Evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound use in the diagnostic approach for right upper quadrant abdominal pain management in the emergency department: a prospective study

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is commonly used at the bedside in the emergency department (ED) as part of clinical examinations. Studies frequently investigate PoCUS diagnostic accuracy, although its contribution to the overall diagnostic approach is less often evaluated. The primary objective of this prospective, multicenter, cohort study was to assess the contribution of PoCUS to the overall diagnostic approach of patients with right upper quadrant abdominal pain. Two independent members of an adjudication committee, who were blind to the intervention, independently evaluated the diagnostic approaches before and after PoCUS for the same patient. The study included 62 patients admitted to the ED with non-traumatic right upper quadrant abdominal pain from September 1, 2022, to March 6, 2023. The contribution of PoCUS to the diagnostic approach was evaluated using a proportion test assuming that 75% of diagnostic approaches would be better or comparable with PoCUS. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests evaluated the impact of PoCUS on the mean number of differential diagnoses, planned treatments, and complementary diagnostic tests. Overall, 60 (97%) diagnostic approaches were comparable or better with PoCUS (χ2 = 15.9, p < 0.01). With PoCUS, the mean number of differential diagnoses significantly decreased by 2.3 (95% CI - 2.7 to - 1.5) (p < 0.01), proposed treatments by 1.3 (95% CI - 1.8 to - 0.9) (p < 0.01), and complementary diagnostic tests by 1.3 (95% CI - 1.7 to - 1.0) (p < 0.01). These findings show that PoCUS positively impacts the diagnostic approach and significantly decreases the mean number of differential diagnoses, treatments, and complementary tests.

Consensus on relevant point-of-care ultrasound skills in General Practice: a two-round French Delphi study

CONTEXT

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has become an important tool in the clinical practice of many specialties, but its use and impact in General Practice in France remains to be explored.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to obtain a consensus among experienced French general practitioners on a list of relevant POCUS skills in General Practice in 4 anatomical regions.

METHOD

We used a two-round Delphi method to obtain a consensus. An initial list of skills was drawn by conducting a literature review. To rate each skill, we used a nine-point Likert scale. An interactive meeting between experts took place between Delphi rounds. POCUS experts in General Practice were defined as general practitioners with theoretical training in ultrasound who regularly perform ultrasound, who have performed ultrasound for more than five years and/or are involved in providing ultrasound training.

RESULTS

11 French general practitioners screened 83 skills in 4 anatomical regions: abdominal, urogenital, vascular, gynecology and obstetrics. An agreement was obtained for 36 POCUS skills as to their appropriateness in General Practice. There were 17 skills with a strong appropriate agreement (100% of "7-9" ratings) and 19 skills with a relative agreement (100% of "5-9" ratings).

CONCLUSION

These skills could serve as a basis for guidelines on the use and curriculum of POCUS in General Practice in France as well as in other countries with similar healthcare systems.

Impact of Different Training Methods on Daily Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Survey on 515 Physicians

ABSTRACT

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) curriculum varies among countries. However, the length of training required for physicians is still under debate. We investigated the impact of different training methods: short hands-on courses (STS), long academic training sessions (LTS), or both (mixed training [MTS]), for POCUS daily use and self-reported confidence overall and specific to specific clinical situations. This was a descriptive study conducted over a 3-month period through a Web-based survey designed to assess the influence of different methods of POCUS training among physicians and residents on their daily practice. The survey was sent to 1212 emergency physicians with prior POCUS training; 515 answers (42%) could be analyzed. Participants in the STS group performed POCUS less frequently than physicians in the LTS or MTS group. Daily use in the STS group was 51% versus 82% in the LTS group and 83% in the MTS group ( P < 0.01). The overall self-reported confidence in POCUS was lower in the STS group ( P < 0.01) in all studied clinical situations. There was no significant difference between LTS and MTS groups ( P > 0.05). Method of POCUS training significantly influenced POCUS daily use. Physicians who underwent long training sessions used POCUS more frequently in their routine practice and were significantly more confident in their ability to perform and interpret a POCUS examination.

