Effect of 200 µg of gonadorelin at the first gonadotropin-releasing hormone of the Resynch-25 on ovarian dynamics and fertility in lactating Holstein cows

Our objective was to determine the effect of a 200-µg dose of GnRH 25 d after previous artificial insemination (AI) in a Resynch-25 resynchronization program on ovulatory response, circulating progesterone (P4) concentrations before and after treatment, and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) compared with a 100-µg dose in lactating Holstein cows. Experimental d 0 was considered the day of the previous AI. Lactating dairy cows (n = 3,240) with an average of 126 d in milk (DIM) and between 1 and 6 services were randomly assigned to receive 100 µg or 200 µg of GnRH on d 25 (GnRH25). On d 32 after AI, cows diagnosed nonpregnant with the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) detected by ultrasound (n = 1,249) received PGF2α treatments on d 32 and 33, followed by a GnRH 32 h later and AI 16 h after this last GnRH. Blood samples were collected on d 25, 32, and 34 to evaluate serum P4 concentrations. Transrectal ultrasonographic examination was performed on d 25 and 27 to assess ovulatory response to GnRH25. Cows were checked for pregnancy on d 32, 46, and 88 after AI. The larger dose of GnRH increased the overall proportion of cows that ovulated to the GnRH25 (25.0% for the 100-µg dose vs. 32.5% for the 200-µg dose). However, when cows were evaluated separately according to the pregnancy status on d 32 after AI, we found no treatment effect within cows pregnant and nonpregnant. Even though treatment increased the proportion of cows with serum P4 ≤0.42 ng/mL at the last GnRH treatment (G2; 86.2% for the 100-µg dose vs. 93.0% for the 200-µg dose), it did not affect P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88. Furthermore, a greater proportion of cows without a functional CL at GnRH25 had circulating P4 concentrations ≥1.00 ng/mL on d 32 and lower than 0.42 ng/mL on G2. These cows also had a greater P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88. In summary, the larger dose of GnRH on d 25 after AI did not increase the ovulatory response in nonpregnant cows and P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88 after AI after the Resynch-25 program. Additionally, nonpregnant cows without a functional CL at GnRH25 were better synchronized after the Resynch-25 protocol and had greater P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88 after timed-AI.

Effect of a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) for 8 days during a modified Ovsynch protocol on pregnancy outcomes in lactating Holstein cows

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) in a 7-d Ovsynch protocol on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) and pregnancy loss, compared with a standard 7-d Ovsynch protocol without progesterone supplementation. We hypothesized that progesterone supplementation during an Ovsynch protocol would increase P/AI and decrease pregnancy loss. Data were collected on lactating Holstein cows (n = 716) that either received a 7-d Ovsynch protocol (control: d 0, 100 µg of GnRH; d 7, 500 µg of cloprostenol; d 9, µg of GnRH; n = 360) or a modified Ovsynch protocol with addition of a PRID (PRIDsynch; d 0, 100 µg of GnRH + PRID; d 7, 25 mg of dinoprost; d 8, PRID removal; d 9, 100 µg of GnRH; n = 356). All cows received timed artificial insemination (TAI) approximately 16 h after the second GnRH treatment. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed via ultrasonography on d 38 ± 3 after TAI and rechecked on d 80 ± 7 after TAI. Reproductive performance differed between treatments, with PRIDsynch cows having greater (38.9%) P/AI compared with control cows (31.7%) at d 38 ± 3 and also at d 80 ± 7 (34.6% vs. 28.9%, for PRIDsynch and control cows, respectively). Pregnancy loss did not differ among treatments.

Ovarian response and conception rate in Boran and Boran*Holstein cows treated by Gonadotrophin-realizing hormone and ProstaglandinF2α with and without exogenous progesterone

BACKGROUND

Difference in breed, nutrition status and climate in which animals are managed result in differences in response to reproductive hormones. Fertility rate to artificial insemination is very low in Ethiopian Boran and Boran*Holstein crosses. This partly maybe due to adopting estrus and/or ovulation synchronization developed for temperate taurine cattle. Experimental study was conducted to evaluate ovarian response to combinations of Gonadotrophin-Realizing Hormone agonist (gonadorelin) and ProstaglandinF2α (PGF2α) with or without progesterone (Controlled Internal Drug Release/CIDR), and conception rate to timed AI. Postpartum native Ethiopian Boran (n = 60) and Boran*Holstein cross (n = 66) cows were randomly assigned to four treatment groups as Ovsynch (gonadorelin on day of start, PGF2α seven days later, 2nd gonadorelin at 48 h of PGF2α and insemination at 19 h of the 2nd gonadorelin); CIDR + Ovsynch (same as Ovsynch but CIDR device was inserted into vagina for 7 days); Cosynch (same as Ovsynch but insemination was made at the 2nd gonadorelin) and CIDR + Cosynch (same as Cosynch but CIDR was inserted for 7 days).

RESULT

There was no difference (P > 0.05) in ovulation rate to day 9 gonadorelin (88.33% in Boran; 78.79% in Boran*Holstein) and interval from day 9 gonadorelin to ovulation (36.5 ± 1.13 h in Boran and 36.057 ± 1.11 h in Boran*Holstein). Dominant follicle immediate to ovulation (14.95 ± 0.19 mm Vs 19.12 ± 0.49 mm) and corpus luteum size (16.31 ± 0.33 mm Vs 20.28 ± 0.43 mm ) respectively were smaller (P < 0.05) in Boran than Boran*Holstein. Plasma progesterone concentration at PGF2α was higher (P < 0.05) in Boran (11.91 ± 0.74ng/mL) than Boran*Holstein (6.13 ± 0.27ng/mL) but luteolysis rate was lower (P < 0.05) in Boran (87.9%) than Boran-Holstein (96.9%). Cows with CIDR had higher conception rate than cows without CIDR (72.00% Vs 39.02% in Boran*Holstein and 74.07%, Vs 51.52% in Boran respectively). Insemination at 19 h of gonadorelin administration resulted in higher conception rate (78.6% for Boran; 71.43% for Boran*Holstein) than insemination at gonadorelin (69.29% for Boran; 66.67% for Boran*Holstein).

CONCLUSION

Boran cows have smaller preovulatory follicles, smaller corpus luteum, large amount of progesterone and lower rate of luteolysis to PGF2α compared to Boran*Holstein. The CL of Boran cattle seems les reactive to PGF2α than Boran*Holstein CL. CIDR significantly improved conception rate in Boran and Boran*Holstein cows.

