Effect of Interval from Timed Artificial Insemination to Initiation of Resynchronization of Ovulation on Fertility of Lactating Dairy Cows

Effect of gonadorelin dose and an additional gonadorelin treatment 2 days after the initiation of Resynch-25 on ovarian dynamics and fertility of lactating Holstein cows

Our objective was to improve ovulatory response at the initiation of the Resynch-25 protocol by (1) increasing the dose of GnRH from 100 µg to 200 µg; and (2) giving a second GnRH treatment 56 h after the initiation of the protocol. We considered the experimental d 0 the day of the previous service. The experiment consisted of a 2 × 2 factorial design to compare the main effects of GnRH dose (100 vs. 200 µg) and GnRH treatment times (once vs. twice 56 h apart). A total of 2,111 previous services in 1,438 Holstein lactating cows were used. On d 25, cows were assigned to receive either 100 or 200 µg of GnRH only on d 25 or on d 25 and 56 h later (d 27). On d 32, cows diagnosed as nonpregnant (n = 1,076 services) were classified as with or without a corpus luteum (CL). Nonpregnant cows with a CL continued the Resynch-25 protocol receiving PGF2α treatments on d 32 and 33, followed by a GnRH 32 h later and timed AI 16 h after the last GnRH. Blood samples were collected in a subset of cows on d 25, 32, and 34 to assess serum P4 concentrations. In the same subset of cows, transrectal ultrasonographic examinations were performed on d 25, 29, 34 and 36 to assess ovarian parameters and ovulatory response to the GnRH treatments. The overall ovulatory response at the initiation of the protocol, defined as the ovulation between d 25 and 29, was not affected by days of GnRH treatment and averaged 41.9%. On the other hand, nonpregnant cows treated with the higher GnRH dose had a greater ovulatory response at the initiation of the protocol compared with cows treated with the lower dose (48.0% vs. 36.1%). Despite the increase in ovulatory response at the initiation of the protocol, the GnRH dose did not affect fertility of cows submitted to Resynch-25. Furthermore, the second GnRH treatment on d 27 tended to decrease pregnancy per AI on d 32 after AI (39.0% vs. 43.9%), but no effect of days of GnRH treatment was observed in the subsequent pregnancy diagnosis. The absence of a functional CL on d 25 and ovulation at the initiation of the protocol were positively associated with improved fertility. However, the improvement in fertility of cows ovulating at the initiation of the protocol occurred only in cows with a functional CL on d 25. In summary, despite increasing ovulatory response at the initiation of the protocol, the higher dose did not improve fertility. The extra GnRH on d 27 did not increase ovulatory response at the initiation of the protocol and tended to decrease P/AI 32 d after AI of the Resynch-25. In addition, no additive effect of the higher dose and extra GnRH treatment was observed. Despite the lack of overall treatment effect, the data presented in this study suggest that the identification of CL functionality on d 25 may help to optimize the resynchronization strategy used at nonpregnancy diagnosis to potentially increase fertility of cows reinseminated.

Lactating dairy cows managed for second and greater artificial insemination services with the Short-Resynch or Day 25 Resynch program had similar reproductive performance