Impact of an enhanced focused cardiac ultrasound on treatment changes in a population of internal medicine patients

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients with acute shortness of breath (SOB) could benefit from an enhanced focused cardiac ultrasound (eFoCUS) with Doppler measurements to reassess treatment and diagnosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study performed in a medical ward. Included patients were those hospitalized for acute SOB. The objectives were to assess therapeutic and diagnosis changes associated with eFoCUS. The primary endpoint of the analysis was a composite of introduction or discontinuation of diuretics, antibiotics or anticoagulation following eFoCUS.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and July 2021, 119 patients were included, 67 women and 52 men, mean age 84 ± 11 years old. The eFoCUS was performed within a median time of 55 h (1st-3rd IQ: 21-107) following hospital admission. Overall, eFoCUS was associated with a change in diagnostic in 40 patients (34% [CI 95%: 25%-43%], p < 10-4 ) and a change in treatment in 53 patients (45% [CI 95%: 35%-54%], p < 10-4 ). Diuretics were prescribed in 94 patients before eFoCUS and in 56 after (p = 10-4 ), antibiotics in 34 before and 27 after and anticoagulation in 30 before and 40 after.

CONCLUSION

eFoCUS was associated with both therapeutic and diagnostic changes in patients with SOB. Such results should be confirmed in multicentric prospective studies.

Is gallbladder PoCUS diagnostic accuracy accessible to medical students after PoCUS training exclusively on healthy volunteers? A pilot randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is increasingly used in clinical practice and is now included in many undergraduate curricula. Here, we aimed to determine whether medical students who participated in a PoCUS teaching program with several practical training sessions involving healthy volunteers could achieve a good level of diagnostic accuracy in identifying gallbladder pathologies. The intervention group (IG) was trained exclusively on volunteers with a healthy gallbladder, whereas the control group (CG) had access to volunteers with a pathological gallbladder as recommended in most PoCUS curricula.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty medical students were randomly assigned to the IG and CG. After completing the training program over 2 months, students were evaluated by three independent examiners. Students and examiners were blind to group allocation and study outcome. Sensitivity and specificity of students' PoCUS gallstone diagnosis were assessed. Secondary outcomes were students' confidence, image quality, acquisition time, and PoCUS skills.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity for gallstone diagnosis were, respectively, 0.85 and 0.97 in the IG and 0.80 and 0.83 in the CG. Areas under the curve (AUC) based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were 0.91 and 0.82 in the IG and CG, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.271) and an AUC difference of -0.092. No significant between-group difference was found for the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot study showed that medical students can develop PoCUS diagnostic accuracy after training on healthy volunteers. If these findings are confirmed in a larger sample, this could favor the delivery of large practical teaching sessions without the need to include patients with pathology, thus facilitating PoCUS training for students.

Ultrasonography performed by an infectiologist in hip and knee prosthetic joint and native joint infections

INTRODUCTION

Clinical ultrasonography (US) by infectiologists has only recently been developing, and as now there is little literature on the subject. Our study focuses on the conditions and diagnostic performance of clinical ultrasound imaging by infectiologists in cases of hip and knee prosthetic and native joint infection.

METHODS

A retrospective study carried out between June 1^st 2019 and March 31^st 2021 in the University Hospital of Bordeaux, South-Western France. We measured US sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), combined or not with the analysis of articular fluid, compared to the MusculoSketetal Infection Society (MSIS) score in prosthetic joints, or to expert diagnosis in native joints.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients underwent US by an infectiologist in an infectious disease ward, including 11 (20.4%) for native joint and 43 (79.6%) for prosthetic joint. Joint effusion and/or periarticular collection were highlighted in 47 (87%) patients, and US led to 44 punctures. In all patients (n=54), Se, Sp, PPV and NPV of US alone were 91%, 19%, 64% and 57%, respectively. When US was combined with fluid analysis, Se, Sp, PPV, NPV were 68%, 100%, 100%, 64% in all patients (n=54), 86%, 100%, 100%, 60% in acute arthritis (n=17) and 50%, 100%, 100% and 65% respectively in non-acute arthritis (n=37).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that US by infectiologists effectively diagnoses osteoarticular infections (OAIs). This approach has many applications in infectiology routines. Consequently, it would be interesting to define the contents of a first level of infectiologist competence in US clinical practice.

Identification précoce des phénotypes cardiovasculaires chez les patients en insuffisance respiratoire aiguë au cours de la première pandémie Covid-19

Objectif : L'objectif principal était de comparer la prévalence de la dysfonction ventriculaire gauche (VG) et/ ou droite (VD) des patients admis au service d'urgence (SU) avec une insuffisance respiratoire aiguë (IRA) secondaire ou non à une pneumopathie à Covid-19.

