1
|
Alderden J, Kennerly SM, Cox J, Yap TL. Pressure Injury Risk Assessment and Prevention in Patients With COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit. AACN Adv Crit Care 2022; 33:173-185. [PMID: 35657764 DOI: 10.4037/aacnacc2022335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients critically ill with COVID-19 are at risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury, including device-related pressure injury. METHODS Braden Scale predictive validity was compared between patients with and without COVID-19, and a logistic regression model was developed to identify risk factors for device-related pressure injury. RESULTS A total of 1920 patients were included in the study sample, including 407 with COVID-19. Among the latter group, at least 1 hospital-acquired pressure injury developed in each of 120 patients (29%); of those, device-related pressure injury developed in 55 patients (46%). The Braden Scale score area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.72 in patients without COVID-19 and 0.71 in patients with COVID-19, indicating fair to poor discrimination. CONCLUSIONS Fragile skin and prone positioning during mechanical ventilatory support were risk factors for device-related pressure injury. Clinicians may consider incorporating factors not included in the Braden Scale (eg, oxygenation and perfusion) in routine risk assessment and should maintain vigilance in their efforts to protect patients with COVID-19 from device-related pressure injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Alderden
- Jenny Alderden is Associate Professor, Boise State University School of Nursing, 1910 University Dr, Boise, ID 83725
| | - Susan M Kennerly
- Susan M. Kennerly is Professor, East Carolina University College of Nursing, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Jill Cox
- Jill Cox is Clinical Associate Professor, Rutgers University, and Wound, Ostomy, Continence Advanced Practice Nurse, Englewood Health, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Tracey L Yap
- Tracey L. Yap is Associate Professor, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reinkensmeyer DJ, Blackstone S, Bodine C, Brabyn J, Brienza D, Caves K, DeRuyter F, Durfee E, Fatone S, Fernie G, Gard S, Karg P, Kuiken TA, Harris GF, Jones M, Li Y, Maisel J, McCue M, Meade MA, Mitchell H, Mitzner TL, Patton JL, Requejo PS, Rimmer JH, Rogers WA, Zev Rymer W, Sanford JA, Schneider L, Sliker L, Sprigle S, Steinfeld A, Steinfeld E, Vanderheiden G, Winstein C, Zhang LQ, Corfman T. How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017; 14:109. [PMID: 29110728 PMCID: PMC5674748 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0321-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 50 million United States citizens (1 in 6 people in the US) have a developmental, acquired, or degenerative disability. The average US citizen can expect to live 20% of his or her life with a disability. Rehabilitation technologies play a major role in improving the quality of life for people with a disability, yet widespread and highly challenging needs remain. Within the US, a major effort aimed at the creation and evaluation of rehabilitation technology has been the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERCs) sponsored by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. As envisioned at their conception by a panel of the National Academy of Science in 1970, these centers were intended to take a "total approach to rehabilitation", combining medicine, engineering, and related science, to improve the quality of life of individuals with a disability. Here, we review the scope, achievements, and ongoing projects of an unbiased sample of 19 currently active or recently terminated RERCs. Specifically, for each center, we briefly explain the needs it targets, summarize key historical advances, identify emerging innovations, and consider future directions. Our assessment from this review is that the RERC program indeed involves a multidisciplinary approach, with 36 professional fields involved, although 70% of research and development staff are in engineering fields, 23% in clinical fields, and only 7% in basic science fields; significantly, 11% of the professional staff have a disability related to their research. We observe that the RERC program has substantially diversified the scope of its work since the 1970's, addressing more types of disabilities using more technologies, and, in particular, often now focusing on information technologies. RERC work also now often views users as integrated into an interdependent society through technologies that both people with and without disabilities co-use (such as the internet, wireless communication, and architecture). In addition, RERC research has evolved to view users as able at improving outcomes through learning, exercise, and plasticity (rather than being static), which can be optimally timed. We provide examples of rehabilitation technology innovation produced by the RERCs that illustrate this increasingly diversifying scope and evolving perspective. We conclude by discussing growth opportunities and possible future directions of the RERC program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - John Brabyn
- The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francesco, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Stefania Fatone
- Northwestern University Prosthetics-Orthotics Center, Evanston, USA
| | - Geoff Fernie
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Steven Gard
- Northwestern University Prosthetics-Orthotics Center, Evanston, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Yue Li
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James L. Patton
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | | | - James H. Rimmer
- Lakeshore FoundationUniversity of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | | | - W. Zev Rymer
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Aaron Steinfeld
- Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Corfman
- National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bergstrand S, Källman U, Ek AC, Engström M, Lindgren M. Microcirculatory responses of sacral tissue in healthy individuals and inpatients on different pressure-redistribution mattresses. J Wound Care 2015; 24:346-58. [DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.8.346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Bergstrand
- Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burns and the Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - U. Källman
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Dermatology, Södra Älvsborgs Sjukhus, Borås, Sweden
| | - A-C. Ek
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M. Engström
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M. Lindgren
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|