Treatment of Occipital Neuralgia by Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation

Ultrasound-guided continuous radiofrequency ablation of the proximal greater occipital nerve is effective in refractory occipital neuralgia: a retrospective cohort study

Pain in occipital neuralgia (ON) originates from the upper cervical nerves converging with the trigeminal complex. Greater occipital nerve (GON) blocks and radiofrequency treatments can be used in refractory ON.To assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided proximal greater occipital nerve (PGON) continous radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) in ON throughout 1 year.We analyzed data from medical records and headache diaries. Before the intervention and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the intervention, at each appointment we evaluated the headache intensity through the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11), the headache disability, through the Six-Item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), as well as the headache days per month. Treatment efficacy was determined by NRS-11 score < 4 at 12 months.A total of 18 patients were analyzed. The mean initial NRS-11 score was of 8.78 ± 0.732. At least 50% of pain reduction was noted in all patients at 6 months, and in 66% patients at 12 months. The frequency of attacks was correlated to poor response (r = 0.598; p = 0.009). The efficacy of the diagnostic block was correlated to successful response (r = -0.789; p = 0.001). For the categorical variables, the electric shock pain was associated with NRS-11 score ≥ 4 (p = 0.041), and lancinating pain was associated with NRS-11 score < 4 at 12 months (p = 0.031).Ultrasound-guided PGON CRFA in refractory ON significantly reduced pain for up to 1 year. The initial frequency of attacks, electric shock like pain, and reduced response to diagnostic block were associated with reduced response.

Reoperation following Primary Greater Occipital Nerve Decompression Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although nerve decompression surgery is an effective treatment for refractory occipital neuralgia, a proportion of patients experience recurrence of pain and undergo reoperation. This study analyzes the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of reoperation following primary greater occipital nerve (GON) decompression.

METHODS

A total of 215 patients who underwent 399 primary GON decompressions were prospectively enrolled. Data included patient demographics, medical and surgical history, reoperation rates, intraoperative findings, surgical technique, and postoperative outcomes in terms of pain frequency (days per month), duration (hours per day), intensity (scale, 0 to 10), and migraine headache index. Bivariate analyses, univariable logistic regression analysis, and multivariable logistic regression analysis, were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven GON decompressions (6.8%) required reoperation with neurectomy at a median follow-up time of 15.5 months (range, 9.8 to 40.5 months). Cervical spine disorders on imaging that did not warrant surgical intervention (OR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.61 to 14.79; P < 0.01) and radiofrequency ablation (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.45 to 15.2; P < 0.05) were significantly associated with higher rates of reoperation. At 12 months postoperatively, patients who underwent reoperation achieved similar mean reductions in pain frequency, duration, intensity, and migraine headache index, as compared with patients who underwent only primary decompression ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with occipital neuralgia who have a history of cervical spine disorders or radiofrequency ablation should be counseled that primary decompression has a higher risk of reoperation, but outcomes are ultimately comparable.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Conservative Management of Occipital Neuralgia Supported by Physical Therapy: A Review of Available Research and Mechanistic Rationale to Guide Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conservative management is consistently recommended as a first line intervention for occipital neuralgia (ON); however, there is limited clinical research regarding conservative intervention for ON. This lack of research may lead to underutilization or unwarranted variability in conservative treatment. This article provides mechanism-based guidance for conservative management of ON as a component of a multimodal treatment approach, and discusses the role of the physical therapist in the care team. It also highlights opportunities for further research to refine conservative management of this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Published research on conservative interventions specific to ON is limited to very low-quality evidence for the use of TENS. The contemporary shift toward precision pain management emphasizing treatment based on a patient's constellation of clinical features-a phenotype-rather than solely a diagnosis provides more personalized and specifically targeted pain treatment. This paradigm can guide treatment in cases where diagnosis-specific research is lacking and can be used to inform conservative treatment in this case. Various conservative interventions have demonstrated efficacy in treating many of the symptoms and accepted etiologies of ON. Conservative interventions provided by a physical therapist including exercise, manual therapy, posture and biomechanical training, TENS, patient education, and desensitization have mechanistic justification to treat symptoms and causes of ON. Physical therapists have adequate time and skill to provide such progressive and iterative interventions and should be included in a multimodal treatment plan for ON. Further research is required to determine appropriate dosing, sequencing, and progression of conservative treatments.

