Avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base: a prospective outcome study

Acute, isolated fractures of the metatarsal bones: an epidemiologic study

INTRODUCTION

Although metatarsal fractures are common, the significance of previous epidemiologic studies is limited to specific fracture entities, subpopulations, or heterogeneous fracture aetiologies. The aim of the study was to assess the epidemiology of isolated metatarsal fractures in an adult population at a level-1 trauma centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiological and clinical databases were searched for a five-year period. Eligible were all patients with acute isolated metatarsal fractures over the age of 18 years with radiographs in two planes available. Stress fractures, injuries affecting Lisfranc joint stability, and concomitant injuries to other regions than the metatarsals were excluded. Data collection included general demographics, mechanism of injury, season of the trauma and fracture details.

RESULTS

Out of 3259 patients, 642 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for the analysis. The patients' mean age was 44.5 ± 18.9 years, 50.6% were female. 83.3% suffered an isolated, 16.7% multiple metatarsal fractures. Single metatarsal fractures occurred predominantly at the fifth metatarsal bone (81.3%), their frequency decreased with increasing age, with a seasonal peak during the summer. Patients suffering multiple metatarsal fractures were significantly older (51.6 ± 21.2 vs. 43.0 ± 18.1 years; p < 0.001) and the injury resulted significantly more often from a high-energy trauma (6.7% vs. 23.4%; p < 0.001). Multiple metatarsal fractures occurred evenly throughout all metatarsals but revealed a focus on female population with no seasonal differences.

CONCLUSION

Single metatarsal fractures predominantly occurred at the fifth metatarsal bone and showed a seasonal, gender and age dependency. Multiple metatarsal fractures were homogeneously distributed between the different metatarsals with distinct age-dependent gender differences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: A Retrospective Study of 834 Fractures With a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years

BACKGROUND

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are common fractures. Treatment strategies have been debated. We wanted to investigate whether Lawrence and Botte's classification has prognostic value because of time to fracture union, and evaluate if weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) and nonweightbearing (NWB) treatment strategy had effect on time to fracture union in nonoperatively treated fractures.

METHODS

Computerized database search, patients diagnosed between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015.

RESULTS

We identified 834 fractures; 510 (61.2%) zone 1, 157 (18.8%) zone 2, and 167 (20.0%) zone 3. Most (94.4%) were treated nonoperatively; time to fracture union was 7.5 (SD 7.7), 7.7 (5.6), and 9.2 (8.1) weeks for zone 1, 2, and 3, respectively, which gave a significant longer time to union for zone 3 compared to zone 1 fractures (P = .04). There was no difference in time to fracture union when comparing WBAT and NWB for all fracture zones. Failure to union, defined as crossover to surgery and/or delayed union, was found in 13 (2.7%) zone 1, 5 (3.2%) zone 2, and 6 (3.8%) zone 3 fractures. Refracture during follow-up was found in 3 (0.6%) zone 1 and 14 (8.9%) zone 3 fractures.

CONCLUSION

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures have high union rates with nonoperative treatment. No difference in time to union could be found between WBAT and NWB treatment strategies for all fracture zones. We observed a significantly longer time to fracture union for zone 3 fractures compared to zone 1 fractures. Refracture occurs in a nonnegligible share of nonoperatively treated zone 3 fractures.

Comparison of Self-adhesive Taping and Short-Leg Casting to Treat Tuberosity Fractures of the Proximal Fifth Metatarsal: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes of self-adhesive taping (SAT) or a short- leg cast (SLC) groups with base of fifth metatarsi.

METHODS

Functional outcome was assessed by the Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) at the Emergency and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks. Labour loss, bone union and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at 12 weeks were also assessed.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the SAT group and SLC group in VAS-FA scores at time of injury, 6 and 12 weeks. The SAT group had a significantly higher mean VAS-FA score at the second and fourth weeks of follow-up compared with the SLC group (P = .001 and P = .039, respectively). No correlation was observed between the fracture gap and functional scores for both groups. There was no difference in AOFAS between two groups at 12 weeks. Twenty one patients were unable to work for a mean of 38.2 days during the treatment. 10 patients with the SAT missed 37.5 days and eleven patients with the SLC g missed 40.2 (p: 0.41). The bone union was also achieved for all patients within 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with SAT in these fractures had satisfactory functional results compared with traditional SLC. Although there were no significant differences in labor loss and use of assistive devices, The VAS-FA score was significantly higher in SAT group than the SLC group at the second and fourth weeks of treatment.

The Fifth Metatarsal Shaft Fracture Is Well Treated With Benign Neglect

Background. Spiral fifth metatarsal fractures have been studied previously in professional dancers. However, little has been reported about outcomes of these injuries in the general population. The objective of this study was to examine patient demographics of those who sustain this injury and their functional outcomes, as stratified by treatment type. Methods. A total of 186 "nonprofessional dancer" patients with a fifth metatarsal fracture who were treated by one orthopaedic surgeon at our academic medical center were identified through chart review. All patients were allowed to weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT). Time to healing, persistence of pain, range of motion, and complications were recorded. Independent samples t tests, 1-way analysis of variance, and Fisher exact tests were used for analysis. Results. Thirty-seven of the 186 patients with fifth metatarsal fractures reviewed were identified as having a spiral fifth metatarsal fracture with appropriate follow-up. The cohort was 78.4% female with a mean age of 50.3 years. Twenty-two were initially treated in a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot, 14 in a postoperative shoe, and 1 continued in their own shoes. All patients were allowed to WBAT. All fractures healed by a mean of 3.1 months. By the end of the follow-up period, 67.6% of patients had full range of ankle motion, with 5.4% reporting feeling stiff, 27.0% reporting mild persistent pain, and 2.7% reporting significant persistent pain. Conclusion. Fifth metatarsal shaft ("Dancer's") fractures occur within the general population, not only among professional dancers. Without operative fixation and regardless of nonoperative treatment selected, these fractures heal reliably and do so without clinically relevant complication.Level of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Fractures of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal (PFMT) are one of the most common foot injuries, accounting for 61% to 78% of all foot fractures, but full consensus on their classification, diagnosis, and treatment has not yet been reached.

»

The most commonly accepted classification is that of Lawrence and Botte, who divided the location of PFMT fractures into 3 zones with respect to their healing potential.

»

Avulsion fractures of the tuberosity of the base (zone 1) generally heal well, and nonoperative treatment is commonly recommended.

»

Internal fixation may be considered for displaced fractures that extend into the fourth-fifth intermetatarsal joint (zone 2) as well as for nondisplaced fractures in athletes or high-demand patients, with the aims of reducing the healing time and expediting return to sport or work.

»

Stress fractures of the proximal diaphysis (zone 3) are preferably treated operatively, particularly in the presence of signs of delayed union. With nonoperative treatment, supportive measures such as ultrasonography or external/extracorporeal shockwave therapy have been demonstrated to have limited potential for the enhancement of fracture-healing.

Association between Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Characteristics in the 5th Metatarsal Bone Base Fracture in Elderly for Prediction of Osteoporotic Fracture

Background

This study aimed to analyze the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and the type of 5th metatarsal fracture, as well as to demonstrate whether there is a difference in radiological findings (heel alignment angle [HAA], heel moment arm [HMA], and metatarsus angle) between fracture types.

