Á priori alignment of transtibial prostheses: a comparison and evaluation of three methods

A systematic review of methods used to assist transtibial prosthetic alignment decision-making

Prosthetic alignment is a highly subjective process that is still based on clinical judgments. Thus, researchers have aimed their effort to quantify prosthetic alignment by providing an objective method that can assist and guide prosthetists in achieving transtibial (TT) prosthetic alignment. This systematic review aimed to examine the current literature on TT prosthetic alignment to scope the qualitative and quantitative methods designed to guide prosthetists throughout the TT prosthetic alignment process as well as evaluate the reported instruments and devices that are used to align TT prostheses and their clinical feasibility. A literature search, completed in June 2022, was performed using the following databases: Web of Science (Clarivate), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Pub Med (Medline) with searching terms focusing on TT, prosthesis, prosthetist, prosthetic alignment, and questionnaires, resulting in 2790 studies being screened. Twenty-four studies have used quantitative methodologies, where sensor technologies were found to be the most frequently proposed technology combined with gait analysis tools and/or subjective assessments. A qualitative method that assists prosthetists throughout the alignment process was not found. In this systematic review, we presented diverse methods for guiding and assisting clinical decision-making regarding TT prosthetic alignment. However, most of these methods considered varied parameters, and there is a need for elaboration toward standardized methods, which would improve the prosthetic alignment clinical outcome.

A proper sequence of dynamic alignment in transtibial prosthesis: insight through socket reaction moments

Dynamic alignment in prosthetic fitting is important because it affects the user's stability, kinematics, and kinetics such as socket reaction moments. It is performed by tuning the spatial relationship between the transtibial prosthetic socket and the foot following sequential observational gait analysis in the three anatomical planes. However, the order of planes in which the adjustment should be performed is still unclear. To investigate the appropriate sequence of dynamic alignment adjustment, ten participants with transtibial amputation were asked to walk in different alignment conditions (flexion, extension, adduction, abduction; lateral, medial, anterior, and posterior translation of the socket, and plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion of the foot) to measure socket reaction moments in the out-of-planes (e.g., the effect of sagittal alignment on the coronal moment). A significant difference was found only among socket posterior translation, socket flexion, and baseline alignment in the coronal moment (P = 0.02). The results of the current and previous studies suggest that moments in the coronal plane are affected by alignment changes in all three planes, whereas moments in the sagittal plane are affected only by sagittal alignment changes. It is suggested that the procedure of alignment adjustments should be finalized in the coronal plane.

Scoping review to evaluate existing measurement parameters and clinical outcomes of transtibial prosthetic alignment and socket fit

INTRODUCTION

Fit and alignment are observable objectives of the prosthesis rendering process for individuals with lower limb amputation. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of validated measures to directly assess the quality of this clinical procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this scoping review are to evaluate existing measurement parameters and clinical outcomes used in investigations of transtibial socket fit or prosthetic alignment and to identify gaps in the literature regarding tools for evaluation of prosthetic fitting.

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping literature review.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase (through Elsevier), Scopus (through Elsevier), and Engineering Village (through Elsevier), resulting in 6107 studies to be screened.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies were included in the review. When measuring fit, studies most frequently reported on patient-reported comfort (n = 22) and socket size compared with the residual limb volume (n = 9). Alignment was most frequently measured by the prosthetists' judgment and/or use of an alignment jig (n = 34). The measurement parameters used to determine alignment or fit varied greatly among the included studies.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrated that most measures of socket fit rely on a patient's self-report and may vary with biopsychosocial factors unrelated to the socket fitting process. Meanwhile, alignment is determined mostly by the prosthetist's judgment, paired with objective measurements, such as alignment jigs and gait analysis. Efforts to standardize and validate measures of these parameters of prosthetic fitting are vital to improving clinical practice and reporting outcomes.

