Cost-effectiveness of primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole versus itraconazole in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

CON: Serum biomarker monitoring should not replace primary antifungal chemoprophylaxis in patients with acute leukaemia receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy

Primary antifungal chemoprophylaxis (PAC) is the widespread strategy of choice for the prevention of invasive fungal disease in patients with acute leukaemia (AL). Twice-weekly monitoring of the serum biomarkers (SBM) galactomannan and 1,3-β-d-glucan has been proposed as an alternative prevention strategy to PAC for these patients. This paper outlines the arguments for why PAC should remain as the standard of care in AL, instead of switching to twice-weekly SBM. Arguments put forward in favour of PAC are the strength of evidence for its safety, cost-effectiveness and adaptability, and its adoption by multiple international guidelines as standard of care. The potential implications of PAC for drug interactions and antifungal resistance are also discussed. The drawbacks of twice-weekly SBM are appraised, including missed or delayed diagnoses, unnecessary investigations, deferral of systemic anti-cancer therapy and increased pressure on laboratory services.

Advancing the Minimal Residual Disease Concept in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The criteria to evaluate response to treatment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have changed little in the past 60 years. It is now possible to use higher sensitivity tools to measure residual disease burden in AML. Such minimal or measurable residual disease (MRD) measurements provide a deeper understanding of current patient status and allow stratification for risk of subsequent clinical relapse. Despite these obvious advantages, and after over a decade of laboratory investigation and preclinical validation, MRD measurements are not currently routinely used for clinical decision-making or drug development in non-acute promyelocytic leukemia (non-APL) AML. We review here some potential constraints that may have delayed adoption, including a natural hesitancy of end users, economic impact concerns, misperceptions regarding the meaning of and need for assay sensitivity, the lack of one single MRD solution for all AML patients, and finally the need to involve patients in decision-making based on such correlates. It is our opinion that none of these issues represent insurmountable barriers and our hope is that by providing potential solutions we can help map a path forward to a future where our patients will be offered personalized treatment plans based on the amount of AML they have left remaining to treat.

The role of primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with haematological malignancies

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) represent important complications in patients with haematological malignancies. Chemoprevention of IFIs may play an important role in this setting, but in the past decades the majority of antifungal drugs utilized demonstrated poor efficacy, particularly in the prevention of invasive aspergillosis. The new triazoles are very useful antifungal drugs, more suitable for prophylaxis of IFIs than amphotericin B and echinocandins. In this review, the main clinical data about antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole are analysed. At present, posaconazole appears to be the most efficacious azole in antifungal prophylaxis, particularly in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.