Methods

A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study and allocated into 3 groups: the Zone 1 group (N=36), the Zone 2 group (N=33), and the Zone 3 group (N=18). The participants’ demographic data, T-scores, existing fracture or osteoporosis medications, and radiologic parameters including HAA, HMA, and metatarsus adductus angle were analyzed and compared.

Results

There was a significant difference between the mean age of the participants, with the highest age in the Zone 1 group and the lowest in the Zone 3 group. Regarding the history of concurrent fracture or osteoporosis medications, there was no significant difference between the 3 groups. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the 3 groups about the BMD values. In contrast, the HAA was statistically significant in all groups with a positive correlation of −8.9 in the Zone 1 group, a negative correlation of 3.55 in the Zone 2 group, and an inverse relationship of 6.1 in the Zone 3 group. The metatarsus adductus angle was significantly higher in the Zone 3 group than the Zone 1 and Zone 2 groups.

Conclusions

The location of a 5th metatarsal bone fracture is not significantly associated with BMD. However, mechanical influences, such as hindfoot varus or forefoot adductus, have a significant correlation with fracture types.

Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Fifth Metatarsal Avulsion Fractures

Fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures are among the most common fractures seen by foot and ankle surgeons. Studies have centered around classification systems, but debate continues regarding surgical versus conservative treatment modalities. The present study focused on quantifying the time for healing fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures. Specifically, we compared healing time, displacement, and incidence of nonunion among surgically managed and conservatively managed avulsion fractures. Surgically managed patients underwent either open reduction with internal fixation or closed reduction with percutaneous fixation. Conservatively managed fractures were immobilized with a below-knee cast or pneumatic walking boot. Fifty-one patient records (51 feet) were retrospectively compared for basic demographics, smoking, and diabetes status, presence of peripheral neuropathy, Stewart classification, amount of displacement, rate of nonunion, and radiographic healing time. The groups did not differ significantly based on age, sex, or the remaining clinical characteristics including time to consolidation. However, among the 31 conservatively managed patients, 11 (35.5%) developed an asymptomatic nonunion versus none among the 20 patients treated surgically (p = .004). All patients were asymptomatic at 1 year. This study provides insight into the time required for fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures to heal or become asymptomatic. The surgical management of these fractures helped to eliminate the risk of nonunion and helped ensure a timely return to preinjury activity. We recommend surgical management of any fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture displaced >2 mm. Both patients and physicians should have realistic expectations when making decisions regarding treatment modalities for fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures.

Adoption of direct discharge of simple stable injuries amongst (orthopaedic) trauma surgeons

INTRODUCTION

The importance of routine follow-up of several relatively simple stable injuries (SSIs) is questionable. Multiple studies show that direct discharge (DD) of patients with SSIs from the Emergency Department results in patient outcomes and experiences comparable to 'standard care' with outpatient follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate to which extent DD of SSIs has been adopted amongst trauma and orthopedic surgeons internationally, and to assess the variation in the management of these common injuries.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to members of an international trauma- and orthopaedic surgery collaboration. Participants, all trauma- or orthopaedic surgeons, were presented with eleven hypothetical cases of patients with simple stable injuries in which they were asked to outline their treatment plan regarding number of follow-up appointments and radiographs, physiotherapy and when to start functional movement. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons selecting direct discharge (i.e. zero scheduled appointments), per injury. Secondary outcomes included clinical agreement (>80% of respondents answering similarly) on total number of follow-up appointments (0, 1 or ≥2), radiographs (0, 1 or ≥2), routine physiotherapy referral (yes/no) and when to start functional movement (weeks).

RESULTS

138 of 667 (20.7%) surgeons completed the survey. Adoption of direct discharge ranged from 4-45% of case examples. In 10 out of 11 cases, less than 25% of surgeons selected direct discharge. Clinical agreement regarding number of appointments and when to start functional movement was not reached for any of the injuries. There was clinical agreement on number of radiographs for one injury and for four injuries regarding routine referral to a physiotherapist.

DISCUSSION

Despite available evidence, DD of SSIs has not been widely adopted worldwide. Practice variation still exists even for these common injuries. This variation suggests inefficiency and consequently unnecessarily high healthcare costs. (Orthopaedic) trauma surgeons are encouraged to evaluate their current treatment protocols of SSIs.

Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Athletes: Management of Acute and Chronic Conditions

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are common in the athlete and can be a source of significant, temporary disability and missed playing time. The pattern of fracture can vary, and the type of fracture leads to a significantly different prognosis and treatment. Jones fractures of the fifth metatarsal are particularly common and difficult to treat in the athlete, can have recurrence and refracture, and require expertise to heal. Intramedullary screw fixation is currently the preferred method of fixation. Most other (non-Jones fractures and os vesalianum) proximal fifth metatarsal fractures can be treated successfully without surgery.

Hard-Soled Shoe Versus Short Leg Cast for a Fifth Metatarsal Base Avulsion Fracture: A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether tolerated weight-bearing in a hard-soled shoe was noninferior to the use of a short leg cast for the treatment of a fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture, as assessed with use of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 6 months after the fracture.

METHODS

A total of 145 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 96 patients were randomly assigned to either the hard-soled shoe group (46 patients) or the cast group (50 patients). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference on the 100-mm VAS between groups at 6 months after the fracture. Secondary outcome measures included the time to return to preinjury activity and patient-reported satisfaction. Analysis was performed according to both an intention-to-treat basis (i.e., patients were included in the assessment of their assigned treatment arm, even if they crossed over to the other treatment arm prior to completing the 6-month follow-up) and a per-protocol basis (i.e., patients who completed the 6-month follow-up were analyzed according to the treatment they received).

RESULTS

At 6 months after the fracture, the mean 100-mm VAS was 8.6 ± 7.0 mm in the hard-soled shoe group and 9.8 ± 7.3 mm in the cast group (p = 0.41) according to intention-to-treat analysis. The mean difference in 100-mm VAS between the 2 groups was -1.3 mm (95% confidence interval, -4.3 to 1.8 mm). The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval did not exceed the noninferiority margin of 10 mm, indicating that treatment with the hard-soled shoe was noninferior to treatment with the short leg cast. The proportion of patients who reported satisfaction with their treatment was similar between the hard-soled shoe and cast groups (89.5% compared with 87.5%, respectively; p = 0.79), but the time to return to preinjury activity was significantly shorter in the hard-soled shoe group (37.2 ± 14.4 days compared with 43.0 ± 11.1 days in the cast group; p = 0.04). There were no cases of nonunion in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight-bearing as tolerated in a hard-soled shoe for a fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture was noninferior to the use of a short leg cast as assessed with use of a 100-mm VAS at 6 months after the fracture. Patient-reported satisfaction was similar between groups, but the time to return to preinjury activity was shorter in the hard-soled shoe group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Adequate union rates for the treatment of acute proximal fifth metatarsal fractures