A systematic review of variables used to assess clinically acceptable alignment of unilateral transtibial amputees in the literature

Prosthetic alignment is a subjective concept which lacks reliability. The outcome responsiveness to prosthetic alignment quality could help to improve subjective and instrument assisted prosthetic alignment. This study was aimed to review variables used to assess clinically acceptable alignment in the literature. The search was done in some databases including: Google Scholar, PubMed, EBSCO, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus. The first selection criterion was based on abstracts and titles to address the research questions of interest. The American Academy of Orthotics and Prosthetics checklists were used for paper risk of bias assessment. A total of 25 studies were included in this study. Twenty-four studies revealed the critics of standing position or walking to locate clinically acceptable alignment, only one study measured outcomes in both situations. A total of 253 adults with transtibial amputations and mean age of 48.71 years participated in included studies. The confidence level of included studies was low to moderate, and before-after trial was the most common study design (n = 19). The joint angle, load line location with respect to joints and center of pressure-related parameters were reported as sensitive outcomes to prosthetic alignment quality in standing posture. The amount of forces at various parts of gait cycle and time of events were sensitive to prosthetic alignment quality during walking. Standing balance and posture and temporal parameters of walking could help to locate clinically acceptable alignment.

Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses through visualization of socket reaction moments

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses is generally performed based on visual interpretation of gait without the benefit of any kinetic analysis in the clinic. The aim of this technical note was to present and discuss the possibilities of assisting dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses through visualization of socket reaction moments.

TECHNIQUE

Smart Pyramid™ (currently Europa™) was used to measure the socket reaction moments under various alignment conditions from an amputee with transtibial prosthesis. The socket reaction moments were plotted to visualize the effect of alignment changes on them, and they were clinically interpreted.

DISCUSSION

Socket reaction moments could complement information available to prosthetists to optimize prosthetic alignment. They could be used to reduce excessive loading on sensitive areas, to improve gait stability, or to communicate the outcome of dynamic alignment with the amputees. Further research is needed to identify the contribution of kinematics and kinetics for optimal alignment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses is currently tuned subjectively based on prosthetists' experiences and skills. Socket reaction moments may potentially provide objective information for prosthetists to align transtibial prostheses in the clinic.

Individual responses to alignment perturbations in socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses

BACKGROUND

The alignment of transtibial prostheses has a systematic effect on the mean socket reaction moments in amputees. However, understanding their individual differences in response to alignment perturbations is also important for prosthetists to fully utilize the socket reaction moments for dynamic alignment in each unique patient. The aim of this study was to investigate individual responses to alignment perturbations in transtibial prostheses with solid-ankle-cushion-heel feet.

METHODS

A custom instrumented prosthesis alignment component was used to measure the socket reaction moments while walking in 11 amputees with transtibial prostheses under 17 alignment conditions, including 3° and 6° of flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction of the socket, 5mm and 10mm of anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial translation of the socket, and an initial baseline alignment. Coronal moments at 30% of stance and maximum sagittal moments were extracted for comparisons from each amputee.

FINDINGS

In the coronal plane, varus moment at 30% of stance was generally reduced by adduction or medial translation of the socket in all the amputees. In the sagittal plane, extension moment was generally increased by posterior translation or flexion of the socket; however, this was not necessarily the case for all the amputees.

INTERPRETATIONS

Individual responses to alignment perturbations are not always consistent, and prosthetists would need to be aware of this variance when addressing individual socket reaction moments during dynamic alignment in clinical setting.

Effect of alignment changes on socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet

BACKGROUND

Energy storage and return feet are designed for active amputees. However, little is known about the socket reaction moments in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of alignment changes on the socket reaction moments during gait while using the energy storage and return feet.

METHODS

A Smart Pyramid™ was used to measure the socket reaction moments in 10 subjects with transtibial prostheses while walking under 25 alignment conditions, including a nominal alignment (as defined by conventional clinical methods), as well as angle malalignments of 2°, 4° and 6° (flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction) and translation malalignments of 5mm, 10mm and 15mm (anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial) referenced from the nominal alignment. The socket reaction moments of the nominal alignment were compared with each malalignment.

FINDINGS

Both coronal and sagittal alignment changes demonstrated systematic effects on the socket reaction moments. In the sagittal plane, angle and translation alignment changes demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05) in the minimum moment, the moment at 45% of stance and the maximum moment for some comparisons. In the coronal plane, angle and translation alignment changes demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05) in the moment at 30% and 75% of stance for all comparisons.

INTERPRETATION

The alignment may have systematic effects on the socket reaction moments in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet. The socket reaction moments could potentially be a useful biomechanical parameter to evaluate the alignment of the transtibial prostheses.