Colles' fracture associated with reduced bone mineral content. Photon densitometry in 74 patients with matched controls

Colles' Fracture: An Epidemiological Nationwide Study in Italy from 2001 to 2016

The present study aimed to evaluate the yearly number of Colles' fractures in Italy from 2001 to 2016, based on official information found in hospitalization records. A secondary aim was to estimate the average length of hospitalization for patients with a Colles' fracture. A tertiary aim was to investigate the distribution of the procedures generally performed for Colles' fractures' treatment in Italy. An analysis of the National Hospital Discharge records (SDO) maintained at the Italian Ministry of Health, concerning the 15 years of our study (from 2001 to 2016) was performed. Data are anonymous and include the patient's age, sex, domicile, length of hospital stays (days), primary diagnoses and primary procedures. From 2001 to 2016, 120,932 procedures for Colles' fracture were performed in Italy, which represented an incidence of 14.8 procedures for every 100,000 adult Italian inhabitants. The main number of surgeries was found in the 65-69- and 70-74-year age groups. In the present study, we review the epidemiology of Colles' fractures in the Italian population, the burden of the disease on the national health care system (in terms of length of hospitalization) and the distribution of the main surgical procedures performed for the treatment of the disease.

Bone health assessment via digital wrist tomosynthesis in the mammography setting

Bone fractures attributable to osteoporosis are a significant problem. Though preventative treatment options are available for individuals who are at risk of a fracture, a substantial number of these individuals are not identified due to lack of adherence to bone screening recommendations. The issue is further complicated as standard diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which, while helpful in identifying many at risk, is limited in fully predicting risk of fracture. It is reasonable to expect that bone screening would become more prevalent and efficacious if offered in coordination with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams, provided that osteoporosis can be assessed using a DBT modality. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to explore the feasibility of using digital tomosynthesis imaging in a mammography setting. To this end, we measured density, cortical thickness and microstructural properties of the wrist bone, correlated these to reference measurements from microcomputed tomography and DXA, demonstrated the application in vivo in a small group of participants, and determined the repeatability of the measurements. We found that measurements from digital wrist tomosynthesis (DWT) imaging with a DBT scanner were highly repeatable ex vivo (error = 0.05%-9.62%) and in vivo (error = 0.06%-10.2%). In ex vivo trials, DWT derived BMDs were strongly correlated with reference measurements (R = 0.841-0.980), as were cortical thickness measured at lateral and medial cortices (R = 0.991 and R = 0.959, respectively) and the majority of microstructural measures (R = 0.736-0.991). The measurements were quick and tolerated by human patients with no discomfort, and appeared to be different between young and old participants in a preliminary comparison. In conclusion, DWT is feasible in a mammography setting, and informative on bone mass, cortical thickness, and microstructural qualities that are known to deteriorate in osteoporosis. To our knowledge, this study represents the first application of DBT for imaging bone. Future clinical studies are needed to further establish the efficacy for diagnosing osteoporosis and predicting risk of fragility fracture using DWT.

Epidemiology, classification, treatment and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults: an observational study of 23,394 fractures from the national Swedish fracture register

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures are the most common of all fractures. Optimal treatment is still debated. Previous studies report substantial changes in treatment trends in recent decades. Few nation-wide studies on distal radius fracture epidemiology and treatment exist, none of which provide detailed data on patient and injury characteristics, fracture pattern and mortality. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology, fracture classification, current treatment regimens and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults within the context of a large national register study.

METHODS

We performed a descriptive study using prospectively registered data from the Swedish fracture register. Included were all non-pathological distal radius fractures registered between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2017 in patients aged 18 years and above. Nominal variables were presented as proportions of all registered fractures.