PURPOSE

To compare the bone healing, clinical, and return to daily activity outcomes after either surgical or conservative management of acute zone 1, 2, and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies published from the earliest record to January 2019 using EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. All articles assessing clinical outcomes of acute proximal fifth metatarsal fractures were included. Bone healing and clinical outcomes were thereafter calculated using a simplified pooling method.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles comprising of a total of 1,239 fractures were included, of which one was a randomized controlled trial, seven were prospective studies, and 24 were retrospective studies. 627 zone 1 fractures demonstrated union rates of 93.2% following conservative treatment and 95.1% following surgical treatment. Conservatively managed zone 1 fractures were displaced 49.5% of the time, compared to a rate of 92.8% for the surgically treated cases. For Jones' (zone 2) fractures, bone healing outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment showed union rates of 77.4% versus 96.3%, refracture rates of 2.4% versus 2.1%, and mean time to union of 11.0 weeks versus 9.4 weeks, respectively. Only ten proximal diaphyseal (zone 3) fractures were reported, with a mean return to work of 8.2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Acute zone 1 fractures are preferably treated conservatively as similar union rates were found after both conservative and surgical management. In contradistinction, acute zone 2 fractures demonstrate higher union rates and faster time to union when treated surgically. The outcomes of acute zone 3 fractures are rarely reported in the literature, so treatment recommendations remain unclear. Further research of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures is warranted to provide more definitive conclusions, but current findings can aid surgeons during the shared clinical decision making process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Biomechanical Comparison of Hook Plate vs Headless Compression Screw Fixation of Large Fifth Metatarsal Base Avulsion Fractures

BACKGROUND

Debate exists on the optimum fixation construct for large avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base. We compared the biomechanical strength of 2 headless compression screws vs a hook plate for fixation of these fractures.

METHODS

Large avulsion fractures were simulated on 10 matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. Specimens were assigned to receive two 2.5-mm headless compression screws or an anatomic fifth metatarsal hook plate, then cyclically loaded through the plantar fascia and metatarsal base. Specimens underwent 100 cycles at 50%, 75%, and 100% physiological load for a total of 300 cycles.

RESULTS

The hook plate group demonstrated a significantly higher number of cycles to failure compared with the screw group (270.7 ± 66.0 [range 100-300] cycles vs 178.6 ± 95.7 [range 24-300] cycles, respectively; P = .039). Seven of 10 hook plate specimens remained intact at the maximum 300 cycles compared with 2 of 10 screw specimens. Nine of 10 plate specimens survived at least 1 cycle at 100% physiologic load compared with 5 of 10 screw specimens.

CONCLUSION

A hook plate construct was biomechanically superior to a headless compression screw construct for fixation of large avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Whether using hook plates or headless compression screws, surgeons should consider protecting patient weight-bearing after fixation of fifth metatarsal base large avulsion fracture until bony union has occurred.

Jones Fracture in the Nonathletic Population

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are common injuries with a unique history. Treatment of these fractures is controversial partly because of confusion regarding fracture subtype nomenclature. Today "Jones fracture" refers to proximal fifth metatarsal fracture in zones 2 or 3. Zone 2 fractures are acute injuries, and their optimal treatment is unclear. Zone 3 fractures commonly occur in the presence of a chronic stress reaction. Because of poor healing potential, zone 3 fractures typically require operative treatment. Zone 1 fractures have excellent healing potential and may be treated nonoperatively with a weightbearing as tolerated protocol.

Factors influencing treatment recommendations for base of 5th metatarsal fractures in orthopaedic residency programs

BACKGROUND

Management of proximal 5th metatarsal fractures remains a controversial topic in orthopaedic surgery. Both operative and non-operative approaches have been described in the clinical setting. This confusion has led to non-standardized treatment recommendations for proximal 5th metatarsal fractures. This study was designed to analyze concordance rate of treatment recommendations between orthopaedic trainees and orthopaedic foot and ankle experts.

METHODS

An online survey containing 14 cases of proximal 5th metatarsal fractures were distributed to 92 orthopaedic residents in two ACGME-accredited programs. Relevant weight-bearing radiographs, patient's age and gender were provided, and two questions regarding treatment recommendations were surveyed. Resident's recommended treatment was then matched against ultimate treatment by orthopaedic foot and ankle experts. ANOVA and T-test are used for associations between the rate of concordant treatment with PGY and trainee foot and ankle experience. Fleiss' kappa was used to assess the inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

Seventy-two residents returned the survey. The overall concordance rate was 43.98% with no correlation between agreement rate and PGY-years. No difference in agreement rate was observed between residents who had completed their foot and ankle rotation versus those who had not. There was a slight inter-observer agreement in recommending treatment among all residents (κ=0.117, 95% CI: 0.071-0.184).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated no significant concordance between resident level in training regarding proximal 5th metatarsal fracture treatment decisions, nor between residents and subspecialty-trained foot and ankle surgeons. Increased rotations with foot and ankle fellowship-trained surgeons throughout residency may be desirable to improve the quality of residency training.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Isokinetic Strength Comparison of Tuberosity Fractures of the Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Treated With Elastic Bandage vs Cast

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the strength of injured and healthy ankle muscle as well as functional and clinical outcomes between patients with proximal fifth metatarsal tuberosity fractures who received elastic bandage treatment and those who received cast immobilization.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients who presented to our clinic between February 2018 and April 2019 were randomly divided into 2 groups: 33 received elastic bandages (group 1) and 32 received cast immobilization (group 2). All patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments at our clinic after 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. Visual analog scale-foot and ankle (VAS-FA) score, time missed from work, and using assistive devices were recorded as clinical outcomes. Both ankle plantarflexion-dorsiflexion and inversion-eversion muscle strengths (peak torque) were measured using an isokinetic dynamometer for each group and were compared with those of the healthy extremities.

RESULTS

The mean missed work was 11.3 days in group 1 and 27.6 days in group 2. Groups 1 and 2 used assistive devices for a mean of 6.7 and 16.2 days, respectively (P = .001). Group 1 had a significantly higher VAS-FA score at the 2nd, 4th, and 8th week of follow-up compared with group 2, and no significant differences were observed at the time of injury and at the 12th and 24th weeks. The muscle strength deficits in group 1 were present at the 4th week, whereas those in the cast immobilization group were determined at the 4th and 8th weeks in all muscles. During the 12th and 24th week of follow-up, no significantly differences in both extremities were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Elastic bandage treatment was better than cast immobilization in terms of preserving ankle muscle strength, clinical outcomes, and functional scores regardless of the degree of fracture displacement. Moreover, the present study emphasized that cast immobilization offered no advantages in this fracture treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prognostic randomized controlled trial.

Results of Functional Treatment of Epi-Metaphyseal Fractures of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the fifth metatarsal base (5th MT) are common foot injuries, but their treatment remains a subject of debate. The aim was to assess the midterm outcome of functionally treated epi-metaphyseal fractures (Lawrence and Botte types I and II) of the 5th MT.

METHODS

This study was a longitudinal retrospective database study with prospective follow-up. Included were all patients with an acute, isolated fracture to the 5th MT base (types I and II). All patients were treated functionally: weightbearing as tolerated without immobilization. Fracture types and fracture characteristics (displacement <2 mm/>2 mm, articular involvement, number of fragments) were assessed retrospectively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the visual analog scale for foot and ankle (VAS FA) and the quality-of-life score (QoL) SF-12 were collected prospectively at 2- and 5-year follow-up. Out of 95 patients, 43 patients (45%) were included with a median follow-up of 5.7 (1.5) years.

RESULTS

For both the VAS FA and SF-12, excellent scores were observed. For 30 patients (77%), longitudinal 2- and 5-year follow-up was available. No significant longitudinal changes could be observed for the VAS FA and SF-12. For both time points, neither fracture type nor characteristics significantly influenced any outcome parameter assessed.

