Assay of prolactin after freezing cow's milk

Milk prolactin response and quarter milk yield after experimental infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci in dairy heifers

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) are the most common bacteria involved in subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Remarkably, CNS-infected dairy heifers produce more milk than uninfected heifers. Because the lactation hormone prolactin (PRL) is also involved in mammary gland immunity, we investigated the milk PRL response and the mammary quarter milk yield following experimental CNS challenge. Eight healthy Holstein-Friesian heifers in mid-lactation were experimentally infected using a split-udder design with 3 different CNS strains: one Staphylococcus fleurettii (from sawdust bedding) and 2 Staphylococcus chromogenes strains (one isolate from a teat apex, the other isolate from a chronic intramammary infection). Three mammary quarters per heifer were simultaneously inoculated with 1.0×10(6) cfu, whereas the remaining mammary quarter was infused with sterile phosphate-buffered saline, serving as a control. An existing radioimmunoassay was modified, validated, and used to measure PRL frozen-thawed milk at various time points until 78h after challenge. The mean milk PRL level tended to be higher in the CNS-challenged mammary quarters compared with the control mammary quarters (7.56 and 6.85ng/mL, respectively). The increase in PRL over time was significantly greater in the CNS-challenged mammary quarters than in the control mammary quarters. However, no difference was found in the PRL response when comparing each individual CNS strain with the control mammary quarters. The mean mammary quarter milk yield tended to be lower in the CNS-infected mammary quarters than in the control mammary quarters (1.73 and 1.98kg per milking, respectively). The greatest milk loss occurred in the mammary quarters challenged with the intramammary strain of S. chromogenes. Future observational studies are needed to elucidate the relation between PRL, the milk yield, and the inflammatory condition, or infection status, of the mammary gland.

Endocrine and other responses to acute administration of cannabinoid compounds to non-stressed male calves

There is an abundance of cannabinoid (CB) receptors for derivatives of cannabis plants in the brain and throughout the body, and several naturally occurring arachidonic acid derivatives can activate these receptors. The specific objective of this study was to activate these CB receptors in castrated male calves through administration of several CB agonists and to measure immediate changes in concentrations of several serum hormones, respiration rate, and sensitivity to pain. The rationale for the study was that exogenous activation of CB receptors might reveal whether the endogenous CB system (consisting of receptors and endogenous ligands) plays a role in the stress response of animals and specifically whether the activated CB system might be part of a coping mechanism to combat stress. Intravenous administration of three CB agonists (anandamide, methanandamide and WIN 55212-2) to nine castrated male calves under non-stress conditions provoked immediate increases of serum cortisol and respiration rate as well as rapidly caused hypoalgesia to cutaneous pain and thermal stimuli. Although anandamide and methanandamide did not affect serum prolactin, administration of another CB agonist (WIN 55212-2) did increase serum prolactin abruptly. None of the CB agonists affected serum growth hormone. In summary, many of the changes following administration of CB agonists were similar to a stress response in this species, but there were some agonist-specific differences, notably regarding prolactin secretion, as well as differences between calves and observations made in other species. Although CB receptors in calves may be activated by endogenous ligands during exposure to some stressors, the present results are also consistent with this CB system being part of a coping mechanism that helps animals deal with imposed stressors.

Secretion and mammary gland uptake of prolactin in dairy cows during lactogenesis

Mammary arteriovenous differences of prolactin concentration and net mammary uptake of prolactin from blood were quantified near parturition in 9 dairy cows. Six cows were milked once daily for at least 6 d before parturition, and prepartum lactogenesis occurred in 3 of 6 cows. Prepartum milking 2 or more d before parturition abruptly increased secretion of prolactin into blood, but milkings within 1 d before or after parturition did not increase prolactin secretion. Concentrations of prolactin in whole milk sampled over 8 d before parturition (64.5 ng/ml) were substantially greater than those occurring several days after parturition (19 ng/ml). Milk prolactin concentrations were unaffected by the successful induction of prepartum lactogenesis, which greatly increased prepartum yields of milk (2 to 8 kg/milking). Therefore, the alveolar lumenal content of prolactin was greatest in pregnant cows with prepartum lactogenesis. This enhanced content of intraalveolar prolactin before parturition was associated with an absence of mammary uptake of prolactin immediately prior to ejection of the prolactin-containing milk from the alveoli. However, prolactin uptake was quickly restored to about 2 micrograms/min per half udder shortly after milk ejection. During the prepartum period, an enhanced intraalveolar reservoir of 200 to 400 micrograms prolactin, due to induction of prepartum lactogenesis, appears to saturate temporarily all putative sites for uptake of prolactin from blood.