Effect of progesterone from corpus luteum, intravaginal implant, or both on luteinizing hormone release, ovulatory response, and subsequent luteal development after gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment in cows

This study aimed to determine the effect of circulating progesterone (P4) concentrations produced by a corpus luteum (CL) or released by an intravaginal P4 implant (IPI) on GnRH-induced LH release, ovulatory response, and subsequent CL development, after treatment with 100 μg of gonadorelin acetate (GnRH challenge). Nonlactating multiparous Holstein cows were synchronized and GnRH was used to induce ovulation (d -7). Over 4 replicates, cows that ovulated (n = 87) were randomly assigned to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (presence or absence of CL and insertion or not of an IPI at GnRH challenge), creating 4 groups: CL_IPI, CL_NoIPI, NoCL_IPI, and NoCL_NoIPI. On d -1.5, NoCL_IPI and NoCL_NoIPI received 2 doses of 0.53 mg of cloprostenol sodium (PGF2α), 24 h apart to regress CL. On d 0, cows were treated with 100 μg of GnRH and, simultaneously, cows from IPI groups received a 2-g IPI maintained for the next 14 d. Diameter of dominant follicle, ovulatory response, and subsequent CL volume were assessed by ultrasonography on d -1.5, 0, 2, 7, and 14. Blood samples were collected on d -1.5, 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14 for analysis of circulating P4 and at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after GnRH challenge for analysis of circulating LH. In a subset of cows (n = 34), the development of the new CL was evaluated daily, from d 5 to 14. The presence of CL at the time of GnRH challenge affected the LH peak and ovulatory response (CL: 5.3 ng/mL and 58.1%; NoCL: 13.2 ng/mL and 95.5%, respectively). However, despite producing a rapid increase in circulating P4, IPI insertion did not affect LH concentration or ovulation. Regardless of group, ovulatory response was positively correlated with LH peak and negatively correlated with circulating P4 on d 0. Moreover, new CL development and function were negatively affected by the presence of CL and by the IPI insertion. In summary, circulating P4 produced by a CL exerted a suppressive effect on GnRH-induced LH release and subsequent ovulation of a 7-d-old dominant follicle, whereas the IPI insertion at the time of GnRH had no effect on LH concentration or ovulation. Finally, elevated circulating P4, either from CL or exogenously released by the IPI, compromised the development and function of the new CL, inducing short cycles in cows without CL at the time of GnRH treatment.

Presynchronization with prostaglandin F2α and gonadotropin-releasing hormone simultaneously improved first service pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating Holstein cows compared with Presynch-14 when combined with detection of estrus

This study aimed to determine the effect of 2 simple breeding strategies combining artificial insemination (AI) after detection of estrus (AIED) and timed AI (TAI) on first-service fertility in lactating Holstein cows. Weekly, lactating Holstein cows (n = l,049) between 40 and 46 d in milk (DIM) were randomly assigned to initiate 1 of 2 breeding strategies for first service: Presynch-14 and PG+G. Presynch-14 is a presynchronization strategy with 2 PGF_2α treatments 14 d apart with the last PGF_2α 14 d before the initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. Cows treated with PG+G receive a simpler presynchronization program that uses PGF_2α and GnRH simultaneously 7 d before Ovsynch. In both treatments, cows detected in standing estrus by tail chalk at any time ≥55 DIM were inseminated, and treatment was discontinued (n = 525). Cows completing treatment received TAI from 78 to 84 DIM (n = 526). In a subgroup of cows that received TAI, blood was collected (n = 163) to assess circulating concentrations of progesterone, and ultrasonographic evaluations of ovaries were performed on the day of first GnRH of Ovsynch (n = 162) and PGF_2α of Ovsynch (n = 122). The proportion of cows that received TAI was greater for PG+G compared with Presynch-14 (63.5 vs. 31.9%), which increased DIM at first service for cows treated with PG+G compared with Presynch-14 (75.5 ± 0.4 vs. 68.7 ± 0.4). For cows receiving TAI, the ovulatory response to first GnRH of Ovsynch (73.8 vs. 48.8%) and the proportion of cows with functional corpora lutea (92.6 vs. 73.1%) were greater for PG+G than Presynch-14. Cows treated with PG+G had greater overall pregnancy per AI (P/AI) 42 ± 7 d after AI (40.2 vs. 33.6%) and calving per AI (32.1 vs. 25.2%) than Presynch-14. For cows receiving AIED, treatment did not affect P/AI 42 ± 7 d after AI. However, for cows receiving TAI, PG+G increased P/AI compared with Presynch-14 (44.6 vs. 35.2%). Overall, cows receiving TAI had greater P/AI 42 ± 7 d after AI (42.5 vs. 31.5%) and calving per AI (34.1 vs. 23.7%) and decreased pregnancy loss (16.8 vs. 25.2%) than cows receiving AIED. In summary, PG+G increased the proportion of cows receiving TAI and the DIM at first service, P/AI, and calving per AI compared with Presynch-14 when both TAI programs were combined with AIED.

Changes in body condition score from calving to first insemination and milk yield, pregnancy per AI, and pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis

We determined the association of body condition score (BCS) at calving, at first postpartum artificial insemination (AI), and change in BCS between calving and first AI on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 30-45 d, pregnancy loss to 60-85 d, and milk yield in lactating dairy cows. Outcome data were included from 15 studies and 47 herd-year combinations. Additional variables included season of AI, herd, days in milk at first AI, parity, and of mean daily milk yield within 2 wk of first AI. The BCS scale employed was a standard 1-5 scale (1 = severe under conditioning or emaciated and 5 = severe over conditioning) with 0.25 cut points. Presynchronization treatments that included PGF_2α and GnRH increased (P < 0.05) the proportion of cows with luteal function before AI compared with PGF_2α alone. Compared with no presynchronization treatment those that included PGF_2α or PGF_2α and GnRH increased (P < 0.05) first P/AI. Cows having BCS ≥2.75 at AI had greater (P < 0.01) first P/AI than cows with BCS <2.75. As BCS at first AI increased, P/AI increased in a linear (P = 0.04) fashion and was greater in cows expressing estrus when BCS at AI was <2.50. Presynchronization had no association with P/AI for cows with BCS at calving <3.00 compared with those with BCS ≥3.00. In contrast, multiparous cows tended (P = 0.06) to have greater P/AI when they calved with BCS ≥3.00 compared with <3.00. Increasing BCS at AI was associated with decreased (P = 0.01) pregnancy loss. Pregnancy per AI did not differ among cows according to the magnitude of prebreeding BCS loss, but more multiparous cows losing more than 0.5 units of BCS tended to have greater pregnancy losses in second-parity cows (P = 0.09) and in cows of third or greater (P < 0.001) parity. Daily milk yields at first AI differed among parities as expected, but a parity by BCS at calving interaction was detected (P = 0.008). Daily milk yield at first AI decreased (P < 0.001) linearly as BCS at AI increased, with an exacerbated greater negative effect during summer. More prebreeding loss in BCS was associated with more (P < 0.05) milk yield in first- and second-parity cows. We concluded that greater BCS at first AI was associated with improved P/AI, but magnitude of prebreeding BCS loss was not associated with P/AI. In contrast, more pregnancy loss was associated with more prebreeding BCS loss in multiparous cows. Cow having lesser BCS at AI and greater prebreeding loss in BCS produced more milk than their herd mates of greater BCS and lesser prebreeding loss in BCS, respectively.

Lactating dairy cows managed for second and greater artificial insemination services with the Short-Resynch or Day 25 Resynch program had similar reproductive performance