RESULTS

A total of 23,394 distal radius fractures in 22,962 patients were identified. The mean age was 62.7 ± 17.6 years for all, 65.4 ± 16.0 for women and 53.6 ± 20.0 for men. A simple fall was the most common cause of injury (75%, n = 17,643/23,394). One third (33%, n = 7783/21,723) of all fractures occurred at the patients' residence. 65% (n = 15,178/23,394) of all fractures were classified as extra-articular AO-23-A, 12% (n = 2770/23,394) as partially intra-articular AO-23-B and 23% (n = 5446/23,394) as intra-articular AO-23-C. The primary treatment was non-surgical for 74% (n = 17,358/23,369) and surgical for 26% (n = 6011/23,369) of all fractures. Only 18% of the AO-23-A fractures were treated surgically, compared to 48% of the AO-23-C fractures. The most frequently used surgical method was plate fixation (82%, n = 4954/5972), followed by pin/wire fixation (8.2%, n = 490/5972), external fixation (4.8%, n = 289/5972) and other methods (4.0%, n = 239/5972). The overall 30-day mortality was 0.4% (n = 98/23,394) and the 1-year mortality 2.9% (n = 679/23,394).

CONCLUSION

This nation-wide observational study provides comprehensive data on the epidemiology, fracture classification and current treatment regimens of distal radius fractures in a western European setting. The most common patient was an eldery woman who sustained a distal radius fracture through a simple fall in her own residence, and whose fracture was extra-articluar and treated non-surgically.

What Factors Contribute to Falls-Related Distal Radius Fracture?

Objective: This mixed methods study analyzed the factors that led to a fall in a cohort of patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). Methods: A sample of 1,453 patients (430 men; 1,023 women; age range: 18-89 years) supplemented by new interview data from 29 patients (19 women) were examined. Chi-square and descriptive analysis of quantitative data and descriptive thematic analysis of qualitative data were compared to determine data convergence and divergence. Results: A higher number of DRF were observed in the 45- to 64-year-old group (44%), employed people (48%), in winter months (41%), and in low-energy fractures (75%). Themes emerged from qualitative data on the cause of the fracture, including environmental factors, behavioral factors, physical factors, and sports activities. Conclusion: Reasons for DRF are multifactorial. Preventive strategies with an emphasis on environmental and behavioral factor modifications are likely to decrease the number of DRF.

Smaller Radius Width in Women With Distal Radius Fractures Compared to Women Without Fractures

Introduction

Bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is typically used to assess fracture risk. However, other factors such as bone size and the forward momentum of a fall (a function of body size) can also potentially influence fracture risk, but are understudied. This report describes the characteristics of a cohort of Caucasian pre- and postmenopausal women with distal radius fractures (DRF) after falling onto an outstretched hand.

Methods

The fracture cohort comprised entries in an institutional review board-approved registry of study patients who had had DXA scans. For patients with DRF, the contralateral radius was scanned and BMD, T-scores (used to define bone status as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic), and radius width were recorded. Generally, side-to-side (left-right) differences in bone size and BMD are small and, hence, the contralateral radius was considered a surrogate for bone status of the fractured radius. Apparently healthy women without fractures were used as race-, age-, and BMI-matched controls.  

Results

Premenopausal women < 49 years of age (mean age, 38 years) with DRF had significanty smaller radii width compared to matched controls. Mean radius BMD was in the normal range. As a group, the cohort was overweight based on mean BMI. Postmenopausal women > 50 years (mean age, 64 years) with DRF also had low radius width, but in contrast to the first group, this group had low peripheral and central BMD.

Conclusions

Women with DRF had contralateral and presumably fractured radii of bone width smaller than matched controls. As a group, these women were also overweight based on BMI. The smaller radius width may increase the risk for fracture irrespective of BMD, especially since larger body size would result in greater inertial force when falling while ambulating.  

Colles' fractures and osteoporosis--A new role for the Emergency Department

PURPOSE

In Denmark, guidelines from the Danish Orthopedic Society recommend that patients older than 65 years who sustain a Colles' fracture should be referred to assessment of underlying osteoporosis. An assessment of referral rates at our hospital during the period October 2010-September 2013 showed that none were referred. Due to this, an automatic out-patient referral system for assessment of underlying osteoporosis was established. With this system, patients are referred directly from the Emergency Department (ED). The purpose of this study was to assess how effective this new referral system was at improving referral rates for assessment of osteoporosis and to evaluate how many more cases of osteoporosis that was identified with this practice during the period October 2013-September 2014.

