Development of a non-tissue adherent neurosurgical patty and an ex vivo testing system to evaluate adherent characteristics

Cottonoids (neurosurgical patties, neurosurgical pads, or micropatties) as effective instruments for safe and successful endoscopic transsphenoidal adenomectomy

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgical cottonoids (also known as neurosurgical patties, pads, or micropatties) have been commonly used in microsurgical procedures to protect the surface of the brain, nerves, and vasculature and to aspirate blood, flushing solution, and cerebrospinal fluid. This article describes the unique applications of cottonoids in endoscopic transsphenoidal adenomectomy (eTSA).

METHODS

Several sizes of cottonoids have been used in eTSA to enhance safe surgical procedures and clear the operative field. The roles of cottonoids in eTSA are divided into three types: to serve as view-ensuring devices, to protect tissue, and to function as instruments or assist with the use of other instruments.

RESULTS

Appropriate cottonoid use provides a well-visualized operative field, allows easy identification of bleeding areas, enables effective adenoma detachment from the cleavage layer (tumour-hypophysis interface), and permits sensitive procedures to be performed around critical structures.

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve safe and successful neurovascular-hypophysis-protective eTSA, cottonoids play an effective role in every type of eTSA procedure, in various applications, performed under higher-resolution endoscopic vision.

Superior Effectiveness of a Newly Developed Nonadherent Polyurethane-Coated Surgical Patty for Hemostasis

Background:

Cotton patty is usually used to aspirate blood and cerebrospinal fluid to maintain a dry field. However, the cotton patty easily adheres to the vessels by capillary action, especially in combination with hemostat. Therefore, re-bleeding may be induced by removal of the cotton patty stuck to the vessel despite initial control of the bleeding.

Methods:

We have developed a new cotton patty (Non-Stina X^®, Hakujuji, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) which does not adhere to the vessels. The newly developed cotton patty is made of 100% cotton, with only the contact surface coated with polyurethane film which prevents capillary action. The coated side includes many holes to allow aspiration from both sides.

Results:

The characteristics of four different surgical patties including our new patty which are available for surgical use in Japan were investigated. Transverse sections of four different surgical patties were investigated by light microscopy (magnification ×150). Our new cotton patty did not show any fluffing on the polyurethane-coated surface. However, other surgical patties showed some fluffing on their surfaces. The friction coefficients of four different surgical patties were investigated. Our new cotton patty had the lowest of the four neurosurgical patties. We confirmed the nonadherent characteristic using with hemostats of gelatinous sponge or fibrin glue-soaked oxidized cellulose cotton during hemostasis in neurosurgical procedures. The polyurethane-coated cotton patty could be removed easily from the hemostats without re-bleeding.

Conclusions:

The newly developed polyurethane-coated cotton patty is more effective for bleeding control from vessels with several types of hemostat due to the nonadherent characteristics.

A New Search Algorithm for Reducing the Incidence of Missing Cottonoids in the Operating Theater

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PURPOSE

Missing cottonoids during and after spinal surgery is a persistent problem and account for the most commonly retained surgical instruments (RSIs) noticed during a final cottonoid count. The aim of this study was to enumerate risk factors and describe the sequence to look out for misplaced cottonoids during spinal surgery and provide an algorithm for resolving the problem.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

There are only a few case reports on RSIs among various surgical branches. The data is inconclusive and there is little evidence in the literature that relates to spinal surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at Indian Spinal Injuries Centre. The data was collected from hospital records ranging from January 2013 to December 2017. The surgical cases in which cottonoid counts were inconsistent during or after the procedure were included in the study. The case files along with operating theater records were thoroughly screened for selecting those in which there was confirmed evidence of such an event.

RESULTS

There were 7,059 spinal surgeries performed during the study period. Fifteen cases of miscounts were recorded with an incidence of one in every 471 cases. Cottonoids were most commonly lost under the shoes of the surgeon or assistants. In two instances, cottonoids were found in the surgical field and trapped in the interbody cage site. Based on these locations, a systematic search algorithm was created.

CONCLUSIONS

This study enumerates RSI risk factors in spinal surgical procedures and describes steps that can be followed to account for any missing cottonoids. The incidence of missing cottonoids can be decreased using a goal-oriented approach and ensuring that surgical teams work in collaboration.