A novel technique to identify and thermally ablate the greater occipital nerve for patients with occipital neuralgia: a retrospective study with cadaveric and ex-vivo validation

Background

This manuscript presents the challenges of treating various forms of headaches and the potential of interventional techniques targeting the greater occipital nerve (GON) to alleviate the burden on patients. Occipital neuralgia, characterized by stabbing or shooting pain in the base of the skull, is often associated with primary, cervicogenic, or migraine headaches. While occipital nerve blocks offer temporary relief, durable treatment options are limited. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and thermal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) have shown promise as minimally invasive procedures for long-term treatment. However, GON is not easily identified using ultrasound or fluoroscopic analysis; thereby, minimizing success of proper ablation. Here, the authors provide a percutaneous strategy to localize the GON and maximize lesion performance. We intend to provide an ex-vivo description of staggered bipolar radiofrequency (RF) lesioning and include the use of staggered bipolar lesioning of the GON and stimulation of the semispinalis capitis. We also analyzed the effectiveness and side effects from this ablation, retrospectively.

Methods

Patients with chronic refractory GON neuralgia were selected for GON TRFA. A novel double needle technique of sequential electrical stimulation was used to localize the GON and approximate needle to nerve distance. Once the needles were positioned adjacent to the GON, TRFA was performed using a bipolar staggered technique.

Results

Twenty-two patients with GON were treated with TRFA using a novel double needle technique. Seventy-two percent of these patients reported greater than 50% pain relief at both 1 and 6 months following the procedure. The results of our ex-vivo study demonstrate that performing TRFA using the parallel needle bipolar approach separated 8 mm apart produced the most desirable lesion dimensions that may correlate with effective ablation of the GON.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a new localization and ablation technique to treat refractory headaches. However, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Treatment delay from onset of occipital neuralgia symptoms to treatment with nerve decompression surgery: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the time between onset of occipital neuralgia symptoms and nerve decompression surgery, (2) perform a cost comparison analysis between surgical and nonsurgical treatment of occipital neuralgia, and (3) report postoperative results of nerve decompression for occipital neuralgia.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 1112) who underwent screening for nerve decompression surgery were evaluated for occipital neuralgia. Of those, 367 patients (33%) met the inclusion criteria. Timing of occipital neuralgia symptom onset and pain characteristics were prospectively collected. Cost associated with the nonsurgical treatment of occipital neuralgia was calculated for the period between onset of symptoms and surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients (73%) underwent occipital nerve decompression. The average time between onset of occipital neuralgia and surgery was 19 years (7.1-32). Postoperatively, the median number of pain days per month decreased by 17 (0-26, 57%) (P < .001), the median pain intensity decreased by 4 (2-8, 44%) (P < .001), and median pain duration in hours was reduced by 12 (2-23, 50%) (P < .001). The annual mean cost of nonsurgical occipital neuralgia treatment was $28 728.82 ($16 419.42-$41 198.41) per patient. The mean cost during the 19-year time frame before surgery was $545 847.75($311 968.90-$782 769.82).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients suffer from occipital neuralgia for an average of 19 years before undergoing surgery. Nerve decompression reduces symptom severity significantly and should be considered earlier in the treatment course of occipital neuralgia that is refractory to conservative treatment to prevent patient morbidity and decrease direct and indirect health care costs.

Radiofrequency ablation of the occipital nerves for treatment of neuralgias and headache

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy as a treatment for occipital neuralgias and headaches at health clinics in the United States between January 1, 2015 and June 20, 2022. We hypothesize that RFA is a minimally invasive treatment that provides significant pain relief long-term for occipital neuralgias and associated headaches.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis studies data collected from 277 occipital nerve RFA patients who had adequate pre-procedure and post-procedure follow-up for data analysis. Data collected includes the patient's age, biological sex, BMI, headache diagnosis, pre-procedure, and post-procedure pain score using the visual analog scale (VAS), subjective percent improvement in symptom(s), and duration of symptom relief. Statistical analysis used SPSS software, version 26 (IBM), using a paired t-test to assess the significance between pre and post-occipital RFA therapy pain scores. p-values were significant if found to be ≤0.05.

RESULTS

The mean pre-procedure pain score before RFA therapy for patients who completed at least 6 months of follow-up was 5.57 (SD = 1.87) and the mean post-procedure pain score after RFA therapy was 2.39 (SD = 2.42). The improvement in pain scores between pre-procedure and post-procedure was statistically significant with a p-value < 0.001. The mean patient-reported percent improvement in pain following RFA therapy was 63.53% (SD = 36.37). The mean duration of pain improvement was 253.9 days after the initiation of therapy (SD = 300.5). When excluding patients who did not have any relief following their RFA procedure, the average pre-procedure pain score was 5.54 (SD = 1.81) and post-procedure pain score was 1.71 (SD = 1.81) with a p-value < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment of RFA in patients with refractory occipital neuralgias and headaches. Additional studies are necessary to illuminate ideal patient characteristics for RFA treatment and the potential for procedural complications and long-term side effects associated with occipital nerve RFA therapy.

