Results of excision of cerebral radionecrosis: experience in patients treated with radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The effect of surgery on radiation necrosis in irradiated brain metastases: extent of resection and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of brain metastasis (BrM) management but carries the risk of radiation necrosis (RN), which can require resection for palliation or diagnosis. We sought to determine the relationship between extent of resection (EOR) of pathologically-confirmed RN and postoperative radiographic and symptomatic outcomes.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was performed at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center to identify all surgically-resected, previously-irradiated necrotic BrM without admixed recurrent malignancy from 2003 to 2018. Clinical, pathologic and radiographic parameters were collected. Volumetric analysis determined EOR and longitudinally evaluated perilesional T2-FLAIR signal preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months postoperatively when available. Rates of time to 50% T2-FLAIR reduction was calculated using cumulative incidence in the competing risks setting with last follow-up and death as competing events. The Spearman method was used to calculate correlation coefficients, and continuous variables for T2-FLAIR signal change, including EOR, were compared across groups.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included. Most underwent prior stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain irradiation (N = 42, 91%). Twenty-seven operations resulted in gross-total resection (59%; GTR). For the full cohort, T2-FLAIR edema decreased by a mean of 78% by 6 months postoperatively that was durable to last follow-up (p < 0.05). EOR correlated with edema reduction at last follow-up, with significantly greater T2-FLAIR reduction with GTR versus subtotal resection (p < 0.05). Among surviving patients, a significant proportion were able to decrease their steroid use: steroid-dependency decreased from 54% preoperatively to 15% at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RN resection conferred both durable T2-FLAIR reduction, which correlated with EOR; and reduced steroid dependency.

A case report on intensive, robot-assisted rehabilitation program for brainstem radionecrosis

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy is a valid treatment option for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, complications can occur following irradiation of the closest anatomical structures, including brainstem radionecrosis (BRN). The rehabilitation is poorly described in patients with BRN, despite its usefulness in improving functional independence in patients with brain tumors. We aimed at testing the usefulness of intensive, robot-assisted neurorehabilitation program to improve functional independence in a 57-year-old male with BRN.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 57-year-old male diagnosed with a nasopharyngeal carcinoma, received a radiation total dose of 72 Gy. Owing to the appearance of a severe symptomatology characterized by dysphagia, hearing loss, and left sided hemiparesis, the patient was hospitalized to be provided with intensive pharmacological and neurorehabilitation treatment.

DIAGNOSIS

Follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging disclosed no residual cancer, but some brainstem lesions compatible with BRN areas were appreciable.

INTERVENTION

The patient underwent a 2-month conventional, respiratory, and speech therapy. Given that the patient only mildly improved, he was provided with intensive robot-aided upper limb and gait training and virtual reality-based cognitive rehabilitation for other 2 months.

OUTCOMES

The patient reported a significant improvement in functional independence, spasticity, cognitive impairment degree, and balance.

CONCLUSION

Our case suggests the usefulness of neurorobotic intensive rehabilitation in BRN to reduce functional disability. Future studies should investigate whether an earlier, even multidisciplinary rehabilitative treatment could lead to better functional outcome in patients with BRN.

Salvage craniotomy for treatment-refractory symptomatic cerebral radiation necrosis

Background

The incidence of symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) has risen as radiotherapy is increasingly used to control brain tumor progression. Traditionally managed with steroids, symptomatic RN can remain refractory to medical treatment, requiring surgical intervention for control. The purpose of our study was to assess a single institution's experience with craniotomy for steroid-refractory pure RN.

Methods

The medical records of all tumor patients who underwent craniotomies at our institution from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for a history of preoperative radiotherapy or radiosurgery. RN was confirmed histopathologically and patients with active tumor were excluded. Preoperative, intraoperative, and outcome information was collected. Primary outcomes measured were postoperative KPS and time to steroid freedom.

Results

Twenty-four patients with symptomatic RN were identified. Gross total resection was achieved for all patients. Patients with metastases experienced an increase in KPS (80 vs 100, P < .001) and required a shortened course of dexamethasone vs patients with high-grade gliomas (3.4 vs 22.2 weeks, P = .003). RN control and neurological improvement at 13.3 months' follow-up were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Adrenal insufficiency after rapidly tapering dexamethasone was the only morbidity (n = 1). Overall survival was 93.3% (14/15) at 1 year.