Effect of exogenous prolactin administration on lactational performance of dairy cows

Eight Holstein cows were utilized to examine the effect of prolactin on lactational performance prior to peak milk production (day 21-34 postpartum) and after peak milk production (day 60-73 postpartum). During each 14 day period, cows received daily intramuscular injections of pituitary-derived bovine prolactin (120 mg; 13.0 IU/mg protein) or excipient. Cows were housed in a controlled environment at 18.1C, 47.8% relative humidity and a 15 hr light: 9 hr dark cycle. In cows administered exogenous prolactin, circulating prolactin concentrations increased within one-half hr post injection, peaked within 2 to 6 hours and declined through the remainder of the day. Average prolactin concentration in the plasma was increased 2 to 5 fold over the 24 hr period in response to prolactin treatment. Yields of milk and milk components (fat, lactose and protein) were not affected by prolactin treatment in either period but the concentration of alpha-lactalbumin in milk was significantly increased (P less than .10) in both periods. Circulating concentrations of somatotropin, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, glucagon, nonesterified fatty acids and glucose were not altered. In prolactin-treated cows, the milking-stimulated prolactin release was decreased at both the PM milking, when circulating concentrations of prolactin were high, and the AM milking, when prolactin concentrations had returned to baseline. Concentration of prolactin in milk tended to increase but was not significantly altered by administration of exogenous prolactin. However, prolactin concentrations in plasma were correlated (r = .56) with milk concentrations. It is clear that postpartum administration of exogenous prolactin during the period of lactation prior to peak milk yield or after peak milk yield does not alter lactational performance in high producing dairy cows.

Effect of dry period versus continuous milking on periparturient concentrations of bovine prolactin in milk from half udders

Four multiparous cows were used to determine whether continuous twice daily milking of half the udder throughout the dry period would alter the prepartum accumulation of prolactin in secreted milk. The control half of each udder was allowed a dry period of 43 d, and twice daily milking was reinitiated in this half udder 11 d before parturition, whereas the treated half was milked continuously throughout. Milk from the treated half decreased to very low yields despite continuous milking, whereas concentrations of prolactin in milk remained low and without much day-to-day variation within each cow. Concentrations of prolactin in milk and yields of milk increased during the week before parturition in both halves of the udder, but there were no significant differences due to previous continuous milking. Therefore, prepartum accumulation of high concentrations of prolactin in secreted milk did not appear to depend on prior occurrence of a dry period. Elevated concentrations of prolactin in milk declined rapidly and equally in each half udder after parturition.

Prolactin in bovine milk near the time of calving and its relationship to premature induction of lactogenesis

Twenty-three primiparous heifers and pluriparous cows were milked once daily beginning 3 to 10 days before parturition. Retrospectively, they were divided into groups representing either successful or unsuccessful premature induction of lactogenesis, depending on milk production prior to calving. Successfully induced animals had prepartum milk yields greater than 4 kg/milking and unsuccessful animals yielded less. Ten of 23 animals satisfied the criterion for successful premature induction at 2.6 +/- .4 days before calving and 3.6 +/- .8 days after first milking and had peak prepartum yields of 7.9 +/- .7 kg/milking. Total number of prepartum days milked did not differ between successful and unsuccessful groups. Greater milk yield prepartum was significantly associated with higher milk prolactin concentration on days -6 to -4. Heifers had less milk yield than cows but did not differ in milk prolactin concentration or in total prolactin per milking. Premature induction of lactogenesis did not confer significant lactational benefits for more than 1 day postpartum or over the first 35 days postpartum. Premature induction of lactogenesis as a result of prepartum milking did not, as hypothesized, decrease the ability of mammary secretions to accumulate prolactin in large amounts. All groups rapidly lost this ability after parturition, suggesting that the hormonal environment of late pregnancy may promote the transfer of prolactin from blood into milk when there is regular removal of prepartum milk.