CONCLUSION

Functional treatment by full weightbearing and free range of motion led to excellent 5-year results for both type I and II fractures. Neither fracture location nor characteristics had a significant influence on the 5-year PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative study.

Acute Fifth Metatarsal Tuberosity Fractures: A Systematic Review of Nonoperative Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Acute metatarsal fractures are a common lower extremity injury. Although surgery may be recommended in specific cases, most are treated nonoperatively. Treatment protocols vary significantly among practitioners, with no consensus on the most efficacious approach. This systematic review aims to identify the effect of treatment protocols on union rate and functional outcome after an acute fifth metatarsal tuberosity fracture.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Multiple databases, including CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane CEntral Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from database inception to March 4, 2018 to identify clinical studies addressing nonoperative management of metatarsal fractures reporting nonunion, pain, and/or length of recovery.

METHODOLOGY

Two reviewers independently completed title, abstract, and full-text screening. Data abstraction was completed in duplicate. Outcome measures and complications were descriptively analyzed.

SYNTHESIS

A total of 1941 studies were eligible for screening. Seven studies (four randomized controlled trials and three prospective cohort studies) satisfied inclusion criteria. This resulted in a total of 388 patient with acute fifth metatarsal tuberosity fractures in 12 different treatment arms, with the most common treatment including plaster casting (7). The mean age was 42 years (27 to 56 years), and the overall nonunion rate was low (1.1%). Four unique functional scores were reported across all studies, and all showed good to excellent short-term results. The overall qualities of studies were moderate, with particular limitations in randomization and concealment allocation.

CONCLUSION

Most acute fifth metatarsal tuberosity fractures heal well, with good-to-excellent functional outcomes with nonoperative treatment, regardless of technique. We recommend a conservative rehabilitation framework, including 2 to 3 weeks of immobilization in a walking cast, followed by gradual increase in activity and strengthening until clinical union is achieved.

Treatment of Zone 1 Fractures of the Proximal Fifth Metatarsal With CAM-Walker Boot vs Hard-Soled Shoes

BACKGROUND

Zone 1 fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are usually treated nonsurgically using some type of immobilization. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes, time to return to prior activity levels, and rate of bone healing when using a hard-soled shoe (HSS) vs a controlled ankle motion (CAM)-walker boot (CWB).

METHODS

Seventy-two consecutive patients with zone 1 fractures of the fifth metatarsal base were treated conservatively with either an HSS or CWB by 2 different providers. We included 57 women and 15 men, average age of 41.3 (range, 16-88) years. Radiographic findings, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and American Orthopaedic Ankle & Foot Society (AOFAS) midfoot score were assessed. Patients were followed at 4, 8, 10, 12, and 24 weeks or until asymptomatic and able to return to prior level of activities. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U, Fisher exact, and chi-square tests. P values <.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Age and gender distributions were similar in both groups (P = .23 and P = .57). Patients had similar VAS and AOFAS scores after 8 (P = .34 and P = .83) and 12 (P = .87 and P = .79) weeks. Average time for bone healing was significantly faster using the CWB (7.2 weeks) when compared to the HSS (8.6 weeks) (P < .001). The average time to return to prior level of activities was similar in both groups (8.3 weeks for CWB and 9.7 weeks for HSS) (P = .11). Fracture displacement was equal in both groups, with a mean of 1.9 mm of displacement in patients using the HSS, and a mean of 1.6 mm in those using the CWB (P = .26).

CONCLUSION

Zone 1 fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal can be treated conservatively with either a hard-soled shoe or a CAM-walker boot. Even though patients treated in the CAM-walker boot demonstrated earlier signs of complete healing, similar clinical and functional results were achieved with both treatments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Comparative outcomes of foot cast and short leg cast in pseudo-Jones avulsion fracture: a single blinded randomized controlled trial

Background

Fractures of the metatarsal bones account for 35% of all foot fractures. Conservative management of fractures proximal to the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal bone (pseudo-Jones) is by protected weight bearing. The methods of protected weight bearing include short-leg casting and splinting (boot cast, Jones's bandage and elastic bandage). However, currently there is no consensus as to which method is the most suitable.

Method

We have conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes of foot casting (FC) and short leg casting (SLC) to assess pain, function and complication outcomes for the treatment of pseudo-jones metatarsal fractures. This single-center, single blind,randomized controlled trial was conducted between 1 June 2016-1 July 2018 at Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Result

A total of 72 pseudo-jones metatarsal fracture participants were randomly allocated to treatment by foot cast or short leg cast. The primary outcomes were pain VAS, AOFAS and complications measured at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after receiving the treatment. Seventy-two patients (36 paticipants per group) were enrolled to receive either FC or SLC. The mean VAS measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 8 weeks were 7.36, 1.97, 0.58, 0.17 and 0.08 respectively in the FC group; and 6.09, 2.91, 1.23, 0.37 and 0.11 respectively in the SLC group. The mean AOFAS at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks were 33.60, 68.22, 82.72, 91.75 and 98.11 respectively in the FC group; and 32.60, 60.20, 70.20, 92.24 and 99.13 in the SLC group. The estimated mean difference of pain VAS and AOFAS at 2 weeks and 4 weeks were - 0.94 (95% CI: - 1.53, - 0.34), - 0.65 (95%CI: - 1.24, - 0.05), 8.02 (95%CI: 3.74, 12.10) and 12.52 (95%CI: 8.27, 16.78), which were statistically significantly better in the FC groups when compared to the SLC groups. However, there were no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 6 and 8 weeks.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the application of foot casting can improve pain VAS and AOFAS function at 2 and 4 weeks in the treatment of pseudo-jones metatarsal fractures when compared to short leg casting. However, at 6 and 8 weeks, there were no statistically significantly different between the two groups.

Trauma assessment clinic: Virtually a safe and smarter way of managing trauma care in Ireland

INTRODUCTION

The Trauma Assessment Clinic [TAC], also referred to as Virtual Fracture Clinic, offers a novel care pathway for patients and is being increasingly utilised across the Irish and UK health care systems. The provision of safe, patient centred, efficient and cost-effective treatment via a multidisciplinary team [MDT] approach is the primary focus of TAC. The Trauma and Orthopaedic unit at Tullamore Hospital was the first centre to introduce a TAC in Ireland and this overview outlines the experiences of this pilot.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Patients arriving to the Emergency Department with injuries that were TAC appropriate were treated as per a recognised protocol. They were given information regarding their injury and a removable splint or cast and told to expect a follow up phone call from the orthopaedic team. Within 24 h the patient's clinical notes and x-rays were assessed by the TAC MDT and patients were called immediately to be advised as to their planned treatment.

RESULTS

To date the TAC pilot in Tullamore Hospital has reviewed 2704 patients. 35% of patients were discharged at the TAC review stage, 27% were referred to an appropriate clinic (e.g. Shoulder injuries referred to an upper limb specialist) or a general trauma follow-up clinic, and 38% were referred onto physiotherapy services local and community based for follow-up. A survey of patients reviewed in the TAC revealed that 97% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their recovery. The cost of each TAC consultation was €28 versus €129 for a traditional fracture clinic appointment.

CONCLUSION

Our experience of the TAC is that it provides a very safe, patient focused and cost-effective means of delivering trauma care. It provides a more streamlined and improved patient journey in select patients with certain fracture patterns, allowing for patient empowerment without compromising clinical care and marries current available technology with up to date best clinical practice.