Minimally Invasive Preganglionic C2 Root Section for Occipital Neuralgia: 2 Case Reports and Operative Video

BACKGROUND

Occipital neuralgia is a painful condition that is believed to occur from processes that affect the greater, lesser, or third occipital nerves. Diagnosis is often made with a combination of classical symptoms, tenderness over the occipital region, and response to occipital nerve blocks. Cervical computed tomography or MRI may be obtained in multiple positions to detect any impingement. Diagnosis can be made with MRI tractography. Nonsurgical treatments include local anesthetic and steroid injections, anticonvulsant medications, botulinum toxin injections, physical therapy, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, cryoneurolysis, and radiofrequency ablation. Surgical treatments include greater occipital nerve decompression, C2 root section, intradural dorsal root rhizotomy, C1-2 fusion, and occipital nerve stimulation. Although stimulation has been favored in the past decade, complications and maintenance of the devices have led us to return to C2 ganglionectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To report on the use of a minimally invasive technique for C2 ganglionectomy to treat occipital neuralgia.

METHODS

Review demographic, surgery, and outcome data of a minimally invasive C2 root ganglionectomy used to treat to 2 patients with occipital neuralgia.

RESULTS

We report on 2 patients with clinically stereotypical unilateral occipital neuralgia confirmed by greater occipital nerve block, but with no imaging correlate. Both were successfully managed by C2 ganglionectomy through an 18-mm tubular retractor and outpatient surgery. Accompanying text, still photographs, and video describe the technique in detail.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive C2 ganglionectomy can be used to successfully treat occipital neuralgia.

Effects of acupuncture in the treatment of occipital neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acupuncture is used to treat subjects with occipital neuralgia, which is 1 of the main causes of occipital pain; however, its effect is conflicting. Hence, the current study aims to evaluate the effects of acupuncture in the treatment of occipital neuralgia.

METHODS

In a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, OVID, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang databases, and Google Scholar until July 2021, 15 studies aimed to evaluate the effects of acupuncture in the treatment of occipital neuralgia were included. Human-related trials were considered in different languages. The size of the study was not considered a limit for its inclusion and the study intervention should focus on comparing the impact of acupuncture in the intervention group compared with the control group.The odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a random or fixed-effect model for different subgroup analyses. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test, while the risk of bias was assessed using the Review manager software.

RESULTS

Acupuncture had a significantly higher effective rate of treatment (OR, 5.40; 95% CI, 2.48 to 11.77, P < .001) compared to control in the treatment of occipital neuralgia and lower visual analogue scale (MD, -2.45; 95% CI, -2.69 to -2.21, P < .001). Acupuncture plus medication had a significantly higher effective rate of treatment (OR, 3.96; 95% CI, 2.10 to 7.47, P < .001) compared to medication in the treatment of occipital neuralgia. Acupuncture analysis for safety issues showed a significant reduction of adverse events compared with the medication group.

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture alone or acupuncture plus medication had a significantly beneficial effect on the effective rate of treatment, safety and visual analog scale compared to medication in the treatment of occipital neuralgia. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Refractory occipital scalp pruritus treated with computed tomography-guided greater occipital nerve ablation

Greater occipital nerve blocks and thermal ablations have been widely discussed as an efficacious treatment strategy for multiple difficult to treat conditions, including occipital neuralgia, migraines, and cervicogenic headaches. Nerve blocks have also recently been presented as a method of treating neuropathic itch in the upper extremities, where pruritus occurs without visible dermatologic manifestations. We report a case of refractory occipital scalp pruritus in a patient who had excellent although time-limited response to greater occipital nerve blocks but achieved durable symptom control with CT-guided greater occipital nerve ablation.

Latest Evidence-Based Application for Radiofrequency Neurotomy (LEARN): Best Practice Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN)

Radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN), also known as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), is a common interventional procedure used to treat pain from an innervated structure. RFN has historically been used to treat chronic facet-joint mediated pain. The use of RFN has more recently expanded beyond facet-joint mediated pain to peripherally innervated targets. In addition, there has also been the emergence of different radiofrequency modalities, including pulsed and cooled RFN. The use of RFN has been particularly important where conservative and/or surgical measures have failed to provide pain relief. With the emergence of this therapeutic option and its novel applications, the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified the need for formal evidence-based guidance. The authors formed a multidisciplinary work group tasked to examine the latest evidence-based medicine for the various applications of RFN, including cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine; posterior sacroiliac joint pain; hip and knee joints; and occipital neuralgia. Best practice guidelines, evidence and consensus grading were provided for each anatomical target.

