Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal pain secondary to recurrent malignant skull base tumors

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Narrative Reappraisal of the Current Evidence

Simple Summary

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas are a group of diverse tumors affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. As a direct consequence of their rarity and heterogeneity, diagnosis is challenging, and treatment does not follow universally accepted protocols. Though surgery represents the mainstay of treatment, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have pivotal roles in improving outcomes of patients treated with curative intent. Indications to endoscopic surgery have been expanding over the last three decades, but a considerable number of patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma still need open surgical procedures. Management of the neck in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is controversial. Curative-intended treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic tumors, alongside palliation of uncurable cases, represent poorly explored aspects of this disease.

Abstract

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is a rare tumor affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Several aspects of this disease, ranging from epidemiology to biology, pathology, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and post-treatment surveillance are controversial, and consensus on how to manage this sinonasal cancer is lacking. A narrative literature review was performed to summarize the current evidence and provide the reader with available data supporting the decision-making process in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma, alongside the authors’ personal opinion on the unsolved issues of this tumor. The review has highlighted several advances in molecular definition of epithelial cancers of the sinonasal tract. Surgery represents the pivot of treatment and is performed through an endoscopic transnasal approach whenever feasible. Open surgery is required for a large proportion of cases. Reconstruction of the defect follows principles of skull base and cranio-maxillo-facial reconstruction. Chemotherapy is given as neoadjuvant treatment or concomitantly to radiotherapy. Photon-based radiation therapy has a crucial role in the adjuvant setting. Particle therapy is providing promising results. Management of the neck should be planned based on the presence of clinically appreciable metastases, primary tumor extension, and need for recipient vessels. Biotherapy and immunotherapy are still underexplored therapeutical modalities.

Trigeminal Neuralgia Secondary to Meningiomas and Vestibular Schwannoma Is Improved after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) secondary to tumors is encountered in up to 6% of patients with facial pain syndromes and is considered to be associated with tumors affecting the trigeminal nerve pathways. The most frequent are meningiomas and vestibular schwannomas (VS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a valuable treatment, with heterogeneity of clinical results. We sought to review the medical literature on TN treated with SRS for meningiomas and VS and investigate the rates of improvement of TN symptoms.

METHODS

We reviewed articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 in PubMed. Pain relief after SRS, the maintenance of pain relief, and TN recurrence and complications were evaluated with separate meta-analyses, taking into account the data on individual patients.

RESULTS

Pain relief after SRS was reported as Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scores of BNI I in 50.5% (range 36-65.1%) of patients and BNI I-IIIb in 83.8% (range 77.8-89.8%). There was no significant difference in series discussing outcomes for tumor targeting versus tumor and nerve targeting. Recurrences were described in 34.7% (range 21.7-47.6; tumor targeting). Maintenance of BNI I was reported in 36.4% (range 20.1-52.7) and BNI I-IIIb in 41.2% (range 29.8-52.7; tumor targeting series). When both the nerve and the tumor were targeted, only 1 series reported 86.7% with BNI I-IIIb at last follow-up. Complications were encountered in 12.6% (range 6.3-18.8; tumor targeting series) of patients; however, they were much higher, as high as 26.7%, in the only study reporting them after targeting both the nerve and the tumor. The most common complication was facial numbness.

CONCLUSION

SRS for TNB secondary to benign tumors, such as meningiomas and VS, is associated with favorable clinical course, but less favorable than in idiopathic TN. There was, however, heterogeneity among reports and targeting approaches. Although targeting both the nerve and the tumor seemed to achieve better long-term results, the rate of complications was much higher and the number of patients treated was limited. Future clinical studies should focus on the standard reporting of clinical outcomes and randomization of targeting methods.

Radiosurgery for Epidermoid Tumors: Dramatic Pain Relief from Trigeminal Neuralgia

Purpose 

The purpose of this study is to discuss the long-term effects of radiosurgery for epidermoid tumors, including the symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia and/or facial spasm, which we have originally reported before.

Background

Intracranial epidermoids are slow-growing tumors that can become symptomatic once they develop into large tumors. The mainstay of the treatment is surgery. However, eradicating the whole tumor is often difficult and some tumors may recur. In addition to their mass effects on the brain, these tumors are often associated with hyperactive nerve dysfunction syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia, glossopharyngeal neuralgia, and/or facial spasm.

Cases and methods 

We report 13 cases of epidermoid tumors, 12 of which were located in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA), which were treated using 14 radiosurgery procedures. The inclusion criteria for radiosurgery were the presence of well-localized small tumors and/or severe associated neuralgia or facial spasms. The mean target volume ranged from 0.17 to 9.5 cm³ with a mean of 2.85 cm³. The lesions were treated with a mean maximum and a marginal dose of 28.2 Gy and 14.2 Gy, respectively.

Results

Among the 14 gamma knife procedures that were performed in 13 patients, dose planning to ensure total and partial coverage for relief from hyperactive cranial nerve dysfunction (HCND) was performed. Six cases were totally and another eight were partially covered at the dose planning. The irradiated tumors showed a minor decrease or no remarkable changes during a mean follow-up period of 86.1 months. Tumor progression requiring a second surgery was seen in two cases. The trigeminal neuralgias either improved or disappeared soon after the procedure, enabling the discontinuation of the medication.

Conclusion 

Radiosurgery led to a dramatic improvement in HCND. In fact, the immediate cure of neuralgia after the radiosurgery was observed in several cases, even after partial coverage with radiosurgery. The interface between the tumor and the nerve was the main target. The definite mechanisms for this favorable outcome have not been verified yet, but the functional modulation by the radiosurgery could be one. Electrophysiological alteration at the interface between the tumor and nerve has been considered. When the tumors were totally covered with radiosurgery, persistent tumor control was expected. Sufficient tumor control is possible if the tumor can be covered entirely with radiosurgery. Functional modulation of trigeminal neuralgia and facial spasms can also be attained even by partial dose planning for the nerve-tumor interface.

Long-term quality of life after definitive treatment of sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term global and site-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients treated for sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

METHODS

One hundred fourteen patients with sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies received surgery, radiation, systemic chemotherapy, or a combination thereof, with curative intent. Validated global ([EuroQol-5D] Visual Analogue Scale [EQ-5D VAS]) and disease-specific instruments (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck [MDASI-HN], Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire [ASBQ]) were administered to patients who were both free of disease and had completed treatment at least 12 months previously. Associations between instruments, instrument domains, and specific clinical parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age was 55 years. The mean EQ-5D VAS, MDASI-22 composite score, and ASBQ score were 74 (standard deviation [SD] 21), 48 (SD 36), and 130 (SD 27), respectively. The most frequently reported high-severity items in MDASI-HN were dry mouth and difficulty tasting food. The most frequently reported high-severity items in ASBQ were difficulty with smell and nasal secretions. Advanced Tumor (T) classification was associated with worse overall ASBQ sum score (P = 0.02). ASBQ performance at home and MDASI-HN drowsy symptom items independently predicted worse global HRQoL as measured by the EQ-5D VAS (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Global HRQoL for survivors of sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies after multimodality treatment approximates that of the U.S. population for the same age group. ASBQ and MDASI-HN correlate well with global HRQoL outcomes as measured by EQ-5D VAS. MDASI-HN and ASBQ elicited unique symptoms, highlighting the complex symptom burden experienced by these patients. Further studies should identify patients predisposed to reduced long-term QOL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 130:86-93, 2020.