Breast Cancer Information Behaviours and Needs among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Study

Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study

Objectives

Personalizing screening recommendations could enhance efficiency, support timely detection, and optimize resource use. This study explores women's perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to current screening guidelines and the implementation of risk-based screening (RBS) for breast cancer in Singapore.

Methods

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 women aged 21 and above with a history of breast cancer. Data coding and thematic analysis were guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM).

Results

Five themes were identified and mapped to the Health Belief Model (HBM): (1) Knowledge and beliefs, (2) Access to mammography screening, (3) Social influences, (4) Healthcare delivery, and (5) Needs and preferences for RBS implementation. Key barriers to screening adherence included low perceived susceptibility, cost concerns, and accessibility issues. Factors that could improve adherence included social influences promoting breast health awareness, reminders from trusted healthcare professionals (HCP), and confidence in affording screening and treatment. Participants were generally receptive to RBS and valued personalized recommendations, but concerns were raised about risk prediction accuracy, insurance implications, and potential negative reactions to risk results.

Conclusion

This study identifies challenges and enablers for enhancing breast screening in Singapore, based on the experiences of breast cancer survivors. Participants supported RBS for routine screening. Successful RBS implementation requires improved health literacy, HCP engagement, and accessible healthcare. Women's acceptance will rely on research to refine prediction accuracy and communication of risk results.

Information needs for cancer screening and associated factors of information-seeking behaviour: a qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

At present, the participation rate in cancer screening is still not ideal, and the lack of screening information or misunderstanding of information is an important factor hindering cancer screening behaviour. Therefore, a systematic synthesis of information needs related to cancer screening is critical.

METHODS

On July 23, 2024, we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, EBSCO, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL to collect qualitative or mixed-methods studies on information needs of cancer screening. We also searched for grey literature on OpenGrey and Google websites. Data were synthesised using Sandelowski and Barroso's framework. A top-down approach was adopted to group and synthesise the encodes and then generate analytical themes.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies were included. The results of the analysis of cancer screening-related information needs content, cancer-specific information needs content, requirements and preferences for information, and associated factors of information-seeking behaviour were reported. Based on the event timeline, we summarised the information needs of the screening demand side into four themes. Their information needs focus on disease risk factors, signs and symptoms, the importance of screening, the benefits and harms of screening, the detailed screening process, and screening results and explanations. Regarding cancer-specific information needs content, we summarised the specific information needs of cervical, breast, colorectal, and lung cancer. By referring to relevant concepts in the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking, we synthesised the requirements and preferences for information according to the themes of editorial tone, communication potential, recommended information channels, and recommended source place. The information-seeking behaviours of the screening demanders are mainly passive attention and active searching. The common factors leading to the passive attention of screening demanders are demographic factors and fear of cancer. The most common reason for them to actively search information is lack of information.

CONCLUSIONS

The list of information needs identified in this review can serve as a reference for health professionals and information service providers before carrying out screening-related work to help the cancer screening participants obtain valuable information.

Understanding Barriers and Facilitators of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Approach

OBJECTIVE

The uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening services among women in Singapore remains inadequate. Little is known about how gender norms influence women's decision to undergo these screening services in a multi-ethnic Asian context. This research aimed to explore how gender-based qualitative factors influence women's decision to screen.

METHODS

Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews from 40 racially diverse women aged 25 and above who had visited polyclinics for their chronic disease management. Women were recruited using a purposive maximum variation sampling strategy to ensure representation of their views from the three major ethnic groups and based on inclusion criteria. Interviews were conducted either face-to-face or via telephone call. Interviews were audiotaped and lasted 30 minutes on average. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. The data was transcribed and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Gender norms and gender non-concordance with the healthcare professionals did not inhibit women from undergoing breast and cervical cancer screening services to a large extent. Women were empowered and had a central role in decision-making for screening services. Healthcare initiatives such as subsidies and mobile health applications facilitated the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening services but can be improved further. Some of the barriers reported by Malay Muslims were not dissimilar to previous qualitative studies with women in this ethnic and religious group.

