Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years

Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of a Reconstruction Cage and Porous Metal Augment to Treat Massive Acetabular Bone Loss: A Midterm Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. In rare scenarios where the extent of bone loss precludes shell placement (cup-cage), reconstruction at our center consisted of a cage combined with highly porous metal augments. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using this technique.

METHODS

Patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Baseline characteristics were collected. Preintervention and postintervention ambulatory scores were collected. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis for cage failure requiring revision surgery was conducted. Binomial regression analysis was performed to assess for correlation of aseptic cage failure with baseline characteristics. Preintervention and postintervention ambulatory aid requirements were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were identified. Mean follow-up was 6.4 years (range 2.8-11.0). Four (9.8%) aseptic cage revisions were identified. Aseptic KM survival analysis was 87.4% (95% confidence interval 75.3-99.6) at 10 years. Aseptic KM survival was 45.0% versus 92.8% at 9 years (P = .14) for patients with vs without pelvic discontinuity. KM survival for all-cause failure was 61.6% (95% confidence interval 44.0-79.2) at 10 years. Binomial regression did not demonstrate correlation of cage failure with baseline characteristics. Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated a significant reduction in ambulatory aide requirement after surgery (mean rank 11.47 vs 9.00, Z = -2.95, P = .003).

CONCLUSION

In scenarios of massive acetabular bone loss where a cup-cage is not a viable option, good survivorship free from aseptic cage failure can be expected at mid-term follow-up using an antiprotrusio cage combined with porous metal augments. Success requires extensive experience in revision surgery.

Fixation Stability of Uncemented Acetabular Cups With Respect to Different Bone Defect Sizes

BACKGROUND

In total hip arthroplasty, acetabular press-fit cups require a proper bone stock for sufficient primary implant fixation. The presence of acetabular bone defects compromises the primary fixation stability of acetabular press-fit cups. The aim of the present study is to determine the fixation stability of a cementless acetabular cup regarding standardized bone defects in an experimental setup.

METHODS

An acetabular defect model was developed and transferred to a biomechanical cup-block model. The lack of superior cup coverage was divided into 4 stages of superior rim loss (33%, 50%, 67%, and 83%) in the anterior-posterior direction and into 4 stages of mediolateral wall absence (11%, 22%, 33%, and 50%). This resulted in 11 different defect cavities, which were compared to the intact cavity in push-in and lever-out tests of one press-fit cup design (56 mm outer diameter). Thereby, push-in force, lever-out moment, lever-out angle, and interface stiffness were determined.

RESULTS

The determined lever-out moments range from 15.53 ± 1.38 Nm (intact cavity) to 1.37 ± 0.54 Nm (83%/50% defect). Smaller defects (33%/11%, 33%/22%, and 50%/11%) reduce the lever-out moments by an average of 33.9% ± 2.8%.

CONCLUSION

The lack of mediolateral acetabular coverage of 50% was assessed as critical for cementless cup fixation, whereby the contact zone between implant and bone in the defect is lost. A lack of 20% to 30% mediolateral coverage appears to be acceptable for press-fit cup fixation in the presence of primary stability. A defect of 50%/50% was identified as the threshold for using additional fixation methods.

Two stage revision with a proximal femur replacement

Background

Despite very good prosthesis retention times, the growing numbers of primary implantations of hip endoprostheses are leading to increasing numbers of revision operations. Periprosthetic infection, particularly in revision implants, often leads to a massive loss of bone stock, so that in a two-stage exchange the only option left is implantation of a megaendoprosthesis. This retrospective study investigated the clinical and functional outcome for patients who received megaendoprostheses in the proximal femur in two-stage exchange procedures.

Methods

Forty-nine patients were treated between 1996 and 2014 (mean age 71 years, mean follow-up period 52 months). Microorganisms were isolated intraoperatively in 44 patients (89.9%). The reinfection rate was documented in patients who did not undergo any further revision surgery due to mechanical failure (primary) and in patients who had subsequent revisions after reimplantation and subsequent reinfection (secondary).

Results

The mean C-reactive protein level at the time of reimplantation was 1.25 mg/dL (range 0.5–3.4). The primary success rate with curative treatment for prosthetic joint infection was 92% (four of 49 patients). The secondary success rate with infection revision cases was 82% (three of 17 revision cases). The mean Harris hip score was 69 (range 36–94). The majority of patients needed different types of walking aid or even wheelchairs, and only 50% of the patients were able to walk outside.

Conclusions

Reinfections occurred in only 8% of patients who underwent two-stage exchanges with a proximal femur replacement. When revision surgery for the proximal femur replacement was required for mechanical reasons, however, the associated reinfections increased the reinfection rate to 18%. Proximal femur replacement achieves a clear reduction in pain, maintenance of leg length, and restoration of limited mobility, and the procedure thus represents a clear alternative to the extensive Girdlestone procedure, which is even more immobilising, or mutilating amputation.

