Phase II study of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide in patients with a first recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme

Enhancing glioblastoma therapy via intranasal administration of highly potent cell-penetrating peptide decorated nanoparticles

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating primary tumor of the central nervous system with a significantly poor prognosis. The primary challenge in treating GBM lies in the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), impeding effective drug delivery to the brain. In this study, intranasal polymeric micelles encapsulating a quercetin-etoposide combination were developed to induce synergistic apoptotic effects and enhance direct drug delivery to the brain. However, the in vivo anticancer efficacy of the unmodified micelle formulation via intranasal administration remains limited. Therefore, this aims to investigate the enhancement of the formulation by conjugating the micelles with a novel and highly potent cell-penetrating peptide (CPP), RMMR1, identified using the intra-dermal delivery technology platform developed by REMEDI Co., Ltd. This modification seeks to enhance the brain-targeting capability of the micelles. The CPP-modified micelles encapsulating the quercetin-etoposide combination (CM(QE)) demonstrated superior in vivo brain-delivery efficiency and enhanced cellular uptake after intranasal administration. Furthermore, animal studies showed significant tumor reduction and increased survival rates, with no significant changes in body weight observed. These findings suggest that intranasal administration of CM(QE) holds promise as a significant advancement in chemotherapy for GBM.

Machine learning-based identification of lower grade glioma stemness subtypes discriminates patient prognosis and drug response

Glioma stem cells (GSCs) remodel their tumor microenvironment to sustain a supportive niche. Identification and stratification of stemness related characteristics in patients with glioma might aid in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. In this study, we calculated the mRNA stemness index in bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets using machine learning methods and investigated the correlation between stemness and clinicopathological characteristics. A glioma stemness-associated score (GSScore) was constructed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. We also generated a GSC cell line derived from a patient diagnosed with glioma and used glioma cell lines to validate the performance of the GSScore in predicting chemotherapeutic responses. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between GSCs with high and low GSScores were used to cluster lower-grade glioma (LGG) samples into three stemness subtypes. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics, including survival, copy number variations, mutations, tumor microenvironment, and immune and chemotherapeutic responses, among the three LGG stemness-associated subtypes were identified. Using machine learning methods, we further identified genes as subtype predictors and validated their performance using the CGGA datasets. In the current study, we identified a GSScore that correlated with LGG chemotherapeutic response. Through the score, we also identified a novel classification of the LGG subtype and associated subtype predictors, which might facilitate the development of precision therapy.

Gliosarcoma with Systemic Metastasis Showing Favorable Response to Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Chemotherapy: An Autopsy Case Report

Gliosarcoma is a rare malignant neoplasm. It accounts for approximately 2% of all glioblastomas. To date, there is no established treatment method for gliosarcoma, and a variety of therapies, such as surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, are typically employed. Here, we describe a patient with gliosarcoma who, despite multiple tumor metastases throughout the body, including the lungs and lymph nodes, achieved a relatively long survival due to salvage therapy with local irradiation and remarkably effective chemotherapy with low-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide therapy. When the patient died, we performed autopsy and confirmed the nature of the primary and metastatic tumor cells that had spread throughout the patient's body. Clinical and systemic histological studies also suggested the possibility of re-metastasis to the brain from systemic metastatic foci. Gliosarcoma appears to have characteristics similar to sarcoma as well as a higher risk of systemic metastasis. Therefore, a careful follow-up is necessary in such patients.

Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Increases Delivery and Efficacy of Etoposide for Glioblastoma Treatment

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating disease. With the current treatment of surgery followed by chemoradiation, outcomes remain poor, with median survival of only 15 months and a 5-year survival rate of 6.8%. A challenge in treating GBM is the heterogeneous integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which limits the bioavailability of systemic therapies to the brain. There is a growing interest in enhancing drug delivery by opening the BBB with the use of focused ultrasound (FUS). We hypothesize that an FUS-mediated BBB opening can enhance the delivery of etoposide for a therapeutic benefit in GBM.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A murine glioma cell line (Pdgf⁺, Pten^-/-, P53^-/-) was orthotopically injected into B6(Cg)-Tyrc-2J/J mice to establish the syngeneic GBM model for this study. Animals were treated with FUS and microbubbles to open the BBB to enhance the delivery of systemic etoposide. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used to evaluate the BBB opening and tumor progression. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure etoposide concentrations in the intracranial tumors.

RESULTS

The murine glioma cell line is sensitive to etoposide in vitro. MR imaging and passive cavitation detection demonstrate the safe and successful BBB opening with FUS. The combined treatment of an FUS-mediated BBB opening and etoposide decreased tumor growth by 45% and prolonged median overall survival by 6 days: an approximately 30% increase. The FUS-mediated BBB opening increased the brain tumor-to-serum ratio of etoposide by 3.5-fold and increased the etoposide concentration in brain tumor tissue by 8-fold compared with treatment without ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates that BBB opening with FUS increases intratumoral delivery of etoposide in the brain, resulting in local control and overall survival benefits.

Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: state-of-the-art and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Almost all patients affected by glioblastoma experience recurrence of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

Management of recurrent glioblastoma is a clinical challenge, and several elements should be taken into consideration when making treatment choice. Loco-regional treatments may be the best treatment approach in selected cases while systemic therapies or supportive care alone are necessary for other patients. Unfortunately, few drugs have shown clinical in this setting. This lack of effective treatments has made recurrent glioblastoma a disease orphan of an effective approach.

EXPERT OPINION

Results of recent clinical trials offer interesting perspectives and may controvert this axiom.

Multiple Bone Metastases from Glioblastoma Multiforme without Local Brain Relapse: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Extracranial metastases from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are a very rare event, even if an increasing incidence has been documented. We report the case of a young woman with primary GBM who developed bone metastases without local brain relapse. Because of persistent headache and visual disturbances, in March 2011 the patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidencing a temporoparietal mass, which was surgically resected. Histology revealed GBM. She was given concomitant chemoradiotherapy according to the Stupp regimen. After a 4-week break, the patient received 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide according to the standard 5-day schedule every 28 days. In December 2011 she complained of progressive low back pain, and MRI showed multiple bone metastases from primary GBM, confirmed by histology. Cases of metastatic GBM in concurrence with a primary brain tumor or local relapse are more common in the literature; only a few cases have been reported where extracranial metastases from GBM occurred without any relapse in the brain. Here we report our experience.

Phase I/II Study of Temozolomide Plus Nimustine Chemotherapy for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Kyoto Neuro-oncology Group

The objective of this phase I/II study was to examine the efficacy and toxicity profile of temozolomide (TMZ) plus nimustine (ACNU). Patients who had received a standard radiotherapy with one or two previous chemo-regimens were enrolled. In phase I, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) by TMZ (150 mg/m2/day) (Day 1-5) plus various doses of ACNU (30, 35, 40, 45 mg/m2/day) (Day 15) per 4 weeks was defined on a standard 3 + 3 design. In phase II, these therapeutic activity and safety of this regimen were evaluated. Forty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 50 years-old. Eighty percent had a KPS of 70-100. Histologies were glioblastoma (73%), anaplastic astrocytoma (22%), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (4%). In phase I, 15 patients were treated at four cohorts by TMZ plus ACNU. MTD was TMZ (150 mg/m2) plus ACNU (40 mg/m2). In phase II, 40 patients were treated at the dose of cohort 3 (MTD). Thirty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities, mainly hematologic. The overall response rate was 11% (4/37). Sixty-eight percent (25/37) had stable disease. Twenty-two percent (8/37) showed progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 6 and 12 months were 24% (95% CI, 12-35%) and 8% (95% CI, 4-15%). Median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 9.2-17.2 months). Overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 were 78% (95% CI, 67-89%) and 49% (95% CI, 33-57%). Median OS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-14.5 months). This phase I/II study showed a moderate toxicity in hematology and may has a promising efficacy in OS, without inferiority in PFS.

Incorporation of biomarkers in phase II studies of recurrent glioblastoma

The survival trends for glioblastoma (GBM) patients have remained largely static, reflecting a lack of improvement in the therapeutic options for patients. Less than 5 % of newly diagnosed GBM survives more than 5 years. Tumor relapse is nearly universal and the majority of patients do not respond to further systemic therapy. The results from phase II studies conducted with recurrent GBM patients have not translated to successful confirmatory studies and thus we have reached a significant roadblock in the development of new treatments for patients with recurrent GBM. The development of new, active, and potentially targeted drugs for the treatment of recurrent GBM represents a major unmet need. The incorporation of diagnostic/companion biomarker combinations into the phase II studies and appropriate stratification of the patients is lagging significantly behind other larger cancer groups such as breast, non-small cell lung cancer, and melanoma. We herein carried out a systematic review of the phase II clinical studies conducted in patients with recurrent GBM (2010-2013 inclusive) to assess the degree of biomarker incorporation within the clinical trial design.

Convection-enhanced delivery of etoposide is effective against murine proneural glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma subtypes have been defined based on transcriptional profiling, yet personalized care based on molecular classification remains unexploited. Topoisomerase II (TOP2) contributes to the transcriptional signature of the proneural glioma subtype. Thus, we targeted TOP2 pharmacologically with etoposide in proneural glioma models.