The objective of this randomized controlled experiment was to evaluate reproductive performance and reproductive physiological outcomes of lactating Holstein cows managed for second and greater artificial insemination (AI) services with the Short-Resynch or Day 25 Resynch program. Cows from 2 commercial farms were randomly assigned after first service to the Short-Resynch (SR; n = 870) or Day 25 Resynch (D25R; n = 917) program in which they remained until 210 d after first service or left the herd. Cows in D25R received GnRH 25 ± 3 d after AI, whereas cows in SR did not. Cows not reinseminated at detected estrus (AIE) by 32 ± 3 d after AI underwent nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD) through transrectal ultrasonography (TUS). Nonpregnant cows from both treatments with a corpus luteum (CL) ≥15 mm and an ovarian follicle ≥10 mm (hereafter, CL cows) received 2 PGF_2α treatments 24 h apart, GnRH 32 h after the second PGF_2α, and timed AI 16 to 18 h later. Cows that did not meet the criteria to be included in the CL group (NoCL cows) received a modified Ovsynch protocol with progesterone (P4) supplementation [P4-Ovsynch; GnRH and controlled internal drug-release device (CIDR) in, 7 d later CIDR removal and PGF_2α, 24 h later PGF_2α, 32 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h later timed AI]. In a subgroup of cows, blood samples were collected and TUS conducted at each treatment to evaluate ovarian responses to resynchronization. Binary data were analyzed with logistic regression, continuous data by ANOVA, and time-to-event data by Cox's proportional hazard regression. A greater proportion (mean; 95% CI) of cows were AIE before NPD in the SR (60.5%; 57.0-63.8; n = 3,416) than the D25R (50.1%; 46.5-53.7; n = 3,177) treatment, whereas pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 32 d for AIE services before NPD was greater for the D25R (41.3%; 38.8-43.8; n = 1,560) than the SR (37.6%; 35.5-39.8; n = 1,961) treatment. At NPD, a greater proportion of cows in the D25R (84.3%; 82.2-86.2) than the SR (77.0%; 74.4-79.4) treatment were considered CL cows. Pregnancy per AI at 32 d was greater for the D25R than the SR treatment for all timed AI services (D25R = 43.0%; 40.2-45.9 vs. SR = 36.8%; 33.8-39.8) and for CL cows (D25R = 42.8%; 39.7-45.9 vs. SR = 33.8%; 30.6-37.2) but did not differ for NoCL cows (D25R = 39.4%; 32.1-47.3 vs. SR = 44.0%; 36.8-51.4). The hazard ratio for time to pregnancy (1.03; 0.93-1.14) and the proportion of cows not pregnant at the end of the observation period (D25R = 5.9%; 4.4-7.8 vs. SR = 6.7%; 5.0-8.7) did not differ between SR and D25R treatments. The GnRH treatment 25 d after AI resulted in more cows with P4 >1 ng/mL (D25R = 80.5%; 75.3-84.9 vs. SR = 63.6%; 57.3-69.4) and smaller follicle diameter at NPD 32 ± 3 d after AI for D25R (16.2 ± 0.4 mm) than for SR (17.5 ± 0.4 mm); however, it did not affect follicle diameter and luteal regression risk (CL cows only) before TAI. We concluded that the use of reproductive management programs including SR and D25R for CL cows and the P4-Ovsynch protocol for NoCL cows resulted in similar hazard of pregnancy and proportion of nonpregnant cows for up to 210 d after first service.

Detection of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in milk and blood as a test for early pregnancy in dairy cows

The objective of our study was to evaluate 2 pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG)-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for use with either blood or milk. From 12 dairy farms, 116 Montbéliarde or Holstein cows were selected that had either undergone artificial insemination (AI; n = 102) or had calved ( n = 14) 2–3 months earlier and had not undergone any further AI. Serum, plasma, and milk were obtained from all cows; serum and plasma were analyzed using the blood pregnancy test and milk using the milk pregnancy test. No false-positive results were observed when samples of the 14 noninseminated cows were tested. Cows undergoing AI were sampled at ~16, 30, and 41 days post-AI. An additional milk sample was taken at ~53 days post-AI. To establish whether the inseminated cows were pregnant, the cows were subjected to transrectal ultrasonography (TU) on or around day 41. Of the 102 inseminated cows, 63 were confirmed pregnant by TU. By day 30, the serum, plasma, and milk ELISAs demonstrated 100%, 100%, and 98.1% sensitivity and 88.6%, 88.9%, and 90.3% specificity, respectively, with potential pregnancy losses 30–41 days post-AI. Accuracy obtained on serum, plasma, and milk at ~41 days post-AI and on milk at ~53 days post-AI ranged from 97.4% to 100%. There were no differences of practical significance in performance between the blood and milk ELISAs for the sampling dates chosen. This new diagnostic capability with milk samples offers a major improvement in bovine reproductive management.

Resynchronization with unknown pregnancy status using progestin-based timed artificial insemination protocol in beef cattle

Two experiments were designed to evaluate the use of resynchronization (RESYNCH) protocols using a progestin-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol in beef cattle. In experiment 1, 475 cyclic Nelore heifers were resynchronized 22 days after the first TAI using two different inducers of new follicular wave emergence (estradiol benzoate [EB; n = 241] or GnRH [n = 234]) with the insertion of a norgestomet ear implant. At ear implant removal (7 days later), a pregnancy test was performed, and nonpregnant heifers received a dose of prostaglandin plus 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate, with a timed insemination 48 hours later. The pregnancy rate after the first TAI was similar (P = 0.97) between treatments (EB [41.9%] vs. GnRH [41.5%]). However, EB-treated heifers (49.3%) had a greater (P = 0.04) pregnancy per AI (P/AI) after the resynchronization than the GnRH-treated heifers (37.2%). In experiment 2, the pregnancy loss in 664 zebu females (344 nonlactating cows and 320 cyclic heifers) between 30 and 60 days after resynchronization was evaluated. Females were randomly assigned to one of two groups (RESYNCH 22 days after the first TAI [n = 317] or submitted only to natural mating [NM; n = 347]). Females from the NM group were maintained with bulls from 15 to 30 days after the first TAI. The RESYNC-treated females were resynchronized 22 days after the first TAI using 1 mg of EB on the first day of the resynchronization, similar to experiment 1. No difference was found in P/AI (NM [57.1%] vs. RESYNC [61.5%]; P = 0.32) or pregnancy loss (NM [2.0%] vs. RESYNC [4.1%]; P = 0.21) after the first TAI. Moreover, the overall P/AI after the RESYNCH protocol was 47.5%. Thus, the administration of 1 mg of EB on day 22 after the first TAI, when the pregnancy status was undetermined, promotes a higher P/AI in the resynchronized TAI than the use of GnRH. Also, the administration of 1 mg of EB 22 days after the TAI did not affect the preestablished pregnancy.

Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination

The objective was to determine if using a Double-Ovsynch protocol [DO; Pre-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-3 d-GnRH, 7 d later Breeding-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-timed artificial insemination (TAI)] to resynchronize ovulation after a previous TAI would increase synchrony and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared with an Ovsynch protocol initiated 32 d after TAI (D32; GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-TAI). Lactating Holstein cows at various days in milk and prior AI services were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to resynchronization treatments. All DO cows received the first GnRH injection of Pre-Resynch 22 d after TAI, and cows (n=981) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal ultrasonography 29 d after TAI continued the protocol. Pregnancy status for all D32 cows was evaluated 29 d after TAI so fertility and pregnancy loss could be compared with that of DO cows. All D32 cows received the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch 32 d after TAI, and cows (n=956) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal palpation 39 d after TAI continued the protocol. In a subgroup of cows from each treatment, ultrasonography (n=751) and serum progesterone (P4) concentrations (n=743) were used to determine the presence of a functional corpus luteum (CL) and ovulation to the first GnRH injection of D32 and Breeding-Resynch of DO (GnRH1), luteal regression after PGF before TAI, and ovulation to the GnRH injection before TAI (GnRH2). Overall, P/AI 29 d after TAI was not affected by parity and was greater for DO compared with D32 cows (39 vs. 30%). Pregnancy loss from 29 to 74 d after TAI was not affected by parity or treatment. The percentage of cows with a functional CL (P4 ≥1.0 ng/mL) at GnRH1 was greater for DO than D32 cows (81 vs. 58%), with most DO cows having medium P4 (60%; 1.0 to 3.49 ng/ml), whereas most D32 cows had either low (42%; <1.0 ng/mL) or high (36%; ≥3.5 ng/mL) P4 at GnRH1. Ovulation to GnRH1 was similar between treatments but was affected by serum P4 at GnRH. Cows with low P4 (<1.0 ng/mL) had the greatest ovulatory response (59%), followed by cows with medium (≥1.0 to 3.49 ng/mL; 38%) and then high (≥3.50 ng/mL; 16%) P4 at GnRH1. A greater percentage of DO cows were synchronized compared with D32 cows (72 vs. 51%) primarily due to a greater percentage of D32 than DO cows without a functional CL at the PGF injection before TAI (35 vs. 17%) or without complete CL regression before GnRH2 (17 vs. 7%). We conclude that DO increased fertility of lactating dairy cows during a resynchronization program primarily by increasing synchronization of cows during the Ovsynch protocol before TAI.

The use of endocrine treatments to improve pregnancy rates in cattle

Reproduction is critical for the success of both dairy and beef cattle production. Inadequate reproduction impairs profitability by compromising production, delaying genetic progress and increasing expenses. A major impediment to the use of artificial insemination (AI) is the ability to detect oestrus for optimum timing of breeding. However, increased understanding of the bovine oestrous cycle has led to the development of reproductive programmes that allow precise synchrony of follicle development, luteal regression and ovulation. The advent of timed-AI protocols revolutionised reproductive management in dairy and beef herds. It allows for AI at a more desired time post partum despite oestrous cyclicity. It also allows for pre-determined re-insemination of cows diagnosed as not pregnant. In subfertile cows, such as the post partum, anoestrous beef cow and the high-producing dairy cow, strategic hormone supplementation has been used to overcome hormone deficiencies and improve pregnancy rates. Several physiological windows have been identified to optimise fertility in synchronisation programmes and they include, but are not limited to, follicle turnover, synchrony of follicular development, length of dominance, progesterone concentrations during development of the ovulatory follicle, luteal regression, peri-ovulatory steroid concentrations, length of pro-oestrus, synchrony of ovulation and AI, and progesterone rise after ovulation.