Outcome of cages in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

To investigate the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes of acetabular revisions with acetabular reinforcement rings and cages.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature study of international databases was performed. Inclusion criteria were cementless revisions, use of reinforcement rings, radiological and clinical follow-up, availability of full text in English, publication between January 1990 and July 2018. In a second further analysis, we selected only studies describing patients with more severe acetabular defects (AAOS 3, AAOS 4, Paprosky III). Data extracted included mean follow-up period, radiographic follow-up, functional scores, implant failures and survival rate.

RESULTS

We included in our review 1327 acetabular revisions described in 28 articles. The most commonly used reinforcement rings were Burch-Schneider ring, the Muller ring and the Ganz ring. Mean follow-up for all patients together was 8.8 years. Clinical or radiological signs of loosening were reported in 191 patients, 83 patients needed further acetabular revision for aseptic loosening and 41 patients received additional surgeries for septic loosening. The mean value of the Harris Hip Score reported at the last follow-up was 76.3. Nineteen articles fulfilled the criteria for further analysis about high-grade acetabular bone defects. We analyzed 649 revisions with mean follow-up period of 8.2 years. Clinical or radiological loosening was reported in 90 patients, additional acetabular revision was performed in 39 patients and 25 patients needed further surgeries for deep infection.

CONCLUSION

Acetabular revisions with cages are characterized by good survival rates and functional scores with a mean follow-up period of 8 years.

Burch-Schneider ring associated with morselized bone allografts, survival and clinical outcomes after acetabular revision surgery

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Acetabular revision surgery is a challenge due to the appearance of bone defects that make primary fixation of implants difficult when extracting loosened components. Reinforcement rings, such as Burch-Schneider (BS), have been shown to be allies in moderate or severe bone defects. The objective of the study is to evaluate the results and survival of these types of implants in acetabular revision surgery in the medium follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study on a cohort of 64 patients (67 replacements) with BS rings associated with morselized bone allografts in a 2 years minimum follow-up. Data were collected regarding clinical outcomes, graft incorporation, implant mobilization, survival and complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 5.06 years (R=2.2-12). The Merle scale improved from 8 points to 15 points at the end of follow-up (P<.0001) with 76.11% of good or excellent results. Reproduction of the anatomical centre of rotation was associated with a better result (P<.05). There was total or subtotal incorporation of the bone allograft in 97% of the patients, although this did not prevent a significant migration of the ring according to Gill criteria in 6 cases. We observed an overall survival of the implant for any cause of 93.4% at 5 years, and 84.6% at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The BS reinforcement ring shows good results in the medium and long term enabling anatomical reconstruction in revision surgery as well as replacement of the bone stock. These results are also comparable and are a vast improvement on other rings.

Biomechanical research on contour cage with transacetabular screws fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Use biomechanical technique to access the strain distribution and stability of Contour anti-protrusion cage with or without the whole circumference acetabular cup fixation by the transacetabular screws.

METHODS

Pelvic specimens from 10 male cadavers were used for the biomechanical test. The models of type C bone defect were copied according to the AAOS classification. Group 1: the contour reconstruction ring was fixed only by flange screws; Group 2: the contour reconstruction ring was fixed both by flange screws and transacetabular screws in dome. Under load in Heel Strike, Midstance, and Toe off phase, the transverse and longitudinal strains were measured in both the superior measure site near the root of the iliac wing and the inferior measure site near the root of the ischium. The relative displacement between the anterior inferior spine and the root of ischium below acetabular component was also measured.

FINDINGS

Compared with Group 1, the transverse and longitudinal pressure strain of Group 2 on the superior measure site decreased, and measure sites also showed reductions on the inferior under load under three different gait phases. The result of mean relative displacement showed transacetabular screws fixation couldn't provide significant improvement of displacement prevention.

INTERPRETATION

Biomechanical test showed that under the premise of a satisfied bone allograft and well-fixed flange screws in iliac and ischium, the satisfactory initial stability of the reconstruction cup can be achieved, but could not be improved by transacetabular screw technique. However, the max strain in root part of the flange will be reduced using transacetabular screws in ilium, pubis and ischium together, and the strain distribution will also be improved.

Management of massive acetabular bone defects in revision arthroplasty of the hip using a reconstruction cage and porous metal augment

Aims

It may not be possible to undertake revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the presence of massive loss of acetabular bone stock using standard cementless hemispherical acetabular components and metal augments, as satisfactory stability cannot always be achieved. We aimed to study the outcome using a reconstruction cage and a porous metal augment in these patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 22 acetabular revisions in 19 patients were performed using a combination of a reconstruction cage and porous metal augments. The augments were used in place of structural allografts. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 70 years (27 to 85) and the mean follow-up was 39 months (27 to 58). The mean number of previous THAs was 1.9 (1 to 3). All patients had segmental defects involving more than 50% of the acetabulum and seven hips had an associated pelvic discontinuity.

