Petroclival tumors

Skull Base Meningiomas

Skull base meningiomas are among the most challenging meningiomas to treat clinically due to their deep location, involvement or encasement of adjacent essential neurovascular structures (such as key arteries, cranial nerves, veins, and venous sinuses), and their often-large size prior to diagnosis. Although multimodal treatment strategies continue to evolve with advances in stereotactic and fractionated radiotherapy, surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for these tumors. Resection of these tumors however is challenging from a technical standpoint, and requires expertise in several skull-base surgical approaches that rely on adequate bony removal, minimization of brain retraction, and respect for nearby neurovascular structures. These skull base meningiomas originate from a variety of different structures including, but are not limited to: the clinoid processes, tuberculum sellae, dorsum sellae, sphenoid wing, petrous/petroclival area, falcotentorial region, cerebellopontine angle, and foramen magnum. In this chapter, we will cover the common anatomical areas in the skull base from which these tumors arise, and the specific or optimal surgical approaches and other treatment modalities for meningiomas in these such locations.

Endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes to the petrous apex: anatomic comparative study of two pathways

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Surgical approaches to the petrous apex region are extremely challenging; while subtemporal approaches and variations represent the milestone of the surgical modules to reach such deep anatomical target, in a constant effort to develop minimally invasive neurosurgical routes, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been tested to get a viable corridor to the petroclival junction. Lately, another ventral endoscopic minimally invasive route, i.e., the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach, has been proposed to access the most lateral aspect of the skull base, including the petrous apex region. Our anatomic study aims to compare and combine such two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways to get full access to the petrous apex. Three-dimensional reconstructions and quantitative and morphometric data have been provided.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five human cadaveric heads (10 sides) were dissected. The lab rehearsals were run as follows: (i) preliminary pre-operative CT scans of each specimen, (ii) pre-dissection planning of the petrous apex removal and its quantification, (iii) petrous apex removal via endoscopic endonasal route, (iv) post-operative CT scans, (v) petrous apex removal via endoscopic transorbital route, and (v) final post-operative CT scan with quantitative analysis. Neuronavigation was used to guide all dissections.

RESULTS

The two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways allowed a different visualization and perspective of the petrous apex, and its surrounding neurovascular structures. After both corridors were completed, a communication between the surgical pathways was highlighted, in a so-called connection area, surrounded by the following important neurovascular structures: anteriorly, the internal carotid artery and the Gasserian ganglion; laterally, the internal acoustic canal; superiorly, the abducens nerve, the trigeminal root, and the tentorium cerebelli; inferomedially, the remaining clivus and the inferior petrosal sinus; and posteriorly, the exposed area of the brainstem. Used in a combined fashion, such multiportal approach provided a total of 97% of petrous apex removal. In particular, the transorbital route achieved a mean of 48.3% removal in the most superolateral portion of the petrous apex, whereas the endonasal approach provided a mean of 48.7% bone removal in the most inferomedial part. The difference between the two approaches was found to be not statistically significant (p = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

The multiportal combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to the petrous apex provides an overall bone removal volume of 97% off the petrous apex. In this paper, we highlighted that it was possible to uncover a common path between these two surgical pathways (endonasal and transorbital) in a so-called connection area. Potential indications of this multiportal approach may be lesions placed in or invading the petrous apex and petroclival regions that can be inadequately reached via transcranial paths or via an endonasal endoscopic route alone.

[Treatment of petroclival meningiomas: current state of the problem]

Petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) are benign, slowly growing tumors. Surgery still remains the main treatment option for them. The desire for total resection of large extended PCMs often leads to the development or worsening of persistent neurological deficits. This paper presents a review of the world literature devoted to petroclival meningiomas. We discuss the issues of PCM classification, biology, diagnosis, and selection of the optimal algorithm for their treatment.

Endoscopic transorbital route to the petrous apex: a feasibility anatomic study

BACKGROUND

While the subtemporal approach represents the surgical module milestone designed to reach the petrous apex, a novel ventral route, which is the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach, has been proposed to access the skull base. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of this route to the petrous apex, providing a qualitative and quantitative analysis of this relatively novel pathway.

METHODS

Five human cadaveric heads were dissected at the Laboratory of Surgical NeuroAnatomy of the University of Barcelona. After proper dissection planning, anterior petrosectomy via the endoscopic transorbital route was performed. Specific quantitative analysis, as well as dedicated three-dimensional reconstruction, was done.

RESULTS

Using the endoscopic transorbital approach, it was possible to reach the petrous apex with an average volume bone removal of 1.33 ± 0.21 cm³. Three main intradural spaces were exposed: cerebellopontine angle, middle tentorial incisura, and ventral brainstem. The first one was bounded by the origin of the trigeminal nerve medially and the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves laterally, the second extended from the origin of the oculomotor nerve to the entrance of the trochlear nerve into the tentorium free edge while the ventral brainstem area was hardly accessible through the straight, ventral endoscopic transorbital trajectory.

CONCLUSION

This is the first qualitative and quantitative anatomic study concerning details of the lateral aspect of the incisura and ventrolateral posterior fossa reached via the transorbital window. This manuscript is intended as a feasibility anatomic study, and further clinical contributions are mandatory to confirm the effectiveness of this approach, defining its possible role in the neurosurgical armamentarium.