Estimated Heterogeneity of Phenotypic Variance of Test-Day Yield with a Structural Variance Model

Comparison of different validation methods for single-step genomic evaluations based on a simulated cattle population

The validation of estimated breeding values from single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) is an important topic, as more and more countries and animal populations are currently changing their genomic prediction to single-step. The objective of this work was to compare different methods to validate single-step genomic breeding values (GEBV). The investigations were carried out using a simulation study based on the German-Austrian-Czech Fleckvieh population. To test the validation methods under different conditions, several biased and unbiased scenarios were simulated. The application of the widely used Interbull GEBV test to the single-step method is only possible to a limited extent, partly because of genomic preselection, which biases conventional estimated breeding values. Alternative validation methods considered in the study are the linear regression method proposed by Legarra and Reverter, the improved genomic validation including additional regressions as suggested by VanRaden and an adaptation of the Interbull GEBV test using daughter yield deviations (DYD) from ssGBLUP instead of pedigree BLUP. The comparison of the different methods for the different scenarios showed that for males the methods based on GEBV estimate the dispersion more accurate and less biased compared with the GEBV test using DYD from ssGBLUP, whereas the standard Interbull GEBV test is highly affected by genomic preselection for males. For females, the GEBV test using yield deviations from ssGBLUP results in better estimations for the true dispersion.

Symposium review: Challenges and opportunities for evaluating and using the genetic potential of dairy cattle in the new era of sensor data from automation

Sensor data from automation are becoming available on an increasingly large scale, and associated research is slowly starting to appear. This new era of sensor data from automation leads to many challenges but also new opportunities for assessing and maximizing the genetic potential of dairy cattle. The first challenge is data quality, because all uses of sensor data require careful data quality validation, potentially using external references. The second issue is data accessibility. Indeed, sensor data generated from automation are often designed to be available on-farm in a given system. However, to make these data useful-for genetic improvement for example-the data must also be made available off-farm. By nature, sensor data often are very complex and diverse; therefore, a data consolidation and integration layer is required. Moreover, the traits we want to select have to be defined precisely when generated from these raw data. This approach is obviously also beneficial to limit the challenge of extremely high data volumes generated by sensors. An additional challenge is that sensors will always be deployed in a context of herd management; therefore, any efforts to make them useful should focus on both breeding and management. However, this challenge also leads to opportunities to use genomic predictions based on these novel data for breeding and management. Access to relevant phenotypes is crucial for every genomic evaluation system. The automatic generation of training data, on both the phenotypic and genomic levels, is a major opportunity to access novel, precise, continuously updated, and relevant data. If the challenges of bidirectional data transfer between farms and external databases can be solved, new opportunities for continuous genomic evaluations integrating genotypes and the most current local phenotypes can be expected to appear. Novel concepts such as federated learning may help to limit exchange of raw data and, therefore, data ownership issues, which is another important element limiting access to sensor data. Accurate genome-guided decision-making and genome-guided management of dairy cattle should be the ultimate way to add value to sensor data from automation. This could also be the major driving force to improve the cost-benefit relationship for sensor-based technologies, which is currently one of the major obstacles for large-scale use of available technologies.

Standardization of milk mid-infrared spectrometers for the transfer and use of multiple models

An increasing number of models are being developed to provide information from milk Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) spectra on fine milk composition, technological properties of milk, or even cows' physiological status. In this context, and to take advantage of these existing models, the purpose of this work was to evaluate whether a spectral standardization method can enable the use of multiple equations within a network of different FT-MIR spectrometers. The piecewise direct standardization method was used, matching "slave" instruments to a common reference, the "master." The effect of standardization on network reproducibility was assessed on 66 instruments from 3 different brands by comparing the spectral variability of the slaves and the master with and without standardization. With standardization, the global Mahalanobis distance from the slave spectra to the master spectra was reduced on average from 2,655.9 to 14.3, representing a significant reduction of noninformative spectral variability. The transfer of models from instrument to instrument was tested using 3 FT-MIR models predicting (1) the quantity of daily methane emitted by dairy cows, (2) the concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acids in milk, and (3) the fresh cheese yield. The differences, in terms of root mean squared error, between master predictions and slave predictions were reduced after standardization on average from 103 to 17 g/d, from 0.0315 to 0.0045 g/100 mL of milk, and from 2.55 to 0.49 g of curd/100 g of milk, respectively. For all the models, standard deviations of predictions among all the instruments were also reduced by 5.11 times for methane, 5.01 times for polyunsaturated fatty acids, and 7.05 times for fresh cheese yield, showing an improvement of prediction reproducibility within the network. Regarding the results obtained, spectral standardization allows the transfer and use of multiple models on all instruments as well as the improvement of spectral and prediction reproducibility within the network. The method makes the models universal, thereby offering opportunities for data exchange and the creation and use of common robust models at an international level to provide more information to the dairy sector from direct analysis of milk.