Results

Three failures were observed in two hips, both of which had undergone a previous resection of a tumour affecting the acetabulum. Other complications included a late arterial injury, a sciatic nerve palsy, a dislocation treated with a femoral revision, a deep infection treated with irrigation and debridement and a fracture of the greater trochanter treated conservatively. The mean Oxford Hip Score significantly increased from 13.9 (2 to 23) to 28.7 (13 to 38) (p < 0.00001). The mean vertical distance between the centre of rotation of the hip and its normal location decreased from 30 mm to 10 mm.

Conclusions

Acceptable early survivorship can be achieved using this novel technique, but it may be unsuitable for use in patients who have previously undergone the resection of a tumour involving the acetabulum. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:607–13.

Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review

The purpose of this paper is to review the clinical indications for acetabular reconstruction in patients with underlying peri-prosthetic segmental and cavitary defects, evaluate steps in pre-operative planning, and present the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and Paprosky classification systems to categorize acetabular defects. We also present a review of the current surgical techniques to reconstruct the acetabular socket which includes a cementless acetabular component with morselized bone, structural allograft, jumbo and oblong cups, reinforcement rings, bone cages, custom triflange acetabular constructs, and trabecular metal components.

10-Year Survival of Acetabular Reinforcement Rings/Cages for Complex Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction :

Acetabular reinforcement rings/ cages (AR) are commonly used for reconstruction of bone defects in complex hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the 10-year survival rate of Ganz reinforcement rings and Burch-Schneider cages used in a single institution.

Material and Methods :

Between September 1999 and June 2002 all ARs, implanted in one institution, were identified. All patients had regular clinical and radiographic follow-up and were included in this study. Their prospectively collected clinical and radiographic data was retrospectively analyzed. In case of death before the 10-year follow-up examination, patient’s families or their general practitioner was contacted by telephone. The main outcome measures were survival of the ARs and kind of revision surgery.

Results :

The 10-year survival rate was 77.7%. At 10-year follow-up, 5/60 (8,3%) patients could not be located and had to be excluded therefore. 27/55 (49,1%) were dead, whereof 22 had no revision of the ARs before death (after a mean of 66 months; range: 0 - 123). Of the remaining 28/55 (50,9%) patients, 23 patients (24 ARs) had no revision of the ARs.

Conclusion :

Despite the high mortality rate of this study’s collective, ARs for complex primary or revision total hip arthroplasty provided predictable long term results.

Level of Evidence :

Clinical investigation.

The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up

Background

Acetabular revision arthroplasty with major bone loss is one of the most difficult operations in orthopedic surgery. The goal of the study was to evaluate midterm clinical results of the use of morselized allografts with cemented cage support in revision total hip replacement.

Methods

We identified 28 patients (29 hips) at an average follow-up of 73 months. Harris Hip Scores (HHS) were assessed before and after surgery. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were evaluated for restoration of the center of rotation, component migration, and graft incorporation.

Results and discussion

At follow-up, the mean HHS improved from 34 (range, 20–45) to 80 (range, 71–98) points. None of the components had been re-revised. On average, the revised hip center of rotation was improved significantly. Incorporation of the graft was complete in 23 hips. The midterm result of cage reconstruction with morselized bone allograft is relatively better than other studies using a similar cage construction. We believe we have three special modifications of this reconstruction technique that are beneficial for bone incorporation.

Conclusions

These data confirm that acetabular reconstruction using morselized allografts and cemented acetabular cages is effective in the midterm as a treatment for acetabular loosening with massive bone deficiency.

Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review

Revision hip arthroplasty in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss is challenging and requires a solid understanding of current techniques. A literature search of multiple databases applying specific criteria revealed a total of 50 articles of level IV scientific evidence comprising 2415 patients (2480 hips) managed with reinforcement devices (roof-reinforcement rings and anti-protrusio cages), custom-made triflanged acetabular components (CTACs), jumbo cups and tantalum metal (TM) systems. Overall, patients had improved postoperative hip scores for each technique. The use of reinforcement devices resulted in a mean revision rate of 8.2% and a mean complication rate of 29.21%. CTACs were associated with a revision rate of 15.9% and had a complication rate of 24.5%. Jumbo cups were revised in 8.8% of patients and had a complication rate of 18.4%. TM systems had an overall revision rate of 8.5% with complications seen in 18.5% of patients. CTACs had considerably higher revision rates compared to the other techniques. Jumbo cups and TM systems had lower complication rates compared to the use of reinforcement devices and CTACs. The most frequently occurring complications seen throughout the series were aseptic loosening, dislocation and infection.

Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation

PURPOSE

Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular bone loss represents a rare but challenging problem. Anatomic reconstruction with biological defect augmentation as solid bone transplants or cancellous bone restores bone stock while providing good component stability. The objective of this study was to present short- to mid-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular ring system in a consecutive series of patients with severe acetabular bone loss.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 39 consecutive patients (39 hips) with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky type 3 A and 3 B) reconstructed with revision total hip arthroplasty using the cementless modular ring system MRS-Titan®. The MRS-Titan® consists of independent ring systems that are adapted modularly to the defect situation. Combined with acetabular defect reconstruction by using cancellous bone in impaction grafting technique, the MRS-Titan® system offers a cement-free revision system that enables defect-adapted customization to individual anatomic matters, bridging of the acetabular bone defect and reconstruction of the centre of rotation. Initial stability of the implant was obtained by screw fixation. Harris hip score and sequential radiographs were used to evaluate clinical and radiographic results.

RESULTS

At an average follow up of 31 months (range 12-69 months) 33 of 39 (84.6 %) of the implants were considered radiographically stable without signs of acetabular migration of more than 2 mm in the horizontal or vertical direction, implant rotation or screw breakage. Complications included six implant failures (15 %). We recorded one aseptic loosening of the MRS prosthesis after 20 months. Five patients (12.8 %) had to undergo revision surgery because of periprosthetic joint infection. Two patients had a dislocation postoperatively. The mean Harris hip score improved from 27 ± 14 points preoperatively to 76 ± 15 points at the time of last follow up.

CONCLUSION

By achieving stable implant fixation and providing potential for biological fixation, treatment of severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty with the modular ring system MRS-Titan provides a durable solution with good clinical and radiographic results and allows us to accomplish major goals of reconstruction.

Acetabular reconstruction using a free fibular autograft in total hip arthroplasty revisions

PURPOSE

Acetabular reconstruction for segmentary bone loss aims for primary stability and long-lasting integration. The use of a fibular autograft has been described after tumour resection and in traumatology. The hypothesis of this study is that it offers a mechanically reliable solution with good functional results and acceptable morbidity.

METHODS

This is a two center retrospective study of 26 operated hips. Indication was mechanical loosening in every case. The operative technique included fibular grafting of a segmental bone loss associated with an acetabular metal reinforcement.

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 88 months (three to 165). The PMA score increased from 8.5 (five to 12) to 15 (six to 18) (p <0.001). Acetabular migration was 2 mm (0-4) vertically and 1 mm (0-2) medially. Three graft failures were observed. No major morbidity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Fibular autograft after mechanical loosening and segmentary bone loss in total hip arthroplasty revisions offers a mechanically reliable solution for acetabular reconstruction. The results seem to be at least equivalent to other techniques.

Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results

Reconstruction of severe pelvic bone loss is a challenging problem in hip revision surgery. Between January 1992 and December 2000, 97 hips with periprosthetic osteolysis underwent acetabular revision using bulk allografts and the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage (APC). Twenty-nine patients (32 implants) died for unrelated causes without additional surgery. Sixty-five hips were available for clinical and radiographic assessment at an average follow-up of 14.6 years (range, 10.0 to 18.9 years). There were 16 male and 49 female patients, aged from 29 to 83 (median, 60 years), with Paprosky IIIA (27 cases) and IIIB (38 cases) acetabular bone defects. Nine cages required rerevision because of infection (3), aseptic loosening (5), and flange breakage (1). The average Harris hip score improved from 33.1 points preoperatively to 75.6 points at follow-up (P < 0.001). Radiographically, graft incorporation and cage stability were detected in 48 and 52 hips, respectively. The cumulative survival rates at 18.9 years with removal for any reason or X-ray migration of the cage and aseptic or radiographic loosening as the end points were 80.0% and 84.6%, respectively. The use of the Burch-Schneider APC and massive allografts is an effective technique for the reconstructive treatment of extensive acetabular bone loss with long-lasting survival.

Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review

The best method of revision acetabular arthroplasty remains unclear. Consequently, we reviewed the literature on the treatment of revision acetabular arthroplasty using revision rings (1541 cases; mean follow-up (FU) 5.7 years) and Trabecular Metal, or TM, implants (1959 cases; mean FU 3.7 years) to determine if a difference with regard to revision failure could be determined. Failure rates of the respective implants were compared statistically using a logistic regression model with adjustment for discrepancies in FU time. In our study, TM shows statistically significant decreased loosening rates relative to revision rings for all grades including severe acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. The severe defects appear to benefit the most from TM.

Bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: seventy eight revisions using bone allografts with or without metal reinforcements

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We report an acetabular reconstruction using impacted, morselized, frozen, radiation sterilized bone allografts in 71 patients suffering from RA. There were sixty-six women and five men at a mean age of 57.5 years. Reconstruction was performed in 78 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) for aseptic loosening of acetabular component. The mean follow-up was five years and four months. In 38 cases, a revision was done with use of reinforcement devices.