Immunoreactive prolactin in subcellular fractions from bovine mammary tissue

Mammary tissue from lactating Holsteins at slaughter was homogenized and fractionated into subcellular compartments. Bovine prolactin was quantified in each subcellular fraction and in preslaughter milk by radioimmunoassay procedures validated for this purpose. Prolactin concentrations were ng prolactin/mg protein for all samples. Immunoreactive prolactin was in rough endoplasmic reticulum (24.8 ng/mg), Golgi apparatus (18.8 ng/mg), and secretory vesicle (10.2 ng/mg). All of these concentrations exceeded that in samples of milk (2.7 ng/mg). Nuclear fractions contained a material that reacted in the prolactin radioimmunoassay, but criteria for valid quantification could not be satisfied. These results confirm prolactin inside bovine mammary cells, and they are consistent with an intracellular pathway for transfer of prolactin from plasma into milk.

Chronological profiles of prolactin and growth hormone in lactating cows

Prolactin and growth hormone were measured in blood plasma at 30-min intervals for three consecutive 24-h periods in 6 cows during midlactation. Concentrations of prolactin in milk and yields of milk also were quantified. Prolactin in blood plasma appeared to have a 24-h rhythm as well asd a 6-h rhythm by time series spectral analysis. Lowest prolactin occurred between 0600 and 0900 h each day, whereas maximums occurred between 1030 and 1600 h. Neither milk prolactin concentration nor yield of milk differed between milkings at 0530 and 1730 h. Concentration of prolactin in milk was not significantly correlated with prolactin concentration of plasma. However, prolactin of plasma averaged over the 12-h prior to milking was associated significantly with yield of milk and with total quantity of milk prolactin removed at that milking.

Artificial induction of lactation in cattle: Effect of modified treatments on milk yield, fertility, and hormones in blood plasma and milk

Holsteins were divided into groups CON and IL, each with six dry cows and six heifers. Group CON calved in mid-summer when group IL was treated (kg body weight per day) with (a) progesterone (P; .25 mg) and estradiol-17beta (Ebeta), either .05 mg or .10 mg, for 7 days; (b) continued Ebeta at one-third the initial rate until udders were engorged; (c) then 12 injections (8-hr intervals) of TRH (each 200 mug) or saline; and (d) GnRH during lactation. Milk yield was not affected by Ebeta dose rate, TRH or GnRH. GnRH luteinized the persistent ovarian follicles in group IL, and pregnancy rates were 80% and 83% in groups IL and CON, respectively. Large differences (P < .01) between groups IL and CON were observed in plasma prolactin (IL-low), insulin (IL-high) and growth hormone (IL-low) wherein insulin was correlated (P < .01) negatively with milk yield between days 7 to 49 of lactation. Milk concentrations of P, Ebeta, estrone and estradiol-17alpha in group IL were no higher (P > .10) 14 days after the last injection of P or Ebeta than in group CON or in milk from the herd's bulk tank. The steroids were lowest in milk and plasma from ovariectomized cows. It was hypothesized that high insulin, as well as low prolactin and growth hormone, may contribute to inferior induced lactations.

Effect of adrenocorticotropin on milk and plasma cortisol and prolactin concentrations

Milk cortisol and prolactin concentrations were measured in 12 lactating Holstein cows for 3 days (Experiment 1). On day 3, cows were divided randomly into groups: IV1, IV4, IM, and control. Group IV1 received one intravenous injection of 49 IU adrenocorticotropin, group IV4 the same dosage four times at 2-h intervals, group IM 240 IU adrenocorticotropin intramuscularly, and control cows were injected with saline. Cortisol concentrations in blood plasma were increased in all groups following adrenocorticotropin injection, while milk cortisol concentrations increased fourfold in groups IV4 and IM and remained unchanged in group IV1. In Experiment 2, infusion of 18% saline into the mammary gland of three cows increased the somatic cell count in the infused quarter but had no effect on prolactin and cortisol of milk or plasma. In Experiment 3, six cows each were assigned to treatment groups of saline controls, IV2-0 (40 IU adrenocorticotropin intravenously at 0 and 2 h post-milking) or IV2-8 (40 IU adrenocorticotropin intravenously at 8 and 10 h post-milking). Half udders of each cow were milked before treatment and 4 h later. Increases of cortisol in plasma increased cortisol concentrations of milk 4 h after each treatment (IV2-0 and IV2-8). However, by 12 h after treatment in IV2-0 cortisol concentrations of milk had returned to normal. Increases in adrenal cortisol secretion are followed rapidly (within 4 h) by increased cortisol concentrations in milk. However, these decline rapidly in the absence of sustained increments in blood cortisol. Increased cortisol concentrations in milk most likely represent sustained elevation in plasma cortisol.