Objective measurements of excess skin in post bariatric patients – inter-rater reliability

Soft Tissue Facial Changes Following Massive Weight Loss Secondary to Medical and Surgical Bariatric Interventions: A Systematic Review

Bariatric interventions, both surgical and medical, are increasingly employed by patients to achieve weight reduction and enhance overall health. However, there is growing concern about the associated changes in soft tissue facial aesthetics resulting from these interventions. In this systematic review, the authors aimed to analyze the existing literature regarding soft tissue facial changes after bariatric interventions, with a focus on the influence of massive weight loss on facial aging, attractiveness, and considerations for facial rejuvenation. A systematic review was conducted until February 10, 2024, using electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. This review was registered in the open science framework. The Covidence software (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) facilitates title, abstract, and full-text screening, as well as data extraction. In total, 309 papers were identified, 94 duplicates were removed, and 194 studies were excluded on the basis of inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 21 studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria with an additional single study from the conference abstract. Descriptive analysis was conducted. We observed a correlation between massive weight loss and facial aging. The most significant fat regional devolumization was observed along the mid-cheek region and with central neck skin laxity. The apparent age of patients was higher among those with massive weight loss. In our study, we demonstrated that massive weight loss causes accelerated facial aging, manifested through fat devolumization, and increased skin laxity. Further quantitative volumetric facial analyses postbariatric surgery would yield valuable results.

Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic

The financial toxicity of postbariatric body contouring surgery: a survey study of an urban tertiary care center's patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with obesity who undergo bariatric surgery achieve sustained weight loss but are often left with excess skin folds that cause functional and psychological deficits. To remove excess skin, patients can undergo postbariatric BCS; however, cost and lack of insurance coverage present a significant barrier for many patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize the financial impact of treatment on all patients who received bariatric surgery and to compare between those receiving only bariatric surgery and those with postbariatric BCS.

SETTING

Email-based survey study at an urban tertiary care center.

METHODS

Surveys that included the COST-FACIT were sent to patients with a history of bariatric surgery and/or post-bariatric BCS.

RESULTS

One hundred and five respondents completed the survey, of which 19 reported having postbariatric BCS. Patients with postbariatric BCS had slightly higher COST scores than those receiving bariatric surgery only, but this difference was not significant (15.6 versus 17.8, P = .23). Most patients (76%) did not have an awareness of BCS or BCS cost prior to bariatric surgery, and many (68%) had more loose skin than anticipated.

CONCLUSIONS

Financial toxicity was similar across all postbariatric surgery patients surveyed regardless of history of BCS. However, survey respondents noted a gap between patient education and expectations around loose skin and body contouring that can be addressed through improved presurgical counseling.

Breast volume in non-obese females is related to breast adipose cell hypertrophy, inflammation, and COX2 expression

BACKGROUND

Breast hypertrophy seems to be a risk factor for breast cancer and the amount and characteristics of breast adipose tissue may play important roles. The main aim of this study was to investigate associations between breast volume in normal weight women and hypertrophic adipose tissue and inflammation.

METHODS

Fifteen non-obese women undergoing breast reduction surgery were examined. Breast volume was measured with plastic cups and surgery was indicated if the breast was 800 ml or larger according to Swedish guidelines. We isolated adipose cells from the breasts and ambient subcutaneous tissue to measure cell size, cell inflammation and other known markers of risk of developing breast cancer including COX2 gene activation and MAPK, a cell proliferation regulator.

RESULTS

Breast adipose cell size was characterized by cell hypertrophy and closely related to breast volume. The breast adipose cells were also characterized by being pro-inflammatory with increased IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, CCL-2, TNF-a and an increased marker of cell senescence GLB1/β-galactosidase, commonly increased in hypertrophic adipose tissue. The prostaglandin synthetic marker COX2 was also increased in the hypertrophic cells and COX2 has previously been shown to be an important marker of risk of developing breast cancer. Interestingly, the phosphorylation of the proliferation marker MAPK was also increased in the hypertrophic adipose cells.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these findings show that increased breast volume in non-obese women is associated with adipose cell hypertrophy and dysfunction and characterized by increased inflammation and other markers of increased risk for developing breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Projektdatabasen FoU i VGR, project number: 249191 (https://www.researchweb.org/is/vgr/project/249191).

