Surgical techniques for investigating the role of the insula in epilepsy: a review

Insular Epilepsy: Functions, Diagnostic Approaches, and Surgical Interventions

Epilepsy, a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures, affects a significant portion of the global population, with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) presenting a major treatment challenge. Insular epilepsy, originating from this complex region, exhibits a broad range of symptoms, making diagnosis particularly difficult. Advanced imaging techniques and invasive procedures like stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) are often crucial for accurately localizing the epileptogenic zone. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment for DRE, with recent advancements in microsurgical techniques and neuroimaging improving outcomes. Additionally, minimally invasive approaches like laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) offer promising alternatives.

Brain Surgery for Medically Intractable Epilepsy

This review covers the broad topic of brain surgery in the treatment of pediatric intractable epilepsy. The authors review the latest advancements in the presurgical workup as well as the mandatory tests needed to explore the epilepsy workup in these children. They describe the different types of epilepsy from a surgical standpoint (temporal, extratemporal, multifocal, and hemispheric epilepsies) and various surgical procedures that can be proposed depending on the clinical scenario: lesionectomies, lobectomies, hemispherectomies, neuromodulation, and palliative surgeries. They also describe the key differences of the pediatric patient as compared with the adult patient in such pathologic conditions.

Frame-based and robot-assisted insular stereo-electroencephalography via an anterior or posterior oblique approach

OBJECTIVE

There is an increasing interest in stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) for invasive evaluation of insular epilepsy. The implantation of insular SEEG electrodes, however, is still challenging due to the anatomical location and complex functional segmentation in both an anteroposterior and ventrodorsal (i.e., superoinferior) direction. While the orthogonal approach (OA) is the shortest trajectory to the insula, it might insufficiently cover these networks. In contrast, the anterior approach (AOA) or posterior oblique approach (POA) has the potential for full insular coverage, with fewer electrodes bearing a risk of being more inaccurate due to the longer trajectory. Here, the authors evaluated the implantation accuracy and the detection of epilepsy-related SEEG activity with AOA and POA insular trajectories.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the accuracy of 220 SEEG electrodes in 27 patients. Twelve patients underwent a stereotactic frame-based procedure (frame group), and 15 patients underwent a frameless robot-assisted surgery (robot group). In total, 55 insular electrodes were implanted using the AOA or POA considering the insular anteroposterior and ventrodorsal functional organization. The entry point error (EPE) and target point error (TPE) were related to the implantation technique (frame vs robot), the length of the trajectory, and the location of the target (insular vs noninsular). Finally, the spatial distribution of epilepsy-related SEEG activity within the insula is described.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in EPE (mean 0.9 ± 0.6 for the nonsinsular electrodes and 1.1 ± 0.7 mm for the insular electrodes) and TPE (1.5 ± 0.8 and 1.6 ± 0.9 mm, respectively), although the length of trajectories differed significantly (34.1 ± 10.9 and 70.1 ± 9.0 mm, repsectively). There was a significantly larger EPE in the frame group than in the robot group (1.5 ± 0.6 vs 0.7 ± 0.5 mm). However, there was no group difference in the TPE (1.5 ± 0.8 vs 1.6 ± 0.8 mm). Epilepsy-related SEEG activity was detected in 42% (23/55) of the insular electrodes. Spatial distribution of this activity showed a clustering in both anteroposterior and ventrodorsal directions. In purely insular onset cases, subsequent insular lesionectomy resulted in a good seizure outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of insular electrodes via the AOA or POA is safe and efficient for SEEG implantation covering both anteroposterior and ventrodorsal functional organization with few electrodes. In this series, there was no decrease in accuracy due to the longer trajectory of insular SEEG electrodes in comparison with noninsular SEEG electrodes. The results of frame-based and robot-assisted implantations were comparable.