CONCLUSION

Gender socialisation, empowerment, and healthcare initiatives did not inhibit our study participants' decision to undergo breast and cervical cancer screening services. However, new initiatives and strengthening of the existing healthcare initiatives are needed to overcome any remnants of gender-related nuances and convert non-doers into doers.

What are the views of three key stakeholder groups on extending the breast screening interval for low-risk women? A secondary qualitative analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing interest in risk-stratified breast screening, whereby the prevention and early detection offers vary by a woman's estimated risk of breast cancer. To date, more focus has been directed towards high-risk screening pathways rather than considering women at lower risk, who may be eligible for extended screening intervals. This secondary data analysis aimed to compare the views of three key stakeholder groups on how extending screening intervals for low-risk women should be implemented and communicated as part of a national breast screening programme.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis of three qualitative studies exploring the views of distinct stakeholder groups was conducted. Interviews took place with 23 low-risk women (identified from the BC-Predict study) and 17 national screening figures, who were involved in policy-making and implementation. In addition, three focus groups and two interviews were conducted with 26 healthcare professionals. A multiperspective thematic analysis was conducted to identify similarities and differences between stakeholders.

FINDINGS

Three themes were produced: Questionable assumptions about negative consequences, highlighting how other stakeholders lack trust in how women are likely to understand extended screening intervals; Preserving the integrity of the programme, centring on decision-making and maintaining a positive reputation of breast screening and Negotiating a communication pathway highlighting communication expectations and public campaign importance.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk-stratified screening programme should consider how best to engage women assessed as having a low risk of breast cancer to ensure mutual trust, balance the practicality of change whilst ensuring acceptability, and carefully develop multilevel inclusive communication strategies.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The research within this paper involved patient/public contributors throughout including study design and materials input.

Ethnic predisposition, risk factors and breast cancer presentation; a 10-year data. Single centered prospective cohort study from Karachi

Background

Breast cancer, a leading cause of mortality among females, has been the center of research for many decades. Work is in progress to advance the research worldwide and in our region. This study is conducted to look into regional ethical predilection/age, clinical presentation/stage, pathological subtypes and risk factors of BC among patients of Karachi, with the aim of proposing a ground in our policy making regarding protocol setting for screening and management of BC patients.

Methods

A prospective cohort study started at public Hospital, Karachi from 2010 to 2020.500 females with histo-pathologically proven BC selected. History, clinical examination, radiological and histo-pathological data retrieved; data regarding age, ethnicity, family history, parity, marriage/menopause, stage/lump size/symptoms were filled on pro-forma. Primary outcomes were age, ethnicity, family history, stage/histological type and menopausal status of our cohort while secondary outcomes were parity, marriage, symptoms and lump size/site. Data analyzed using SPSS in ranges and percentages.

Results

Among different ethnicities, Makrani were the most affected(34%). Majority were premenopausal females ≤50yrs (78%). Infiltrating ductal carcinoma (88.8%) was the commonest subtype. Family history was positive in few (5.8%). Parity and marital status had no effect on our population. Breast lump (88%) was the commonest presenting symptom and 51% of our patients had the right side involved. Upper outer quadrant (51%) was the most involved quadrant and the majority (46%) were stage II.

Conclusions

Age of presentation is around a decade earlier in our region, with women of Makrani descent more prone to develop BC. 2/3rd of patients were premenopausal, with lump breast as primary complaint. Majority of patients presented in stage-II. Results of age and racial predilection in our population suggest us to concentrate future research more on genetic profiling so we incorporate the results to devise population specific protocols with reference to age, presentation, BC type, ethnicity & risk factors.

Record submitted retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.govt on 09-07-2022 NCT05458570.

•

Regional ethical predilection, diagnosis age, clinical presentation, pathological subtypes and risk factors of BC among patients of Karachi, Pakistan.

•

Need of institutional/national level guidelines for breast cancer, specific to our population parameters.

•

Age of presentation is around a decade earlier in our population as compare to the West.

•

Screening age criteria specific to our population should be proposed and implemented.

•

Women of Makrani decent are the most affected ethnic group from Karachi, followed by Memons.