METHOD

The automatic referral system for evaluation of osteoporosis in patients 65 years and above without known osteoporosis, living in the catchment area and sustaining a low energy distal forearm fracture was established in October 2013. With the new system, patients were referred directly from the ED for evaluation of osteoporosis at the osteoporosis out-patient department at the hospital. The system was evaluated for the period October 2013-September 2014. For comparison data was collected on the same patient group for the 3 years preceding the system.

RESULTS

Before the automatic system none were referred for evaluation of osteoporosis and thus none were diagnosed. After introduction of the system 100% were referred, 73.26% were examined and 65.08% of these were found to have osteoporosis. Anti-osteoporotic treatment was initiated in all but 4.88% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The results show that this type of automatic referral system can be an effective way of increasing the number of patients diagnosed with and treated for osteoporosis. It also shows that involvement of the ED in the screening for osteoporosis can be an effective way of increasing referral rates leading to higher rates of diagnosed osteoporosis. The early identification and initiating of treatment might result in a lower rate of secondary and potentially more severe osteoporotic fractures.

Bone density and geometric properties of the distal radius in displaced and undisplaced Colles' fractures: quantitative CT in 70 women

We examined cortical and trabecular bone density and geometric properties of the unfractured distal radius in 70 women with recent Colles' fractures, using multilayer peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). We found that cortical volumetric density, cortical area and mean cortical thickness were lower in the displaced than in the undisplaced fractures, suggesting that the cross-sectional volumetric density and geometric properties of cortical bone may be essential in determining the severity of a Colles' fracture. We also compared lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) and the occurrence of osteoporosis in the displaced and undisplaced fracture groups and found no significant difference, which suggests that displacement of a Colles' fracture is not associated with general osteoporosis.

Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity?

BACKGROUND

Medical treatment of women with established osteoporosis may decrease the incidence of future fractures. Postmenopausal women who have sustained a distal radial fracture have decreased bone-mineral density and nearly twice the risk of a future hip fracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women following an acute fracture of the distal part of the radius.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed with use of a claims database that includes more than three million patients, from thirty states, enrolled in multiple health plans. All women, fifty-five years of age or older, who sustained a distal radial fracture between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1997, were identified in the database. Only patients with at least six months of continuous and complete medical and pharmaceutical health-care coverage from the date of the fracture were enrolled, to ensure that all health-care claims would be captured in the database. This cohort of patients was then evaluated to determine the proportion who had undergone either a diagnostic bone-density scan or treatment with any recommended medication for established osteoporosis (estrogen, a bisphosphonate, or calcitonin) within six months following the fracture.

RESULTS

A search of the database identified 1,162 women, fifty-five years of age or older, who had a distal radial fracture. Of these 1,162 patients, thirty-three (2.8 percent) underwent a bone-density scan and 266 (22.9 percent) were treated with at least one of the medications approved for treatment of established osteoporosis. Twenty women had both a bone-density scan and drug treatment. Therefore, only 279 (24.0 percent) of the 1,162 women who sustained a distal radial fracture underwent either diagnostic evaluation or treatment of osteoporosis. There was a significant decrease in the rate of treatment of osteoporosis with increasing patient age at the time of the fracture (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current physician practice may be inadequate for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women who have sustained a distal radial fracture.

The effect of alendronate on bone mass after distal forearm fracture

Fracture and immobilization of an extremity lead to bone loss at the fracture and at adjacent sites. We conducted a 1-year, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study to determine whether bone loss would occur in the distal radius after a Colles' fracture and whether this loss could be prevented using an antiresorptive drug (alendronate). Thirty-seven women with a recent fracture of the distal forearm and low bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine were randomized to receive either 10 mg alendronate daily or placebo. BMD of both forearms was measured at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The results of four women who developed reflex sympathetic dystrophy were not included in the analysis. In the placebo group, there was a significant reduction at 3 months and 6 months in BMD of total radius (p < 0.01), one-third distal radius (p < 0.01), middistal radius (p < 0.05), and ultradistal radius (p < 0.01) on the fractured side. The loss in BMD at one-third distal radius remained significant at month 12 (p < or = 0.001). In the alendronate group BMD of total distal radius, one-third distal radius, and middistal radius at the fractured side remained unchanged. BMD of ultradistal radius increased significantly at months 3, 6, and 12, compared with baseline (p < 0.05). The difference between the two treatment groups was significant at 3 months and 6 months and borderline significant (p = 0.054) after 1 year in total distal radius. In ultradistal radius the differences were significant at all time points. We conclude that BMD of the distal radius of a recently fractured forearm decreases significantly in the 6 months after fracture and the resulting deficit remains evident at least 1 year after fracture. This bone loss can be prevented by alendronate.

