Outcomes in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 5 years after treatment with minimally invasive decompression: examination of pre- and postoperative slippage, intervertebral disc changes, and clinical results

Preoperative factors affecting the two-year postoperative patient-reported outcome in single-level lumbar grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis

Background

The choice of operative method for lumbar spinal stenosis with Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the preoperative factors affecting the 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome in Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Methods

Seventy-two consecutive patients who had minimally invasive decompression alone (D group; 28) or with fusion (DF group; 44) were enrolled. The parameters investigated were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire as patient-reported assessment, and L4 slippage (L4S), lumbar lordosis (LL), and lumbar axis sacral distance (LASD) as an index of sagittal alignment for radiological evaluation. Data collected prospectively at 2 years postoperatively were examined by statistical analysis.

Results

Sixty-two cases (D group; 25, DF group; 37) were finally evaluated. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative L4S and LASD were extracted as significant preoperative factors affecting the 2-year postoperative outcome. Patients with preoperative L4S of 6 mm or more have a lower rate of improvement in lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio=0.188, p=.043). Patients with a preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more have a higher rate of improvement in lumbar dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio=11.48, p=.021). The results of multiple logistic analysis by operative method showed that there was a higher rate of improvement in lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain in patients with preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more in DF group (risk ratio=172.028, p=.01).

Conclusions

Preoperative L4S and LASD were extracted as significant preoperative factors affecting patient-reported outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Multiple logistic analyses by the operative method suggested that DF may be advantageous in improving lumbar dysfunction due to low back pain in patients with preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Decompression without Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Synovial Cysts: Feasibility and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) can cause painful radiculopathy and sensory and/or motor deficits. Historically, first-line surgical treatment has been decompression with fusion. Recently, minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion has shown equal or superior results to traditional decompression and fusion methods.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the long-term efficacy of minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion in the treatment of LSC as it relates to the rate of subsequent fusion surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed over a 10-year period of patients undergoing minimally invasive laminectomy for symptomatic LSCs. The primary end point was the rate of revision surgery requiring fusion.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients with symptomatic LSCs underwent minimally invasive laminectomy alone January 2010-August 2020 at our institution. The most common location was L4-5 (72%). Preoperative imaging identified spondylolisthesis (grade 1) in 43 patients (57%), none of which was unstable on available dynamic radiographs. Average procedure duration was 93 minutes, with 78% of patients discharged home on the same day of surgery. Over 46 months of mean follow-up, 17 patients (20%) required 19 revision operations. Of those operations, 16 were spinal fusions (17.6%). Median time to fusion surgery was 36 months. There were no identifiable risk factors on multivariate regression analysis that predicted the need for fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive laminectomy is an effective first-line treatment for symptomatic LSCs and avoids the need for fusion in most treated patients. Of our patients, 18% required a fusion over 46 months, suggesting that further studies are required to guide patient selection.

Factors of Adjacent Segment Disease Onset After Microsurgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have examined the underlying cause of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. The goal of this study is to investigate factors related to the onset of ASD after decompression surgery based on the imaging results.

METHODS

We examined 95 patients who underwent single-level decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (L3/4, L4/5) and follow-up for 5 or more years. Radiographic images were performed preoperatively and at each year of follow-up. We then examined image parameters by focusing on the level operated on and adjacent segments in relation to the postoperative onset of symptomatic ASD.

RESULTS

During the mean observation period of 7.5 years, 39 of 95 patients developed symptomatic ASD. Patients with a high preoperative sagittal rotation angle in adjacent segments possibly developed postoperative ASD (P = 0.0006). Furthermore, postoperative ASD tended to be unlikely in patients who exhibited postoperative slip progression at the operated level (P = 0.025). Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, ASD developed with a probability of 91.3% in patients with a preoperative sagittal rotation angle of ≥7.5° in adjacent segments when there was no postoperative slip progression at the operated level. However, ASD developed in only 16.7% of patients with a preoperative adjacent segment sagittal rotation angle of 7.5° or less when there was postoperative slip progression at the operated level.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical changes at the operated level and adjacent segments contribute to the onset of ASD after lumbar decompression. Preoperative high sagittal rotation angle of adjacent segments and negative postoperative slip progression at the operated level are risk factors of ASD.