Effect of interval between induction of ovulation and artificial insemination (AI) and supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program

Objectives were to investigate 2 intervals from induction of ovulation to artificial insemination (AI) and the effect of supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of lactating dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program. In experiment 1, 1,227 Holstein cows had their estrous cycles presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2α) at 46 and 60 d in milk (DIM). The timed AI protocols were initiated with GnRH at 72 DIM, followed by 2 injections of PGF(2α) at 77 and 78 DIM and a second injection of GnRH at either 56 (OVS56) or 72h (COS72) after the first PGF(2α) of the timed AI protocols. All cows were time-inseminated at 72h after the first PGF(2α) injection. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32 and 60 after AI. In experiment 2, 675 nonpregnant Holstein cows had their estrous cycles resynchronized starting at 34 d after the first AI. Cows received the OVS56 with (RCIDR) or without (RCON) supplemental progesterone, as an intravaginal insert, from the first GnRH to the first PGF(2α). Pregnancy diagnoses were performed on d 32 and 60 after AI. During experiment 2, subsets of cows had their ovaries scanned by ultrasonography at the first GnRH, the first PGF(2α), and second GnRH injections of the protocol. Blood was sampled on the day of AI and 7 d later, and concentrations of progesterone were determined in plasma. Cows were considered to have a synchronized ovulation if they had progesterone <1 and >2.26 ng/mL on the day of AI and 7 d later, respectively, and if no ovulation was detected between the first PGF(2α) and second GnRH injections during resynchronization. In experiment 1, the proportion of cows detected in estrus at AI was greater for COS72 than OVS56 (40.6 vs. 32.4%). Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) did not differ between OVS56 (46.4%) and COS72 (45.5%). In experiment 2, cows supplemented with progesterone had greater P/AI compared with unsupplemented cows (51.3 vs. 43.1%). Premature ovulation tended to be greater for RCON than RCIDR cows (7.5 vs. 3.6%), although synchronization of the estrous cycle after timed AI was similar between treatments. Timing of induction of ovulation with GnRH relative to insemination did not affect P/AI of dairy cows enrolled in a 5-d timed AI program. Furthermore, during resynchronization starting on d 34 after the first AI, supplementation with progesterone improved P/AI in cows subjected to the 5-d timed AI protocol.

Management practices associated with conception rate and service rate of lactating Holstein cows in large, commercial dairy herds

Data from lactating Holstein cows in herds that participate in a commercial progeny testing program were analyzed to explain management factors associated with herd-average conception and service rates on large commercial dairies. On-farm herd management software was used as the source of data related to production, reproduction, culling, and milk quality for 108 herds. Also, a survey regarding management, facilities, nutrition, and labor was completed on 86 farms. A total of 41 explanatory variables related to management factors and conditions that could affect conception and service rate were considered in this study. Models explaining conception and service rates were developed using a machine learning algorithm for constructing model trees. The most important explanatory variables associated with conception rate were the percentage of repeated inseminations between 4 and 17 d post-artificial insemination, stocking density in the breeding pen, length of the voluntary waiting period, days at pregnancy examination, and somatic cell score. The most important explanatory variables associated with service rate were the number of lactating cows per breeding technician, use of a resynchronization program, utilization of soakers in the holding area during the summer, and bunk space per cow in the breeding pen. The aforementioned models explained 35% and 40% of the observed variation in conception rate and service rate, respectively, and underline the association of herd-level management factors not strictly related to reproduction with herd reproductive performance.

Genetic parameters for anovulation and pregnancy loss in dairy cattle

The objectives were to estimate heritabilities and genetic variances for anovulation at ~50 d in milk and pregnancy loss occurring between first and second pregnancy diagnoses after artificial insemination. Data were originally collected for trials on reproductive management. Anovulation data consisted of 5,818 records from 13 studies in 8 herds with an overall prevalence of 23.3%. A Bayesian approach using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods was used in mixed threshold models for both traits. The statistical model for anovulation included fixed effects [parity, herd-study-treatment, and body condition score (BCS)], covariates (inbreeding and milk yield), and random effects (sire and residual). A second statistical model included all terms in the first model except BCS. In addition, 2 bivariate, mixed sire models were used to analyze anovulation with BCS and anovulation with milk yield. The posterior mean heritability estimate for anovulation was 0.171 [posterior standard deviation (PSD) = 0.052]. Correlations of anovulation with milk yield were as follows: genetic = 0.168, PSD = 0.187; residual = -0.046, PSD = 0.022; and phenotypic = -0.036. Bivariate analysis of BCS with anovulation showed a genetic correlation (-0.301, PSD = 0.177) and phenotypic correlation (-0.192, PSD = 0.019). Pregnancy-loss data consisted of 3,775 records from 14 studies in 8 herds with an overall prevalence of 14.4%. Analysis of pregnancy loss used a sire-maternal grandsire threshold model with embryo survival as the subject of analysis. Independent variables consisted of fixed effects (parity and herd-study), covariates (embryo and maternal inbreeding), and random effects (sire of embryo, maternal grandsire of embryo, and residual). In addition, separate sire models were analyzed using embryo as the subject and cow as the subject of analysis. The sire-maternal grandsire model yielded a heritability for direct effect of 0.489 (PSD = 0.221) and for maternal effects of 0.166 (PSD = 0.113). In this study, the breeding value variance for embryo effects was 3 times the breeding value variance for maternal effects, indicating that, at the level of breeding values, the embryo's ability to survive has a greater effect on pregnancy loss than does the cow's ability to maintain the pregnancy. These results suggest that genetic improvement of reproductive performance could be enhanced by selection for fundamental measures such as abnormally long periods of postpartum anovulation and pregnancy loss. Larger studies of these traits are needed to obtain parameter estimates with greater precision.