The objective of this randomized controlled experiment was to evaluate reproductive performance and reproductive physiological outcomes of lactating Holstein cows managed for second and greater artificial insemination (AI) services with the Short-Resynch or Day 25 Resynch program. Cows from 2 commercial farms were randomly assigned after first service to the Short-Resynch (SR; n = 870) or Day 25 Resynch (D25R; n = 917) program in which they remained until 210 d after first service or left the herd. Cows in D25R received GnRH 25 ± 3 d after AI, whereas cows in SR did not. Cows not reinseminated at detected estrus (AIE) by 32 ± 3 d after AI underwent nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD) through transrectal ultrasonography (TUS). Nonpregnant cows from both treatments with a corpus luteum (CL) ≥15 mm and an ovarian follicle ≥10 mm (hereafter, CL cows) received 2 PGF_2α treatments 24 h apart, GnRH 32 h after the second PGF_2α, and timed AI 16 to 18 h later. Cows that did not meet the criteria to be included in the CL group (NoCL cows) received a modified Ovsynch protocol with progesterone (P4) supplementation [P4-Ovsynch; GnRH and controlled internal drug-release device (CIDR) in, 7 d later CIDR removal and PGF_2α, 24 h later PGF_2α, 32 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h later timed AI]. In a subgroup of cows, blood samples were collected and TUS conducted at each treatment to evaluate ovarian responses to resynchronization. Binary data were analyzed with logistic regression, continuous data by ANOVA, and time-to-event data by Cox's proportional hazard regression. A greater proportion (mean; 95% CI) of cows were AIE before NPD in the SR (60.5%; 57.0-63.8; n = 3,416) than the D25R (50.1%; 46.5-53.7; n = 3,177) treatment, whereas pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 32 d for AIE services before NPD was greater for the D25R (41.3%; 38.8-43.8; n = 1,560) than the SR (37.6%; 35.5-39.8; n = 1,961) treatment. At NPD, a greater proportion of cows in the D25R (84.3%; 82.2-86.2) than the SR (77.0%; 74.4-79.4) treatment were considered CL cows. Pregnancy per AI at 32 d was greater for the D25R than the SR treatment for all timed AI services (D25R = 43.0%; 40.2-45.9 vs. SR = 36.8%; 33.8-39.8) and for CL cows (D25R = 42.8%; 39.7-45.9 vs. SR = 33.8%; 30.6-37.2) but did not differ for NoCL cows (D25R = 39.4%; 32.1-47.3 vs. SR = 44.0%; 36.8-51.4). The hazard ratio for time to pregnancy (1.03; 0.93-1.14) and the proportion of cows not pregnant at the end of the observation period (D25R = 5.9%; 4.4-7.8 vs. SR = 6.7%; 5.0-8.7) did not differ between SR and D25R treatments. The GnRH treatment 25 d after AI resulted in more cows with P4 >1 ng/mL (D25R = 80.5%; 75.3-84.9 vs. SR = 63.6%; 57.3-69.4) and smaller follicle diameter at NPD 32 ± 3 d after AI for D25R (16.2 ± 0.4 mm) than for SR (17.5 ± 0.4 mm); however, it did not affect follicle diameter and luteal regression risk (CL cows only) before TAI. We concluded that the use of reproductive management programs including SR and D25R for CL cows and the P4-Ovsynch protocol for NoCL cows resulted in similar hazard of pregnancy and proportion of nonpregnant cows for up to 210 d after first service.

Luteal Presence and Ovarian Response at the Beginning of a Timed Artificial Insemination Protocol for Lactating Dairy Cows Affect Fertility: A Meta-Analysis

Progesterone (P4) concentration during follicular growth has a major impact on fertility response in timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols. Luteal presence at the beginning of a TAI protocol and ovarian response after the first gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) injection (G1) affect P4 concentration and subsequently pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI). A systematic review of the literature and meta-analytical assessment was performed with the objective of evaluating the magnitude of the effect of luteal presence and ovarian response at the beginning of a TAI protocol on P/AI in lactating dairy cows. We considered only studies using synchronisation protocols consisting of GnRH and prostaglandin F _2α. The time interval between G1 and prostaglandin F _2α (PGF _2α) had to range from 5 to 7 d. The time interval between the PGF _2α injection and G2 had to range from 48 to 72 h. We used 28 controlled experiments from 27 published manuscripts including 16,489 cows with the objective of evaluating the effect size of having a functional corpus luteum (CL) at G1 on P/AI. Information regarding ovulatory response after G1 was available for 5676 cows. In a subset of cows (n = 4291), information was available for luteal presence and ovulatory response at the initiation of the TAI protocol. A functional CL at G1 increased (p < 0.001) the relative risk of conceiving (RR (relative risk) = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.21-1.45) in lactating dairy cows. Ovulation after G1 increased (p < 0.001) the relative risk of conceiving (RR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.20-1.38) in lactating dairy cows. The effect of ovulatory response on P/AI after G1 was affected by luteal presence at G1. In summary, there was a clear benefit on P/AI for cows starting a TAI protocol with a functional CL (+10.5 percentage units) and cows ovulating at the beginning of a TAI protocol (+11.0 percentage units).

Use of on-farm milk progesterone information to predict fertility outcomes in dairy cows subjected to timed artificial insemination

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of a qualitative on-farm milk progesterone test to predict non-pregnancy in dairy cows. Lactating Jersey cows (n = 752) were subjected to the 5-d Cosynch-72 protocol for timed artificial insemination (AI; d -8 GnRH, d -3 and -2 PGF_2α, d 0 GnRH and timed AI). Milk was sampled on d -3, 0, 7, and 28 relative to timed AI, and progesterone concentrations were assessed using a lateral flow immunochromatographic test. Samples were classified into 3 groups indicative of high (hP4; test line not visible or lighter than reference), intermediate (iP4; test line similar to reference), and low (lP4; test line darker than reference) progesterone concentrations. Blood was sampled from a subset of cows (n = 50) on d -3, 0, 7, and 28 relative to timed AI, and plasma progesterone concentrations were determined by RIA. Cows were observed daily for signs of estrus based on removal of tail paint. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography on d 34 and 62 after AI. Plasma progesterone concentrations across all time points were greater for hP4 (3.13 ± 0.20 ng/mL) followed by iP4 (1.12 ± 0.27 ng/mL) and lP4 (0.38 ± 0.23 ng/mL). Cows in lP4 on d -3 had lesser pregnancy per AI (P/AI) compared with iP4 and hP4 (17.4, 38.3, and 37.2%, respectively). For measurements performed on the day of AI (d 0), lP4 cows had greater P/AI compared with hP4 and iP4 (34.8, 0.0, and 15.6%, respectively), and the risk of pregnancy loss tended to be greater for iP4 compared with lP4. Cows in lP4 on d 7 after AI had lesser P/AI than those in iP4 and hP4 (12.0, 34.0, and 37.7%, respectively). Cows classified as lP4 on d 28 had the least P/AI on d 62 followed by iP4 and then hP4 (0.8, 9.2, and 59.4%, respectively) and were at the greatest risk for pregnancy loss (lP4 = 74.6%, iP4 = 8.4%, hP4 = 7.1%). Sensitivity and specificity to predict non-pregnancy on d 62 were 0.86 and 0.32 (d -3), 0.95 and 0.15 (d 0), 0.93 and 0.23 (d 7), and 0.99 and 0.53 (d 28), respectively. On-farm milk progesterone profiling using a lateral flow immunochromatographic test was able to identify cows without functional corpus luteum and to predict fertility outcomes following timed AI.

Treatment of cows that fail to respond to pre-synchronization treatments with a CIDR-Ovsynch regimen improves the overall pregnancy percentage after a double Ovsynch treatment regimen

In this study, there was evaluation of pregnancy per AI (P/AI) as a result of the first postpartum AI following four ovulation-synchronization treatments. Treatment regimens were Ovsynch-56 (OVS, n = 875; GnRH1-7d-PGF_2α-56h-GnRH2-16h-FTAI), CIDR-OVS (n = 1001; OVS plus CIDR inserts between GnRH1 and PGF_2α), Double-Ovsynch (DOVS, n = 663; imposing Pre-OVS followed by breeding-OVS 7 days later), and Modified-DOVS (M-DOVS, n = 1397; imposing Pre-OVS followed either by breeding-OVS or CIDR-OVS based upon the ovarian structure at GnRH1). Cows with a corpus luteum were assigned to a breeding-OVS treatment regimen and those that did not have a corpus luteum were assigned to the CIDR-OVS treatment regimen. Compared with OVS, the P/AI of the cows in the M-DOVS (OR = 1.5, P = 0.001) and CIDR-OVS (OR = 1.4, P = 0.017) was greater at day 30. At day 70, only in the M-DOVS group was there a greater P/AI compared with the OVS group (OR = 1.7, P < 0.001). Pregnancy loss between days 30 and 70 was greater in cows of the CIDR-OVS (OR = 1.9, P = 0.014) compared with those of the OVS group. In cows of the M-DOVS, the dominant ovarian structures (follicle, corpus luteum or cyst) at different time-points of the pre-synchronization period and occurrence of estrus at the end of this period were not associated with P/AI at day 30 post-AI. In conclusion, imposing CIDR-OVS in cows that did not respond to pre-synchronization treatments, resulted in an enhanced pregnancy percentage with the use of the DOVS.