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in the elderly

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) under local anesthesia is rarely performed for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) because of the limited field of vision, inherent instability, etc. The objective of this study was to describe the procedure of the PTED technique and to demonstrate the early clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2019, 40 consecutive patients aged 60 and older were diagnosed with LSS with DLS in our institution and underwent PTED. All patient were followed up to 1 year postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria.

RESULTS

The mean age was 70.2 ± 7.1 years. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. The mean ± SD values of the preoperative VAS leg pain and ODI scores were 7.5 ± 1.1 and 67.3 ± 9.3, respectively. The scores improved to 2.2 ± 1.1 and 20.7 ± 8.1 at 12 months postoperatively. The outcomes of the modified MacNab criteria showed that 87.5 % of patients obtained a good-to-excellent rate. The percent slippage of spondylolisthesis before surgery (10.8 ± 2.6 %) and at the end of follow-up (11.0 ± 2.4 %) was not significantly different. One patient had a dural tear and intracranial hypertension, and one patient had tibialis anterior weakness.

CONCLUSION

PTED under local anesthesia could be an effective treatment method for LSS with DLS in elderly patients. However, potential complications still require further evaluation.

Endoscopic Ventral Decompression for Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis by Partially Removing Posterosuperior Margin Underneath the Slipping Vertebral Body: Technical Note and Outcome Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Decompression alone is a treatment option in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). This study aims to describe the procedure of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic ventral decompression technique and to demonstrate the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Two years of retrospective data were collected from 26 patients with predominant unilateral leg pain caused by LSS and low-grade DLS (Meyerding grades I and Ⅱ). All patients underwent endoscopic ventral decompression by removing the posterosuperior margin underneath the slipping vertebral body, combined with dorsal decompression without excessive resection of facet joints. The surgical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), modified MacNab criteria, and walking distance improvement evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 18 women and 8 men was 69.2 years. The mean preoperative ODI and VAS of the leg and the back scores were 64.7 ± 8.1, 7.0 ± 1.4, and 3.0 ± 1.2, respectively. All mean scores improved postoperatively to 31.4 ± 5.6, 2.4 ± 1.1, and 1.7 ± 1.1 at the final follow-up. In 88.5% of cases, patients' estimated walking distance improved. The outcomes of the modified MacNab criteria showed that 81.3% of patients obtained good-to-excellent rate. There were no statistically significant differences between the percent slip of spondylolisthesis before surgery and at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the initial short-term follow-up results, transforaminal endoscopic ventral decompression by partially removing the posterosuperior margin underneath the slipping vertebral body, combined with dorsal decompression, might be an efficient alternative treatment for leg dominant symptoms in patients with LSS and low-grade DLS.

Minimally invasive decompression in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Report of a surgical series and review of the literature

We reported the results of minimally invasive spinal decompression (MISD) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) associated with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and performed a literature review in order to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes, the complications and reoperation rate of MISD procedures in these patients. Data of 28 patients submitted to MISD for DS associated to LSS were reviewed. We evaluated the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both for low back pain (LBP) and legs pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the degree of the slippage. A PubMed search of the English literature was conducted. Only papers with more than 10 patients and reporting explicitly data of patients with DS were included in the analysis. We found a statistically significant improvement of LBP, legs pain and ODI in our series. The degree of slippage was stable at follow-up (FU) with no need of reoperation. No major complications occurred. In our literature review, we were able to analyze the differences in ODI in 156 patients and the differences in Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score in 218 patients. We observed a statistically significant improvement of ODI and JOA score at FU compared to pre-operative. The percentage of slippage, evaluated in 283 patients, was unchanged at FU compared to pre-operative. The overall complication rate was 1.6%. The overall reoperation rate was 4.5%. MISD procedures are safe and effective in patients with DS associated to LSS and are associated to low morbidity and significant improvement of disability without progression of slippage.