Outcomes following pantalar arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis

Pantalar Arthrodesis

A triple arthrodesis is comprised of subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints arthrodesis. A pantalar arthrodesis is triple arthrodesis combined with tibiotalar arthrodesis. The goal of the procedure is to obtain a correction of deformity and achieve a plantigrade, functional, painless, stable, weightbearing foot that can be used to ambulate. This is done by creating an osseous continuity across the ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints. There are several approaches and fixation strategies that result in successful clinical union and should be chosen to match the clinical situation. Modern techniques result in high rates of union and pain relief.

Limb salvage versus below knee amputation for severe adult lower limb deformity - A retrospective, comparative series

BACKGROUND

This study compares outcomes of patients with severe, multiplanar, fixed, pantalar deformities undergoing limb preservation with either pantalar fusion (PTF) or talectomy and tibiocalcaneal fusion (TCF), versus below knee amputation (BKA).

METHODS

Fifty-one patients undergoing either PTF, TCF and BKA for failed management of severe pantalar deformity were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty-seven patients underwent PTF, 8 TCF and 16 BKA. Median age at surgery was 55.0 years (17-72 years) and median follow-up duration was 49.9 months (24.0-253.7 months). Clinical evaluation was undertaken using the MOxFQ, EQ-5D and Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine score (SIGAM). Patients were also asked whether they were satisfied with their surgery and whether they would have the same surgery again.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcomes, satisfaction, or complications between the groups. Twenty-two patients undergoing PTF (81.5%), 6 patients undergoing TCF (75%), and 15 patients undergoing BKA (93.8%) were satisfied overall (p = 0.414). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who would opt for the same procedure again (p = 0.142): 23 in the PTF group (85.2%), 8 in the TCF group (100%), and 11 in the BKA group (68.8%). Seven patients undergoing PTF (25.9%), 2 patients undergoing TCF (25%) and 6 patients undergoing BKA (37.5%) had major complications (p = 0.692).

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that PTF, TCF and BKA can all provide an acceptable outcome in treatment of severe, degenerative pantalar deformities. This data may be useful in counselling patients when considering salvage versus amputation in such cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3(Original) Clinical Research Article.

Triple arthrodesis of the foot with allograft through a lateral incision in planovalgus deformity

BACKGROUND

Triple arthrodesis may be performed using various surgical approaches, most typically through two incisions and without structural bone graft. We have found that a single lateral incision allows adequate surgical exposure and structural bone graft facilitates lateral column reconstruction.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 30 triple arthrodeses with additive bone graft using a single lateral incision. Outcome measures were SF12 score, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire index score, visual analogue pain score and satisfaction scores, and radiographic assessment at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements were seen in all measured outcomes, except the SF12 mental component score. The union rate was 100% with no loss of correction at 12 months. Twenty-nine out of 30 patients were satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, triple arthrodesis using structural allograft through a single lateral incision was safe and effective, with restoration and maintenance of surgical deformity correction and foot length.

Severe pes planovalgus successfully treated in a patient with mutilating rheumatoid arthritis using a new surgical approach involving medial malleolar resection and medial displacement of the talus: A case report

We report the case of a 56-year-old female with mutilating rheumatoid arthritis, who developed severe pes planovalgus. The foot was successfully reconstructed through a combination of osteotomies, including medial displacement of the talus accompanied by resection of the medial malleolus. This maneuver enabled a ∼1-cm medial displacement of the hindfoot while minimizing the adverse effect on forefoot rotation.

Radiologic patterning of joint damage to the foot in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Foot and ankle deformities greatly affect the quality of life of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The aim of this study was to elucidate the pattern of destruction of the RA foot and its impact on patients.

METHODS

We cross-sectionally investigated RA patients (274 patients and 542 feet) using radiographs. The grade of joint destruction was assigned using Larsen's grading system for 12 joints in the foot and ankle. Cluster analysis was performed using the K-means method to classify the pattern of joint destruction. Of the 274 patients evaluated radiographically, 212 were assessed for functional disability using questionnaires.

RESULTS

Cluster analysis revealed that 542 feet were divided into 5 clusters, named according to the characteristic distribution of joint destruction: cluster I (normal type), cluster II (forefoot type), cluster III (midfoot type), cluster IV (mid-hindfoot type), and cluster V (combined type). Radiographic measurements revealed the characteristic deformities of each cluster: splay foot for cluster II, flat foot for cluster III, hindfoot malalignment for cluster IV, and mixtures of these characteristics for cluster V. A distribution map of each cluster based on disease duration revealed that cluster III peaked in cases of 5-10-year disease duration and subsequently decreased, followed by a gradual increase of cluster IV and cluster V. Cluster IV and cluster V showed significant changes in functional disability compared to cluster III.

CONCLUSION

This report is the first to reveal the pattern of RA foot deformities and their impact on patients using statistical measures in a large series.

Additive hindfoot arthrodesis for rheumatoid hindfoot disease: a clinical study of patient outcomes and satisfaction

Advanced rheumatoid hindfoot disease causes significant pain and disability. Hindfoot arthrodesis is a useful procedure but is often overlooked as a treatment option. The objective of this study was to report the improvements in patients' health, pain, functional ability and satisfaction following this procedure. Thirty-seven patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were recruited from the outpatient clinic and underwent 42 hindfoot arthrodesis procedures by a single surgeon. Outcome measures were SF12 score, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire index score, visual analogue pain score and satisfaction scores, as well as radiographic assessment. Assessment was undertaken at the pre-admission clinic and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Statistically significant improvements were seen at 6 and 12 months in all measured outcomes. The union rate was 97.6%. The satisfaction rate was 92.5%. The complication rate was 7.1%. The functional benefit and outcome scores are comparable to those reported following hip and knee replacement in patients with RA. The findings of this study provide evidence that hindfoot arthrodesis should be considered a worthwhile surgical treatment in the rheumatoid patient with advanced hindfoot disease. Healthcare professionals involved in the management of these patients should be aware of the potential benefits of this procedure and refer early to a foot and ankle surgeon specialist when conservative treatment modalities have failed.