"Normal" breast dimensions in obese women-reference values and the effect of weight loss

BACKGROUND

Breast hypertrophy may cause significant suffering, such as back- and breast pain, painful shoulder groves, and eczemas. Furthermore, women with breast hypertrophy may have lower quality of life than women without breast hypertrophy. Although 50% of the women undergoing breast reduction in the US have body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, the current standard of normality is based on studies focusing on women <40 years of age and BMIs <25 kg/m2. This study aimed to present reference values for breast measurements for women with obesity and to investigate the relationship between BMI loss and each breast measurement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and six women underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in Gothenburg, Sweden. The participants' breast anthropometrics were measured before and after bariatric surgery and their perception of the skin on their breasts was measured using the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Breast volume, sternal notch to nipple (SNN) distance, and ptosis increased significantly with increasing BMI. For instance, women with BMIs between 30-34.9 kg/m2 have a mean breast volume of approximately 770 ml, those with BMIs of 40-44.9 kg/m2 have approximately 1150 ml, and those with BMIs above 50 kg/m2 have approximately 1400 ml. Furthermore, the percent change in the respective breast measurements relative to percent BMI change can be predicted, for instance, with a 20% reduction in BMI, the breast volume, SNN-distance, and ptosis decrease by 25%, 4%, and 20% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This article presents the first standard of normality for breast anthropometrics in women with obesity and a model for predicting the change in breast anthropometrics relative to BMI.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This is a longitudinal observation study, registered https://fou.nu/is/gsb/ansokan/49651, No: VGFOUGSB-49651. Trial registry name: "Överskottshud efter överviktskirurgi - dess utveckling samt behov och effekt av plastikkirurgi" ("Excess skin after bariatric surgery - its development and the need and effect of plastic surgery").

Physical measurements and patients’ perception of excess skin on arms and thighs before and after bariatric surgery

Background

Bariatric surgery is an effective weight loss method for patients with obesity. One side effect of bariatric surgery is uncomfortable excess skin. Much remains to be learned about physical measurements and patients’ subjective perceptions of it. Here, we investigated the pre- to post-bariatric changes in patients’ perception and physical measurements of the skin on the arms and thighs, in order to find possible subgroups especially affected by post-operative excess skin and to identify predicting factors.

Methods

One hundred forty-seven patients eligible for bariatric surgery completed the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ) and underwent measurements of their skin before and 18 months after the procedure.

Results

Although most physical measurements decreased post-operatively, many patients reported increased discomfort. We identified one subgroup particularly prone to report excess skin on the arms post-operatively: women with high discomfort from excess skin on the arms and high body mass index (BMI), pre-operatively. Ptosis of the excess skin seems to be a feasible measurement for predicting post-operative discomfort. For every centimetre of ptosis pre-operatively, patients had 1.37- and 1.31-fold higher odds of achieving a score for post-operative discomfort from excess skin on the upper arms and thighs, respectively, of ≥ 6 (on a 0–10 scale).

Conclusions

We identified a subgroup especially affected by discomforting excess skin on arms and thighs after weight loss. Furthermore, we suggest a pre-operative pro-operative ptosis measuring to predict post-operative discomfort level. The result of this study further increases the knowledge of excess skin and should be useful in further improving patient education.

Level of Evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study.

Excess skin after weight loss following bariatric surgery: focus on the abdomen

BACKGROUND

The majority of postbariatric patients experience major problems from excess skin, with most desiring abdominoplasty.

OBJECTIVES

To present visual assessments and objective measurements of excess abdominal skin; analyze relationships between patient-reported outcomes, objective measurements of excess skin, and visual assessments; and discuss criteria for reconstructive abdominal surgery in public healthcare.

SETTING

An academic hospital in Sweden.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, longitudinal study that included 200 obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, with 147 of these patients participating in follow-up 18-months postsurgery. Patients rated their symptoms related to excess skin and quality of life (QoL) according to the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire and EuroQol-5 D before and after bariatric surgery. Abdominal ptosis was measured at different anatomic locations.