METHODS

TOP2 gene expression was evaluated in mouse platelet derived growth factor (PDGF)(+)phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)(-/-)p53(-/-) and PDGF(+)PTEN(-/-) proneural gliomas and cell lines, as well as human glioblastoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Correlation between TOP2 transcript levels and etoposide susceptibility was investigated in 139 human cancer cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia public dataset and in mouse proneural glioma cell lines. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of etoposide was tested on cell-based PDGF(+)PTEN(-/-)p53(-/-) and retroviral-based PDGF(+)PTEN(-/-) mouse proneural glioma models.

RESULTS

TOP2 expression was significantly higher in human proneural glioblastoma and in mouse proneural tumors at early as well as late stages of development compared with normal brain. TOP2B transcript correlated with susceptibility to etoposide in mouse proneural cell lines and in 139 human cancer cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Intracranial etoposide CED treatment (680 μM) was well tolerated by mice and led to a significant survival benefit in the PDGF(+)PTEN(-/-)p53(-/-) glioma model. Moreover, etoposide CED treatment at 80 μM but not 4 μM led to a significant survival advantage in the PDGF(+)PTEN(-/-) glioma model.

CONCLUSIONS

TOP2 is highly expressed in proneural gliomas, rendering its pharmacological targeting by intratumoral administration of etoposide by CED effective on murine proneural gliomas. We provide evidence supporting clinical testing of CED of etoposide with a molecular-based patient selection approach.

Retrospective analysis of bevacizumab in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide in patients with second recurrence of glioblastoma

Bevacizumab has been reported to be effective for recurrent glioblastoma. In our hospital, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (ICE) is the second-line chemotherapy for first recurrence of glioblastoma after temozolomide failure. In the present analysis, we retrospectively investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of bevacizumab combined with ICE in patients with glioblastoma at second relapse during ICE treatment. Between 2010 and 2012, tumor progressions were diagnosed in consecutive 8 patients who were treated with ICE for the first recurrence of glioblastoma. These patients were administered 3 cycles of 10 mg/kg bevacizumab every two weeks in combination with ICE treatment. The objective response rate of bevacizumab combination was 75% in Neuro-Oncology Working Group (RANO criteria), including complete response and partial response. Median progression free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) after second relapse were 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5–18.5 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.2–19.7 months), respectively. The 6-month PFS rates were 25% (95% CI, 0–55.0%). The median OS after initial diagnosis was 23.3 months (95% CI, 16.2–55.8 months). The grade 2 or 3 hematologic adverse events were identified in 7 of 8 patients, most of which might be due to ICE chemotherapy. The results of our retrospective analysis suggest that combination treatment with bevacizumab and ICE may be safe and beneficial in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Meningeal seeding from glioblastoma multiforme treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide

Extracranial and meningeal seeding of glioblastoma multiforme is rare. We report herein a case of glioblastoma in a 41-year-old man who underwent surgical resection, concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and seven courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. The patient then complained of intermittent severe lower back pain and gait disturbance. Imaging studies demonstrated that although the intracranial residual tumors were well-controlled by the treatment, meningeal seeding involving the brainstem and spinal cord was present. The patient died 2 months after the diagnosis of spinal seeding. This case illustrates the need for consideration of extracranial metastasis if a patient is symptomatic, even if the intracranial tumor appears responsive to treatment. We suggested that the prophylactic craniospinal irradiation may be considered in patients at high risk of meningeal seeding immediately after surgery.

Standard therapy for glioblastoma--a review of where we are

Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults and is a challenging disease to treat. The current standard therapy includes maximal safe surgical resection, followed by a combination of radiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide. However, recurrence is quite common, so we continue to search for more effective treatments both for initial therapy and at the time of recurrence. This article will review the current standard of care and recent advances in therapy for newly-diagnosed and recurrent glioblastomas, based on the most authoritative guidelines, the National Cancer Institute's comprehensive cancer database Physician Data Query (PDQ®), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology(TM) for central nervous system cancers (V.1.2010), to elucidate the current position and in what direction we are advancing.

Initial and cumulative recurrence patterns of glioblastoma after temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy and salvage treatment: a retrospective cohort study in a single institution

Purpose

To analyze initial recurrence patterns in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma after radiotherapy plus concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, and to investigate cumulative recurrence patterns after salvage treatment, including surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with glioblastoma that recurred after concurrent temozolomide and localized radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed (11 male, 10 female; median age, 57 years; range, 27–74). Disease progression was assessed by new response criteria proposed by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The pattern of recurrence was determined by relationships between locations of recurrent tumors and irradiated doses. Central, in-field, marginal, and out-field recurrences were defined relative to the prescribed isodose line. Distant recurrence was operationally defined as subependymal or disseminated disease. Initial and cumulative patterns of recurrence were evaluated in each patient.