Intracranial EEG and laser interstitial thermal therapy in MRI-negative insular and/or cingulate epilepsy: case series

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the success rate and complications of stereo-electroencephalogra-phy (sEEG) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in the treatment of nonlesional refractory epilepsy in cingulate and insular cortex.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the treatment response in 9 successive patients who underwent insular or cingulate LITT for nonlesional refractory epilepsy at their center between 2011 and 2019. Localization of seizures was based on inpatient video-EEG monitoring, neuropsychological testing, 3-T MRI, PET scan, magnetoencephalography scan, and/or ictal SPECT scan. Eight patients underwent sEEG, and 1 patient had implantation of both sEEG electrodes and subdural grids for localization of epileptogenic zones. LITT was performed in 5 insular cases (4 left and 1 right) and 3 cingulate cases (all left-sided). One patient also underwent both insular and cingulate LITT on the left side. All of the patients who underwent insular LITT as well as 2 of the 3 who underwent cingulate LITT were right-hand dominant. The patient who underwent insular plus cingulate LITT was also right-hand dominant.

RESULTS

Following LITT, 67% of the patients were seizure free (Engel class I) at follow-up (mean 1.35 years, range 0.6-2.8 years). All patients responded favorably to treatment (Engel class I-III). Two patients developed small intracranial hemorrhages during the sEEG implantation that did not require surgical management. One patient developed a large intracranial hemorrhage during an insular LITT procedure that did require surgical management. That patient experienced aphasia, incoordination, and hemiparesis, which resolved with inpatient rehabilitation. No permanent neurological deficits were noted in any of the patients at last follow-up. Neuropsychological status was stable in this cohort before and after LITT.

CONCLUSIONS

sEEG can be safely used to localize seizures originating from insular and cingulate cortex. LITT can successfully treat seizures arising from these deep-seated structures. The insula and cingulum should be evaluated more frequently for seizure onset zones.

Jean Talairach: a cerebral cartographer

Although French psychiatrist-turned-neurosurgeon Jean Talairach (1911-2007) is perhaps best known for the stereotaxic atlas he produced with Pierre Tournoux and Gábor Szikla, he has left his mark on most aspects of modern stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. In the field of psychosurgery, he expressed critique of the practice of prefrontal lobotomy and subsequently was the first to describe the more selective approach using stereotactic bilateral anterior capsulotomy. Turning his attention to stereotaxy, Talairach spearheaded the team at Hôpital Sainte-Anne in the construction of novel stereotaxic apparatus. Cadaveric investigation using these tools and methods resulted in the first human stereotaxic atlas where the use of the anterior and posterior commissures as intracranial reference points was established. This work revolutionized the approach to cerebral localization as well as leading to the development of numerous novel stereotactic interventions by the Sainte-Anne team, including tumor biopsy, interstitial irradiation, thermal ablation, and endonasal procedures. Together with epileptologist Jean Bancaud, Talairach invented the field of stereo-electroencephalography and developed a robust scientific methodology for the assessment and treatment of epilepsy. In this article the authors review Talairach's career trajectory in its historical context and in view of its impact on modern stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Nonlesional Insular Epilepsy in Pediatric Patients: Technical Considerations

INTRODUCTION

The insula presents anatomic challenges to surgical exploration and intervention. Open neurosurgical intervention is associated with high rates of complications despite improved seizure control. Minimally invasive techniques using novel energy delivery methods have gained popularity due to their relative safety and ability to overcome access-related barriers. The goal of this paper is to present an operative technical report and methodological considerations on the application of magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) for the treatment of nonlesional, medically refractory, insular epilepsy in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Visualase laser probe(s) were implanted using ROSA robotic stereotactic guidance into the insula using a parasagittal trajectory. After confirmation of placement using intraoperative MRI, thermal energy was delivered under real-time MR guidance. Laser wire pullback was performed when the initial dose of thermal energy was insufficient to ablate the target in its entirety. Thermal ablation within the intended target was confirmed using gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI. Following removal of laser wires, a final T1-weighted axial brain MRI was performed to confirm no evidence of hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Three patients underwent MRgLITT of nonlesional insular epilepsy over an 11-month period. The epileptogenic focus was localized to the insula using stereoelectroencephalography. The anterior and middle portions of the insula were accessed using a parasagittal trajectory. Laser ablation was performed for up to 3 min using an output of 10.5 W. No complications were encountered, and all patients were discharged within 24 h after the surgery. At the most recent follow-up, all patients had an Engel I outcome without any new neurologic deficits.

