Spinal intraarterial chemotherapy: interim results of a Phase I clinical trial

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in clinical trial reporting for metastatic spine tumors: An exploration of North American studies

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reporting of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic data in clinical trials exploring the management of metastatic spine disease (MSD).

METHODS

We undertook a cross-sectional analysis of North American completed and published clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov exploring the management of patients with MSD. Data on patient demographics, trial characteristics, reporting of race and ethnicity, distribution of racial and ethnic groups, and reporting of socioeconomic measures was extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov and related publications identified through PubMed and Google Scholar searches. An exploratory data analysis was performed, followed by Pearson's Chi-square and binary logistic regression analyses to explore associations of covariates with racioethnic reporting.

RESULTS

Out of 158 completed trials, only 8% (12 of 158) met inclusion criteria with published results. These 12 trials included a total of 1,568 patients with a mean age of 61 years. Almost half (42%; (5 of 12)) of trials did not report race, while only 17% (2 of 12) of trials reported ethnicity. In trials reporting complete racial data (n = 5), 77% (377 of 493) patients were White, 15% (n = 73) Black or African American, and 4% (n = 19) Asian. American Indian/Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander patients were severely underrepresented (0.4% and 0.2%, respectively). Of the two trials reporting ethnicity, 94% (479 of 514) patients were Not Hispanic or Latino. Sponsoring body of the trial, trial phase, intervention type, number of trial patients, or mean age of patients were not significantly associated with racioethnic reporting. Notably, no trial reported any measures of socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSION

Our review revealed significant gaps in the reporting of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic data in MSD clinical trials, with substantial underrepresentation of minority groups. This underrepresentation limits the generalizability of trial findings and may perpetuate health disparities. Coordinated efforts from researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and funding bodies are needed to improve diversity in future trials. Strategies such as targeted outreach, community engagement, and more inclusive eligibility criteria should be implemented to ensure that trial populations better reflect the diversity of MSD patients in the general population.

Current and future directions in interventional neuro-oncology-are we there yet?

Advancements in technology and technical expertise increasingly enable neurointerventionalists to deliver safer and more effective endovascular treatments to cancers of the brain, spine, head, and neck. In addition to established neuro-oncological interventions such as pre-surgical tumor embolization and percutaneous ablation, newer modalities focused on direct arterial infusion of chemotherapy, radioisotopes, and radiosensitizers continue to gain traction as complementary treatment options, while stem cell-mediated delivery of theranostic nanoparticles and oncolytic virus are being explored for even greater specificity in targeting cancers across the blood-brain barrier. This article aims to provide an overview of the current state of the art and future directions for the field of interventional neuro-oncology, as well as opportunities and challenges presented by this emerging treatment modality.

Chemoembolization for Symptomatic Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Refractory to Re-radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of chemoembolization for inoperable metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) refractory to re-radiotherapy.

METHODS

Nineteen consecutive patients with recurrent MESCC after re-radiotherapy who had undergone chemoembolization were retrospectively analyzed. Outcome measures were pain relief rate, neurological improvement rate, objective response rate, and adverse events. MESCC degree classification was assessed using Bilsky grades. Pain assessment was performed using Numerical Rating Scale, and neurological function was evaluated using the Frankel classification.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 7 (range 2-44) months. All participants had MESCC grade 2 or higher and had severe pain. Fifteen patients (79%) had neurological deficits, and ten had Frankel classification C and five had D. Symptoms were relieved in almost all patients the day following chemoembolization. Pain relief was achieved in 18 of 19 (95%) patients; the median decrease in Numerical Rating Scale score was 8 (range 0-10; p < 0.001). Neurological improvement was achieved in 11 of 15 patients (73%); the median increase in Frankel classification was 1 (range 0-2; p = 0.006). Ten of 19 (53%) patients showed a reduction in MESCC; the median decrease in Bilsky grade was 1 (range 0-2; p = 0.005). There was no correlation between the change in Bilsky grade and pain relief (p = 0.421). However, the decrease in Bilsky grade significantly improved neurological symptoms (p = 0.01). No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Chemoembolization may be a useful palliative treatment modality for MESCC refractory to re-radiotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3b, Follow up Study.

Metastatic Complications of Cancer Involving the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems

Neurologic complications of cancer may involve both the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system manifesting as brain, leptomeningeal, intramedullary, intradural, epidural, plexus, and skull base metastases. Excluding brain involvement, neurologic complications affecting these other sites are relatively infrequent, but collectively they affect more than 25% of patients with metastatic cancer causing significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and intervention optimize quality of life and improve survival.