Méthodes : Pendant un mois, nous avons inclus (24/7) de façon prospective les patients de l'unité de Covid-19 du SU qui présentaient une IRA. Pour chaque patient, un test RT-PCR, une tomodensitométrie thoracique et une échographie cardiaque de niveau 2 et pulmonaire étaient systématiquement réalisés avant toute intervention thérapeutique. Chaque patient était classé selon les phénotypes cardiovasculaires suivants : insuffisance VG, insuffisance VD, hypovolémie ± hyperkinésie et profil hémodynamique normal.

Résultats : Parmi les 517 patients admis pendant la période d'étude, 78 présentaient une IRA (15 %) et 62 ont bénéficié d'une échocardiographie de niveau 2 (âge : 73 ± 14 ans ; SpO2 : 90 ± 4 % ; lactate : 2,1 ± 1,3 mmol/l). Le diagnostic de la Covid-19 a été établi pour 22 patients (35 %). L'insuffisance VG (15 [38 %] vs 2 [9 %] ; p = 0,016) et celle VD (12 [30 %] vs 1 [5 %] ; p = 0,018) étaient plus souvent observées dans le groupe témoin que chez les patients ayant une pneumopathie à Covid-19. Inversement, les patients Covid-19 avaient plus fréquemment un profil hémodynamique normal ou une hypovolémie associée ou non à une vasoplégie (20 [91 %] vs 21 [53 %] ; p = 0,002). La mortalité intrahospitalière était de 18 % ( n = 11). Tous les patients atteints de la Covid-19 présentant une insuffisance VG et/ou VD précoce sont décédés pendant leur hospitalisation.

Conclusions : La dysfonction VG et celle VD étaient plus fréquentes chez les patients non atteints de la Covid-19, alors que les patients atteints de Covid-19 avaient un phénotype cardiovasculaire normal ou hypovolémique.

Apport de l’échographie clinique dans la prise en charge des douleurs abdominales aiguës non traumatiques chez l’adulte dans les services d’urgence : une étude rétrospective monocentrique dans un centre hospitalier général

Objectif : Déterminer si la réalisation d’une échographie clinique en médecine d’urgence (ECMU) modifie la prise en charge des patients présentant une douleur abdominale aiguë d’origine non traumatique.

Matériel et méthodes : Étude rétrospective, monocentrique, incluant les patients qui ont consulté aux urgences pour douleur abdominale aiguë d’origine non traumatique entre le 1er juin 2019 et le 31 octobre 2019. Les données recueillies étaient le nombre d’examens complémentaires d’imagerie réalisés, le temps de prise en charge, le taux d’hospitalisation, le diagnostic et le taux de reconsultation à 30 jours. Le critère de jugement principal était le recours aux examens complémentaires d’imagerie spécialisée (parmi lesquels : échographie spécialisée, tomodensitométrie abdominopelvienne et abdomen sans préparation) chez les patients ayant bénéficié d’une échographie clinique (groupe « ECMU ») comparativement aux patients n’ayant pas bénéficié d’échographie (groupe « sans ECMU »).

Résultats : Mille cinquante-trois patients ont été inclus. Parmi ces patients, 16 % ont bénéficié d’une échographie clinique par le médecin urgentiste. Il existait une réduction significative du recours à l’échographie spécialisée dans le groupe ECMU (4 % dans le groupe « avec ECMU » versus 9 % dans le groupe « sans ECMU », OR = 0,45, IC 95 % : [0,17–1,00], p = 0,04), sans différence significative entre les deux groupes concernant le temps de prise en charge, l’orientation, le taux de reconsultation à 30 jours et la concordance diagnostique.

Conclusion : La réalisation d’une ECMU dans l’exploration des douleurs abdominales aiguës d’origine non traumatique entraînait une réduction significative du nombre d’échographies spécialisées, sans pour autant diminuer le temps de prise en charge ni la concordance entre le diagnostic posé aux urgences et celui en fin d’hospitalisation.

Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations

Context

In the emergency ward, where the use of ultrasound is common (including for sterile procedures), ward equipment is constantly exposed to high risks of microbiological contamination. There are no clear guidelines for disinfection control practices in emergency departments, and it is not known how emergency ward doctors follow good hygiene practices.

Method

A multi-centre audit was conducted in 16 emergency services from Northern France regional hospitals, in form of a questionnaire. It was proposed to all emergency ward physicians. We excluded questionnaires when physicians mentioned that they did not use ultrasound on a daily basis. The questionnaire was designed using existing hygiene and ultrasound disinfection practices guidelines from varying French medical societies. It included three different clinical scenarios: (a) ultrasound on healthy skin, (b) on injured skin, and (c) ultrasound-guided punctures. All questions were closed-ended, with only one answer corresponding to the guidelines. We then calculated compliance rates for each question, each clinical situation, and an overall compliance rate for all the questions.