Evaluation of presynchronization and addition of GnRH at the beginning of an estradiol/progesterone protocol on circulating progesterone and fertility of lactating dairy cows

The objectives of this study were to determine if the utilization of a presynchronization strategy would improve fertility at first artificial insemination (AI) during an E2/P4 ovulation synchronization protocol with or without GnRH administration at the beginning of the protocol. This experiment was conducted using cows (n = 665) at their first postpartum service and the following breeding treatment: CIDR insertion and 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) on day -11; 25 mg dinoprost tromethamine (PG) on day -4; PG, CIDR withdrawal, and 1.0 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) on day -2; timed-AI on day 0. At 31 ± 3 days postpartum, cows were randomly allocated to one of three treatments on a weekly basis: 1) -P + GnRH: cows assigned to the breeding protocol with 100 μg of GnRH on day -11, 2) P + GnRH: cows assigned to a presynchronization protocol using CIDR insertion +2 mg EB on day -28, PG + ECP and CIDR withdrawal on day -21, and beginning of the breeding protocol plus GnRH (100 μg) on day -11, and 3) +P-GnRH: cows assigned to a presynchronization protocol and the breeding treatment without GnRH on day -11. No treatment effects were observed on P/AI at the pregnancy diagnoses on days 32 and 60, or for pregnancy losses between days 32 and 60 of pregnancy whether analyses included all cows or only cows that ovulated near TAI. Moreover, milk yield negatively affected P/AI. Cows with greater circulating P4 concentrations on day -4 had greater P/AI on day 60. Cows without CL on day -11 had a reduced P/AI and this effect was more significant in cows not treated with GnRH. Cows assigned to -P + GnRH had the lowest circulating P4 concentration on day -4 (3.4 ± 0.16 ng/mL), followed by + P-GnRH (4.56 ± 0.17 ng/mL), and +P + GnRH (5.08 ± 0.17 ng/mL) cohorts. The data of the current study suggest that the combination of a Presynch and GnRH administration at the beginning of a TAI protocol was the most effective way to increase the % of cows with a functional CL and with elevated circulating P4 concentrations at the time of PG treatment.

A shortened resynchronization treatment for dairy cows after a nonpregnancy diagnosis

We hypothesized that a shortened version of a modified Ovsynch program (OVS: GnRH-1 - 7 d - PGF_2α-1 - 24 h - PGF_2α-2 - 32 h - GnRH-2 - 16 h - AI) that excluded GnRH-1 to resynchronize ovulation in cows bearing a corpus luteum (CL) after a non-pregnancy diagnosis (NPD) or including progesterone supplementation with the OVS treatment for cows without a CL would produce shorter inter-insemination intervals and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) not different from that of cows treated with the OVS treatment. Of the 1697 lactating Holstein cows enrolled in this experiment, complete data were available for only 1584 cows because the remainder was not treated, inseminated per treatment design, left the herd before pregnancy diagnosis, or some other outcome was missing. Cows were enrolled in the study and assigned to either of three treatments at NPD (32 ± 3 d after AI [Day 0]). Cows with a detected CL were assigned randomly to: (1) a modified Ovsynch (OVS; GnRH-1 - 7 d - PGF_2α-1 - 24 h - PGF_2α-2 - 32 h - GnRH-2 - 16 h - AI) or (2) Short Synch (SS; PGF_2α-1 - 24 h - PGF_2α-2 - 32 h - GnRH-2 - 16 h - AI). Cows with no CL were assigned to OVS plus a progesterone insert (CIDR). Blood was collected at NPD to measure progesterone concentration and determine accuracy of treatment assignment (progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL for a functional CL). Overall progesterone concentration at NPD was less in OVS + CIDR cows (1.5 ± 0.3 ng/mL) than in OVS (5.2 ± 0.2 ng/mL) or SS cows (3.7 ± 0.3 ng/mL). No differences in luteolytic risk (progesterone < 0.5 ng/mL at 72 h after PGF_2α-1) were detected after PGF_2α (>96.7%) and ovulation risk after GnRH-2 was 93.8, 91.7, and 86.2% for SS, OVS, and OVS + CIDR, respectively. Mean and median inter-insemination interval were less in SS (mean = 34.3 ± 0.05 d [median = 35 d] than OVS cows (40.2 ± 0.05 d [42 d]), but that in OVS cows did not differ from OVS + CIDR cows (41.4 ± 0.05 d [42 d]). Technicians were more accurate in visually detecting a functional CL than a non-functional CL (81.2 vs. 61.1%). Sensitivity of detecting a functional CL by technicians averaged 91.2%, but specificity was 39.8%. Pregnancy per AI at 32 ± 3 d after AI was less for SS (16.5% [n = 115]) than OVS (29.3% [n = 133] when a functional CL was inaccurately detected, but did not differ when a functional CL was detected accurately (27.6% [n = 561] vs 30.3% [508]). Pregnancy per AI did not differ between OVS and OVS + CIDR cows regardless of CL status. Short synch is an alternative to the entire modified Ovsynch program to produce similar P/AI when the CL status was detected accurately, and regardless of functional CL status, SS reduced inter-insemination intervals by 7 d.

Metabolic Profile and Hormonal Status Comparison Between Primiparous and Multiparous Non-Cyclic Cows

Several reports indicated that a large proportion of dairy cows have not resumed cyclicity until day 60 after calving. These cows are traditionally classified as non-cycling (anoestrous or anovular cows). Static ovaries (SO, lack of luteal tissue and follicles >8 mm, and progesterone < 0.5 ng/mL) could be a possible underlying reason that contributes to a non-cycling status. Although SO affects both primiparous (PP) and multiparous (MP) cows, PP cows are more prone to be non-cycling than MP. Therefore, this study aims to compare the metabolic profiles and hormonal status between non-cycling PP and MP cows diagnosed with SO. One hundred and twenty one animals that did not express signs of oestrus until day 60 postpartum were grouped by parity (PP, n=58 and MP, n=63), then blood sampled and examined using transrectal ultrasonography. Blood samples were collected before the ultrasonographic examination. Out of those, 42 PP (72.4%) and 28 MP (44.4%) were diagnosed as non-cycling (bearing SO). Serum concentrations of triglycerides, cholesterol, total protein and albumin did not differ between parity groups. The glucose concentrations in PP cows (1.43 ± 0.59 mmol/L) and MP cows (1.69 ± 0.71 mmol/L) did not differ, however, they were less than the normal physiological concentration. In addition, no differences were detected between parity groups for concentrations of NEFA, β-HBA, progesterone and estradiol. In summary, we concluded that non-cycling PP and MP cows bearing SO have similar hormonal status and metabolic profiles.

