [OR 10.57, 95 % CI (1.21–92.20)] compared to spontaneously conceived infants. Similar trends were observed when comparing infants conceived through oocyte donation to those conceived by traditional IVF. Furthermore, donor oocyte infants had a lower mean birthweight and length compared to autologous oocyte neonates (p = 0.013); however no differences were noted among infants born at term. Neonatal outcomes were more favorable among women with diminished ovarian reserve compared to those with other indications for oocyte donation.

Conclusions

Infants conceived after oocyte donation in Sweden have higher odds of being born prematurely and having lower mean birthweight in comparison to non-donor infants.

It seems that these unfavorable neonatal outcomes are present despite the age, weight and health restrictions applied to recipients before oocyte donation treatment in Sweden.

Placenta accreta following hysteroscopic myomectomy

Hardly any report exists on the influence of hysteroscopic myomectomy on subsequent pregnancy. Placenta accreta is most often associated with placenta previa in women with multiple prior cesarean sections. We report the first case of placenta accreta without placenta previa during the first pregnancy subsequent to hysteroscopic myomectomy.

Oocyte donation pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: a systematic review and metaanalysis

The purpose of this study was to determine whether pregnancies that were achieved via oocyte donation, compared with pregnancies achieved via other assisted reproductive technology methods or natural conception, demonstrate increased risk of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension. Comparative studies of pregnancies that were achieved with oocyte donation vs other methods of assisted reproductive technology or natural conception with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension were included as 1 of the measured outcomes. Abstracts and unpublished studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently selected studies, which were assessed for quality with the use of methodological index for non-randomized studies, and extracted the data. Statistical analysis was conducted. Of the 523 studies that were reviewed initially, 19 comparative studies met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the metaanalysis, which allowed for analysis of a total of 86,515 pregnancies. Our pooled data demonstrated that the risk of preeclampsia is higher in oocyte-donation pregnancies compared with other methods of assisted reproductive technology (odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.24; P < .0001) or natural conception (odds ratio, 4.34; 95% confidence interval, 3.10-6.06; P < .0001). The risk of gestational hypertension was also increased significantly in oocyte donation pregnancies in comparison with other methods of assisted reproductive technology (odds ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.44-3.70; P < .0001) or natural conception (odds ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-36.36; P = .008). Subgroup analysis that was conducted for singleton and multiple gestations demonstrated a similar risk for preeclampsia and gestational hypertension in both singleton and multiple gestations. This metaanalysis provides further evidence that supports that egg donation increases the risk of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension compared with other assisted reproductive technology methods or natural conception.

Twin pregnancy in a 51-year-old woman who underwent autologous cryopreservation at the age of 36 years: case report

Climacteric women are able to become pregnant using oocytes donated earlier in life. However, adverse effects on such donated oocytes have been identified. We report a case of a successful dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy achieved using autologous fertilized cryopreserved oocytes in a climacteric woman. A 51-year-old woman became pregnant using autologous fertilized oocytes that had been frozen for 15 years. On her first visit, multiple leiomyoma of the uterus and gestational diabetes mellitus were diagnosed, and proteinuria began to appear at 30 weeks. In spite of our concerns these complications did not exacerbate and the clinical course for both mother and neonates was favorable. This is the first report of a live twin birth achieved using autologous cryopreserved oocytes in a climacteric woman. This case report may be of value to women who desire postponement of their infertility treatment and the professional assisted reproduction community.

Obstetric and perinatal complications in an oocyte donation programme. Is it time to limit the number of embryos to transfer?

The aim of this study is to describe obstetric and perinatal complications in pregnancies from oocyte donation (OD) cycles, delivering in our centre and to determine the impact of maternal age. Retrospective observational study of a 225 singleton pregnancies, 113 multiple pregnancies and 447 live birth. Pearson's χ(2) test or Fisher's exact test were used for the statistical analysis. A higher incidence of obstetric complications was observed in multiple compared to singleton pregnancies with regard to preeclampsia (24.8% versus 8%), premature rupture of membranes (9.7% versus 1.8%), preterm delivery at <37 weeks (54.9% versus 10.2%) and caesarean section (81.4% versus 64%) (p < 0.05). If the age factor is added, the caesarean sections are higher in the single pregnancy group aged ≥40 years than in the group of <40 years (73.5% versus 49.4%) (p < 0.05). A higher incidence is found in multiple versus singleton pregnancies for low birth weight (<2500 g) (61.1% versus 8.2%), admissions to the intensive care unit (15.2% versus 4.7%) and perinatal mortality (13.5‰ versus 0‰) (p < 0.05). It is necessary to consider preconception counselling prior to an OD cycle to inform patients about the incidence complications observed and recommend to transfer only a single embryo.