Results

The median follow-up of the recurrent patients was 501 (range, 217–1815) days after initial surgery. Initial recurrences were central in 14 patients (66.7%), in-field in four patients (19.0%), marginal in no patient (0%), out-field in two patients (9.5%), and distant in four patients (19.0%). One patient had both central and in-field recurrences simultaneously, and two had both central and distant recurrences. In the analysis of cumulative recurrence patterns, five patients, who had no scans after initial recurrences, were excluded and the remaining 16 were included. Cumulative recurrences were central in 11 patients (68.8%), in-field in five patients (31.3%), marginal in three patients (18.8%), out-field in five patients (31.3%), and distant in 14 patients (87.5%). Regarding salvage treatments, 11 (52.4%), 11 (52.4%) and 17 (81.0%) patients underwent surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. Eighteen (85.7%) patients had died at the time of analysis, and 16 of them (88.9%) had suffered distant recurrences, which could have been the immediate causes of death.

Conclusions

Recurrence patterns of glioblastoma after radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide were mainly central at first, and distant recurrences were often detected during the clinical course. Much better local control and prevention of distant recurrence, including effective salvage treatment, seem to be important.

Relapse of herpes encephalitis induced by temozolomide-based chemoradiation in a patient with malignant glioma

The authors report on a case of concurrent herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) and malignant glioma. The co-occurrence of HSE and malignant glioma is very rare, but it can occur during glioma treatment. Both radiotherapy and chemoradiation with temozolomide can induce viral reactivation, leading to HSE relapse. Careful observation for HSE is necessary when administering chemoradiation to patients with a history of HSE. Antiviral therapy for HSE must be initiated immediately, and the chemoradiation for glioma should be stopped; however, it is not clear what antitumor therapy is optimal when HSE co-occurs during the treatment of glioma.

State of the art and perspectives in the treatment of glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Cures are rare and median survival varies from several to 22 months. Standard treatment for good performance patients consists of maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy and six cycles of postradiotherapy TMZ. At recurrence, treatment options include repeat surgery (with or without Gliadel wafer placement), reirradiation or systemic therapy. Most patients with good performance status are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted biologic therapy following or in lieu of repeat surgery. Cytotoxic chemotherapy options include nitrosoureas, rechallenge with TMZ, platins, phophoramides and topoisomerase inhibitors, although efficacy is limited. Despite the intense effort of developing biologic agents that target angiogenesis and growth and proliferative pathways, bevacizumab is the only agent that has shown efficacy in clinical trials. It was awarded accelerated approval in the USA after demonstrating an impressive radiographic response in two open-label, prospective Phase II studies. Two randomized, Phase III trials of upfront bevacizumab have completed and may demonstrate survival benefit; however, results are pending at this time. Given the limited treatment options at tumor recurrence, consideration for enrollment on a clinical trial is encouraged.

Tumor status at 12 weeks predicts survival in advanced colorectal cancer: findings from NCCTG N9741

PURPOSE

We explored the prognostic value of actual tumor measurements (TM) versus World Health Organization (WHO) criteria as three-level (responder, stable, and progression) and two-level (responder and non-responder) variables at 12 and 24 weeks as predictors of survival in Intergroup Trial N9741, a phase III trial in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

All patients with measurable disease (N = 1,188) were included. The percentage changes in TM from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks were calculated. The prognostic values of TM versus WHO criteria (as three- and two-level variables) at 12 and 24 weeks were compared, using Cox models for overall survival (OS) in a landmark analysis, adjusting for baseline tumor size, performance status, and treatment arm.

RESULTS

Tumor status at 12 weeks by WHO criteria (three or two levels) or actual TM were all strongly associated with OS. Actual TM provided no meaningful additional benefit compared with the three-level WHO criteria. Tumor status at 24 weeks was also strongly associated with survival, but added no additional prognostic value compared with the 12-week assessment. At 12 weeks, actual TM improved prognostic characterization of patients with WHO status of response, but provided no additional value in patients with stable disease or progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In N9741, the use of actual TM, or following tumor status beyond 12 weeks, did not improve survival prediction compared with a single three-level response assessment at 12 weeks, suggesting that 12-week tumor status could be an appropriate phase II trial endpoint in metastatic CRC.

[Neurological complications of neurooncological therapy]

Neurological complications of therapeutic procedures for brain tumors are increasingly being recognized. These encompass the classic types of central and peripheral neurotoxicity, such as radiotherapy-induced leukoencephalopathy and platinum-induced neuropathy. However, the advent of novel protocols and targeted therapeutics has expanded the spectrum of neurological complications. A problem of considerable importance is pseudoprogression after radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. Among the new targeted drugs complications of therapy with bevacizumab are the subject of intense discussion. In this review article the neurotoxic potential of intrathecal chemotherapy, kinase inhibitors, immunological strategies and local therapies are summarized. Knowledge about neurological complications of brain tumor therapy procedures is important for risk assessment and patient information.