Microscope use in clinical veterinary practice and potential implications for veterinary school curricula

Digital Cytology in Veterinary Education: A Comprehensive Survey of Its Application and Perception among Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated technological changes in veterinary education, particularly in clinical pathology and anatomic pathology courses transitioning from traditional methods to digital pathology (DP). This study evaluates the personal effectiveness and satisfaction, as well as the advantages and disadvantages, of DP, in particular digital cytology (DC), as a teaching method among European veterinary students, both at the undergraduate and postgraduate level, who attended digital pathology courses during and before the pandemic. A further aim is to discuss the differences between the two student groups. A Google Form survey consisting of 11 multiple-choice questions was emailed to pathology teachers and distributed to their students. Results indicated that undergraduate students showed greater digital pathology training, favouring DC as the most effective learning modality. In contrast, postgraduate students reported less digital slide training, and their preference for learning cytology was split between DC alone and DC integrated with traditional microscopy. All students experienced whole slide imaging for learning cytology slides prevalently, and they stated that DC enhanced their learning experience. While DC demonstrates personal effectiveness and satisfaction as a teaching method, it is important to not replace pathology training with light microscopy completely, as almost a third of the students indicated.

Histology as a paradigm for a science-based learning experience: Visits by histology education spirits of past, present, and future

The term "histology" was coined a little over 200 years ago and the subject has always relied on microscopy as its defining technology. Microscopy was and still is an essential approach for the description of cellular components and their arrangements in living organisms. For more than a century and a half, histology or microanatomy has also been part of the basic science education for biomedical students. Traditionally, it has been taught in two major components, a didactic transfer of information, either in a lecture or self-learning format, and in active-learning laboratory sessions. These two modes of histology instruction conform with the dual-processing theory of learning, one being more automatic and depending mainly on rote memorization, whereas the other is analytical, requiring more advanced reasoning skills. However, these two components of histology education are not separate and independent, but rather complementary and part of a multi-step learning process that encourages a scientific analysis of visual information and involves higher-level learning skills. Conventional, as well as modern electronic instruction methods (e-learning) have been used in complementary ways to support the integrated succession of individual learning steps as outlined in this manuscript. However, as recent curricular reforms have curtailed instructional time, this traditional format of teaching histology is no longer sustainable and a reflective reassessment of the role of histology in modern biomedical education is a timely necessity.

Virtual Microscopy Goes Global: The Images Are Virtual and the Problems Are Real

For the last two centuries, the scholarly education of histology and pathology has been based on technology, initially on the availability of low-cost, high-quality light microscopes, and more recently on the introduction of computers and e-learning approaches to biomedical education. Consequently, virtual microscopy (VM) is replacing glass slides and the traditional light microscope as the main instruments of instruction in histology and pathology laboratories. However, as with most educational changes, there are advantages and disadvantages associated with a new technology. The use of VM for the teaching of histology and pathology requires an extensive infrastructure and the availability of computing devices to all learners, both posing a considerable financial strain on schools and students. Furthermore, there may be valid reasons for practicing healthcare professionals to maintain competency in using light microscopes. In addition, some educators may be reluctant to embrace new technologies. These are some of the reasons why the introduction of VM as an integral part of histology and pathology instruction has been globally uneven. This paper compares the teaching of histology and pathology using traditional or VM in five different countries and their adjacent regions, representing developed, as well as developing areas of the globe. We identify general and local roadblocks to the introduction of this still-emerging didactic technology and outline solutions for overcoming these barriers.

Implementing Digital Pathology into Veterinary Academics and Research

The advantages of digital pathology (DP) have been recognized as early as 1963, but only within the last decade or so have the advancements of slide scanners and viewing software made the use and implementation of DP feasible in the classroom and in research. Several factors must be considered prior to undertaking the project of implementing the DP workflow in any setting, but particularly in an academic environment. Sustained and open dialogue with information technology (IT) is critical to the success of this enterprise. In addition to IT, there is a multitude of criteria to consider when determining the best hardware and software to purchase to support the project. The goals and limitations of the laboratory and the requirements of its users (students, instructors, and researchers) will ultimately direct these decisions. The objectives of this article are to provide an overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with the integration of DP in education and research, to highlight some important IT considerations, and to discuss some of the requirements and functionalities of some hardware and software options.