RESULTS

Waist circumference and ptosis were significantly reduced at all anatomic locations after weight loss, and abdominal ptosis was significantly larger laterally than at the midline (P < .001). The majority of patients had a ptosis ≥3 cm following bariatric surgery and had significantly more symptoms related to excess skin relative to those reported preoperation (P < .05). Additionally, the number of patients experiencing discomfort from excess skin increased along with increased ptosis size, but the correlation between ptosis size and QoL was low. Reconstructive abdominal surgery was requested by 70% of patients, all having significantly larger ptosis and significantly more symptoms than those not desiring surgery.

CONCLUSION

Criteria for abdominal reconstruction should be based on both patient-reported symptoms and objective measures to ensure more patient-centered care than is possible only using objective measurements.

The BAPRAS screening tool for reimbursement in a postbariatric population

INTRODUCTION

Reimbursement of body-contouring surgery (BCS) is a worldwide problem: there is no objective instrument to decide which postbariatric patients should qualify for reimbursement. The British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) has developed a screening tool for this purpose. In this study, we used a modified version of this screening tool in a postbariatric population and describe which patients would qualify for reimbursement using this tool.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study postbariatric patients were asked to fill in an online questionnaire based on the BAPRAS screening tool with questions regarding complaints of overhanging skin and medical history. Weight loss data were extracted from a prospective database. The BODY-Q was added to assess patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients who wanted to undergo BCS (n = 90) had higher screening tool scores and lower BODY-Q scores compared to patients who did not want BCS (n = 24). In total, 25 patients (26%) qualified for reimbursement, these patients had higher weight loss (33.5% versus 29.2%, p = 0.008), lower BMI (27.3 kg/m² versus 30.4 kg/m², p = 0.014) and more medical (4.0 versus 2.0, p = 0.004) and psychological complaints (88% versus 61%, p = 0.009). There was a significant, negative correlation between the screening tool scores and almost all BODY-Q scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a desire for BCS have more complaints of excess skin, which negatively impacts their well-being. With the modified BAPRAS screening tool, patients with the best weight (loss) and most medical and psychological complaints of excess skin qualified for referral and reimbursement of BCS.

Complications after lower body contouring surgery due to massive weight loss unaffected by weight loss method

Body contouring surgery following massive weight loss positively affects a patient's quality of life. However, the procedure is prone to complications. Herein, we stratified complications timewise. Furthermore, we examined whether the weight loss method - bariatric surgery or lifestyle changes - affected the frequency or severity of complications. In this single-centre retrospective analysis, we included 158 patients with massive weight loss undergoing body contouring surgery between 2009 and 2015. We recorded 96 complications in 80 patients, with an overall rate of 51%. Most complications (80.2%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2) and superficial wound infections. Immediate complications (0-24 hours post-operation) affected 8.3% of patients, with early complications (1-7 post-operative days) affecting 16.7% of them and late complications (8-30 post-operative days) affecting 58.3% of them. We found no statistical difference in complication rates when comparing bariatric and non-bariatric patients. Older age (p = 0.042) at operation is associated with an increased risk for immediate haematoma or bleeding requiring surgery. Among early complications, a high maximum weight (p = 0.035) and a high preoperative weight (p = 0.0053) significantly correlated with a haematoma or bleeding requiring surgery. For late complications, seroma correlated with older age (p = 0.0061). Complications are primarily minor and non-life threatening after body contouring surgery because of frequent massive weight loss. Here, no particular subgroup of massive weight loss patients appeared more prone to complications. Thus, for each patient, the risks associated with body contouring surgery following massive weight loss should be considered individually.

Aspects of excess skin in obesity, after weight loss, after body contouring surgery and in a reference population

BACKGROUND

Excess skin is well known after massive weight loss but, there is missing knowledge from various groups.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and compare excess skin in a reference population during obesity, after obesity surgery, and after reconstructive abdominoplasty.

SETTING

University hospital, Sweden.