[Metatarsal and toe fractures]

Metatarsal and toe fractures are the most frequent injuries of the foot skeleton. Nondislocated fractures can be conservatively treated with good success. Long-term relief and immobilization including the ankle joint are unnecessary. Metatarsal fractures close to the base are nearly always associated with Lisfranc luxation and treatment must also take the instability of the tarsometatarsal joints into consideratíon. Basal fractures of the 5th metatarsal bone require a differentiated consideration. The correct classification is necessary in order to initiate an adequate treatment. In general, intra-articular layer formation, inclination >10° and shortening between 3 mm and 5 mm, taking the position of the head of the metatarsal bone into consideration, are recommended as indications for surgery. Operative treatment of toe fractures is only rarely necessary.

Suture Anchor Fixation for Fifth Metatarsal Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures: A Case Series and Review of Literature

Fifth metatarsal tuberosity avulsion fractures are common. Despite good outcomes with nonoperative treatment, acute fractures with displacement, intra-articular involvement, comminution, or painful nonunion have been reported to benefit from early open reduction and internal fixation, especially in athletes. No consensus has been reached regarding the best surgical fixation technique. We present a case series of 4 patients with displaced fifth metatarsal tuberosity avulsion fractures and an innovative technique of fixation for the tuberosity avulsion fractures using a suture anchor.

Comparative Outcomes of Cast and Removable Support in Fracture Fifth Metatarsal Bone: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fractures of the metatarsals account for 35% of all foot fractures. Conservative management of fractures proximal to the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal bone (pseudo-Jones) is protected weightbearing. The methods of protected weightbearing include a short-leg cast and splint (boot cast, Jones bandage, and elastic bandage). However, no consensus has yet been reached regarding which method is most suitable. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of a short-leg cast and splint for pseudo-Jones metatarsal fractures. We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases up to October 29, 2016. Five of 104 studies (3 comparative studies and 2 randomized controlled trials; n = 246 patients) were eligible. Of the studies, 3, 5, and 4 were included in pooling of early (within 1 month) and last follow-up foot function scale scores and fracture nonunion, respectively. The unstandardized mean difference of early (within 1 month) and last follow-up foot scores for the short leg cast were -14.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] -24.12 to -5.04) and -3.89 (95% CI -6.30 to -1.49), significantly lower than the scores for the splint (bandage or boot support) for pseudo-Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone. The risk of nonunion of the fifth metatarsal bone fracture of the patients who were treated with short leg cast method was insignificantly greater at 1.57 times (95% CI 0.29 to 8.49) that compared with the splint. The treatment of fracture of the pseudo-Jones fifth metatarsal bone with a splint (boot or bandage) resulted in foot function scale scores better than those with short leg cast treatment and a lower nonunion rate.

Comparative study of surgical and conservative treatments for fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures (type I) in young adults or athletes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects and complications of minimally invasive surgery in treating displaced avulsion fractures (2-3 mm) of fifth metatarsal base zone I in young adults or athletes.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with displaced fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures were assigned to operative and nonoperative groups by randomization. Patients in nonoperative group were immobilized with plaster, while patients in operative group were treated with closed reduction and fixation with a percutaneous screw.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 14 months on average (ranging from 12 to 24 months). All cases got primary union except for three patients in nonoperative group with malunion and two with frequent mild to moderate plantar pain. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was significantly better in operative group at 6 months after treatment ( p < 0.05) but not significantly different at 12 months after treatment ( p > 0.05). The average time of full weight bearing and returning to work was significantly shorter in operative group than nonoperative group ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In young adults or athletes with displaced avulsion fractures of fifth metatarsal base zone I, closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation provides anatomical stable fixation and early mobilization.

[Fractures of the base of the V metatarsal bone-current concepts revised]

Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone are one of the most frequent fractures to the foot and ankle. Despite the high frequency and although a number of studies are now available, treatment frequently does not follow the available evidence. Among the reasons is the inconsistent terminology used and that the studies available are neglected. The aim of this review is to present the current classifications, the available treatment studies and to derive evidence-based treatment recommendations. The term "Jones fracture" has been used inconsistently for different fracture entities and should, therefore, not be used anymore. Fractures are mostly classified according to Lawrence and Botte into three zones. However, the available studies demonstrate that type I and type II fractures according to Lawrence and Botte do not differ with respect to the prognosis. Both fractures can be successfully healed by functional treatment with weightbearing as tolerated. Consequently, a differentiation between these two zones does not seem to be meaningful. Therefore, they should be summarized as epi-metaphyseal fractures. Even dislocated, intra-articular, and multifragmentary fractures in this region can be functionally treated with good results. Fractures in the meta-diaphyseal region (Lawrence and Botte type III, distal to the IV and V intermetatarsal articulation) demonstrate a high rate of symptomatic non-unions after conservative treatment. Therefore, these fractures should be primarily treated operatively by closed reduction and intramedullary screw fixation.

Comparison of the Outcomes Between Headless Cannulated Screw Fixation and Fixation Using a Locking Compression Distal Ulna Hook Plate in Fracture of Fifth Metatarsal Base

The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiologic results of internal fixation with a headless cannulated screw versus a locking compression distal ulna hook plate for fractures at the base of the fifth metatarsal bone, zone 1. From April 2012 to April 2015, 30 cases (29 patients) were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 13 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups stratified by the fixation method: screw (group A, n = 15) or plate (group B, n = 15). We measured the displacement to diastasis of the fracture on the foot oblique radiographs taken pre- and postoperatively in each group, recorded the time to bony union, and measured the difference in the reduction distance in each group. The clinical results were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score at 12 months postoperatively. In group A, the mean interval to union was 54.2 ± 9.3 days, the mean displacement to diastasis had improved to 0.3 ± 0.4 mm postoperatively (p < .001), and the mean reduction distance was 2.9 ± 1.0 mm postoperatively. In group B, the mean interval to union was 41.5 ± 7.0 days, the mean displacement to diastasis had improved to 0.06 ± 0.2 mm postoperatively (p < .001), and the mean reduction distance was 4.1 ± 1.6 mm. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scale score was 97.7 ± 3.4 in group A and 98.2 ± 3.2 in group B. The interval to union was significantly different between the 2 groups (p = .01). No complications were recorded. Our findings have shown that the plate is a reasonable and alternative method for the surgical treatment of fifth metatarsal base fractures.

Initial support with no immobilisation as therapy of choice for fractures of the fifth metatarsal

AIM

To demonstrate the effectiveness of early weight bearing with no immobilisation (functional therapy) applied to fractures of the fifth metatarsal.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective case and control observational study was performed among 382 fractures on the fifth metatarsal comparing functional, conservative-orthopaedic and surgical treatments. Fractures were classified according to the settlement on the distal, diaphyseal or proximal part of the bone, the recommended therapy and the treatment performed. Influence of age, profession and characteristics of the injury were considered and results were measured using the parameters incapacity for work and number and intensity of complications.

DISCUSSION

Fractures of the fifth metatarsal are the most common injuries of the foot. Whether conservative or surgical treatment is recommended depends on the sort of fracture, the trend nowadays is to use non-invasive methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional treatment for metatarsal fractures provides earlier healing and fewer adverse effects than conventional therapies, and becomes first choice for non-displaced fractures and most displaced fractures of the fifth metatarsal.