Effect of interval to resynchronization of ovulation on fertility of lactating Holstein cows when using transrectal ultrasonography or a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to diagnose pregnancy status

The objective of this study was to compare 2 strategies for resynchronization of ovulation based on nonpregnant diagnoses using transrectal ultrasonography or a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) ELISA. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,038) were submitted for first postpartum timed artificial insemination (TAI) using a Presynch + Ovsynch protocol. After the initial breeding, cows were randomly assigned to initiate resynchronization 25 d (D25) or 32 d (D32) later. Pregnancy status of cows initiating Resynch 25 d after TAI was determined 27 d after TAI by using a PAG ELISA, whereas pregnancy status of cows initiating Resynch 32 d after TAI was determined 39 d after TAI using transrectal ultrasonography. Cows diagnosed as not pregnant continued the Resynch protocol by receiving an injection of PGF(2 alpha) 7 d after the initial GnRH injection and a second GnRH injection 54 h after the PGF(2 alpha) injection. Cows in both treatments were inseminated approximately 16 h after the second GnRH injection. Blood samples for analysis of progesterone (P(4)) were collected at the first GnRH injection of each Resynch protocol. Pregnancies per AI (P/AI) of nonpregnant cows initiating Resynch 25 vs. 32 d after first postpartum TAI did not differ 39 d after TAI and were 28.3 vs. 30.9% for D25 vs. D32 cows, respectively. Mean P(4) at the first GnRH injection of Resynch was greater for D32 than for D25 cows (3.67 +/- 0.22 vs. 2.83 +/- 0.22 ng/mL), indicating that the Resynch treatments were initiated at different stages of the estrous cycle. After blocking P(4) concentration into low (<1.0 ng/mL) or high (>or=1.0 ng/mL) classes, P(4) class was not found to affect P/AI 39 d after TAI. Early resynchronization was not found to affect P/AI 39 d after TAI; however, early resynchronization did decrease days between inseminations and the interval from the initial nonpregnant diagnosis to conception. Earlier detection of nonpregnant cows using the PAG ELISA in conjunction with a TAI resynchronization program may improve the rate at which cows become pregnant in a dairy herd compared with transrectal ultrasonography conducted at a later stage after TAI.

Synchronization and resynchronization of inseminations in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol

Pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) was evaluated in dairy cows (Bos taurus) subjected to synchronization and resynchronization for timed AI (TAI). Cows (n=718) received prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) on Days -38 and -24 (Days 39 and 53 postpartum), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day -10, PGF on Day -3, and GnRH and TAI on Day 0. Between Days -10 and -3, cows received a progesterone intravaginal insert (CIDR group) or no CIDR (Control group). Between Days 14 and 23, cows received a CIDR (Resynch CIDR group) or no CIDR (Resynch control group), GnRH on Day 23, with pregnancy diagnosis on Day 30. Cows in estrus (between Days 0 and 30) were re-inseminated at detected estrus (RIDE). Nonpregnant cows received PGF on Day 30 and GnRH and TAI on Day 33. Plasma progesterone was determined to be low or high on Days -24 and -10. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 30 and 55 d after AI. The CIDR insert included in the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol did not increase overall pregnancy per AI for first service (36.1% and 33.6% for CIDR; 34.1% and 28.8% for Control) but did decrease pregnancy loss (7.0% for CIDR and 15.6% for Control). The CIDR insert increased pregnancy per AI in cows with high progesterone at the time the CIDR insert was applied. Administration of a CIDR insert between Days 14 and 23 of the estrous cycle after first service did not increase overall pregnancy per AI to second service (24.7% and 22.7% for Resynch CIDR; 28.6% and 25.3% for Resynch control). For second service, RIDE cows had lower pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than in the Resynch control group. Cows with a CL (corpus luteum) at Day 30 had higher pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than those in the Resynch control group.