CONCLUSION

This small cohort shows that insular ablation can be achieved safely with promising seizure outcomes in the short term.

Electroclinical features of insulo-opercular epilepsy: an SEEG and PET study

Objective

To report clinical experience with presurgical evaluation in patients with insulo‐opercular epilepsy. Quantitative analysis on PET imaging and stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) signals was used to summarize their electroclinical features.

Methods

Twenty‐two patients with focal epilepsy arising from the insular and/or opercular cortex according to SEEG were retrospectively analyzed. Presurgical noninvasive data were analyzed in detail. Interictal PET data of patients were then statistically compared with those of healthy controls to identify the interictal hypometabolic network. The epileptogenicity index (EI) of ictal SEEG signal was computed to identify areas of spread at the beginning of seizure onset.

Results

Focal tonic seizures of the face and/or neck (16/22, 73%) were the most prevalent early objective signs. Epileptic discharges in the interictal and ictal scalp‐EEG mostly showed an ipsilateral perisylvian distribution. Statistical analysis of interictal PET showed significant hypometabolism in the insular lobe, central operculum, supplementary motor area, middle cingulate cortex, bilateral caudate nuclei, and putamen. According to the EI analysis, insulo‐opercular epilepsy could be classified as insulo‐opercular epilepsy (50%), opercular epilepsy (41%), and insular cortex epilepsy (9%).

Significance

Clinical diagnosis of insulo‐opercular epilepsy is challenging because of its complex seizure semiology and nonlocalizing discharges on scalp‐EEG. A common hypometabolic network involving the insulo‐opercular cortex, mesial frontal cortex and subcortical nuclei may be involved in the organization of the insulo‐opercular epilepsy network. Furthermore, quantified SEEG analysis suggested that pure insular epilepsy is rare, and the close connection between insular and opercular cortex necessitates SEEG implantation to define the epileptogenic zone.

Insular epilepsy surgery

Since it was originally described nearly 70 years ago, insular epilepsy has been increasingly recognized and may explain failures after apparently well-planned operations. We review the history of awareness of the phenomenon, techniques for its assessment, and its surgical management. Insular epilepsy can mimic features of frontal, parietal, or temporal seizures. It should be considered when a combination of somatosensory, visceral, and motor symptoms is observed early in a seizure. Extraoperative intracranial recordings are required to accurately diagnose insular seizures. Stereo-electroencephalography (EEG) or craniotomy with implantation of surface and depth electrodes have been used successfully to identify insular onset of seizures. Surgical resection of an insular focus may be performed with good success and acceptable risk.

Indications, technique, and safety profile of insular stereoelectroencephalography electrode implantation in medically intractable epilepsy

OBJECTIVE Insular epilepsy is relatively rare; however, exploring the insular cortex when preoperative workup raises the suspicion of insular epilepsy is of paramount importance for accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone and achievement of seizure freedom. The authors review their clinical experience with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with medically intractable epilepsy and suspected insular involvement. METHODS A total of 198 consecutive cases in which patients underwent SEEG implantation with a total of 1556 electrodes between June 2009 and April 2013 were reviewed. The authors identified patients with suspected insular involvement based on seizure semiology, scalp EEG data, and preoperative imaging (MRI, PET, and SPECT or magnetoencephalography [MEG]). Patients with at least 1 insular electrode based on the postoperative 3D reconstruction of CT fused with the preoperative MRI were included. RESULTS One hundred thirty-five patients with suspected insular epilepsy underwent insular implantation of a total of 303 electrodes (1-6 insular electrodes per patient) with a total of 562 contacts. Two hundred sixty-eight electrodes (88.5%) were implanted orthogonally through the frontoparietal or temporal operculum (420 contacts). Thirty-five electrodes (11.5%) were implanted by means of an oblique trajectory either through a frontal or a parietal entry point (142 contacts). Nineteen patients (14.07%) had insular electrodes placed bilaterally. Twenty-three patients (17.04% of the insular implantation group and 11.6% of the whole SEEG cohort) were confirmed by SEEG to have ictal onset zones in the insula. None of the patients experienced any intracerebral hemorrhage related to the insular electrodes. After insular resection, 5 patients (33.3%) had Engel Class I outcomes, 6 patients (40%) had Engel Class II, 3 patients (20%) had Engel Class III, and 1 patient (6.66%) had Engel Class IV. CONCLUSIONS Insula exploration with stereotactically placed depth electrodes is a safe technique. Orthogonal electrodes are implanted when the hypothesis suggests opercular involvement; however, oblique electrodes allow a higher insular sampling rate.