Results

104 questionnaires were collected, and 19 were excluded. For the 85 analysed questionnaires, the compliance rates were 60.4% 95% CI [56.4–64.7] for ultrasound on healthy skin, 70.9% 95% CI [66.3–76.1] on injured skin and 69.4% 95% CI [65.1–73.6] for ultrasound-guided punctures. The overall compliance rate for the compliance questions was 66.1% 95% CI [62.8–69.1]. Analysis of the questionnaires revealed severe asepsis errors, misuse of gel, ignorance of infection control practices to be applied in the context of ultrasound-guided puncture and exposure of the probe to body fluids.

Conclusion

This study details areas for quality improvement in the disinfection of emergency ultrasound scanner use. Consequently, we propose a standardized protocol based upon the recommendations used for the questionnaire drafting, with a visual focus on the low compliance points that have been revealed in this audit. This protocol has been distributed to all the medical emergency services audited and included in the emergency resident’s ultrasound learning program.

Experience of ultrasound performed by infectiologists, an innovating approach for the management of patients

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound imaging has many clinical applications, but there is a lack of data about its use by infectiologists. The aim of this study was to describe ultrasound performed routinely by infectiologists and to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound with aspirate and fluid analysis in prosthetic joint infections.

METHODS

Retrospective study between 1^st June 2019 and 1^st June 2020 in an infectious and tropical diseases unit in a tertiary University Hospital.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one ultrasounds were performed on 127 patients by the infectious diseases team. These included 64 musculoskeletal ultrasounds (31 in native joints and 33 in prosthetic joints including 15 knees, 13 hips and 5 spacers) and 33 led to a fluid aspirate. Fourteen lung ultrasounds were done, 11 confirmed pneumopathy and 7 resulted in pleural puncture. Twenty-three vascular ultrasounds were done, 17 to insert a catheter, and four to perform a blood test. Five ultrasounds explored adenopathy, of which one node tuberculosis and one Bartonella infection were diagnosed. In prosthetic joint infections, sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound with fluid aspirate and analysis were respectively 100% and 100% for the knee and 40% and 100% for the hip.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound performed by infectiologists is useful and contributes to a faster diagnosis. Furthermore, the specificity of ultrasound with aspirate and fluid analysis is very high in prosthetic joint infection. Ultrasound training courses should be considered for infectiologists including residents.

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during a military mission in a French role II in Mali: is it useful to learn this practice?

Introduction

Ultrasound is now recognized as a key tool in the practice of medicine in isolated situations. This study aims to evaluate the impact of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in a military mission when performed by a trained military practitioner (MP).

Materials and Methods

We conducted a 2-month retrospective observational study on the use of TTE in a French medical complex in Mali with a mission that included providing a medical aid to the population. All patients were included. Every ultrasound performed by the MP was listed, and the epidemiologic data, indication for the exam and results were collected for each TTE.

Results

A total of 349 patients were included, 16 were war-wounded patients and 333 came for a general medical consultation. In all, 153 ultrasounds were performed, including 48 TTEs. Sixteen TTEs were performed to evaluate injuries in war-wounded patients. During the 333 medical consultations, 32 TTEs were realized. The indications were dyspnoea (10), heart murmur (7), acute chest pain (5) and assessment of heart disease (10). TTE permitted a direct positive diagnosis for 18 patients: 7 with acute heart failure and 11 with morphologic problems. The normality of the exam was a supplementary argument to exclude a cardiac implication for eight patients.

Conclusions

TTE can provide important information with a direct impact on the management of patients. Faced with cardiac emergencies, an adapted training can be proposed for the MP. Thereby, the transfer of conventional cardiac views could facilitate the advice of a cardiologist.

