Healthcare utilization and costs incurred by patients with major depression after being switched from escitalopram to another SSRI for non-medical reasons

Non-medical switching of prescription medications, brand-name drugs and out-of-pocket spending on medicines among Peruvian adults

Objectives

This study evaluated the association between non-medical switching of prescription medications (NMSPM) with brand-name drugs and out-of-pocket spending (OPS) on drugs among Peruvian adults.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of the National Survey of User Satisfaction Health using an analytical cross-sectional design. We included 3155 adults who went to drugstores and pharmacies with prescriptions. The independent variable was the self-reported NMSPM. The outcomes were brand-name drug purchase and OPS on drugs. We calculated crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the OPS on drugs was analysed using linear regression with crude and adjusted β and their 95% CIs.

Key findings

The rate of NMSPM was 6.7%, the proportion of brand-name drug purchases was 55.7% and the average spending on drugs was US$1.73. In the adjusted analysis, the proportion of brand-name drug purchases with NMSPM was higher than without (73.3% versus 54.5%; P < 0.001), with a statistically significant association (adjusted PR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.47; P < 0.001), and the association between NMSPM and OPS on drugs was statistically significant (adjusted β = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.30; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

There is a greater probability of brand-name drug purchases and OPS on drugs when NMSPM exists among adults who go to drugstores and pharmacies in Peru.

Pharmacists' considerations on non-medical switching at the hospital: a systematic review of the economic outcomes of cost-saving therapeutic drug classes

OBJECTIVES

Non-medical switching (NMS) strategies have the capacity to reduce overall costs in hospitals while maintaining a high level of care. However, the most appropriate diseases and/or medicines for NMS strategies are still vague. The aim of this review was to give a state-of-the-art summary regarding the economic outcomes resulting from the use of NMS strategies and to discuss whether they would be implementable in a hospital inpatient setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and ScienceDirect. Studies published between 1988 and 2018 were included if they evaluated the economic impact of NMS strategies or if they performed an economic evaluation between two drugs. Studies regarding antineoplastic agents, endocrine therapies, and immunostimulants, or immunosuppressants, and biosimilars were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty (69%) studies assessing an NMS strategy and 22 (31%) studies comparing two medicines were allocated to four categories: prospective studies (n=8, 11%); retrospective chart reviews (n=29, 40%); retrospective claims analysis (n=13, 18%); and retrospective data analysis (n=22, 31%). Hypercholesterolemia, peptic ulcer, and gastro-oesophageal reflux diseases, diabetes mellitus, and venous thromboembolism were the most prevalent diseases in studies evaluating an NMS strategy. Sixty-eight per cent of the included papers reported a reduction in costs with no significant changes in health outcomes and 8 per cent reported a deterioration in health outcomes and/or increased costs.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of the exclusion of studies regarding biologics or medicines used in oncology, the review highlights that NMS strategies with medicines whose management do not require a thorough clinical assessment were associated with reduced costs and no significant changes in patients' health outcomes, in the inpatient setting. NMS strategies targeting medicines that require an extensive clinical assessment should be evaluated using hospital-specific effectiveness and/or utility data prior to their implementation.

The impact of non-medical switch on type 2 diabetes patients treated with canagliflozin in the commercially insured US population

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of non-medical switch (NMS) from canagliflozin on antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) medication taking behavior.

METHODS

This retrospective real-world database analysis included patients with type 2 diabetes with a prescription claim for canagliflozin (CANA) between August 2015 and January 2016 using administrative claims and longitudinal prescription data. Patients with NMS from canagliflozin were identified as those with discontinuation or switch of canagliflozin and enrolled in a pharmacy benefit manager that removed CANA from formulary in 2016. Patients with NMS were propensity score matched to patients without NMS. Patients had a 6 month baseline period and a 4 month follow-up period.

RESULTS

The study sample comprised 668 patients with NMS matched to 668 patients without NMS (52.4% and 49.9% male, mean age 55.6 and 55.7, respectively). Among patients with NMS, half (52.8%) did not switch to a new AHA medication (i.e. abandoned therapy) after discontinuation of CANA, while the remaining 47.2% switched to a new AHA medication. Over the 4 month follow-up, patients with NMS used significantly fewer unique AHA products compared to patients without NMS (mean [SD] 2.13 [1.40] vs. 2.66 [1.02], p < .0001). Over the 4 month follow-up, 16.5% of patients with NMS had no use of any AHA; by definition, patients without NMS used at least 1 AHA (i.e. canagliflozin).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with NMS, therapy abandonment was a major unintended consequence. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of NMS on clinical outcomes as well as the impact of NMS over a longer follow-up.