Medically resistant pediatric insular-opercular/perisylvian epilepsy. Part 1: invasive monitoring using the parasagittal transinsular apex depth electrode

OBJECTIVE Insular lobe epilepsy (ILE) is an under-recognized cause of extratemporal epilepsy and explains some epilepsy surgery failures in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. The diagnosis of ILE usually requires invasive investigation with insular sampling; however, the location of the insula below the opercula and the dense middle cerebral artery vasculature renders its sampling challenging. Several techniques have been described, ranging from open direct placement of orthogonal subpial depth and strip electrodes through a craniotomy to frame-based stereotactic placement of orthogonal or oblique electrodes using stereo-electroencephalography principles. The authors describe an alternative method for sampling the insula, which involves placing insular depth electrodes along the long axis of the insula through the insular apex following dissection of the sylvian fissure in conjunction with subdural electrodes over the lateral hemispheric/opercular region. The authors report the feasibility, advantages, disadvantages, and role of this approach in investigating pediatric insular-opercular refractory epilepsy. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of all children (< 18 years old) who underwent invasive intracranial studies involving the insula between 2002 and 2015. RESULTS Eleven patients were included in the study (5 boys). The mean age at surgery was 7.6 years (range 0.5-16 years). All patients had drug-resistant epilepsy as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy and underwent comprehensive noninvasive epilepsy surgery workup. Intracranial monitoring was performed in all patients using 1 parasagittal insular electrode (1 patient had 2 electrodes) in addition to subdural grids and strips tailored to the suspected epileptogenic zone. In 10 patients, extraoperative monitoring was used; in 1 patient, intraoperative electrocorticography was used alone without extraoperative monitoring. The mean number of insular contacts was 6.8 (range 4-8), and the mean number of fronto-parieto-temporal hemispheric contacts was 61.7 (range 40-92). There were no complications related to placement of these depth electrodes. All 11 patients underwent subsequent resective surgery involving the insula. CONCLUSIONS Parasagittal transinsular apex depth electrode placement is a feasible alternative to orthogonally placed open or oblique-placed stereotactic methodologies. This method is safe and best suited for suspected unilateral cases with a possible extensive insular-opercular epileptogenic zone.

Medically resistant pediatric insular-opercular/perisylvian epilepsy. Part 2: outcome following resective surgery

OBJECTIVE Seizure onset in the insular cortex as a cause of refractory epilepsy is underrepresented in the pediatric population, possibly due to difficulties localizing seizure onset in deep anatomical structures and limited surgical access to the insula, a complex anatomical structure with a rich overlying vascular network. Insular seizure semiology may mimic frontal, temporal, or parietal lobe semiology, resulting in false localization, incomplete resection, and poor outcome. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of all pediatric patients who underwent insular cortical resections for intractable epilepsy at Miami Children's Hospital from 2009 to 2015. Presurgical evaluation included video electroencephalography monitoring and anatomical/functional neuroimaging. All patients underwent excisional procedures utilizing intraoperative electrocorticography or extraoperative subdural/depth electrode recording. RESULTS Thirteen children (age range 6 months-16 years) with intractable focal epilepsy underwent insular-opercular resection. Seven children described symptoms that were suggestive of insular seizure origin. Discharges on scalp EEG revealed wide fields. Four patients were MRI negative (i.e., there were no insular or brain abnormalities on MRI), 4 demonstrated insular signal abnormalities, and 5 had extrainsular abnormalities. Ten patients had insular involvement on PET/SPECT. All patients underwent invasive investigation with insular sampling; in 2 patients resection was based on intraoperative electrocorticography, whereas 11 underwent surgery after invasive EEG monitoring with extraoperative monitoring. Four patients required an extended insular resection after a failed initial surgery. Postoperatively, 2 patients had transient hemiplegia. No patients had new permanent neurological deficits. At the most recent follow-up (mean 43.8 months), 9 (69%) children were seizure free and 1 had greater than 90% seizure reduction. CONCLUSIONS Primary insular seizure origin should be considered in children with treatment-resistant focal seizures that are believed to arise within the perisylvian region based on semiology, widespread electrical field on scalp EEG, or insular abnormality on anatomical/functional neuroimaging. There is a reasonable chance of seizure freedom in this group of patients, and the surgical risks are low.