Functional treatment for fractures to the base of the 5th metatarsal - influence of fracture location and fracture characteristics

Background

Fractures to the base of the fifth metatarsal are common, but their treatment remains controversial. Especially for Lawrence and Botte (L&B) type II fractures, there is conflicting evidence and consequently no consensus. Further, many authors consider displacement, articular involvement, and number of fragments an indication for surgery, although evidence is missing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of functional treatment for all L&B type I and II fractures. Of special interest were the influence of (1) the fracture location (L&B type I vs. II) and (2) the fracture characteristics (displacement, intra-articular involvement, communition) on the subjective outcome.

Methods

Retrospective registry study with a prospective follow-up. Patients with an acute, isolated, epi-metaphyseal fracture to the fifth metatarsal bone (L&B type I and II) treated by full weightbearing with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Fracture location (L&B type I and II) and characteristics (displacement <2 mm or >2 mm, intra-articular involvement, and number of fragments) were assessed. Outcome parameters were return to work, return to sports, VAS-FA, and SF-12. The influence of the fracture (1) location and (2) -characteristics on these parameters was tested.

Results

Thirty-nine patients (40 ± 15 years, 56% female) were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 22 ± 10 months. L&B type I fractures occurred in 59%, type II in 41%. Thirty-one percent of all fractures were dislocated, 74% intra-articular, and 41% multi-fragmentary. Patients returned to work after 17 ± 12 days, to sports after 53 ± 22 days. The VAS-FA score at the final follow-up was 96 ± 4, SF-12 PCS score 57 ± 5 and MCS score 51 ± 8. No complications were reported, no patient required surgery. None of the assessed outcome parameters differed significantly between (1) the different fracture locations (L&B type I vs. II) or (2) the different fracture characteristics (displacement, intra-articular involvement, and number of fragments).

Conclusions

(1) Both, L&B I and II fractures featured excellent results with immediate full weightbearing. Consequently, L&B type I and II fractures should be summarized as epi-metaphyseal fractures. (2) Fracture displacement, articular involvement, and number of fragments did not influence the outcome. Therefore, functional treatment should be recommended for all epi-metaphyseal fractures.

Functional Outcomes for Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are relatively common and can be treated with a variety of treatment modalities. The goals of the current study were to answer the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in functional outcomes with different nonoperative treatment modalities for avulsion and Jones fractures? (2) What is the long-term functional impairment? This study included 53 patients who were treated for proximal fifth metatarsal fracture at 1 university health care system between 2004 and 2013. Treatment methods included shoe modification, cast, and boot. Patients completed a telephone questionnaire that included selected questions from the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS). Treatment groups were stratified as shoe modification or immobilization, and the results of the MODEMS survey were compared. At most recent follow-up, no significant difference was found between the 2 patient groups (P=.062) for self-reported effects of the injury on work and quality of life. No significant difference was found for frequency of use of pain medication (P=.157), patient satisfaction with current symptoms (P=.633), ambulatory status (P=.281), or pain level with strenuous activity (P=.772). Obese patients were more likely to have severe pain with strenuous activity (P=.015). Most (87%) patients were able to ambulate without the need for assistive devices. Of the study patients, 79% could wear dress shoes, excluding high heels, comfortably. The findings showed that patients who were treated with a variety of nonoperative methods for closed proximal fifth metatarsal fracture had acceptable functional outcomes, regardless of treatment method. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e1030-e1035.].

The outcome of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: redefining treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

To optimize the treatment strategy and reduce treatment costs of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures, clinical and patient-reported outcome, and its determinants were addressed.

METHODS

A retrospective adult cohort study including 152 proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: 121 nonoperatively and 31 operatively treated. In the operative group, 21 were zone 1 and 10 zone 2 fractures. Median follow-up was 37.5 (IQR 20.8-52.3) months with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. Twenty-three demographic, fracture, and treatment characteristics were assessed as well as the healthcare costs. Outcome was assessed using the patient files, anterior-posterior and oblique X-rays, foot function index (FFI), visual analog score (VAS), and SF-36 questionnaires.

RESULTS

The median FFI, physical SF-36, and VAS scores did not significantly differ between nonoperatively and operatively treated patients. The FFI and physical SF-36 were predominantly affected by a history of mobility impairment and pre-existent cardiovascular diseases, whereas mental SF-36 correlated significantly with higher ASA-score. Overall complication rate was 5.9% (4.1 vs. 12.9%; p = 0.065, nonoperative vs. operative, respectively). Nonunion was recorded in only one (nonoperatively) treated patient. The total healthcare costs for operative treatment were 4.2 times higher compared to nonoperative treatment (€1960 vs. €463 per patient, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the clinical and patient-reported outcome was good. The foot function and quality of life were mainly affected by comorbidity, rather than fracture and treatment-related variables. Although nonoperatively treated patients indicated decreased mental quality of life, our study indicates that proximal fifth metatarsal fractures can safely be treated nonoperatively without the risk of nonunion, with fewer complications and lower healthcare costs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate fixation versus intramedullary screw fixation for displaced avulsion fifth Metatarsal Base fractures: a comparative retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary screw (IMS) fixation was wildly used in fifth metatarsal base fractures (FMBFs) and the results were satisfactory. However, in the comminuted osteoporosis or small displaced avulsion FMBFs, anatomical reduction and stable fixation could not be achieved with IMS. The Locking Compression Plate (LCP) distal ulna hook plate fixation was a novel alternative fixation method. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine if LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation resulted in improved outcomes compared to the traditional IMS fixation in displaced avulsion FMBFs.

METHODS

Of 43 patients with displaced avulsion FMBFs, 18 patients were treated with LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation and 25 were treated with IMS fixation. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically and followed up to 12 months. The surgery time, time for hospital stay, time for weight-bearing, time for bony union, time for return to daily life, pain relief, functional outcome and complications after treatment with LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation or IMS fixation were compared. The functional outcome was assessed by the AOFAS (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society) mid-foot score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. Meanwhile, pain scores were obtained at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Surgery time was less in LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation cohort compare to IMS fixation cohort (p < 0.0001). Time for partial weight-bearing (p < 0.0001) and full weight-bearing (p < 0.0001) also demonstrated significant improvements in patients with LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation compared to IMS fixation. Patients in the LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation cohort had significantly increased AOFAS at 9 months (p < 0.0001) and 12 months (p < 0.0001) after surgery compared to the IMS fixation cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort study, LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation as an alternative fixation method was better therapy for the displaced avulsion FMBFs compared to IMS fixation. LCP distal ulna hook plate fixation had a short surgery time and improved functional performance.

Cost comparison of orthopaedic fracture pathways using discrete event simulation in a Glasgow hospital

OBJECTIVE

Healthcare faces the continual challenge of improving outcome while aiming to reduce cost. The aim of this study was to determine the micro cost differences of the Glasgow non-operative trauma virtual pathway in comparison to a traditional pathway.

DESIGN

Discrete event simulation was used to model and analyse cost and resource utilisation with an activity-based costing approach. Data for a full comparison before the process change was unavailable so we used a modelling approach, comparing a virtual fracture clinic (VFC) with a simulated traditional fracture clinic (TFC).