RESULTS

In four revised hips (10 %) without reinforcement implants, resorption of the allografts was noticed. All Mueller rings and 50 % of unscrews cages (Link, Howmedica) were revised because of aseptic loosening and bone graft resorption. In all of 17 hips with the Burch-Schneider cage, no measurable migration or bone allografts resorption occurred. There were no major general complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetabular reconstruction with use of morselized, frozen, radiation sterilized bone allografts and the Burch-Schneider cage can be highly successful in managing massive deficiency of acetabular bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty in RA patients.

The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results

With the development of hip prosthesis, younger patients may need more than one revision surgery, with less bone stock available in each subsequent surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the hip revision surgeries in which a Burch-Schneider device has been used. Patients were classified according to the Paprosky score. Functional and clinical evaluation was assessed by the Merlé-Daubigné score. Radiolucencies were assessed by Gill's criteria. Sixteen patients with a mean age of 66.1 years were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 60.7 months. According to Paprosky classification, 18.7% were grade IIb, 56.3% grade IIIa and 25% grade IIIb. The mean Merlé-Daubigné score improved from 10 to 15 points. Radiologically, 12 patients had no radiolucencies, two had grade I radiolucencies and two had grade III radiolucencies. In greater than 50% of acetabular defects, the Burch-Schneider seems to be useful providing clinical and functional improvement. Immediately, non-progressive radiolucencies are not associated with implant loosening at the end of follow-up. The ischial flap should be inserted inside the ischial portion of the acetabulum.

Multiple Acetabular Revisions in THA - Poor Outcome Despite Maximum Effort

A consecutive series of 52 acetabular revisions was evaluated retrospectively. Inclusion criteria for all patients were at least one former exchange of the acetabular component. Reconstruction was performed with reliable techniques and implants other than extensively porous coated device (e.g. tantalum). The mean follow up was 5.63 (0.01-14.05) years. Cumulative survival at 14.05 years with removal of the acetabular component due to aseptic loosening or the worst case criterion (removal of the acetabular component for any cause and/or lost to follow-up) as the end point was 66.38 (95 % C.-I.: 47.80-84.96) % and 58.42 (95 % C.-I.: 41.01-75.83) %, respectively. The cumulative survival rate with mechanical failure of the acetabular reconstruction as the endpoint was significantly lower in patients with two or more previous revisions in comparison to those with only one former procedure (log rank test: p=0,0112 respectively). The mean Merle d'Aubignée-score improved from 7.3 (0-14) preoperatively to 10.6 (0-17) points at latest follow up examination.Survival of acetabular reconstructions with common techniques and implants is decreasing with the number of previous revisions. This may cause major concerns with regard to the rising number of patients needing repeated revisions. Maximizing durability of primary THA, precise preoperative planning as well as improved techniques and implants for revision may decrease this problem in the long term.

A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity

Eighteen consecutive hips with pelvic discontinuity and associated periprosthetic bone deficiency were treated with bulk allografts and Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed at an average of 13.5 (range, 10.5-16.6) years. Three cages required re-revision because of infection (1) and aseptic loosening (2). Average Harris hip score improved from 31.9 to 77.0 points (P < .001). A severe resorption of the bone graft occurred in 2 hips. The stability of the cage was detected in 13 cases. The cumulative survival rate at 16.6 years with acetabular revision for any reason, radiographic loosening, or unhealing of the discontinuity as the end point was 72.2%. The use of Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts is an effective technique for the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Revision total hip arthroplasty without bone graft of high-grade acetabular defects

Mixed results have been reported with bulk and cancellous bone graft to fill defects during acetabular revision arthroplasty. Jumbo cups have been used to maximize host bone contact, and if adequate initial stability can be achieved, this approach may provide a superior long-term outcome. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 107 acetabular revisions performed using jumbo cups without bone graft. Bone defects were assessed using a validated radiographic classification system that yielded 64 hips with significant bone defects for inclusion. Mean change in American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower extremity core and pain scores and in Short Form-12 scores showed increases of 22.01, 37.52, and 17.08 points, respectively. Postoperative radiographs consistently demonstrated host bone ingrowth into the jumbo acetabular shells, except for 3 failures. Careful incremental reaming up to a size that optimizes host bone support and contact may eliminate the need for bone graft in most acetabular revision arthroplasties.

Restoration of the center of rotation in revision total hip arthroplasty

We measured the change of the center of hip rotation after the revision of acetabular loosening using an acetabular reconstruction ring and an impaction allogenic bone grafting. Thirty-five revision total hip arthroplasties were performed. The average follow-up was 3.8 years. Horizontal distance was changed from 34.01±10 mm preoperatively to 41.07±6 mm at the latest follow-up. Vertical distance was changed from 32.06±9 mm preoperatively to 20.21±7 mm at the latest follow-up. The Harris hip score was improved from an average of 47 in the preoperative period to 86 at the final follow-up. The restoration of the anatomical hip center has shown to be favorable in terms of functional and radiologic evaluation in total hip revision.

Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear

We report a case of a 46-year-old male patient who sustained a fracture of the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage (APC) that was implanted 13 years before. The fracture occurred in the transitional area to the proximal flange and was caused by direct and recurrent contact between the prosthetic metal head and the acetabular device. Late failure was related to increased wear of the polyethylene cup further aggravated by vertical orientation of the cage. Revision surgery included acetabular reconstruction using a new APC and cross-linked polyethylene cup, and replacement of the 36 mm diameter ball head. At 18 months follow-up the patient showed a complete functional recovery. When a reconstruction device is used, particularly in a young patient, special attention should be paid to the correct positioning of the cage in order to prevent accelerated polyethylene wear. Furthermore, cross-linked polyethylene cups that have become available in recent years must be used.

[Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases]

BACKGROUND

Acetabular revision in total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially for loose or migrated cup components with collateral bone loss, remains a great surgical challenge. The aim should always be a functionally favorable reconstruction of the rotation center with sufficient load capacity of the acetabulum. Commonly used implants in Europe are the Mueller ring, the Ganz ring, and the Burch-Schneider cage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report our results of 298 patients (298 hips) with a median follow-up period of 4 (range 0-17) years in a retrospective series.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available in 224 cases (75%). A radiographic examination was performed in 176 (59%) patients. Another 54 patients (18%) had died in the follow-up period, while another three patients (1%) were lost to follow-up. Eighteen patients (16%) underwent re-revision, in nine cases for aseptic loosening and in the remaining nine cases for infection. In seven additional cases (2%), radiological and clinical failure was found during follow-up. The overall survival rate was 94% at 5 years and 89% at 8 years.

CONCLUSION

Revision THA using acetabular reinforcement rings results in acceptable midterm results. However, septic complications and lysis of the bone graft with consecutive failure of the reinforcement ring remain problematic.

Aneurysm of the femoral artery caused by aseptic loosening and migration of a Burch-Schneider cage

Reinforcement cages are widely used for the treatment of large acetabular defects. We report a rare case of an aseptic loosened Burch-Schneider cage causing an aneurysm of the femoral artery and life-threatening bleeding, large hematoma, and signs of hyperfibrinolysis. After performing several diagnostic procedures, the patient underwent extensive interdisciplinary revision surgery. Initial unspecific symptoms such as pain, swelling, and hematoma of the leg after acetabular reconstructions using reinforcement cages should alert clinicians to consider the possibility of vascular complications.

Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss

From 1992 to 1995, 71 total hip arthroplasties with extensive acetabular bone loss underwent revision using bulk allografts and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cages. Twelve patients died of unrelated causes and 3 were lost to follow-up. Fifty-six hips were available for clinical and radiographic follow-up examination at an average of 11.7 years after surgery. The average final Harris hip score was 75. X-ray signs of incorporation of massive bone graft were observed in 49 hips. Two cases developed deep infection that required resection arthroplasty. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular cage occurred in 5 patients, and 2 of them underwent re-revision. With a total survival rate of 87.5%, anti-protrusion cages and structural allografts compare favorably with other techniques in the long-term reconstructive treatment of extensive loss of acetabular bone stock.

Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure

The reported results of acetabular cage reconstruction for pelvic deficiency are widely variable. Our primary question was: what is the survivorship of cage reconstruction with a primary end point of cage revision and secondary end points of radiographic loosening and any reoperation? Secondary questions were: which factors predict cage failure, and what is the functional outcome (SF-36, WOMAC, Harris hip score) of this reconstructive method? We reviewed 72 cage reconstructions in 68 patients. Minimum followup was 1.2 years (mean, 5.1 years; range, 1.2-10.7 years). Five-year cage revision-free survivorship was 87.8%. Five-year loosening-free and acetabular reoperation-free survivorships were 80.7% and 81.3%, respectively. No single preoperative factor (age, gender, severity of pelvic defect, degree of heterotopic ossification, difference in limb lengths and centers of rotation) or intraoperative factor (type of bone graft, type of cage, changes in limb length and center of rotation) predicted cage failure. Functional outcomes were 28.9 (SF-36 Physical Component), 52.4 (SF-36 Mental Component), 33.7 (WOMAC), and 44.2 (Harris). We judged these outcomes acceptable for this sometimes challenging problem. Future techniques for treating pelvic deficiency will need to be compared with these and other outcomes in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery

Between 1980 and 2000, 63 support rings were used in the management of acetabular deficiency in a series of 60 patients, with a mean follow-up of 8.75 years (2 months to 23.8 years). There was a minimum five-year follow-up for successful reconstructions. The indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening in 30 cases and infection in 33. All cases were Paprosky III defects; IIIA in 33 patients (52.4%) and IIIB in 30 (47.6%), including four with pelvic dissociation. A total of 26 patients (43.3%) have died since surgery, and 34 (56.7%) remain under clinical review. With acetabular revision for infection or aseptic loosening as the definition of failure, we report success in 53 (84%) of the reconstructions. A total of 12 failures (19%) required further surgery, four (6.3%) for aseptic loosening of the acetabular construct, six (9.5%) for recurrent infection and two (3.2%) for recurrent dislocation requiring captive components. Complications, seen in 11 patients (18.3%), included six femoral or sciatic neuropraxias which all resolved, one grade III heterotopic ossification, one on-table acetabular revision for instability, and three early post-operative dislocations managed by manipulation under anaesthesia, with no further instability.

We recommend support rings and morcellised bone graft for significant acetabular bone deficiency that cannot be reconstructed using mesh.

Burch-Schneider cage fracture: a case report

In this report, we present the case of a 64-year-old woman who sustained a Burch-Schneider cage fracture. Prior to this event, she underwent repeated acetabular reconstructions, but in the end prosthesis removal was performed as a salvage procedure. We believe that the primary cause of the fracture was metal fatigue facilitated by intraoperative re-contouring of the flange, as well as reuse of the cage. Based on this case we caution against repetitive or excessive flange bending during implantation of Burch-Schneider cages and do not recommend their reuse.

Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years

BACKGROUND

In revision hip arthroplasty, cages are commonly used for acetabular reconstruction in cases with loss of bone stock. It is important to follow this patient group closely, in order to better understand failure mechanisms and the chance of long-term success.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We followed our first 164 acetabular revisions with the Mueller reinforcement ring (ARR) in 164 patients, with an average follow-up period of 6 (2-17) years. Mean age at surgery was 69 (29-92) years. 39 patients died (39 hips) during follow-up, but only 3 patients (3 hips) were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

In the observation period, 13 of the hips had to undergo acetabular re-revision for aseptic and septic loosening. Overall survival at 5 years was 95% (CI: 89%-98%) and 90% (CI: 76%-95%) at 8 years using acetabular re-revision or implant removal for all reasons as endpoint. In addition, mechanical and clinical failure was seen in 2 cases. The mean Harris hip score was 70 points, whilst the Merle d'Aubigné score averaged 7 points. Radiolucent lines according to DeLee and Charnley were observed twice in zone I, 6 times in zone II and 14 times in zone III.

INTERPRETATION

We found that mid- to long-term survival of the ARR is acceptable. However, failure of the implant due to allograft collapse/resorption or deep infection, and also poor clinical outcome, remain major concerns in acetabular revision arthroplasty. This should be recognized when advising patients.

Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider ring: an EBRA analysis of 40 cup revisions

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the bone stock and fixation of the implant remain challenging problems in revision surgery. In this retrospective study, we wanted to gain information on initial stability and wear after revision with the Burch-Schneider ring.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and 1998, we performed 70 reconstructions of the acetabulum with a Burch-Schneider ring in revision arthroplasty. 63 patients could be followed up clinically and radiographically. 40 cups were suitable for EBRA measurements whereas migration and wear could not be assessed by this method in 23 cases due to lack of comparability of pelvic radiographs. The mean follow-up time was 4.7 years.

RESULTS

2 cups were re-revised and 14 cups had breakage or changes of position of the screws. 30 cups showed detectable migration and 18 cups detectable wear. The mean migration was 2.8 mm and the mean wear rate was 0.12 mm/year. 16 cups had detectable migration after 1 year; 11 of these 16 continued to migrate and 9 of them had screw breakage. Both re-revisions showed early migration. Early migration correlated with later screw breakage and the overall migration correlated with wear. The only risk factor found for early migration was the wear rate.

INTERPRETATION

The Burch-Schneider ring is an established and reliable implant for cup revision with good clinical results, but it seems to be difficult to maintain intraoperative stability. The implants with continuous migration may lead to late clinical failure and require further observation. Wear may contribute to migration and resorption of the bone graft.

Structural allografts for bone stock reconstruction in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty: good outcome in 16 of 18 patients followed for 5-14 years

BACKGROUND

The use of massive bone allografts in cases of revision of failed total hip arthroplasties (THAs) due to infection is controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

18 patients presented with infection at the site of a THA and were treated with a two-stage protocol. In the first stage, the prosthesis was removed together with all necrotic tissues and cement material if present. A custom-made mold of Palacos R cement containing 1 g of gentamicin was then inserted in 17 of the 18 patients. Systemic antibiotics were used during the interval period. In the second stage, the patients had either acetabular or femoral reconstruction using bulk allograft bone.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 9 (5-14) years. 1 patient presented with recurrent infection and underwent a Girdlestone resection arthroplasty as definitive treatment. Another patient had a mechanical failure of the acetabular component, which was revised 10 years after the second stage of the reconstruction. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 34 points preoperatively to 71 points at the last review. By our definition, 16/18 of the patients had a successful outcome.