Presynchronization strategy using prostaglandin F2α, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and detection of estrus to improve fertility in a resynchronization program for dairy cows

Objectives of experiment 1 were to evaluate pregnancy outcomes and reinsemination patterns of cows whose estrous cycles or ovulation were presynchronized with prostaglandin (PGF_2α) or PGF_2α and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) after non-pregnancy diagnosis in programs focusing on inseminating cows based on tail paint removal. Objectives of experiment 2 were to evaluate pregnancy outcomes and reinsemination patterns of cows with or without a corpus luteum (CL) present at non-pregnancy diagnosis in a program utilizing PGF_2α and GnRH to presynchronize estrous cycles before resynchronization. Lactating Holstein cows from three herds were enrolled in the experiments at non-pregnancy diagnosis (d 0). Estrus was determined daily based on tail paint removal. In experiment 1, cows were assigned randomly to two treatments: (1) PGF_2α on d 0 (n = 967; P7); and 2) PGF_2α on d 0 and GnRH on d 7 (n = 962; P7G7). Cows not reinseminated based on tail paint removal were submitted to the timed-AI Cosynch-72 protocol 7 d after presynchronization treatments. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was greater (P = 0.01) for P7G7 cows than P7 cows. Cows inseminated based on tail paint removal had increased (P < 0.01) P/AI than cows submitted to the timed AI protocol. In addition, an interaction was detected (P = 0.03) between method of insemination and presynchronization treatment such that cows submitted to timed AI in the P7G7 treatment had greater P/AI than P7 cows. Nonetheless, P7 cows were inseminated at a faster rate (P < 0.01) than P7G7 cows. In experiment 2, presence of a CL was determined by transrectal ultrasonography at initiation of the P7G7 protocol (n = 1479). In a random subset of cows (n = 210), blood samples were collected immediately after ultrasound examination to determine progesterone concentration in order to evaluate accuracy of detection of a CL by ultrasonography. Accuracy of detection of a CL was 80%. Hazard to insemination and P/AI did not differ among cows regardless of CL status. In conclusion, herds relying mostly on detected estrus to reinseminate cows may achieve greater pregnancy outcomes if presynchronizing with PGF_2α and GnRH instead of only PGF_2α, albeit at a slower insemination rate. In addition, pregnancy outcomes and reinsemination patterns were similar for cows bearing or not bearing a CL when utilizing the P7G7 protocol, indicating a limited benefit of evaluating ovarian luteal structures by ultrasonography.

Level of circulating concentrations of progesterone during ovulatory follicle development affects timing of pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows

The objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of high versus low progesterone (P4) during the pre-dominance or dominance phase (or both) of ovulatory follicle development on follicular dynamics and fertility of lactating dairy cows. Progesterone (P4) was manipulated to reach high (H) or low (L) serum concentrations during the pre-dominance phase (d 0 to 4 of the wave) and dominance phase (d 5 to 7 of the wave) of a second follicular wave ovulatory follicle, creating 4 treatments: H/H, H/L, L/H, and L/L. Luteolysis was induced with PGF_2α on d 7 of the wave and ovulation was induced with GnRH 56 h after PGF_2α. Cows (n = 558) received artificial insemination (AI) 16 h following GnRH. Pregnancy was determined at 6 intervals during gestation and at calving to quantify pregnancy loss beginning at d 23 post-AI utilizing pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB) in novel within-cow comparisons. Cows with single ovulations assigned to the L/L treatment had greater pre-ovulatory follicle diameter compared with cows assigned to the L/H or H/L treatments. Cows with single ovulations had greater pre-ovulatory follicle diameter compared with cows with double ovulations. Low P4 in H/L, L/H, and L/L increased double ovulation rate compared with H/H. Cows with double ovulations had greater pregnancies per AI (P/AI) on d 23 post-AI compared with cows with single ovulations but had greater losses if ovulations were unilateral. Cows with low P4 during the entire period of the ovulatory follicle development also had greater P/AI on d 23 post-AI compared with cows with high P4 during both phases. However, full-term P/AI was not different between treatments. This was a result of the greater incidence of pregnancy losses between d 35 and 56 of gestation for cows with unilateral double ovulations compared with bilateral double ovulations and single ovulatory cows. Cows with single ovulation and low circulating P4 during the dominance period of follicle development had increased pregnancy losses between d 35 and 56 of gestation compared with cows with single ovulations and high P4. The PSPB measurements on d 16 and 23 post-AI were highly accurate in the prediction of pregnancy at d 28. The PSPB differed on d 23 and 28 between cows that had versus cows that did not have pregnancy losses between d 28 and 35 of gestation. In summary, circulating concentrations of P4 during ovulatory follicle development affected numbers of follicles ovulated and timing of subsequent pregnancy losses.

Pregnancy outcomes are not improved by administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone at initiation of a 5-day CIDR-Cosynch resynchronization protocol for lactating dairy cows

Using a 5-d controlled internal drug-release (CIDR)-Cosynch resynchronization protocol, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of the initial GnRH injection on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) to the second artificial insemination in lactating Holstein dairy cows. On 37 ± 3 d (mean ± standard deviation) after the first artificial insemination, and upon nonpregnancy diagnosis (d 0 of the experiment), lactating cows eligible for a second artificial insemination (n = 429) were enrolled in a 5-d CIDR-Cosynch protocol. On d 0, all cows received a CIDR insert and were assigned randomly to receive the initial GnRH injection (GnRH; n = 226) of the protocol or no-GnRH (n = 203). Blood samples were collected from a sub-group of cows (n = 184) on d 0 and analyzed for progesterone (P4) concentration. On d 5, CIDR inserts were removed, and all cows received 1 injection of PGF_2α. On d 6 and 7, cows were observed once daily by employees for tail-chalk removal, and cows detected in estrus on d 6 or 7 received artificial insemination that day (EDAI), and did not receive the final GnRH injection. The remaining cows not detected in estrus by d 8 received GnRH and timed artificial insemination (TAI). Pregnancy status was confirmed by transrectal palpation of uterine contents at 37 ± 3 d (mean ± standard deviation) after the second artificial insemination. Eliminating the initial GnRH injection had no effect on P/AI compared with cows receiving GnRH (27 vs. 21%), respectively. Similarly, method of insemination (EDAI vs. TAI) and its interaction with treatment had no effect on P/AI. Primiparous cows had greater P/AI than multiparous cows (31 vs. 21%). Mean P4 concentrations (n = 184) at the initiation of the protocol did not differ between treatments (4.51 ± 0.35 ng/mL no-GnRH vs. 3.96 ± 0.34 ng/mL of GnRH). When P4 concentrations were categorized as high (≥1 ng/mL) or low (<1 ng/mL), P/AI tended to be greater for high P4 concentrations (n = 136) compared with low (n = 48) P4 concentrations (26 vs. 16%, respectively). No differences were observed in the proportion of cows with high or low P4 between treatments. Collectively, these results provide evidence that eliminating the initial GnRH in a 5-d CIDR-Cosynch resynchronization protocol for lactating dairy cows did not reduce P/AI in this study.

