Reasons for ICU Demand and Long-term Follow-up of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cohort

Global mortality and readmission rates following COPD exacerbation-related hospitalisation: a meta-analysis of 65 945 individual patients

Background

Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) have a major impact on patients and healthcare systems across the world. Precise estimates of the global burden of ECOPD on mortality and hospital readmission are needed to inform policy makers and aid preventive strategies to mitigate this burden. The aims of the present study were to explore global in-hospital mortality, post-discharge mortality and hospital readmission rates after ECOPD-related hospitalisation using an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) design.

Methods

A systematic review was performed identifying studies that reported in-hospital mortality, post-discharge mortality and hospital readmission rates following ECOPD-related hospitalisation. Data analyses were conducted using a one-stage random-effects meta-analysis model. This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-IPD statement.

Results

Data of 65 945 individual patients with COPD were analysed. The pooled in-hospital mortality rate was 6.2%, pooled 30-, 90- and 365-day post-discharge mortality rates were 1.8%, 5.5% and 10.9%, respectively, and pooled 30-, 90- and 365-day hospital readmission rates were 7.1%, 12.6% and 32.1%, respectively, with noticeable variability between studies and countries. Strongest predictors of mortality and hospital readmission included noninvasive mechanical ventilation and a history of two or more ECOPD-related hospitalisations <12 months prior to the index event.

Conclusions

This IPDMA stresses the poor outcomes and high heterogeneity of ECOPD-related hospitalisation across the world. Whilst global standardisation of the management and follow-up of ECOPD-related hospitalisation should be at the heart of future implementation research, policy makers should focus on reimbursing evidence-based therapies that decrease (recurrent) ECOPD.

Serum MCP-1 and NGAL Play an Important Role in the Acute Inflammatory Event of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

NGAL is mainly secreted by neutrophils which play the core role in AECOPD. MCP-1 is secreted specifically by monocytes and macrophages. Both biomarkers are involved in the core process of acute inflammatory reaction in COPD. So We analyzed serum NGAL and MCP-1levels to explore their potential clinical values in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) .This study enrolled 97 COPD patients and 50 healthy controls. All participants received blood collection and lung function test and arterial blood gas measurements. The expression levels of serum NGAL and MCP-1 were measured by ELISA. The serum NGAL and MCP-1 levels of COPD with community-acquired pneumonia (COPD-CAP) patients were significantly higher than those of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients and healthy adults. The NGAL levels of the GOLD III and IV groups were significantly higher than those of the GOLD II group. Spearman correlation analysis showed a negative correlation between NGAL and FEV1%pred, FVC% pred. ROC curves indicated that NGAL has a high diagnostic value for both AECOPD and COPD-CAP. NGAL has the value of distinguishing GOLD I and II from GOLD III and IV. MCP-1 have moderate diagnostic value for COPD-CAP and can differentiate COPD-CAP from AECOPD. This study shows NGAL has certain diagnostic value for AECOPD and COPD-CAP, but can not distinguish the two. NGAL is closely related to airway remodeling and can be used as a potential indicator to distinguish the higher GOLD degree. MCP-1 can be used as potential indicator for the diagnosis of COPD-CAP.

Pneumonic versus Nonpneumonic Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer acute exacerbations (AECOPD) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), named nonpneumonic and pneumonic exacerbations of COPD, respectively. Abnormal host defense mechanisms may play a role in the specificity of the systemic inflammatory response. Given the association of this aspect to some biomarkers at admission (e.g., C-reactive protein), it can be used to help to discriminate AECOPD and CAP, especially in cases with doubtful infiltrates and advanced lung impairment. Fever, sputum purulence, chills, and pleuritic pain are typical clinical features of CAP in a patient with COPD, whereas isolated dyspnea at admission has been reported to predict AECOPD. Although CAP may have a worse outcome in terms of mortality (in hospital and short term), length of hospitalization, and early readmission rates, this has only been confirmed in a few prospective studies. There is a lack of methodologically sound research confirming the impact of severe AECOPD and COPD + CAP. Here, we review studies reporting head-to-head comparisons between AECOPD and CAP + COPD in hospitalized patients. We focus on the epidemiology, risk factors, systemic inflammatory response, clinical and microbiological characteristics, outcomes, and treatment approaches. Finally, we briefly discuss some proposals on how we should orient research in the future.

Community-acquired pneumonia and survival of critically ill acute exacerbation of COPD patients in respiratory intensive care units

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to appraise the effect of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) on inhospital mortality in critically ill acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed. Consecutive critically ill AECOPD patients receiving treatment in a respiratory intensive care unit were reviewed from September 1, 2012, to August 31, 2015. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the association of CAP with survival of critically ill AECOPD patients for univariate analysis. Cox's proportional hazards regression model was performed to identify risk factors for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 80 consecutive eligible individuals were reviewed. These included 38 patients with CAP and 42 patients without CAP. Patients with CAP had a higher inhospital rate of mortality than patients without CAP (42% vs 33.3%, P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with CAP had a worse survival rate than patients without CAP (P<0.05). Clinical characteristics, including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, C-reactive protein, and CAP, were found to be closely associated with survival of AECOPD individuals. Further multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that CAP and APACHE II were independent risk factors for inhospital mortality in critically ill AECOPD patients (CAP: hazard ratio, 5.29; 95% CI, 1.50-18.47, P<0.01 and APACHE II: hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.37, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

CAP may be an independent risk factor for higher inhospital mortality in critically ill AECOPD patients.