SETTING

The orthopaedic unit VFC pathway pioneered at Glasgow Royal Infirmary has attracted significant attention and interest and is the focus of this cost study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Our study focused exclusively on patients with non-operative trauma attending emergency department or the minor injuries unit and the subsequent step in the patient pathway. Retrospective studies of patient outcomes as a result of the protocol introductions for specific injuries are presented in association with activity costs from the models.

RESULTS

Patients are satisfied with the new pathway, the information provided and the outcome of their injuries (Evidence Level IV). There was a 65% reduction in the number of first outpatient face-to-face (f2f) attendances in orthopaedics. In the VFC pathway, the resources required per day were significantly lower for all staff groups (p≤0.001). The overall cost per patient of the VFC pathway was £22.84 (95% CI 21.74 to 23.92) per patient compared with £36.81 (95% CI 35.65 to 37.97) for the TFC pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results give a clearer picture of the cost comparison of the virtual pathway over a wholly traditional f2f clinic system. The use of simulation-based stochastic costings in healthcare economic analysis has been limited to date, but this study provides evidence for adoption of this method as a basis for its application in other healthcare settings.

Surgical Treatment of Zone 1 Fifth Metatarsal Base Fractures Using the Locking Compression Plate Distal Ulna Hook Plate

BACKGROUND

The distal ulna hook plate was recently introduced for the treatment of fifth metatarsal base fractures, but no special articles have reported the surgical results of the plate fixation of displaced or comminuted fifth metatarsal base fractures in zone 1, which are the most common forefoot fractures.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with Lawrence classification zone 1 fifth metatarsal base fractures with extra-articular displacement greater than 2 mm (n = 13) and intra-articular displacement fractures (n = 8) were included in the study. Patients were treated with the distal ulna hook plate. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically, and the functional outcomes were graded using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scoring system. Time to union and return to pre-injury levels of activity were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scores were 42.25 points (range, 27-55 points) preoperatively and 93.16 points (range, 87-100 points) 1 year postoperatively. Mean time to complete union was 61.9 days (range, 52-85 days). Nineteen patients reported returning to previous activities of daily living at a mean of 79.8 days (range, 59-91 days). Two patients showed radiographic signs of mild degenerative changes and noted mild pain, and one patient experienced hardware irritation.

CONCLUSIONS

The distal ulna hook plate might be considered an effective surgical method for zone 1 displaced fifth metatarsal base fractures or multifragmentary, osteoporotic fifth metatarsal base fractures.

Symptomatic treatment or cast immobilisation for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective, randomised, single-blinded non-inferiority controlled trial

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare symptomatic treatment of a fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal with immobilisation in a cast. Our null hypothesis was that immobilisation gave better patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The alternative hypothesis was that symptomatic treatment was not inferior.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients were randomised to receive four weeks of treatment, 36 in a double elasticated bandage (symptomatic treatment group) and 24 in a below-knee walking cast (immobilisation group). The primary outcome measure used was the validated Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) Score. Data were analysed by a clinician, blinded to the form of treatment, at presentation and at four weeks, three months and six months after injury. Loss to follow-up was 43% at six months. Multiple imputations missing data analysis was performed.

RESULTS

At four weeks and six months, symptomatic treatment proved non-inferior in terms of primary outcome.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Immobilisation is no better than symptomatic treatment in the management of a fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal when judged by PROMs. Significant loss to follow-up with this injury could be expected in longer term. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:806-11.

Management of sports injuries of the foot and ankle: An update

Injuries to the foot in athletes are often subtle and can lead to a substantial loss of function if not diagnosed and treated appropriately. For these injuries in general, even after a diagnosis is made, treatment options are controversial and become even more so in high level athletes where limiting the time away from training and competition is a significant consideration. In this review, we cover some of the common and important sporting injuries affecting the foot including updates on their management and outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1299-1311.

Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment in 5th metatarsal base fractures (Zone 1)

The treatment of Zone 1 fractures of the 5th metatarsal base with >2mm of displacement remains controversial. We prospectively analyzed 29 patients with 5th metatarsal base fractures (Zone 1) during 2009-2014. Radiography was performed to assess the degree of fracture gap and metatarsal length. Patients with gaps of 2mm or less were treated conservatively using a short leg cast or splint (Group A), while patients with fracture gap >2mm were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group B patients were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and Group C patients were placed in a short leg cast only. Visual analog scale (VAS) score and American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) score were obtained at the initial consult and at the last follow-up after treatment; change of the 5th metatarsal length was also measured at the initial consult and after complete bony union. Our study demonstrated that radiographic union of all cases was observed with a significant decrease in VAS and AOFAS scores, regardless of the initial fracture gap and type of management. Additionally, there was no difference seen in final VAS scores for patients with longer metatarsals when compared to those in whom the metatarsals were unchanged or shortened.

Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: Anatomy, Classification, Treatment and Complications

Context

Fractures of proximal fifth metatarsal are one of the most common fractures of the foot.

Evidence Acquisition

A search of PubMed for studies on proximal fifth metatarsal fracture and Jones fracture focusing on the classification and management was performed. The reference list of the retrieved articles was searched for additional related studies.

Results

The vascular supply and soft tissue anatomy of the fifth metatarsal explains the increased risk of delayed union and non-union in fractures at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Lawrence and Botte classify proximal fifth metatarsal fractures according to their location: tuberosity avulsion fractures (zone 1), fractures at metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction extending into the fourth-fifth intermetatarsal joint (zone 2) and proximal diaphyseal fractures (zone 3). Zone 1 fractures are treated conservatively with functional immobilization and early mobilization with excellent outcome. For zone 2 and zone 3 fractures, acute forms can be treated conservatively but with a risk of delayed union time and time for return to function. Therefore, early surgical fixation with intramedullary screw is advised in athletic individuals. For cases presented with signs of delayed union and non-union, surgical treatment with or without bone grafting is recommended. Complications of these fractures and their management are discussed in this report.

Conclusions

Lawrence and Botte’s classification of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures is recommended by experts, due to its implication on prognosis and treatment strategy. Zone 1 fractures should be treated conservatively due to their excellent healing potential. Early operative treatment is advised for zone 2 and zone 3 fractures, especially in the athletic group. Complications of delayed union, non-union and refractures should be treated by revision fixation and bone grafting.

Likelihood of surgery in isolated pediatric fifth metatarsal fractures

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the fifth metatarsal bone are common and surgery is uncommon. The "Jones" fracture is known to be in a watershed region that often leads to compromised healing, however, a "true Jones" fracture can be difficult to determine, and its impact on healing in pediatric patients is not well described. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess patterns of fifth metatarsal fracture that led to surgical fixation in an attempt to predict the likelihood for surgery in these injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients aged 18 and under who were treated for an isolated fifth metatarsal fracture from 2003 through 2010 at our pediatric hospital. Patient demographics, treatment, and complications were noted. Radiographs were reviewed for location of fracture and fracture displacement. Patients and fracture characteristics were then compared.

RESULTS

A total of 238 fractures were included and 15 were treated surgically. Most surgical indications were failure to heal in a timely manner or refracture and all patients underwent a trial of nonoperative treatment. Jones criteria for fracture location were predictive of needing surgery (P<0.01) but confusing in the clinic setting. Fractures that occurred between 20 and 40 mm (or 25% to 50% of overall metatarsal length) from the proximal tip went on to surgery in 18.8% (6/32) of the time, whereas those that occurred between <20 mm had surgery in 4.9% (9/184). This was a statistically significant correlation (P=0.0157).