Invited review: Reproducible research from noisy data: Revisiting key statistical principles for the animal sciences

Reproducible results define the very core of scientific integrity in modern research. Yet, legitimate concerns have been raised about the reproducibility of research findings, with important implications for the advancement of science and for public support. With statistical practice increasingly becoming an essential component of research efforts across the sciences, this review article highlights the compelling role of statistics in ensuring that research findings in the animal sciences are reproducible-in other words, able to withstand close interrogation and independent validation. Statistics set a formal framework and a practical toolbox that, when properly implemented, can recover signal from noisy data. Yet, misconceptions and misuse of statistics are recognized as top contributing factors to the reproducibility crisis. In this article, we revisit foundational statistical concepts relevant to reproducible research in the context of the animal sciences, raise awareness on common statistical misuse undermining it, and outline recommendations for statistical practice. Specifically, we emphasize a keen understanding of the data generation process throughout the research endeavor, from thoughtful experimental design and randomization, through rigorous data analysis and inference, to careful wording in communicating research results to peer scientists and society in general. We provide a detailed discussion of core concepts in experimental design, including data architecture, experimental replication, and subsampling, and elaborate on practical implications for proper elicitation of the scope of reach of research findings. For data analysis, we emphasize proper implementation of mixed models, in terms of both distributional assumptions and specification of fixed and random effects to explicitly recognize multilevel data architecture. This is critical to ensure that experimental error for treatments of interest is properly recognized and inference is correctly calibrated. Inferential misinterpretations associated with use of P-values, both significant and not, are clarified, and problems associated with error inflation due to multiple comparisons and selective reporting are illustrated. Overall, we advocate for a responsible practice of statistics in the animal sciences, with an emphasis on continuing quantitative education and interdisciplinary collaboration between animal scientists and statisticians to maximize reproducibility of research findings.

Efficacy of different methods for detecting the onset of ovarian cyclicity in post-partum Murrah buffaloes

This study was designed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of three methods for detecting the onset of cyclicity in post-partum Murrah buffaloes. The methods investigated were visual signs, transrectal ultrasonography, and serum progesterone (P₄) assay. For this study, 102 post-partum Murrah buffalo cows were grouped for monitoring their ovarian activity. The first group of buffaloes was between 26 and 35 days post-partum. Thereafter, the buffalo cows that calved were grouped after every 10 days for the study sample. Thus, the study animals were adjudged between 26 and 35, 36-45, 46-55, 56-65, 66-75, 76-85, and 86-95 days post-partum with an average of 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 days post-partum, respectively. Visual estrus signs were monitored twice daily, and simultaneously, ultrasound examination was carried out at 10 days interval for accessing the presence of corpus luteum (CL). Serum P₄ was estimated in the animals which were adjudged cyclic by ultrasound examination, and the assay was repeated after 10 days. The buffalo cows in estrus were inseminated artificially, and pregnancy status was assessed after 30 days post-insemination. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of visual observation were low (39.37 and 70.73%, respectively) when compared to P₄ assay (98.80 and 96.47%) and ultrasound examination (single, 97.59 and 97.59%; double, 100 and 100%), respectively. Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of single and double ultrasound examination and P₄ assay were comparable. In conclusion, this study reports that single and double ultrasound examination and P₄ assay are more efficient than visual observation in detecting the onset of ovarian cyclicity in post-partum Murrah buffaloes.

Impact of parity on the efficiency of ovulation synchronization protocols in Holstein cows

The objective of this study was to elucidate the impact of parity on the efficiency of three different protocols to synchronize time of ovulation in Holstein cows. All cows enrolled in this trial were categorized into primiparous and multiparous (M₁ = 2-3 and M₂ ≥3 parities). Conception (P/AI at Day 28) and pregnancy (P/AI at Day 75) rates in the Presynch and CIDRsynch (31.7% and 35.5%; 26.3% and 28.4%, respectively) groups were significantly greater than that in spontaneous estrus (SE; 24.7 and 20.4%, respectively) group (P = 0.048 and 0.024; 0.041 and 0.011, respectively); however, no significant differences were detected between the SE and Ovsynch group for conception, pregnancy, and embryonic loss rates. Conception and pregnancy rates in the Presynch group decreased from 37.8% and 33.5%, respectively in primiparous cows to 29.6% and 23.1%, respectively in M₁ cows (P = 0.022 and 0.007, respectively). However, conception and pregnancy rates using the CIDRsynch regimen were increased from 31.1% and 23.8% in primiparous cows to 41.4% and 34.7% in M₁ cows (P = 0.017 and 0.008, respectively), and 40.9% and 33.6% in M₂ cows (P = 0.021 and 0.019, respectively). Embryonic loss rate using the CIDRsynch protocol was decreased from 22.9% in primiparous cows to 15.1% and 18.2% in M₁ and M₂ cows (P = 0.013 and 0.130, respectively). On the contrary, embryonic loss rate using the Ovsynch protocol was increased from 11.5% in primiparous cows to 22.1% and 21.8% in M₁ and M₂ cows (P = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). The Cox proportional-hazards model of embryonic loss showed significant associations for parity and season of calving with the hazard of embryonic loss (P = 0.001 and 0.016, respectively). Multiparous cows (M1 and M2) had a higher risk of embryonic loss than primiparous cows (Hazard ratio = 1.32 and 1.89, respectively). Our results indicate that use of the CIDRsynch regimen may achieve satisfactory conception and pregnancy rates in multiparous Holstein cows. However, synchronizing time of ovulation in primiparous cows with use of the Presynch treatment increases the fertility indices.

Presynchronization of lactating dairy cows with PGF2α and GnRH simultaneously, 7 days before Ovsynch have similar outcomes compared to G6G

The overarching objective of this study was to develop an alternative strategy for first and greater services that will improve fertility in lactating dairy cows for dairy operations limited by labor or other logistical constraints that make it difficult to use Presynch-11, G6G, or Double-Ovsynch. Our overall hypothesis was that simplification of a Presynch program through the combination of PGF2α and GnRH on the same day (PG + G), 7 days before the first GnRH of Ovsynch, would allow for similar ovulation and luteolysis rate and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared with G6G. Lactating dairy cows 58 to 64 days in milk (first service; n = 114), and cows diagnosed not pregnant 39 days after previous AI (second + service; n = 122) were blocked by parity and service and randomly assigned to control or PG + G. Control cows received G6G (n = 116) that consisted of PGF2α, 2-day GnRH, 6-day GnRH, 7-day PGF2α, 56-hour GnRH, and 16-hour AI. Treated cows (PG + G; n = 121) received PGF2α and GnRH, 7-day GnRH, 7-day PGF2α, 56-hour GnRH, and 16-hour AI. All cows received a second PGF2α 24 hours after the PGF2α of Ovsynch. First service cows received AI between 76 and 82 days in milk and second + service received AI 57 days after previous AI. Pregnancies/AI (n = 230) were similar in controls compared with treated cows on Day 35 (57 vs. 50%; P = 0.27) and Day 49 (54 vs. 47%; P = 0.33), respectively. Percent of cows ovulating after GnRH of the presynchronization was greater (P = 0.002) for controls vs. treated (80 vs. 58%); however, ovulation after first GnRH of Ovsynch was similar (67 vs. 68%; P = 0.86). Serum concentrations of progesterone were similar (P = 0.78) at the time of first GnRH of Ovsynch for control and treated cows (2.22 vs. 2.14 ng/mL). However, serum progesterone at the time of PGF2α of Ovsynch was greater (P = 0.002) for control cows compared with treated cows (5.75 vs. 4.64 ng/mL). In summary, administering both PGF2α and GnRH on the same day, 7 days before the start of Ovsynch, appears to be a simple alternative that results in acceptable P/AI but potentially less progesterone during the growth of the ovulatory follicle.