Conclusion

In cases of treatment-refractory symptomatic RN, resection can lead to an overall improvement in postoperative health status and neurological outcomes with minimal RN recurrence. Craniotomy for surgically accessible RN can safely manage symptomatic patients, and future studies assessing the efficacy of resection vs bevacizumab may be warranted.

Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Brain radionecrosis (tissue death caused by radiation) can occur following high-dose radiotherapy to brain tissue and can have a significant impact on a person's quality of life (QoL) and function. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear for this condition, which makes establishing effective treatments challenging.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of interventions used for the treatment of brain radionecrosis in adults over 18 years old.

SEARCH METHODS

In October 2017, we searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for eligible studies. We also searched unpublished data through Physicians Data Query, www.controlled-trials.com/rct, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials for ongoing trials and handsearched relevant conference material.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any intervention directed to treat brain radionecrosis in adults over 18 years old previously treated with radiation therapy to the brain. We anticipated a limited number of RCTs, so we also planned to include all comparative prospective intervention trials and quasi-randomised trials of interventions for brain radionecrosis in adults as long as these studies had a comparison group that reflects the standard of care (i.e. placebo or corticosteroids). Selection bias was likely to be an issue in all the included non-randomised studies therefore results are interpreted with caution.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (CC, PB) independently extracted data from selected studies and completed a 'Risk of bias' assessment. For dichotomous outcomes, the odds ratio (OR) for the outcome of interest was reported. For continuous outcomes, treatment effect was reported as mean difference (MD) between treatment arms with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Two RCTs and one prospective non-randomised study evaluating pharmacological interventions met the inclusion criteria for this review. As each study evaluated a different drug or intervention using different endpoints, a meta-analysis was not possible. There were no trials of non-pharmacological interventions that met the inclusion criteria.A very small randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab versus placebo reported that 100% (7/7) of participants on bevacizumab had reduction in brain oedema by at least 25% and reduction in post-gadolinium enhancement, whereas all those receiving placebo had clinical or radiological worsening or both. This was an encouraging finding but due to the small sample size we did not report a relative effect. The authors also failed to provide adequate details regarding the randomisation and blinding procedures Therefore, the certainty of this evidence is low and a larger RCT adhering to reporting standards is needed.An open-label RCT demonstrated a greater reduction in brain oedema (T2 hyperintensity) in the edaravone plus corticosteroid group than in the corticosteroid alone group (MD was 3.03 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.92; low-certainty evidence due to high risk of bias and imprecision); although the result approached borderline significance, there was no evidence of any important difference in the reduction in post-gadolinium enhancement between arms (MD = 0.47, 95% CI - 0.80 to 1.74; low-certainty evidence due to high risk of bias and imprecision).In the RCT of bevacizumab versus placebo, all seven participants receiving bevacizumab were reported to have neurological improvement, whereas five of seven participants on placebo had neurological worsening (very low-certainty evidence due to small sample size and concerns over validity of analyses). While no adverse events were noted with placebo, three severe adverse events were noted with bevacizumab, which included aspiration pneumonia, pulmonary embolus and superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. In the RCT of corticosteroids with or without edaravone, the participants who received the combination treatment were noted to have significantly greater clinical improvement than corticosteroids alone based on LENT/SOMA scale (OR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.01; low-certainty evidence due to open-label design). No differences in treatment toxicities were observed between arms.One included prospective non-randomised study of alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) versus no active treatment was found but it did not include any radiological assessment. As only one included study was a double-blinded randomised controlled trial, the other studies were prone to selection and detection biases.None of the included studies reported quality of life outcomes or adequately reported details about corticosteroid requirements.A limited number of prospective studies were identified but subsequently excluded as these studies had a limited number of participants evaluating different pharmacological interventions using variable endpoints.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of good certainty evidence to help quantify the risks and benefits of interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery. In an RCT of 14 patients, bevacizumab showed radiological response which was associated with minimal improvement in cognition or symptom severity. Although it was a randomised trial by design, the small sample size limits the quality of data. A trial of edaravone plus corticosteroids versus corticosteroids alone reported greater reduction in the surrounding oedema with combination treatment but no effect on the enhancing radionecrosis lesion. Due to the open-label design and wide confidence intervals in the results, the quality of this data was also low. There was no evidence to support any non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of radionecrosis. Further prospective randomised studies of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are needed to generate stronger evidence. Two ongoing RCTs, one evaluating bevacizumab and one evaluating hyperbaric oxygen therapy were identified.