Surgery for Nontumoral Insular Epilepsy Explored by Stereoelectroencephalography

BACKGROUND

Hidden by the perisylvian operculi, insular cortex has long been underexplored in the context of epilepsy surgery. Recent studies advocated stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) as a reliable tool to explore insular cortex and its involvement in intractable epilepsy and suggested that insular seizures could be an underestimated entity. However, the results of insular resection to treat pharmacoresistant epilepsy are rarely reported.

OBJECTIVE

We report 6 consecutive cases of right insular resection performed based on anatomoelectroclinical correlations provided by SEEG.

METHODS

Six right-handed patients (3 male, 3 female) with drug-resistant epilepsy underwent comprehensive presurgical evaluation. Based on video electroencephalographic recordings, they all underwent SEEG evaluation with bilateral (n = 4) or unilateral right (n = 2) insular depth electrode placement. All patients had both orthogonal and oblique (1 anterior, 1 posterior) insular electrodes (n = 4-6 electrodes). Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings were normal in 4 patients, 1 patient had right insular focal cortical dysplasia, and 1 patient had a right opercular postoperative scar (cavernous angioma). All patients underwent right partial insular corticectomy via the subpial transopercular approach.

RESULTS

Intracerebral recordings demonstrated an epileptogenic zone confined to the right insula in all patients. After selective insular resection, 5 of 6 patients were seizure free (Engel class I) with a mean follow-up of 36.2 months (range, 18-68 months). Histological findings revealed focal cortical dysplasia in 5 patients and a gliosis scar in 1 patient. All patients had minor transient neurological deficit (eg, facial paresis, dysarthria).

CONCLUSION

Insular resection based on SEEG findings can be performed safely with a significant chance of seizure freedom.

Vascular consequences of operculoinsular corticectomy for refractory epilepsy

OBJECT

Surgery in the insular region is considered challenging because of its vascular relationships, the proximity of functional structures, and its deep location in the sylvian fissure. The authors report the incidence and consequences of ischemic lesions after operculoinsular corticectomy for refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who underwent an insular resection with or without an opercular resection for refractory epilepsy at their center. All patients underwent postoperative MRI, enabling a radiological analysis of the ischemic lesions as a result of the corticectomies. The resections were classified according to the location and extent of the insular corticectomy and the type of operculectomy. Each patient underwent clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent surgery. All patients underwent insular corticectomy with or without an operculectomy. Ischemic lesions were identified in 12 patients (60%). In these patients, 11 ischemic lesions (55%) were related to the insular corticectomy, and 1 was related to the associated periinsular resection. The ischemic lesions associated with the insulectomies were typically located in the corona radiata running from the insula to the periventricular region. Nine patients (45%) developed a postoperative neurological deficit, among whom 6 (67%) had an insular corticectomy–related ischemic lesion. All reported neurological deficits were transient. Five patients (25%) had ischemic lesions without neurological deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

Operculoinsular corticectomies are associated with ischemic lesions in approximately 60% of patients. However, given that no patient had a definitive postoperative deficit, these ischemic lesions have few clinical consequences. Therefore, this surgical procedure can be considered reasonably safe for the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Epilepsy surgery: current status and ongoing challenges

