Cost per responder analysis in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism on dialysis treated with cinacalcet

Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatments in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

The study addresses the challenge of treating secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, focusing on the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus pharmacological interventions. Conducting a retrospective analysis on 152 CKD patients with SHPT at the Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, the study matched 80 patients into two groups: 40 undergoing parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation (PTX + AT) and 40 treated with calcimimetics. PTX + AT was more effective in alleviating symptoms, particularly bodily pain, and demonstrated greater cost-effectiveness over a long-term period compared to calcimimetics. This was especially significant in patients with PTH levels > 1800 pg/mL and hyperphosphatemia. Despite similar initial costs, PTX + AT led to a substantial decrease in expenses during the 2-5 years post-treatment period, PTX + AT results in an ICER of -RMB 26.71/QALY for the first post-treatment year and -RMB-111.9k/QALY for the 2-5 year period, indicating cost-effectiveness with reduced long-term costs. The study also found an increased economic burden in managing patients with hyperphosphatemia. Surgical intervention (PTX + AT) is advocated as the primary treatment strategy for severe SHPT in CKD patients, owing to its long-term economic and clinical advantages. The results underscore the need for a severity-based approach in treating SHPT.

Cinacalcet versus Placebo for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis

To assess the efficacy and safety of cinacalcet on secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease, Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until March 2016. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to control the risks of type I and II errors and calculate required information size (RIS). A total of 25 articles with 8481 participants were included. Compared with controls, cinacalcet administration did not reduce all-cause mortality (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.89–1.05, P = 0.41, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 0.86–1.08, RIS = 5260, n = 8386) or cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.83–1.07, P = 0.39, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 0.70–1.26, RIS = 3780 n = 5418), but it reduced the incidence of parathyroidectomy (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.40–0.50, P < 0.001, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 0.39–0.60, RIS = 5787 n = 5488). Cinacalcet increased the risk of hypocalcemia (RR = 8.48, 95% CI = 6.37–11.29, P < 0.001, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 5.25–13.70, RIS = 6522, n = 7785), nausea (RR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.62–2.77, P < 0.001, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 1.45–3.04, RIS = 4684, n = 7512), vomiting (RR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.79–2.24, P < 0.001, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 1.77–2.26, RIS = 1374, n = 7331) and diarrhea (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05–1.32, P = 0.006, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 1.02–1.36, RIS = 8388, n = 6116). Cinacalcet did not significantly reduce the incidence of fractures (RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.21–1.59, P = 0.29, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 0.01–35.11, RIS = 76376, n = 4053). Cinacalcet reduced the incidence of parathyroidectomy, however, it did not reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and increased the risk of adverse events including hypocalcemia and gastrointestinal disorders.

Number needed to treat and associated incremental costs of treatment with enzalutamide versus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

Enzalutamide (ENZA) and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) are approved second-generation hormone therapies for chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compared ENZA with AA in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT) and associated incremental costs to achieve one additional chemotherapy-naïve patient with mCRPC free of radiographic progression, chemotherapy, or death over a 1-year time horizon.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes were obtained from the PREVAIL and COU-AA-302 trials. Three outcomes were evaluated: radiographic progression-free survival, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy initiation, and overall survival at 1 year. NNT was calculated as the reciprocal of the outcome event rate difference for ENZA compared with AA. The incremental costs to achieve one additional outcome at 1 year were calculated as the difference in cost per treated patient multiplied by the NNT. Per-treated-patient costs were considered from a US payer perspective and included medications, monitoring, adverse events, post-progression treatments, and end-of-life care.

RESULTS

Within a 1-year time horizon, the total cost per treated patient for ENZA was $2,666 less than AA. Compared with AA, treating 14 patients with ENZA resulted in one additional patient free of progression or death over 1 year; treating 26 patients with ENZA resulted in one additional patient with chemotherapy delayed over 1 year; and treating 91 patients with ENZA resulted in one additional patient free of death over 1 year. Therefore, ENZA is cost-effective compared with AA for all three outcomes evaluated, and the modeled results suggest ENZA is associated with potentially improved clinical outcomes in delaying chemotherapy initiation and disease progression for chemotherapy-naïve patients. The results are robust in sensitivity analyses, where the effect of changes in key model inputs and assumptions were tested.

CONCLUSION

The results modeled in the present study suggest ENZA is cost-effective compared with AA for treating chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC.

The cost-effectiveness of drug therapies to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism in renal failure: a focus on evidence regarding paricalcitol and cinacalcet

The present review aims to assess the state-of-the-art regarding cost-effectiveness of therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in order to identify the best treatment and review methodological issues. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify papers performing comparative analysis of costs and effects of treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism in adult patients. Among the 66 papers identified, only 10 were included in the analysis. Treatment strategies evaluated in the selected papers were: cinacalcet in addition to vitamin D and phosphate binders versus vitamin D and phosphate binders only (seven papers), paricalcitol versus non-selective vitamin D (two papers), early and late introduction of cinacalcet in addition to vitamin D and phosphate binders (one paper) and paricalcitol versus cinacalcet (one paper). The high degree of heterogeneity among alternative treatments and methodological limits related to cost items considered, resource valuation methods and so on, make it unfeasible to reach a definite conclusion regarding cost-effectiveness but allow for future research opportunities.