Late-onset cystic brain necrosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

Cystic brain radionecrosis (CBRN) is a late-onset devastating complication after radiotherapy for head and neck neoplasms, especially for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). To our knowledge, it has scarcely been reported.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all available medical records of NPC patients with CBRN who were treated with surgical intervention.

Results

Sixteen patients were identified in this study and the mean latency of CBRN was 9.2 ± 0.9 years. The total irradiation dose of the nasopharynx ranged from 60 to 78 Gy. Cyst-like lesions were observed and there were slightly enhancements on the cyst wall in five patients on patients' brain MRI. All the included patients underwent surgical resection of the cystic necrotic lesion thought temporal approach. Specimens from surgery revealed reactive gliosis and immunopositive cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6 and HIF-2α. Only one patient experienced recurrence and received reoperation after surgery. All the other patients made a good recovery and no operation-related mortality was observed.

Conclusions

CBRN is a delayed but irreversible neurological sequel in irradiated NPC patients. Post-radiotherapy follow-up is quite necessary for those with high risk of CBRN. Proper treatment is needed for early CBRN patients to suppress inflammation in the brain. Timely neurosurgery may benefit patients with late-stage CBRN by alleviating increased intracranial pressure and inflammatory responses.

Cerebral radiation necrosis

Cerebral radiation-induced injury ranges from acute reversible edema to late irreversible radiation necrosis (RN). Cerebral RN is poorly responsive to treatment, is associated with permanent neurological deficits and occasionally progresses to death. We review the literature regarding cerebral RN after radiotherapy for various brain and head and neck lesions and discuss its clinical features, imaging characteristics, pathophysiology and treatment. For new enhancing lesions on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, apart from tumor progression or recurrence, RN needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis. Further studies are required to design chemoradiotherapy protocols that are effective in treating tumors while minimizing risk of RN. Current available treatments for RN, steroid and surgery, only relieve the mass effect. None of the experimental treatments to date have consistently been shown to reverse the pathologic process of RN.

Neurosurgical interventions for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single institution experience

Background

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a frequent head and neck cancer in southern China and Southeast Asia. The majority of NPC patients are managed by radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and head and neck surgeons. Actually, neurosurgical interventions are warranted under specific circumstances. In this article, we described our experience as neurosurgeons in the management of NPC patients.

Methods

Medical records of NPC patients who received neurosurgical procedure at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were reviewed.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were identified. Among 27 cases, neurosurgical procedures were performed in 18 (66.7%) with radiation-induced temporal necrosis, 2 (7.4%) with radiation-induced sarcoma, 4 (14.8%) with synchronous NPC with primary brain tumors, 2 (7.4%) with recurrent NPC involving skull base, and 1 (3.7%) with metachronous skull eosinophilic granuloma, respectively. The diagnosis is challenging in specific cases and initial misdiagnoses were found in 6 (22.2%) patients.

Conclusions

For NPC patients with intracranial or skull lesions, the initial diagnosis can be occasionally difficult because of the presence or a history of NPC and related treatment. Unawareness of these entities can result in misdiagnosis and subsequent improper treatment. Neurosurgical interventions are necessary for the diagnosis and treatment for these patients.

Radionecrosis induced by stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: results of surgery and outcome of disease

Sterotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and commonly employed therapy for metastatic brain tumors. Among complication of this treatment, symptomatic focal cerebral radionecrosis (RN) occurs in 2-10 % of cases. The large diffusion of combined therapies as SRS followed by WBRT and/or CHT, has significantly amplified the number of patients who potentially might be affected by this pathology and neurosurgeons are increasingly called to treat suspected area of RN. Results of surgery of RN in patients with brain metastases are rarely reported in literature, a standardization of diagnostic work-up to correctly identify RN is still lacking and the timing and indications in favour of surgical therapy over medical treatments are not clear as well. In this retrospective study, we review current concept related to RN and analyze the outcome of surgical treatment in a series of 15 patients previously submitted to SRS for brain metastases and affected by suspected radionecrotic lesions. After surgery, all patients except one neurologically improved. No intra-operative complications occurred. Brain edema improved in all patients allowing a reduction or even suspension of corticosteroid therapy. Pure RN was histologically determined in 7 cases; RN and tumor recurrence in the other 8. Overall median survival was 19 months. An aggressive surgical attitude may be advisable in symptomatic patients with suspected cerebral RN, to have histologic confirmation of the lesion, to obtain a long-lasting relief from the mass effect and brain edema and to improve the overall quality of life, sparing a prolonged corticosteroid therapy.