METHODS

The following 6 groups were included: the reference population, obese adults before obesity surgery, obese adults after obesity surgery, adolescents after obesity surgery, super-obese adults after obesity surgery, and adults after abdominoplasty. All groups filled in the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ). Some groups also underwent measurements of ptosis/excess skin on 4 body parts.

RESULTS

All groups scored significantly higher experience of and discomfort from excess skin compared with the reference population. SESQ scores were significantly higher for obese adults (10.5 ± 8.5) and even higher for adults and adolescents (12.3 ± 8.1 versus 14.4 ± 7.7) after obesity surgery compared with the reference population (1.5 ± 3.5). Abdominoplasty resulted in significantly reduced scores (2.9 ± 5.2). Those undergoing obesity surgery and weight loss had significantly less excess skin measured on arms, breasts, and abdomen compared with before surgery, except for the upper arms on the adolescents. Excess skin increased on inner thighs in both age groups after weight loss. Correlations between objectively measured ptosis/excess skin and the patients' experience of and discomfort were .16 to .71, and the highest correlations were found among adolescents.

CONCLUSION

Excess skin is not a problem for the vast majority of the normal population but is linked to obesity and massive weight loss. The SESQ score illustrates major problems related to excess skin both for obese adults and after obesity surgery for adults and for adolescents, who have problems similar to or worse than adults. Abdominoplasty markedly decreases symptoms.

Self-image after bariatric surgery and its relationship to gender, excess skin and health-related quality of life

Introduction: There is limited knowledge about self-image in relation to excess skin after bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was therefore to explore self-image after massive weight loss and its relationship to gender, weight loss, discomfort regarding excess skin and health-related quality of life. Methods: Eighteen months after obesity surgery, 131 patients filled in questionnaires about self-image (Som jag ser mig själv), excess skin (Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire, SESQ) and quality of life (EQ-5D and SF-36). In addition, maximal ptosis was measured on their abdomen, arms and thighs. Results: There were no differences in self-image or quality of life between the genders. Participants who scored low discomfort on SESQ had a significantly better overall self-image, in all subscales, compared to those with high discomfort scores (p < .05). They also had a significantly higher quality of life on the EQ-5D VAS (p = .045). Correlations were low, if any, between self-image, excess skin, quality of life and ptosis. There were moderate correlations between the SESQ score and the self-image subscore 'physical well-being', and in self-image and quality-of-life scores. Conclusions: Self-image is lower among those who experience a high degree of discomfort of excess skin after bariatric surgery. Its correlation to weight loss, measured excess skin and quality of life is weak.

What Is Known About the Correlates and Impact of Excess Skin After Bariatric Surgery: a Scoping Review

Although bariatric surgery (BS) improves health among adults with severe obesity, it results in excess skin in more than 70% of adults. The purpose of this study was to synthesize current knowledge on (1) the impact of excess skin experienced by adults after BS and (2) the correlates of excess skin quantity and inconveniences. PubMed, PsyArticles, and CINAHL databases were searched in May 2016 for relevant studies. Titles, abstracts, and full texts of studies retrieved were screened independently by two reviewers against inclusion criteria: (1) peer-reviewed primary research studies, (2) samples with adults who underwent BS, and (3) studies reporting the impact of excess skin and/or excess skin correlates. Thirteen quantitative and eleven qualitative studies met inclusion criteria. Negative physical, psychosocial, and daily life impacts of excess skin were reported in 67, 75, and 83% of studies, respectively. Women reported more excess skin and greater inconveniences of excess skin than did men. Based on the quantitative studies, pre-BS BMI, time since BS, and type of BS were not significantly associated with inconveniences of excess skin; findings were inconclusive for other correlates found (e.g. age, weight loss, BMI). Excess skin may adversely impact adults' physical and psychosocial functioning, as well as their activities of daily life after BS. However, evidence is lacking to determine which adults may be at heightened risk of developing or being negatively impacted by excess skin. More research on correlates of excess skill is needed to inform the development of tailored interventions in those more vulnerable to developing excess skin after BS to mitigate adverse consequences.