Effect of extending the interval from Presynch to initiation of Ovsynch in a Presynch-Ovsynch protocol on fertility of timed artificial insemination services in lactating dairy cows

The specific objective of this study was to determine if increasing the interval between the Presynch and Ovsynch portion of the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol (Presynch: PGF2α-14 d-PGF2α and Ovsynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF2α-56 h-GnRH-16-20 h-timed artificial insemination) from 12 to 14 d would reduce the fertility of lactating dairy cows not detected in estrus after Presynch that receive timed artificial insemination (TAI). Cows from 4 commercial dairy farms (n=3,165) were blocked by parity (primiparous vs. multiparous) and randomly assigned to a 12 (PSOv14-12; n=1,566) or 14 d (PSOv14-14; n=1,599) interval between the second PGF2α (PGF) injection of Presynch (P2) and the beginning of Ovsynch. Cows detected in estrus any time between P2 and the day of the TAI were inseminated (AIED group). From a subgroup of cows (177 and 150 in PSOv14-12 and PSOv14-14, respectively), ovarian parameters and ovulation were evaluated through determination of concentrations of progesterone (P4) in blood and transrectal ultrasonography at the time of the first GnRH (GnRH1) and the PGF injection of Ovsynch. Overall, 52.8% (n=1,671) of the cows were AIED, whereas 47.2% (n=1,494) received TAI. For cows that received TAI, pregnancies per artificial insemination 39 d after artificial insemination were similar for PSOv14-12 (36.3%) and PSOv14-14 (36.0%) but were greater for primiparous (41.5%) than multiparous cows (33.6%). Pregnancy loss from 39 to 105 d after artificial insemination was similar for PSOv14-12 (4.8%) and PSOv14-14 (8.6%), for primiparous (6.4%) and multiparous cows (7.0%), but a tendency for a treatment by parity interaction was observed. Both treatments had a similar proportion of cows with a follicle ≥ 10 mm and similar follicle size at GnRH1; however, the ovulatory response to GnRH was greater for PSOv14-12 (62.2%) than PSOv14-14 (46.4%). A greater proportion of cows with a functional corpus luteum (75.3 vs. 65.6%) and greater concentrations of P4 (3.9 vs. 3.3 ng/mL) at GnRH1 in PSOv14-14 than PSOv14-12 may have compensated for the reduction in fertility expected due to reduced ovulatory response to GnRH1. We concluded that extending the interval from Presynch to Ovsynch from 12 to 14 reduced ovulatory response to GnRH1 but did not reduce the fertility of cows that received TAI when cows were inseminated in estrus after presynchronization. Thus, farms that combine AIED and TAI during the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol may use a 14-d interval between Presynch and Ovsynch to simplify their management without reducing fertility of cows receiving TAI.

Impact of thermal stress on the efficiency of ovulation synchronization protocols in Holstein cows

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of thermal stress on the efficiency of three different protocols to synchronize time of ovulation in purebred Holstein cows under subtropical Egyptian conditions. The influence of temperature humidity index (THI) on the conception, pregnancy, embryonic loss and early abortion rates were investigated. Conception and pregnancy rates using the CIDRsynch and Presynch (37.5% and 33.9%; 29.5 and 29. 6%, respectively) were significantly greater than that for cows expressing spontaneous estrus (SE) and with use of the Ovsynch (28.5% and 24.3%; 21.6% and 24.6%, respectively) treatment regimen. Conception and pregnancy rates using the Ovsynch protocol were significantly decreased from 31.6% and 26.3% at the lesser THI to 11.5% and 9.9%, respectively than at the greater THI [crude odds ratio (COR) = 0.28 and 0.32; P = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively]. However, conception (P/AI at 28 days) and pregnancy (P/AI at 75 days) rates using the Presynch protocol were significantly reduced at either the lesser or greater THI (COR = 0.47 and 0.42; 0.48 and 0.34, respectively). Embryonic loss rate with the Presynch group was significantly increased from 11.5% at the lesser THI to 22.2% at the greater THI (COR = 2.28; P = 0.039). In contrast, conception, pregnancy and embryonic loss rates did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) with the CIDRsynch protocol at the different THI. Results from the present study indicate that use of the CIDRsynch protocol may provide consistent and satisfactory conception and pregnancy rates in Holstein cows under subtropical environmental conditions.

Short communication: Insertion of an intravaginal progesterone device at the time of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) injection affects neither GnRH-induced release of luteinizing hormone nor development of dominant follicle in early diestrus of lactating dairy cows

Our objectives were to evaluate the acute effects of a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert containing 1.38 g of progesterone (P4) on the release of LH, follicular growth, and circulating concentrations of P4 in cows treated with GnRH at the time of CIDR insertion. Nonpregnant, lactating dairy cows (n=27) were blocked by parity, predicted 305-d mature-equivalent milk production, and body condition score and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: (1) CIDR insertion concurrent with an injection of 200 µg of GnRH (n=10; 2GP4); (2) CIDR insertion concurrent with an injection of 100 µg of GnRH (n=10; 1GP4); and (3) injection of 100 µg of GnRH (n=7; CON). Prior to onset of treatments, cows were submitted to a presynchronization protocol that consisted of a CIDR insert containing 1.38 g of P4 from d -7 to -2, 25mg of PGF2α on d -2 and -1, and 100 µg of GnRH on d 0. Experimental treatments were applied on d 6, the early luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Concentrations of P4 in plasma were determined on d -2 and 0 and at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 345, 600, and 1,200 min relative to treatment on d 6. Concentrations of LH were determined in plasma samples obtained at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 345 min relative to treatment on d 6. Ultrasonography examinations of ovarian structures were performed on d -2, 0, 2, and at 0, 600, and 1,200 min relative to treatment on d 6. Mean concentrations of P4 in the CON group (1.91±0.28 ng/mL) were lower than in 2GP4 (3.40±0.26 ng/mL) and 1GP4 (3.31±0.24 ng/mL) groups, but concentrations in 2GP4 and 1GP4 were similar. Mean concentration of LH in response to the GnRH injection on d 6 was greatest in 2GP4 cows (3.08±0.21 ng/mL) and did not differ between 1GP4 (2.23±0.21 ng/mL) and CON (2.14±0.25 ng/mL) cows. The diameter of the dominant follicle on d 6 was similar among treatments (2GP4=15.34±0.50; 1GP4=15.31±0.50; CON=14.77±0.62 mm). In conclusion, CIDR insertion concurrent with a 100- or 200-µg dose of GnRH neither altered GnRH-induced LH release nor had an acute effect on dominant follicle growth.

Expression and detection of estrus in dairy cows: the role of new technologies

Despite the widespread adoption of hormonal synchronization protocols that allow for timed artificial insemination (AI), detection of estrus plays an important role in the reproductive management program on most dairies in the United States. Increased physical activity is a secondary sign of estrus in dairy cattle, and a new generation of electronic systems that continuously monitor physical activity to predict timing of AI have been developed and marketed to the dairy industry. A variety of management and physiologic challenges inhibit detection of behavioral estrus on farms, but the prevalence of anouvular cows near the end of the voluntary waiting period is particularly problematic. Only 70% of lactating Holstein cows were detected in estrus when using an activity monitoring system, with the remaining 20% of cows classified as anovular and 10% ovulating without showing signs of activity. Mean time of AI in relation to ovulation based on the activity monitoring system was acceptable for most of the cows with increased activity, however, variability in the duration of estrus and timing of AI in relation to ovulation could result in poor pregnancy outcomes in some cows. Use of a Presynch-Ovsynch protocol for submission of cows for first AI has been widely adopted by dairies in the United States, and a combined approach in which AI based on activity is followed by submission of cows not detected with activity to timed AI after synchronization of ovulation may be an effective strategy for submission of cows to first AI. Based on a field trial on a large commercial dairy in the United States, the activity monitoring system detected 70% of cows with increased activity after the second PGF2α injection of a Presynch-Ovsynch protocol, however, cows inseminated to increased activity had fewer pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared with cows with increased activity after the second PGF2α injection that received timed AI after completing the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol. Based on an economic model comparing reproductive management programs with varying levels of AI to estrus v. timed AI, the rate of estrus detection and the P/AI to inseminations based on AI to detected estrus v. timed AI affected the decision to inseminate based on activity v. timed AI. In conclusion, an activity monitoring system detected increased activity in about 70% of lactating Holstein cows on a large commercial dairy in the United States, however, synchronization of ovulation and timed AI was beneficial to inseminate cows not detected with increased activity by the activity monitoring system.

Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2α dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response, luteal regression, and fertility of lactating dairy cows

Ovsynch-type synchronization of ovulation protocols have suboptimal synchronization rates due to reduced ovulation to the first GnRH treatment and inadequate luteolysis to the prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) treatment before timed artificial insemination (TAI). Our objective was to determine whether increasing the dose of the first GnRH or the PGF2α treatment during the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of Double-Ovsynch could improve the rates of ovulation and luteolysis and therefore increase pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI). In experiment 1, cows were randomly assigned to a two-by-two factorial design to receive either a low (L) or high (H) doses of GnRH (Gonadorelin; 100 vs. 200 μg) and a PGF2α analogue (cloprostenol; 500 vs. 750 μg) resulting in the following treatments: LL (n = 263), HL (n = 277), LH (n = 270), and HH (n = 274). Transrectal ultrasonography and serum progesterone (P4) were used to assess ovulation to GnRH1, GnRH2, and luteal regression after PGF2α during Breeding-Ovsynch in a subgroup of cows (n = 651 at each evaluation). Pregnancy status was assessed 29, 39, and 74 days after TAI. In experiment 2, cows were randomly assigned to LL (n = 220) or HH (n = 226) treatment as described for experiment 1. For experiment 1, ovulation to GnRH1 was greater (P = 0.01) for cows receiving H versus L GnRH (66.6% [217/326] vs. 57.5% [187/325]) treatment, but only for cows with elevated P4 at GnRH1. Cows that ovulated to GnRH1 had increased (P < 0.001) fertility compared with cows that did not ovulate (52.2% vs. 38.5%); however, no effect of higher dose of GnRH on fertility was detected. The greater PGF2α dose increased luteal regression primarily in multiparous cows (P = 0.03) and tended to increase fertility (P = 0.05) only at the pregnancy diagnosis 39 days after TAI. Overall, P/AI was 47.0% at 29 days and 39.7% at 74 days after TAI; P/AI did not differ (P = 0.10) among treatments at 74 days (LL, 34.6%; HL, 40.8%; LH, 42.2%; HH, 40.9%) and was greater (P < 0.001) for primiparous cows than for multiparous cows (46.1% vs. 33.8%). For experiment 2, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.21) between H versus L treatments (44.2% [100/226] vs. 40.5% [89/220]). Thus, despite an increase in ovulatory response to GnRH1 and luteal regression to PGF2α, there were only marginal effects of increasing dose of GnRH or PGF2α on fertility to TAI after Double-Ovsynch.

Targeted progesterone supplementation improves fertility in lactating dairy cows without a corpus luteum at the initiation of the timed artificial insemination protocol

The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of supplemental progesterone on fertility in lactating dairy cows lacking a corpus luteum (CL) at the initiation of the timed artificial insemination (AI) program. Holstein cows were subjected to the 5-d timed AI program (d -8 GnRH, d -3 and -2 PGF2α, d 0 GnRH and AI). Cows had their ovaries scanned by ultrasonography on d -8 and those bearing a CL were considered to be in diestrus (DI; n=946). Cows that lacked a CL on d -8 were assigned to remain as untreated control (CON; n=234) or receive 2 controlled internal drug release (CIDR) inserts containing progesterone (2CIDR; n=218) from d -8 to -3, as a single insert has been proven insufficient to modulate fertility in cows without CL. Blood was analyzed for progesterone and estradiol concentrations. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 34 and 62 after AI. Progesterone concentrations during the timed AI program were lowest for CON, intermediate for 2CIDR, and highest for DI. Supplementation increased progesterone concentrations between d -7 and -3 compared with CON (2.65 vs. 0.51 ng/mL). Ovulation to the first GnRH was not affected by treatment. However, a greater proportion of CON and 2CIDR cows had a new CL on d -3 compared with DI cows (66.7 vs. 61.9 vs. 52.0%). In cows with a new CL, the diameter of the ovulatory follicle was larger for CON than 2CIDR, and intermediate for DI (18.7 vs. 16.5 vs. 17.7 mm). Concentrations of estradiol on d -3 did not differ among treatments; however, DI cows had greater estradiol concentrations at AI compared with CON or 2CIDR cows. Pregnancy per AI was less for CON compared with 2CIDR or DI on d 32 (30.8 vs. 46.8 vs. 49.9%) and 64 (28.6 vs. 43.7 vs. 47.3%), indicating that supplementation with progesterone reestablished fertility in cows lacking a CL on d -8. A greater proportion of nonpregnant CON cows had a short reinsemination interval compared with 2CIDR or DI (11.1 vs. 3.5 vs. 5.7%). Treatment did not affect pregnancy loss between d 34 and 62 of gestation. A single ultrasound exam was effective in identifying a low-fertility cohort of cows based on the absence of CL at the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol. Progesterone supplementation with 2 CIDR inserts increased progesterone in plasma to 2.65 ng/mL and restored fertility in lactating dairy cows lacking a CL at the initiation of the timed AI program similar to that of cows in diestrus.

Effect of progesterone on magnitude of the luteinizing hormone surge induced by two different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in lactating dairy cows

Ovulation to the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch-type protocols is lower in cows with high progesterone (P4) concentrations compared with cows with low P4 concentrations, suggesting that P4 may suppress the release of LH from the anterior pituitary after GnRH treatment. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of 1) circulating P4 concentrations at the time of GnRH treatment on GnRH-induced LH secretion in lactating dairy cows and 2) increasing the dose of GnRH from 100 to 200 μg on LH secretion in a high- and low-P4 environment. A Double-Ovsynch (Pre-Ovsynch: GnRH, PGF(2α) 7d later, GnRH 3d later, and Breeding-Ovsynch 7d later: GnRH, PGF(2α) 7d later, and GnRH 48 h later) synchronization protocol was used to create the high- and low-P4 environments. At the first GnRH injection of Breeding-Ovsynch (high P4), all cows with a corpus luteum ≥ 20 mm were randomly assigned to receive 100 or 200 μg of GnRH. At the second GnRH injection of Breeding-Ovsynch (low P4) cows were again randomized to receive 100 or 200 μg of GnRH. Blood samples were collected every 15 min from -15 to 180 min after GnRH treatment, and then hourly until 6h after GnRH treatment. As expected, mean P4 concentrations were greater for cows in the high- than the low-P4 environment. For cows receiving 100 μg of GnRH, the LH peak and area under the curve (AUC) were greater in the low- than in the high-P4 environment. Similarly, for cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH, the LH peak and AUC were greater in the low- than the high-P4 environment. Cows receiving 100 or 200 μg of GnRH had greater mean LH concentration in the low- than the high-P4 environment from 1 to 6h after GnRH treatment. On the other hand, when comparing the effect of the 2 GnRH doses in the high- and low-P4 environments, cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH had a greater LH peak and AUC than cows treated with 100 μg of GnRH both in the high- and low-P4 environments. For the high-P4 environment, mean LH was greater from 1.5 to 5h after GnRH treatment for cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH than for those receiving 100 μg of GnRH. In the low-P4 environment, mean LH was greater for cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH than for those receiving 100 μg of GnRH from 1 to 2.5h after GnRH treatment. We conclude that the P4 environment at GnRH treatment dramatically affects GnRH-induced LH secretion, and that a 200-μg dose of GnRH can increase LH secretion in either a high- or a low-P4 environment.