Effect of synchronisation of ovulation on ovarian profile and days open in holstein cows diagnosed as nonpregnant 26 days after timed artificial insemination

The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of a second protocol of ovulation synchronisation starting on day 26 after timed artificial insemination on ovarian profile and days open in dairy cows diagnosed as nonpregnant. Ninety-four Holstein-Friesian cows received intramuscular injections of a GnRH analogue (GnRH), 100 microg fertirelin, on day 0 and a prostaglandin F(2alpha) analogue (PG), 5 mg etyprostontromethamine, on day 7. GnRH was again administered 48 h after the PG injection, and timed artificial insemination was performed 16 to 20 h later (Ovsynch/TAI). Twenty-six of the 94 cows returned to oestrus within 26 days after TAI and were inseminated. Of the other 68 cows, 44 were not pregnant and were randomly allocated to undergo another Ovsynch/TAI protocol (Resynch group; n=23) or AI only after detection of oestrus (Control group; n=21). The ovarian and hormonal profiles were compared between the first and second Ovsynch protocol periods in the Resynch group. The diameter of the dominant follicle and plasma oestradiol-17 beta concentration at the second GnRH injection were significantly greater than those at PG injection during the second Ovsynch period. Ovulation was synchronised in all of the animals in the second Ovsynch period. The AI submission rates, mean AI intervals and pregnancy rates of the Resynch and Control groups were 100% and 57.1%, 36.0 +/- 0.0 and 43.2 +/- 10.9 and 30.4% and 14.3%, respectively. The mean AI interval was 7 days shorter and the pregnancy rate was higher in the Resynch group than in the Control group, although no significant differences were found due to the small number of the animals. In conclusion, the Resynch protocol initiated on day 26 after TAI in the first protocol has the potential to reduce days open and increase the pregnancy rate in dairy cows.

Effect of pretreatment with prostaglandin F2alpha before resynchronization of ovulation on fertility of lactating dairy cows

Our objective was to assess the effect of pretreatment with PGF(2alpha) 12 d before initiation of a protocol for resynchronization of ovulation (Resynch) using an Ovsynch protocol. Lactating Holstein cows diagnosed not pregnant 31 d after a timed artificial insemination (TAI) were randomly assigned to initiate the Resynch protocol 32 d after TAI (n = 255; RES), or receive 25 mg of PGF(2alpha) 34 d after TAI and initiate the Resynch protocol 12 d later at 46 d after TAI (n = 272; PGF+RES). Within each treatment, a subset of cows were examined using transrectal ultrasonography to determine ovulatory response to the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols or a blood sample was collected to determine serum progesterone (P(4)) at initiation of the Resynch protocol, or both. Overall, PGF+RES cows had more pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) than RES cows 66 d after TAI (35.2 vs. 25.6%), whereas pregnancy loss from 31 to 66 d after TAI was greater for RES than PGF+RES cows (17.1 vs. 7.6%). Although P/AI was greater for cows with high (>/=1.0 ng/mL) vs. low (<1.0 ng/mL) P(4) at the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols, treatment did not affect the proportion of cows with low P(4) at the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols. Overall, no effect of treatment on ovulatory response to the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocols was detected. We conclude that pretreatment with PGF(2alpha) 12 d before initiation of the Resynch protocol increased P/AI 66 d after TAI for cows with serum P(4) concentration >1.0 ng/mL at the first GnRH injection of the Resynch protocol and decreased pregnancy loss from 31 to 66 d after TAI. This modified resynchronization protocol may be a useful strategy for reproductive management of lactating dairy cows.

Accuracy of a Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein ELISA to Determine Pregnancy Status of Lactating Dairy Cows Twenty-Seven Days After Timed Artificial Insemination

To determine the accuracy of a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) ELISA in identifying pregnancy status 27 d after timed artificial insemination (TAI), blood samples were collected from lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,079) 27 d after their first, second, and third postpartum TAI services. Pregnancy diagnosis by transrectal ultrasonography (TU) was performed immediately after blood sample collection, and pregnancy outcomes by TU served as a standard to test the accuracy of the PAG ELISA. Pregnancy outcomes based on the PAG ELISA and TU that agreed were considered correct, whereas the pregnancy status of cows in which pregnancy outcomes between PAG and TU disagreed were reassessed by TU 5 d later. The accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis was less than expected when using TU 27 d after TAI (93.7 to 97.8%), especially when pregnancy outcomes were based on visualization of chorioallantoic fluid and a corpus luteum but when an embryo was not visualized. The accuracy of PAG ELISA outcomes 27 d after TAI was 93.7, 95.4, and 96.2% for first, second, and third postpartum TAI services, respectively. Statistical agreement (kappa) between TU and the PAG ELISA 27 d after TAI was 0.87 to 0.90. Pregnancy outcomes based on the PAG ELISA had a high negative predictive value, indicating that the probability of incorrectly administering PGF(2alpha) to pregnant cows would be low if this test were implemented on a commercial dairy.