A meta-analysis of neonatal health outcomes from oocyte donation

Donated oocytes are a treatment modality for female infertility which is also associated with increased risks of preeclampsia. Subsequently it is important to evaluate if there is concomitant increased risks for adverse neonatal events in donated oocyte neonates. A structured search of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews was performed to investigate the perinatal health outcomes of offspring conceived from donor oocytes compared with autologous oocytes. Meta-analysis was performed on comparable outcomes data. Twenty-eight studies were eligible and included in the review, and of these, 23 were included in a meta-analysis. Donor oocyte neonates are at increased risk of being born with low birth weight (<2500 g) [risk ratio (RR): 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14–1.22, P-value (P)<0.00001], very low birth weight (<1500 g) (RR: 1.24, CI: 1.15–1.35, P<0.00001), preterm (<37 weeks) (RR: 1.26, CI: 1.23–1.30, P<0.00001), of lower gestational age (mean difference −0.3 weeks, CI: −0.35 weeks to −0.25 weeks, P<0.00001), and preterm with low birth weight (RR: 1.24, CI: 1.19–1.29, P<0.00001), when compared with autologous oocyte neonates. Conversely, low birth weight outcomes were improved in term donor oocyte neonates (RR: 0.86, CI: 0.8–0.93, P=0.0003). These negative outcomes remained significant when controlling for multiple deliveries. The donor oocyte risk rates are higher than those found in general ART outcomes, are important considerations for the counselling of infertile patients and may also influence the long term health of the offspring.

Association between gamete source, exposure and preeclampsia: A review of literature

Preeclampsia complicates 3%-5% of pregnancies and is one of the major causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. The pathologic mechanisms are well described but despite decades of research, the exact etiology of preeclampsia remains poorly understood. For years it was believed that the etiology of preeclampsia was the result of maternal factors, but recent evidence suggests that preeclampsia may be a couple specific disease where the interplay between both female and male factors plays an important role. Recent studies have suggested a complex etiologic mechanism that includes genetic imprinting, immune maladaptation, placental ischemia and generalized endothelial dysfunction. The immunological hypothesis suggests exaggerated maternal response against fetal antigens. While the role of maternal exposure to new paternal antigens in the development of preeclampsia was the initial focus of research in this area, studies examining pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies from donor oocytes provide intriguingly similar findings. The pregnancies that resulted from male or female donor gametes or donor embryos bring new insight into the role of immune response to new antigens in pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The primary goal of the current review is the role of exposure to new gametes on the development of preeclampsia. The objective was therefore to provide a review of current literature on the role of cohabitation length, semen exposure and gamete source in development of preeclampsia.

Obstetric and perinatal outcome of babies born from vitrified oocytes

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes after oocyte vitrification on obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared with those achieved with fresh oocytes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Private university-affiliated IVF center.

PATIENT(S)

Children born after use of vitrified oocytes (1,027 from 804 pregnancies) and fresh oocytes (1,224 from 996 pregnancies). Singleton and multiples pregnancies from own and donated ova were included.

INTERVENTION(S)

Oocyte vitrification by the Cryotop method.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULT(S)

Vitrification had no clinically relevant adverse effects on obstetric and perinatal outcomes after adjusting for potential confounders. No differences were found between the vitrified and fresh oocyte groups in the rate of obstetric problems (including diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm birth, anemia, and cholestasis), gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores, birth defects, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (ICU), perinatal mortality, and puerperal problems. Only a greater number of invasive procedures (adjusted odds ratio 2.12; 95% confidence interval 1.41-3.20), and a reduced occurrence of urinary tract infection (adjusted odds ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.91), were observed in the vitrified oocytes group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Although our data, the largest series to date, suggest that oocyte vitrification does not increase adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in children conceived with vitrified oocytes, further studies with larger samples are required to reinforce our conclusions.

Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010

IMPORTANCE

The prevalence of oocyte donation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) has increased in the United States, but little information is available regarding maternal or infant outcomes to improve counseling and clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify trends in donor oocyte cycles in the United States and to determine predictors of a good perinatal outcome among IVF cycles using fresh (noncryopreserved) embryos derived from donor oocytes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Analysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National ART Surveillance System, to which fertility centers are mandated to report and which includes data on more than 95% of all IVF cycles performed in the United States. Data from 2000 to 2010 described trends. Data from 2010 determined predictors.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Good perinatal outcome, defined as a singleton live-born infant delivered at 37 weeks or later and weighing 2500 g or more.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2010, data from 443 clinics (93% of all US fertility centers) were included. The annual number of donor oocyte cycles significantly increased, from 10,801 to 18,306. Among all donor oocyte cycles, an increasing trend was observed from 2000 to 2010 in the proportion of cycles using frozen (vs fresh) embryos (26.7% [95% CI, 25.8%-27.5%] to 40.3% [95% CI, 39.6%-41.1%]) and elective single-embryo transfers (vs transfer of multiple embryos) (0.8% [95% CI, 0.7%-1.0%] to 14.5% [95% CI, 14.0%-15.1%]). Good perinatal outcomes increased from 18.5% (95% CI, 17.7%-19.3%) to 24.4% (95% CI, 23.8%-25.1%) (P < .001 for all listed trends). Mean donor and recipient ages remained stable at 28 (SD, 2.8) years and 41 (SD, 5.3) years, respectively. In 2010, 396 clinics contributed data. For donor oocyte cycles using fresh embryos (n = 9865), 27.5% (95% CI, 26.6%-28.4%) resulted in good perinatal outcome. Transfer of an embryo at day 5 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.04-1.32]) and elective single-embryo transfers (adjusted OR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.92-2.80]) were positively associated with good perinatal outcome; tubal (adjusted OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60-0.86]) or uterine (adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.94]) factor infertility and non-Hispanic black recipient race/ethnicity (adjusted OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.67]) were associated with decreased odds of good outcome. Recipient age was not associated with likelihood of good perinatal outcome.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In the United States from 2000 to 2010, there was an increase in number of donor oocyte cycles, accompanied by an increase in good outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the factors associated with less successful outcomes.