Clinical Outcomes Associated with Switching or Discontinuation from Anti-TNF Inhibitors for Nonmedical Reasons

PURPOSE

This study evaluated clinical outcomes and health care resource utilization associated with nonmedical switching from or discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies in US clinical practice.

METHODS

Responding physicians extracted data from the medical charts of patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, or psoriatic arthritis who achieved response on an anti-TNF therapy. Physicians selected 2 cohorts of patients that were matched on diagnosis: patients who were switched/discontinued, for nonmedical reasons, from the anti-TNF therapy on which they achieved response (switchers/discontinuers), and patients who continued on their anti-TNF (continuers). Switchers/discontinuers were followed up for 12 months from the date of discontinuation (index date); continuers were followed up for 12 months from the date of an office visit within 2 months of the matched switcher/discontinuer׳s index date. Multivariate regression was used to compare disease flares, disease control, and health care resource utilization between cohorts, with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses compared data from the continuer cohort to those from (1) patients who were switched to another biologic therapy and (2) patients who were switched to conventional therapy or discontinued from all therapy.

FINDINGS

A total of 377 matched pairs of continuers and switchers/discontinuers were analyzed (N = 754), with the latter cohort comprising 284 patients (73.3%) who were and 93 (24.7%) who did not switch to another treatment (biologic or conventional treatment) immediately after discontinuation. Switchers/discontinuers had more frequent flares than did continuers, across severity levels (adjusted incidence rate ratios = 1.67, 2.36, and 3.48 for mild, moderate, and severe flares, respectively; all, P < 0.05). Switchers/discontinuers had a lower rate of well-controlled disease symptoms (46.9% vs 88.1%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.11; P < 0.001). Switchers/discontinuers also had more frequent inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits (adjusted incidence rate ratios = 3.58, 5.73, and 1.12, respectively; all, P < 0.001). Findings from the subgroup analyses of data from the 183 patients who switched to a biologic therapy and 194 who switched to conventional therapy or discontinued from all therapy were largely consistent with the overall analysis.

IMPLICATIONS

In this study, switching/discontinuation from an anti-TNF therapy for nonmedical reasons was associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes and increased health care resource utilization-factors that should be considered when developing treatment algorithms.

Economic Impact of Therapeutic Substitution of a Brand Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor with an Alternative Generic Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Background

To reduce pharmacy costs, managed care organizations encourage therapeutic substitution from brand to a generic product. However, little is known about whether these cost-containment strategies can also potentially lower total expenditures for payers in treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).

Objective:

To compare economic outcomes of patients with MDD who were switched from a brand selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to an alternative generic SSRI for nonmedical reasons versus patients who continued on the brand SSRI.

Methods:

Adult MDD patients in the Ingenix Impact Database (2003–2007) were considered “switchers” if they received treatment with a brand SSRI and were later switched to an alternative generic SSRI for nonmedical reasons. Patients who remained on the brand SSRI (nonswitchers) were matched 1:1 with switchers. All-cause, mental health-related, and MDD-related rates of hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits and costs over 6 months were compared both descriptively and by using adjusted regression models. A subgroup analysis on patients who were switched from escitalopram (Lexapro) to an alternative generic SSRI was also performed.

Results:

The study included 4449 matched pairs. Compared with nonswitchers, switchers had higher risk of all-cause, mental health–related, and MDD-related use of hospitalizations/ED visits (OR 1.15, 1.34, and 1.54, respectively; all p < 0.01) and higher risk-adjusted mental health–related and MDD-related medical costs ($219 and $222, respectively; both p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis on escitalopram showed similar results; switchers experienced higher risk of any-cause, mental health–related, and MDD-related use of hospitalizations/ED visits (OR 1.21, 1.41, and 1.53, respectively; all p<0.01) and higher risk-adjusted MDD-related medical costs ($151; p<0.05).

Conclusions:

Compared with patients who continued on their patented SSRIs, patients who switched to a generic SSRI incurred more resource use of hospitalizations/ED visits and higher MDD-related health-care costs. The effects of therapeutic substitution should be carefully examined, because use of generic alternatives may not be a cost-saving strategy when total health-care costs are considered.

What one hand giveth the other taketh away: some unpredicted effects of enantiomers in psychopharmacology

It is well known that many medicines are a mixture of two enantiomers, or mirror-image molecules. Two enantiomers occur when a molecule has a single chiral centre and the two mirror images, called S or L (left handed) and R or D (right handed), are usually found in equal amounts in the parent (racemic) mixture. While for many compounds used in clinical practice the active moiety is found in one of the two enantiomers with the other being seen as an unnecessary and redundant component of the racemic mixture, the difference between enantiomers can mean a difference between therapeutic and adverse effects, as well as in beneficial pharmacological effect and potency.