Place de l’échographie clinique en médecine d’urgence

L’échographie clinique en médecine d’urgence (ECMU) devient une pratique intégrée à l’exercice de la spécialité. Quatre étapes semblent nécessaires au déploiement de cet outil : l’existence de preuves scientifiques sur sa pertinence clinique, l’implantation d’échographes dans les structures d’urgences (SU), la formation des médecins et l’objectivation d’un impact secondaire à son utilisation. Les preuves sur la pertinence diagnostique des techniques utilisées datent des années 1990 pour la majorité des applications utilisées aujourd’hui. La disponibilité d’un échographe adapté est également nécessaire. Si la majorité des SU disposent aujourd’hui d’un échographe, selon les recommandations françaises, toutes le devraient. Des échographes de mieux en mieux adaptés à la pratique de l’ECMU arrivent sur le marché. L’objectif doit être de permettre des examens rapides et fiables. Pour cela, une ergonomie épurée et l’implication de techniques d’intelligence artificielle semblent être l’avenir. Les médecins doivent également être formés. En France, l’utilisation de l’ECMU va se généraliser grâce à la formation de tous les nouveaux internes de médecine d’urgence. Cependant, beaucoup d’urgentistes exerçant actuellement doivent encore être formés. Pour répondre à cette demande, de nombreuses formations sont aujourd’hui accessibles. Enfin, peu de données sur l’impact clinique secondaire à l’utilisation de cet outil dans les SU sont disponibles. Après avoir défini l’ECMU, l’objectif de ce texte est d’expliquer la place de l’échographie clinique dans la spécialité de médecine d’urgence. Des perspectives d’évolution de l’ECMU sont également proposées.

Conception d’un programme d’enseignement par simulation dans le DES de médecine d’urgence selon la méthode du modèle logique

Dans le cadre de la création du diplôme d’études spécialisées de médecine d’urgence (DESMU), l’intégration d’un programme national de simulation est difficile à promouvoir face à la grande variabilité des ressources de chaque université. Nous proposons une méthodologie de conception et de mise en oeuvre d’un programme de formation par simulation (PFS) fondée sur les spécificités de chaque université et intégrant une démarche évaluative selon une approche par compétences. La méthode du modèle logique a été utilisée pour définir les objectifs en lien avec le contexte de formation, préciser les ressources disponibles puis décrire le processus de mise en oeuvre et d’évaluation d’un PFS intégré au DESMU de l’université de Toulouse. La méthode du modèle logique a permis la conception d’un PFS à partir de six étapes successives : 1) l’objectif qui tient compte du contexte ; 2) les ressources ; 3) les activités ; 4) les groupes visés par le programme ; 5) les produits issus des activités ; 6) les résultats à court, moyen et long termes. Il a permis d’intégrer la simulation dans le cursus de formation des DESMU selon une approche réaliste et adaptée aux ressources locales avec un processus d’évaluation cohérent (satisfaction, mobilisation des compétences en situation de soins et impact sur l’organisation des soins). Dans le cadre d’une approche par compétences dans le cursus des DESMU, le modèle logique a mené à la conception, à la mise en oeuvre et à l’évaluation d’un PFS cohérent avec comme défi de rester dynamique afin d’intégrer l’évolution des variables pendant la période du projet.

Pratique de l’échographie clinique au sein d’un réseau territorial d’urgence

Objectif : L’échographie clinique en médecine d’urgence (ECMU) est un outil essentiel de notre pratique. L’objectif principal de notre étude était d’évaluer les caractéristiques des médecins pratiquant l’ECMU au sein de notre territoire. L’objectif secondaire était d’analyser les facteurs influençant une pratique régulière.

Matériel et méthodes : Étude descriptive multicentrique et déclarative, réalisée auprès de médecins urgentistes travaillant au sein d’un réseau territorial de médecine d’urgence à l’aide d’un questionnaire en ligne.

Résultats : Cent onze questionnaires sur 120 envoyés ont été renseignés (92 %). Onze services (92 %) étaient dotés en échographe dont neuf (82 %) en dotation propre. Soixantesix médecins (59 %) déclaraient pratiquer l’échographie régulièrement. La FAST (focused assessment with sonography for traumas) était la plus pratiquée (80 médecins, 72 %), suivie de l’exploration hémodynamique (50 médecins, 45 %) et pleurale (44 médecins, 40 %). Dans le groupe des médecins ne pratiquant pas l’ECMU, 17 médecins sur 22 (77 %) l’expliquaient par un manque de formation. Dans le même temps, l’intérêt porté à l’ECMU par les urgentistes était coté à 7 ± 2 sur une échelle de 0 à 9. Les facteurs associés à la fréquence de la pratique de l’ECMU étaient le sexe (p < 0,001), le type d’activité (p = 0,005), le type de formation à l’échographie (p < 0,001) et l’ancienneté d’équipement de son service en échographe (p < 0,001).

Conclusion : Cette enquête a montré que la pratique régulière était majoritaire avec un intérêt porté par les praticiens à l’ECMU élevé. Cependant, le frein principal à son développement était un niveau de formation jugé insuffisant par certains praticiens.