Occipital Neuralgia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Occipital neuralgia is a painful condition that affects the posterior aspect of the head and can be difficult to distinguish from other common forms of headaches. This article reviews the anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, diagnostic testing, and management approaches for occipital neuralgia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-pharmacological treatments aim to alleviate muscle tension and improve posture. Acupuncture shows some promise. The occipital nerve block is considered the first line in a minimally invasive intervention, but the duration of relief may be short term. An onabotulinum toxin A injection may improve the sharp but not the dull component of the pain of occipital neuralgia. Radiofrequency ablation and occipital nerve stimulation may provide effective long-term relief in refractory patients. Surgical decompression, neurotomies, and neurolysis are last-resort treatment options. Occipital neuralgia is a debilitating condition that can be difficult to treat. Studies with larger sample sizes and randomized control trials are needed to further determine the effectiveness and safety of different therapies.

Surgical Management of Occipital Neuralgia: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Occipital neuralgia (ON) is a primary headache disorder characterized by severe, paroxysmal, shooting or stabbing pain in the distribution of the greater occipital, lesser occipital, and/or third occipital nerves. Both medical and surgical options exist for treating headaches related to ON. The purposes of this study are to summarize the current state of surgical ON management through a systematic review of the literature and, in doing so, objectively identify future directions of investigation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of primary literature on surgical management for ON of at least level IV evidence. Included studies were analyzed for level of evidence, therapeutic intervention, study design, sample size, follow-up duration, outcomes measured, results, and risk of bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. All 22 studies used patient-reported pain scores as an outcome metric. Other outcome metrics included complication rates (7 studies; 32%), patient satisfaction (7 studies; 32%), quality of life (7 studies; 18%), and analgesic usage (3 studies; 14%). Using the ROBINS-I tool for risk of bias in nonrandomized studies, 7 studies (32%) were found to be at critical risk of bias, whereas the remaining 15 studies (68%) were found to be at serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater occipital nerve decompression seems to be a useful treatment modality for medically refractory ON, but further prospective, randomized data are required.

A Review of the Recent Findings in Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for the Management of Occipital Neuralgia

Occipital neuralgia (ON) is unilateral or bilateral neuralgia in the dermatomal nerve distribution of the greater, lesser or third occipital nerves and is a very common presentation of neuropathic pain. ON, although common and well defined, is still a poorly understood pain syndrome. It often requires invasive treatment for long term and significant pain alleviation; however, the evidence supporting different options is still limited. Several minimally invasive techniques have proven to be efficacious and safe, and the selection depends mostly on response to nerve blocks, patient choice and provider preference. This is a comprehensive review of the latest and seminal literature available about occipital neuralgia and currently available minimally invasive treatment options. It covers the anatomical and physiologic biology at the base of neuralgia, the presentation and diagnostic process. It then reviews the available literature to provide description and comparison of the available methods for alleviation.

The effects of acupuncture on occipital neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Occipital neuralgia is one of the main causes of occipital pain. This systematic review aims to assess the level of evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of acupuncture on occipital neuralgia.

Methods

We searched 11 databases and a journal archive from their inception up to December 2019 for relevant RCTs. We did not place any specific restrictions on patients diagnosed with occipital neuralgia, such as age or gender. We included studies that used an acupuncture intervention group, with or without the control group treatment, and that set a control group receiving active, interventional treatment such as medication. For outcomes, we used visual analogue scale (VAS) and effective rate.

Results

We included a total of 11 RCTs. All VAS scores (mean difference [MD] –2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] –2.84, − 1.86) and effective rate values (odds ratio [OR] 4.96, 95% CI 2.24, 10.96) showed significant differences in effect between acupuncture treatment alone and the control group treatment. Similarly, combined acupuncture treatment with control group treatment also showed significant effects in effective rate (OR 6.68, 95% CI 1.11, 40.37). We performed a subgroup analysis on studies that used acupuncture only as the intervention and reported the effective rate, and found that all acupuncture subgroups showed significant effects compared to the control group treatments. None of the studies reported severe adverse effects.

Conclusions

Although acupuncture only and combined acupuncture treatments showed significant effects compared to medication, the results of this study are inconclusive. Studies with rigorous study design and larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the role of acupuncture in this field.

Trial registration

International prospective register for systematic review (PROSPERO) number CRD42019128050.