Genetic Variability of Lactoferrin Content Estimated by Mid-Infrared Spectrometry in Bovine Milk

The effects of lactoferrin (LF) on the immune system have already been shown by many studies. Unfortunately, the current methods used to measure LF levels in milk do not permit the study of the genetic variability of lactoferrin or the performance of routine genetic evaluations. The first aim of this research was to derive a calibration equation permitting the prediction of LF in milk by mid-infrared spectrometry (MIR). The calibration with partial least squares on 69 samples showed a ratio of standard error of cross-validation to standard deviation equal to 1.98. Based on this value, the calibration equation was used to establish an LF indicator trait (predicted LF; pLF) on a large number of milk samples (n = 7,690). A subsequent study of its variability was conducted, which confirmed that stage of lactation and lactation number influence the overall pLF level. Small differences in mean pLF among 7 dairy breeds were also observed. The pLF content of Jersey milk was significantly higher than that in Holstein milk. Therefore, the choice of breed could change the expected LF level. Heritability estimated for pLF was 19.7%. The genetic and phenotypic correlations between somatic cell score and pLF were 0.04 and 0.26, respectively. As somatic cell score increases in presence of mastitis, this observation seems to indicate that pLF, or a function of observed pLF, compared with expected LF might have potential as an indicator of mastitis. The negative genetic correlation (-0.36) between milk yield and pLF could indicate an undesirable effect of selection for high milk production on the overall LF level.

Estimation of Heritability and Genetic Correlations for the Major Fatty Acids in Bovine Milk

The current cattle selection program for dairy cattle in the Walloon region of Belgium does not consider the relative content of the different fatty acids (FA) in milk. However, interest by the local dairy industry in differentiated milk products is increasing. Therefore, farmers may be interested in selecting their animals based on the fat composition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of genetic selection to improve the nutritional quality of bovine milk fat. The heritabilities and correlations among milk yield, fat, protein, and major FA contents in milk were estimated. Heritabilities for FA in milk and fat ranged from 5 to 38%. The genetic correlations estimated among FA reflected the common origin of several groups of FA. Given these results, an index including FA contents with the similar metabolic process of production in the mammary gland could be used, for example, to increase the monounsaturated and conjugated fatty acids in milk. Moreover, the genetic correlations between the percentage of fat and the content of C14:0, C12:0, C16:0, and C18:0 in fat were -0.06, 0.55, 0.60, and 0.84, respectively. This result demonstrates that an increase in fat content is not directly correlated with undesirable changes in FA profile in milk for human health. Based on the obtained genetic parameters, a future selection program to improve the FA composition of milk fat could be initiated.

Adjustments for heterogeneous herd-year variances in a random regression model for genetic evaluations of Polish Black-and-White cattle

The study investigated the existence of heterogeneous variance in first-lactation daily milk yield of Polish Black-and-White cows across herds in different years. Bayesian Information Criterion was used to show that the model with unequal residual variances for different herd-years was more plausible than the model assuming equal variances. A method of adjusting phenotypic records was developed to account for unequal variability in herd-years. Factors used for the data adjustment considered variation of general residuals and residuals for specific herd-years. The size of herd-year was also taken into account. Varied power of corrections was used to analyze the effect of adjustment on estimated breeding values. The method was applied to daily milk records of 817,165 primiparous cows. The effectiveness of the data adjustment was evaluated by the analysis of differences between each bull's breeding value and its parental index. Data correction reduced the average difference and variance of differences between breeding values and parental indices. Accounting for the size of herd-year classes in correction factors improved the efficiency of heterogeneous variance adjustment.