Change in bone mass after Colles' fracture: a case report on unique data collection and long-term implications

The cast immobilization of a fractured limb results in a loss of bone mass; however, the long-term implications of that effect with regard to bone mineral status, particularly in other skeletal sites, are less known. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in bone mass in different skeletal sites triggered by Colles' fracture. The case is unique regarding the existence of baseline measurements taken just a few days before the fracture on all measurable skeletal sites, including the fractured radius. Therefore, it was also possible to determine whether the injury caused long-term bone loss in the affected and unaffected skeletal sites. The patient was a healthy, premenopausal Caucasian woman, in her late forties, who fractured her nondominant wrist as a result of low-impact fall on ice. The arm and the metacarpals were immobilized to the elbow for 5 wk. Bone mass measurements were performed with DPX-MD densitometer (Lunar Corp. Madison, WI) at baseline and 5, 10, 13, 21, and 52 wk postinjury. At the 5-wk measurement (on plaster removal) there was a notable increase in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) in all sites of ulna and radius of the injured forearm (from 10 to 73%), followed by the apparent decline to or below the baseline at 10, 13, 21 and 52 wk of follow-up. Other skeletal sites were measured at 10 wk when a substantial decrease in BMD and BMC in some of the hip regions and lumbar spine was noticed; most notably in L3-L4, Ward's triangle, and femoral neck (from 2 to 8%) and remained such after 1 yr. Although this patient had a normal bone mineral status and no osteopenia detected before fracture, the trauma of radial fracture caused long-standing bone loss in fracture-prone areas-hip and spine. Because about 70% of bone strength is explained by its mineral density, the patient might be at increased risk for fracture later in life. The changes in bone mass after injury should be monitored and interpreted carefully, and more elaborate treatment of patients presenting with wrist fractures are needed to prevent any potential risk for later osteoporotic fractures in spine and hip and possible refracture of the injured extremity.

Osteoporosis in Colles fracture

Previous studies of bone density in patients with Colles fracture have been inconclusive. We measured bone density at the second metacarpal in 36 postmenopausal women with Colles fracture. The patients were found to have highly significant (P < 0.01) or significant (P < 0.05) differences in the parameters of bone density compared with controls matched for age. The results suggest that osteoporosis is of definite relevance to the etiology of Colles fracture in postmenopausal women.

Forearm fracture

Bone mineral density of the distal forearm decreases with age in women, and this results in an increased risk of forearm fractures. Men have no increase in risk of forearm fractures with age because they have a higher peak bone mass at this site and less of a decrease in bone mineral density with ageing. Bone loss from the forearm slows in women after the age of 65 years in women and this may account for the plateau in forearm fracture rate after this age. Women with forearm fractures have twice the expected risk of vertebral and hip fractures. Forearm fractures before the age of 60 years are associated with an increase in the risk of vertebral fractures. Forearm fractures after the age of 70 years are associated with an increased risk of hip fractures. Thus, women presenting with forearm fractures are a good target population for the prevention of osteoporosis.

Fractures of the distal radius in a Norwegian city

During a prospective one-year study (1988) all fractures of the distal radius in people over 20 years old were registered in Bergen, Norway. Six hundred patients with 609 fractures were treated. The incidence was 38/10000 population, and 79% of the fractures occurred in women. The age-specific incidence in women increased rapidly after the menopause and reached a maximum between 60 and 69 years. The incidence for women over 60 years of age is the highest reported. Among women over 50 years the incidence of fractures caused by minor falls varied depending on the season. The mean number of fractures was 3.6 times higher on days when there was snow on the ground compared with days when there was no snow. More than half the distal radial fractures occurred while out walking. Possible strategies to prevent fractures must include prevention of falls, in particular among postmenopausal women on winter days.

Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm: a population-based case-control study

To evaluate the risk factors for early osteoporosis in consecutive patients with fracture of the distal forearm, a population-based case-control study was carried out using postal questionnaires supplemented by interviews when necessary. All men and women between the ages of 40 and 80 years who were resident in the County of Uppsala (population 265,000) and who sustained a fracture of the distal forearm during a defined 12-month period were initially included. Of 427 cases, 385 (90.2%) replied. Those with previous fragility fractures were excluded, leaving 367 patients in the study (mean age 61.9 +/- 10.6 years): 302 women (mean age 62.8 +/- 10.1 years) and 65 men (mean age 57.5 +/- 11.8 years). For each patient an age- and sex-matched control without previous fragility fractures was selected from the population register. The questionnaire concerned heredity, diseases and medications, general health, tobacco smoking and physical activity. Reproductive variables and postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy were analyzed extensively. In neither sex were any significant, consistent differences found with regard to chronic diseases, medications, physical activity or smoking. In females heredity for fractures (odds ratio, OR = 1.46) was associated with an increased risk. Nulliparous women had an increased risk of forearm fractures (OR = 1.72) while late menopause (OR = 0.95) and postmenopausal oestrogen therapy > 2 years (OR = 0.44) appeared to be protective. It is concluded that lifestyle factors did not discriminate between fracture patients and controls in this strict population-based investigation, suggesting that in affluent Western societies, with their high fracture rate, most individuals have an osteoporosis-prone way of life.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Distal radius fracture is an early sign of general osteoporosis: bone mass measurements in a population-based study

To evaluate the bone mass by bone density measurements in patients with distal radius fracture, a prospective open case-control study was carried out in the county of Uppsala, Sweden, with population-based cases and controls. There were 111 patients with a distal radius fracture who were otherwise healthy and aged 53-76 years, together with 60 healthy controls of similar age, sex and menopausal status. The main outcome measures were bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and in the (non-fractured) distal forearm determined by single-photon absorptiometry. It was found that at all measuring sites BMD was significantly lower in cases than in controls. The difference in the distal forearm was around 20% (p < 0.001) and in the spine and hip 5%-8% (p < 0.05-0.001). In the healthy subjects there were positive correlations (r = 0.39-0.65; p < 0.002) between the forearm BMD and that of both the spine and hip, whereas in the patients with distal radius fracture there was only a weak correlation between the forearm and spine BMD (r = 0.28; p < 0.05) and no association between the BMD of the forearm and hip (r < 0.01). It is concluded that patients with distal radius fracture who are otherwise healthy have a preferential bone loss at the distal forearm but also a generally low bone mass. Patients with fracture of the distal radius fracture should be considered for prophylactic measures against osteoporosis.

Fracture of the distal forearm as a forecaster of subsequent hip fracture: a population-based cohort study with 24 years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term risk of hip fracture following fracture of the distal forearm.

DESIGN

Registry-based cohort study comparing patients with a fracture of the distal forearm with a population-based cohort. FRACTURE COHORT: All women and men above 40 years of age with a radiologically verified fracture of the distal forearm during a 5-year period, 1968-1972, in all 1,126 women and 212 men. CONTROL COHORT: An equal number of population-based, age- and sex-matched control persons selected from a population register.

MEASUREMENTS

All cohort members were followed up individually through record linkage until the first hip fracture, emigration, death, or the end of 1991. The cohort members contributed a total of 40,832 person-years of observation, and altogether 365 cases of hip fractures were observed.

RESULTS

Both women and men with a fracture of the distal forearm ran an increased risk of sustaining a subsequent hip fracture. The overall relative hazard for the women was 1.54 and for men 2.27. The increased risk in the women was independent of age at inclusion, but that in the men was more pronounced in the younger age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a fracture of the distal forearm run an increased risk of sustaining a subsequent hip fracture. They therefore appear to constitute a group in which appropriate prophylactic measures against osteoporosis and fractures should be considered.