Virtual Microscopy Is More Effective Than Conventional Microscopy for Teaching Cytology to Veterinary Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Virtual microscopy (VM) using scanned slides and imaging software is increasingly used in medical curricula alongside instruction in conventional microscopy (CM). Limited reports suggest that VM is useful in the veterinary education setting, and generally well-received by students. Whether students can apply knowledge gained through VM to practical use is unknown. Our objective was to determine whether instruction using VM, compared to CM, is a successful method of training veterinary students for the application of cytology in practice (i.e., using light microscopes). Seventy-one veterinary students from Colorado State University who attended a voluntary 3-hour cytology workshop were randomized to receive the same instruction with either VM (n = 35) or CM (n = 36). We compared these students to a control group (n = 22) of students who did not attend a workshop. All students took a post-workshop assessment involving the interpretation of four cases on glass slides with CM, designed to simulate the use of cytology in general practice. Students also took an 18-question survey related to the effectiveness of the workshop, providing their opinions on cytology instruction in the curriculum and their learning preference (VM or CM). The mean assessment score of the VM group (14.18 points) was significantly higher than the control group (11.33 points, p = .003), whereas the mean of the CM group (12.77 points) was not statistically significantly different from controls (p = .170). Not only is VM an effective method of teaching cytology to veterinary students that can be translated to a real-world case scenario, but it outperformed CM instruction in this study.

A century of teaching veterinary parasitology in South Africa - Lessons learnt

Finding a healthy balance between classical parasitology and clinical veterinary medicine remains a challenge. Veterinary parasitology, of vital interest in sub-Saharan Africa, has always featured prominently at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria (founded in 1920). The faculty was initially an integral part of the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute (OVI), and parasitology was taught by specialist researchers from OVI - a cult of total coverage prevailed. Presenting three separate courses - ectoparasitology, helminthology and protozoology - continued for many decades. From 1949 to 1973 an attendance course in veterinary parasitology was presented in the final academic year. This was revived in 1995, with a "refresher" in parasitology for final-year students (during their clinic rotation), including diagnostic parasite identification and problem-solving group discussions (prepared and led by students). Student contact time (including practical classes and assessments), initially 80 h/discipline/year, was gradually reduced. A species-based approach (introduced in 1998) had a major impact - an introductory course in general parasitology was followed by fragmented lectures in the subsequent 2 years on key parasitic diseases in the species-based subjects. In 2013 the curriculum reverted to being discipline-based, i.e. all aspects of parasitology and parasitic diseases covered during one academic year. The 3 sub-disciplines are included in a 2-semester course, with a total contact time of 100 h, which barely meets the minimum recommended by the WAAVP. Various lessons learnt are discussed.

Virtual Microscopy in Histopathology Training: Changing Student Attitudes in 3 Successive Academic Years

Several veterinary faculties have integrated virtual microscopy into their curricula in recent years to improve and refine their teaching techniques. The many advantages of this recent technology are described in the literature, including remote access and an equal and constant slide quality for all students. However, no study has analyzed the change of perception toward virtual microscopy at different time points of students' academic educations. In the present study, veterinary students in 3 academic years were asked for their perspectives and attitudes toward virtual microscopy and conventional light microscopy. Third-, fourth-, and fifth-year veterinary students filled out a questionnaire with 12 questions. The answers revealed that virtual microscopy was overall well accepted by students of all academic years. Most students even suggested that virtual microscopy be implemented more extensively as the modality for final histopathology examinations. Nevertheless, training in the use of light microscopy and associated skills was surprisingly well appreciated. Regardless of their academic year, most students considered these skills important and necessary, and they felt that light microscopy should not be completely replaced. The reasons for this view differed depending on academic year, as the perceived main disadvantage of virtual microscopy varied. Third-year students feared that they would not acquire sufficient light microscopy skills. Fifth-year students considered technical difficulties (i.e., insufficient transmission speed) to be the main disadvantage of this newer teaching modality.