Effect of timing of Cosynch on fertility of lactating Holstein cows after first postpartum and Resynch timed-AI services

To compare two intervals from the PGF(2alpha) injection to the second GnRH injection+timed artificial insemination (TAI) of Ovsynch, lactating Holstein cows received their first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch (n=352) and second and greater postpartum TAI after resynchronization of ovulation using Ovsynch (Resynch; n=458). Each week, cows housed in each of four breeding pens were randomized by breeding pen to receive the second GnRH injection of Presynch + Ovsynch or Resynch and TAI either 48 h (Cosynch 48; n=382) or 72 h (Cosynch 72; n=428) after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch or Resynch. Overall, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ for cows receiving Cosynch 48 (29%) versus Cosynch 72 (33%). Furthermore, treatment did not affect P/AI for cows receiving first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch, for cows receiving second and greater TAI after Resynch, or the proportion of female calves born. In conclusion, delaying the second GnRH injection and TAI from 48 to 72 h after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch did not affect P/AI or calf sex ratio. The lack of a difference in fertility between these Cosynch protocols may offer more flexibility for implementing a systematic synchronization protocol when a Cosynch strategy is used.

Genetic Analysis of the Twenty-One-Day Pregnancy Rate in US Holsteins Using an Ordinal Censored Threshold Model with Unknown Voluntary Waiting Period

Genetic variation in the number of 21-d opportunity periods required to achieve pregnancy after the voluntary waiting period (VWP) had passed was examined using 44,901 lactation records of 29,422 lactating Holstein cows on 61 large commercial dairy farms in the United States. Cows were allowed a maximum of 8 opportunity periods, and the cumulative percentages of cows that became pregnant by the end of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth opportunity periods were 19, 29, 37, 43, and 47%, respectively. In addition, 38% of records were censored because of culling or failure to achieve pregnancy after 8 opportunity periods. Mean days open was 128 d for complete records, whereas mean days to last service was 148 d for censored records. An ordinal censored threshold model was developed, in which duration of the VWP was estimated simultaneously with prediction of sire breeding values. The posterior mean of intraherd-year heritability for the number of 21-d opportunity periods required to achieve pregnancy was 0.06, with a posterior standard deviation of 0.01. Posterior means for duration of the VWP ranged from 28 to 74 d postpartum among the 116 herd-parity classes represented in the study, whereas farmer-reported survey values for duration of the VWP ranged from 30 to 78 d postpartum. Sires' predicted transmitting abilities were computed, assuming an unknown VWP (i.e., estimated from the data), a VWP fixed at 60 d postpartum, or a VWP fixed at farmer survey values. Correlations among sire predicted transmitting abilities from different models were > or = 0.98, although some reranking occurred among top sires. In summary, the proposed model for genetic evaluation of female fertility can accommodate heterogeneity in duration of the VWP between herds, as well as heterogeneity that may arise within herds owing to management practices such as intentional delay of first insemination in high-producing cows or cows with poor body condition, and it can also accommodate censored records for nonpregnant cows.

The bovine dominant ovarian follicle

Central roles in reproductive biology (i.e., growth and development of the oocyte, steroidogenesis, and ovulation) are played by the ovarian dominant follicle (DF). The DF is different from other follicles because it can escape atresia (the fate of all other follicles), and if exposed to the LH surge, its cells will differentiate into the corpus luteum. The DF was originally studied by looking at the surface of ovary through a surgical approach. Current studies employ a less-invasive ultrasound technique to track the growth and development of the DF. Recruitment and selection, the processes that give rise to the DF, and dominance, the physiological state of the mature DF, are important areas of basic research. Results of these basic studies are easily translated into real-world problems in farm animal reproduction. Superovulation, for example, overrides the selection mechanism and increases the number of ovulations. Understanding the factors that affect the size of the recruited pool should increase success rates (i.e., number of collected embryos) for superovulation. In most animals, the DF is short-lived, existing for long enough to allow for the final maturation of the oocyte. Some DF become atretic because they mature during the luteal phase and are never exposed to the LH surge. For other DF, the LH surge redirects the DF toward its ultimate demise (i.e., luteinization, ovulation, and differentiation into the corpus luteum). The DF is managed pharmacologically within protocols for timed AI. When timed AI fails, there may be abnormal corpus luteum development and early embryonic loss; outcomes that are secondary to inadequate follicular cell maturation and incomplete oocyte capacitation in the DF. Future work on the DF will clarify its underlying biological functions so that a variety of needs in farm animal reproduction can be efficiently managed.