INTERPRETATION

Our results support the use of massive allografts in staged reconstructions of infected THAs complicated by considerable bone loss.

Acetabular reconstruction in revision hip surgery using femoral head block allograft

This prospective study analyzed the clinical and radiological results of 140 consecutive cases of acetabular revision using large frozen femoral head allografts and cemented all-polyethylene acetabular components. Mean follow-up was 10 years (range: 5-16 years). Thirty patients died, seven were lost to follow-up, and 26 had failed and undergone further surgery. Nineteen failures were due to aseptic failure and collapse of the graft. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis calculated a mean survival at 10 years of 88.5% for revision for any reason. We compared all reported techniques of acetabular reconstruction for similar defects and recommend a surgical strategy based on the available evidence, but weighted towards a preference to reconstitute bone stock rather than removing further bone in the revision situation.

Structural allograft and primary press-fit cup for severe acetabular deficiency. A minimum 6-year follow-up study

Between October 1992 and December 1996, 23 patients with pelvic bone stock deficiency involving major columns underwent revision surgery with a cementless press-fit cup and a structural bone graft. Twenty cases were followed up for a minimum of 6 (average 7.6, range 6-11) years. Three cups were revised: one for aseptic loosening, one for septic loosening, and one for recurrent dislocation. At latest follow-up, the average Merle d'Aubigne hip score improved from 10.9 to 16.2; four hips were rated excellent, seven very good, three good, two fair, and one poor. All cups were stable; the grafts were integrated and anatomy was restored. The Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability of not having revision for loosening at 11 years, predicted a survival rate of 84.4%. We are confident that these results are satisfactory for a very demanding procedure.

The incorporation of morselized bone grafts in cementless acetabular revisions

The treatment of large osteolytic lesions is a challenge during acetabular revisions. Periprosthetic bone loss can compromise the stability of new implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5- to 10-year clinical and radiographic results of morselized bone grafting for acetabular osteolysis during cementless acetabular revisions. Ninety-nine patients (108 hips) who had an acetabular revision hip arthroplasty for osteolysis were retrospectively reviewed. There were 44 men and 55 women who had a mean age of 66 years. At the index revision, the acetabular defects were debrided of granulomatous tissue and packed tightly with morselized cancellous femoral head allograft. All the revision acetabular components were implanted using cementless fixation. At a mean followup of 85 months (range, 60-118 months), the results of 103 of 108 hips (95%) were clinically and radiographically successful. The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 37 points, which improved to a mean of 91 points at the last followup. All cavitary defects had complete radiographic incorporation of the bone grafts except for two lesions. The results of this study indicate that morselized bone graft incorporates into cementless acetabular revisions. This treatment method provided a stable reconstruction in 98% of patients at a mean of 7 years followup.

Antiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision

The purpose of this review was to explore the results of antiprotrusio cages and present indications for these devices. The role of antiprotrusio cages has had several reassessments in North America during the past decade. Currently, the primary indication for antiprotrusio cages are: (1) circumstances in which a stable, uncemented hemispheric acetabular component cannot be gained; and (2) circumstances in which there is so little remaining host bone that biologic fixation of a porous implant is very unlikely. Antiprotrusio cages have been reported to have a mechanical failure rate between 0% and 15% at midterm followup but most series do not report selective results of using cages only for the most severe bone defects. Key technical points when using antiprotrusio cages include: (1) wide exposure of the acetabular bone while protecting surrounding neurovascular structures; (2) positioning the antiprotrusio cage so as to span from host bone to host bone, thereby bridging acetabular defects; (3) appropriate bone grafting of acetabular bone deficiencies; and (4) secure fixation of the cage with good dome and posterior column support.

The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years

A total of 38 acetabular revisions using a Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in 37 patients (18 women and 19 men), with a mean age at surgery of 75 years (range, 55-88 years), were evaluated retrospectively with a mean follow-up of 12 years (range, 8-21 years). In 2 cases with total hip dislocation and in 1 case with a deep infection, revision of the antiprotrusio cages was required. Defining every revision of the antiprotrusio cage as the endpoint of survivorship, the antiprotrusio cage showed a survival rate of 92% after 21 years. Clinical evaluation of the surviving patients showed a mean Harris hip score of 76 points (range, 20-96). Radiologic evaluation revealed that 1 antiprotrusio cage was loose and that 4 femoral stems were loose. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage compares favorably with other devices with regard to long-term implant survival rate.