This article reviews the current status of surgical treatment of epilepsy and introduces the ongoing challenges. Seizure outcome of resective surgery for focal seizures associated with focal lesions is satisfactory. Particularly for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, surgical treatment should be considered from the earlier stage of the disease. Meanwhile, surgical outcome in nonlesional extratemporal lobe epilepsy is still to be improved using various approaches. Disconnective surgeries reduce surgical complications of extensive resections while achieving equivalent or better seizure outcomes. Multiple subpial transection is still being modified expecting a better outcome by transection to the vertical cortices along the sulci- and multi-directional transection from a single entry point. Hippocampal transection is expected to preserve memory function while interrupting the abnormal epileptic synchronization. Proper selection or combination of subdural and depth electrodes and a wide-band analysis of electroencephalography may improve the accurate localization of epileptogenic region. Patients for whom curative resective surgery is not indicated because of generalized or bilateral multiple nature of their epilepsies, neuromodulation therapies are options of treatment which palliate their seizures.

Insular and insulo-opercular epilepsy in childhood: an SEEG study

PURPOSE

In recent years, there have been series analysing the electro-clinical correlations of insular epilepsy in adult populations. In contrast, the ictal semiology in children with insular epilepsy is poorly described. Considering that early and successful surgery may greatly improve the cognitive outcome and quality of life, it is worthwhile to deepen our knowledge of insular epilepsy in children.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated ten children with drug-resistant focal insular epilepsy who had been consecutively explored with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), followed by individually tailored resective surgery that included part of the insula in all cases. A detailed anatomo-electro-clinical analysis of non-invasive EEG and SEEG data was performed. At least one of the electrodes explored the insular cortex. SEEG analysis confirmed that the insular cortex was included in the ictal onset zone.

RESULTS

Epilepsy onset was mostly during the first year of life, characterized by subtle seizures as well as spasms and myoclonic seizures. Later on, neurovegetative signs and asymmetric tonic and hypermotor seizures (HMS) dominated the ictal semiology. The epileptogenic zone was frequently wider than insular with frontal and central predominance. In eight patients, the tailored resection included a lesion. In seven patients, an Engel class 1 outcome as well as neuropsychological and behavioural improvement was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG is feasible and useful in children with drug-resistant insular epilepsy which is often characterized by autonomic symptoms as the initial symptoms and should be suspected in cases with HMS, asymmetric tonic seizures and even asymmetric spasms. Early propagation is mostly frontal and central. Analysis of a larger population is required to refine these findings.

Posthemispherectomy hydrocephalus: results of a comprehensive, multiinstitutional review

PURPOSE

Hemispherectomy surgery for medically intractable epilepsy is known to cause hydrocephalus in a subset of patients. Existing data regarding the incidence of, and risk factors for, developing posthemispherectomy hydrocephalus have been limited by the relatively small number of cases performed by any single center. Our goal was to better understand this phenomenon and to identify risk factors that may predispose patients to developing hydrocephalus after hemispherectomy surgery.

METHODS

Fifteen pediatric epilepsy centers participated in this study. A retrospective chart review was performed on all available patients who had hemispherectomy surgery. Data collected included surgical techniques, etiology of seizures, prior brain surgery, symptoms and signs of hydrocephalus, timing of shunt placement, and basic demographics.

KEY FINDINGS

Data were collected from 736 patients who underwent hemispherectomy surgery between 1986 and 2011. Forty-six patients had preexisting shunted hydrocephalus and were excluded from analysis, yielding 690 patients for this study. One hundred sixty-two patients (23%) required hydrocephalus treatment. The timing of hydrocephalus ranged from the immediate postoperative period to 8.5 years after surgery, with 43 patients (27%) receiving shunts >90 days after surgery. Multivariate regression analysis revealed anatomic hemispherectomies (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, p < 0.0001) and previous brain surgery (OR 1.7, p = 0.04) as independent significant risk factors for developing hydrocephalus. There was a trend toward significance for the use of hemostatic agents (OR 2.2, p = 0.07) and the involvement of basal ganglia or thalamus in the resection (OR 2.2, p = 0.08) as risk factors.

SIGNIFICANCE

Hydrocephalus is a common sequela of hemispherectomy surgery. Surgical technique and prior brain surgery influence the occurrence of posthemispherectomy hydrocephalus. A significant portion of patients develop hydrocephalus on a delayed basis, indicating the need for long-term surveillance.