Evaluation of Progesterone Supplementation in a Prostaglandin F2α-Based Presynchronization Protocol Before Timed Insemination

The objective of the study was to determine the effects of treatment with a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone in a PGF2alpha-based presynchronization protocol on pregnancy rates at first service in lactating Holstein cows. A total of 1,318 (656 treatment and 662 control) cows from 5 farms were used in the analysis. Cows received a CIDR insert as part of the presynchronization protocol of 2 PGF2alpha injections given 14 d apart. The CIDR insert was applied during 7 d before the second PGF2alpha injection, whereas control cows received no CIDR insert. Serum progesterone concentrations were measured in samples collected at 37 +/- 3 d in milk (DIM; 7 d after the first PGF2alpha injection) and at 58 +/- 3 DIM, just before initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. According to serum concentrations of progesterone, cows were classified as having either high (> or = 1 ng/mL) or low (< 1 ng/mL) progesterone. The proportion of cows with low progesterone at 37 +/- 3 DIM was similar for cows treated later with the CIDR insert (60.7%; n = 654) and for control cows (59.2%; n = 657). In contrast, use of the CIDR insert resulted in fewer low-progesterone cows (17.4%; n = 402) compared with control cows (30.6%; n = 399) at 58 +/- 3 DIM. No significant effect of the CIDR insert was detected on overall pregnancy rates. Pregnancy rates, as measured by the percentage of cows pregnant at 37 +/- 3 d post timed artificial insemination, for control cows having high or low progesterone at 58 +/- 3 DIM were 46.6 and 22.1%, respectively. For the CIDR group, pregnancy rates were 40.4 and 11.4%, respectively, for high- and low-progesterone cows at 58 +/- 3 DIM. Overall pregnancy rates were 36.4 and 34.5% for control cows and cows receiving the CIDR insert, respectively. A significant decreasing trend was observed in the proportion of cows having low progesterone as the body condition score increased, at 37 +/- 3 and 58 +/- 3 DIM. A significant increasing trend in the pregnancy rate was observed as body condition score increased. In conclusion, incorporation of CIDR inserts into a presynchronization protocol reduced the proportion of cows having low progesterone; however, the pregnancy rate did not differ between control cows and those receiving the CIDR insert. Earlier expression of estrus after the second PGF2alpha injection, and consequently improper timing of initiation of the Ovsynch protocol, could have negatively affected fertility in the CIDR-treated cows.

Survey of Management Practices on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle on Large US Commercial Farms

A survey regarding general management, sire selection, reproductive management, inseminator training and technique, heat abatement, body condition scoring, facility design and grouping, nutrition, employee training and management, and animal health and bio-security was carried out from March to September of 2004 in 153 herds in the Alta Genetics (Watertown, WI) Advantage Progeny Testing Program. A total of 103 herds (67.3%) completed the survey. Herd size was 613 +/- 46 cows, with herds located in Wisconsin (26), California (12), New York (11), Minnesota (10), Michigan (7), Washington (6), Pennsylvania (6), Iowa (5), Idaho (5), Texas (4), Ohio (4), and other states (7). These farms sold 34.5 +/- 0.3 kg of milk/d per cow, with an annual culling rate of 34 +/- 1% and a calving interval of 13.8 +/- 0.1 mo. Cows were observed for estrus 2.8 +/- 0.3 times/d, for a duration of 27 +/- 4 min, but 78% of the respondents admitted that detection of estrus was not the employee's sole responsibility at that time. Managers tried to achieve pregnancy until 8.8 +/- 0.9 failed inseminations, 300 +/- 26 d postpartum, or milk yield <17.7 +/- 0.5 kg/d. Nonpregnant cows were culled at 326 +/- 36 d postpartum or milk yield <16.4 +/- 0.3 kg/ d. Mean durations of the voluntary waiting period were 52 +/- 1.3 and 53 +/- 1.4 d for primiparous and multiparous cows, respectively. Hormonal synchronization or timed artificial insemination programs were used in 87% of the herds, with 86% synchronizing first services, 77% resynchronizing repeat services, and 59% treating cystic, anestrous, or anovular cows. Finding good employees was identified as the greatest labor challenge, followed by training and supervising employees. Mastitis and hairy heel warts were noted as the greatest animal health concerns, followed by lameness, abortions, and death losses, whereas the greatest reproductive challenges were artificial insemination service rate, conception rate, twinning, and retained placenta or metritis. Results of this study can provide a useful benchmark or reference with regard to commonly used management practices on large commercial US dairy farms at the present time.