CONCLUSIONS

Although fractures of the fifth metatarsal are common, need for surgery in these fractures is not. However, a region of this bone is known to have trouble healing, and it can be difficult to identify these "at-risk" fractures in the clinical setting. We found simple ruler measurement from the proximal tip of the fifth metatarsal to the fracture to help determine this "at-risk" group and found a significant difference in those patients with a fracture of <20 mm compared with those 20 to 40 mm from the tip; this can help guide treatment and counsel patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Functional outcome of fifth metatarsal fractures

INTRODUCTION

Fifth metatarsal fractures are common and the outcome has been reported; however, prospective studies reporting the functional outcome using validated questionnaires are lacking in the literature. The aims of this study were to determine whether fifth metatarsal fractures remain symptomatic in the medium term and whether the fracture type influences outcome.

METHODS

Over the course of a year, 117 patients (62 avulsion fractures, 26 Jones fractures, 29 shaft fractures) were followed up (1 month, 4 months, 12 months), with functional outcome assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI)- and Short Form 36 (SF36)-validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

The FFI reduced (function improved) over the course of the year from 22.0 (8.4-38.5) at 1 month to 0.0 (0.0-4.2) at 4 months, to 0.0 (0.0-1.3) at 1 year. There was no significant difference in the FFI scores with regard to gender or fracture type. Pain scores were also observed to decline over the year, with no significant differences between fracture types. However, while the severity of pain was low, the numbers of people reporting pain were relatively high. At 1 month, >80% of patients reported ongoing pain (83% avulsion, 88% Jones and 83% shaft), reducing to 38% at 4 months and 28% at 1 year. At final follow-up, 25% with an avulsion fracture, 28% with a Jones fracture and 33% with a shaft fracture reported pain.

CONCLUSIONS

While 25-33% of patients continue to experience pain at 1 year, <10% experience any limitation of their activities. At the final follow-up at 1 year, there were no significant differences in functional outcome by fracture type, gender or patient age. Patients should be advised about the likelihood of ongoing low-level symptoms, even after a year from injury in this previously presumed innocuous injury.

The fifth metatarsal base: anatomic evaluation regarding fracture mechanism and treatment algorithms

Fractures occurring within the 1.5-cm proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal are commonly considered avulsion fractures. The exact mechanisms of such fractures are controversial. The present study focused on determining the likely mechanism of fracture according to the exact anatomy to allow for more successful treatment. The research sample included 10 frozen cadaveric specimens. The lateral band of the plantar fascia, peroneus brevis, and articular surface were identified and separated from their attachments, thereby splitting the fifth metatarsal base into zones A, B, and C. In zone A, the attachment of the plantar fascia was 6.6 ± 2.2 mm from the inferior aspect, 9.5 ± 2.9 mm from the proximal aspect, and 11.5 ± 0.9 mm from the lateral aspect. In zone B, the attachment of the peroneus brevis was 12.0 ± 2.2 mm from the inferior aspect, 10.2 ± 2.2 mm from the proximal aspect, and 11.5 ± 0.9 mm from the lateral aspect. Zone C was measured from the border of zone B and encompassed the articulation of the fifth metatarsal to the cuboid. We propose that fractures occurring in the most proximal end of the fifth metatarsal, zone A, are caused by a lateral band of plantar fascia and might be able to be treated conservatively by immobilization with weightbearing. We also propose that fractures occurring in zones B and C result from traumatic tension on peroneus brevis and might need to be treated with strict immobilization and non-weightbearing or open reduction internal fixation.

Nonunion of fifth metatarsal fractures

Metatarsal fractures are those most frequently encountered in the foot. More than half of these are of the 5th metatarsal. The incidence is increasing, along with the activity levels of the general population. Fractures of the 5th metatarsal require careful evaluation and classification to ensure selection of the optimum treatment plan. Distal fractures rarely require fixation, even when displacement is wide. Cases of established nonunion or refracture require fixation.

Locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate as alternative fixation for fifth metatarsal base fracture

Intramedullary screw fixation has been the most common treatment for fifth metatarsal base fractures. However, screw application will not achieve accurate reduction in fractures with small fragments, osteoporotic bone, or Lawrence zone 1 fractures. Because of the similar anatomic architecture between the distal ulna and the fifth metatarsal base, the purpose of the present study was to assess the results of a locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate in stabilizing displaced zone 1 or 2 fifth metatarsal base fractures. A total of 19 patients with Lawrence zone 1 (n = 12) or 2 (n = 7) fractures of the fifth metatarsal base were treated surgically with a locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically, and the functional outcomes were graded using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scoring system. Radiographic bony union was obtained in all patients, at an average of 7.4 weeks. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score improved from 26 (range 0 to 45) points preoperatively to 94 (range 72 to 100) points at the final follow-up visit. Three patients developed post-traumatic cubometatarsal arthrosis, and 1 patient developed sural nerve neurapraxia. In our experience, the distal ulna hook plate achieved a high rate of bony consolidation and anatomically suitable fixation in zone 1 or 2 fifth metatarsal base fractures. We suggest that the locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate should be considered as an alternative treatment of multifragmentary, osteoporotic, and tuberosity avulsion (zone 1) fifth metatarsal base fractures.

Radiographic classification for fractures of the fifth metatarsal base

OBJECTIVE

Avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base (MTB5) are common fore foot injuries. Based on a radiomorphometric analysis reflecting the risk for a secondary displacement, a new classification was developed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 95 healthy, sportive, and young patients (age ≤ 50 years) with avulsion fractures of the MTB5 was included in the study and divided into groups with non-displaced, primary-displaced, and secondary-displaced fractures. Radiomorphometric data obtained using standard oblique and dorso-plantar views were analyzed in association with secondary displacement. Based on this, a classification was developed and checked for reproducibility.

RESULTS

Fractures with a longer distance between the lateral edge of the styloid process and the lateral fracture step-off and fractures with a more medial joint entry of the fracture line at the MTB5 are at higher risk to displace secondarily. Based on these findings, all fractures were divided into three types: type I with a fracture entry in the lateral third; type II in the middle third; and type III in the medial third of the MTB5. Additionally, the three types were subdivided into an A-type with a fracture displacement <2 mm and a B-type with a fracture displacement ≥ 2 mm. A substantial level of interobserver agreement was found in the assignment of all 95 fractures to the six fracture types (κ = 0.72). The secondary displacement of fractures was confirmed by all examiners in 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomorphometric data may identify fractures at risk for secondary displacement of the MTB5. Based on this, a reliable classification was developed.

National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes

OBJECTIVE

To present recommendations for athletic trainers and other allied health care professionals in the conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes.

BACKGROUND

Because ankle sprains are a common and often disabling injury in athletes, athletic trainers and other sports health care professionals must be able to implement the most current and evidence-supported treatment strategies to ensure safe and rapid return to play. Equally important is initiating preventive measures to mitigate both first-time sprains and the chance of reinjury. Therefore, considerations for appropriate preventive measures (including taping and bracing), initial assessment, both short- and long-term management strategies, return-to-play guidelines, and recommendations for syndesmotic ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability are presented.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations included in this position statement are intended to provide athletic trainers and other sports health care professionals with guidelines and criteria to deliver the best health care possible for the prevention and management of ankle sprains. An endorsement as to best practice is made whenever evidence supporting the recommendation is available.