Pipeline embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter study of 131 aneurysms

Flow-Diverting Devices in the Treatment of Vertebral Artery Aneurysms: Insights into Efficacy and Safety from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of flow-diverting devices (FDs) treatment for intracranial vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, OVID, and Embase for English-language studies up to February 2024 and included clinical studies on FD treatment of intracranial VA aneurysms. Sensitivity analysis evaluated outcome stability. Of 2273 articles, 29 studies involving 541 aneurysms treated with FDs were included. Based on the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), six were high-quality and 23 moderate quality. FD treatment showed a 95% rate of favorable clinical outcomes (95% CI, 89-99%), 81% (95% CI, 74-88%) complete aneurysmal occlusion, 4% (95% CI, 2-7%) ischemic complication incidence, 1% (95% CI, 0-3%) hemorrhagic complication incidence, 95% (95% CI, 87-100%) posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) preservation, and 6% (95% CI, 3-10%) in-stent stenosis or occlusion across clinical and angiographic follow-up periods of 13.62 months (95% CI, 10.72-16.52) and 11.85 months (95% CI, 9.36-14.33), respectively. Subgroup analyses, based on a 12-month angiographic follow-up threshold, indicated no statistically significant differences in rates of complete aneurysm occlusion, PICA preservation, or in-stent stenosis or occlusion incidence (p > 0.05) between subgroups. Moreover, significant differences were observed in clinical and angiographic outcomes between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, particularly in hemorrhagic complications (p < 0.05), without significant disparity in ischemic complications (p > 0.05). The results' stability was confirmed via sensitivity analysis. FDs treatment for VA aneurysms is efficacious and safe, offering high rates of positive clinical and angiographic outcomes with minimal complications, underscoring FDs' viability as a treatment option for VA aneurysms. The study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024499894).

Flow diversion for posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms are associated with a higher risk of rupture. Flow diverters (FDs) are widely used for carotid intracranial aneurysms, but their role in PC aneurysms is less established. This meta-analysis examines the available literature on the safety and effectiveness of FDs for PC aneurysms.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic search from database inception until October 2024. The primary effectiveness outcome was complete occlusion rate defined by the Raymond-Roy and/or O'Kelly-Marotta scales. Primary safety outcomes included thromboembolic event rates following implantation. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related mortality, good functional outcome (GFO), and retreatment. Pool estimates were calculated using a random-effect model. Subgroup analysis based on morphology and study design was also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 1698 patients were treated with FDs for 1760 PC aneurysms. Among these cases, 47.6% were in the vertebral artery. Our pooled overall analysis of complete occlusion rates was 72.73% (P<0.0001; I2=67.2%), and the pooled thromboembolic events rate following implantation was 11.70% (P<0.0046; I2=70.5%). Additionally, the pooled mortality rate was 8.07% (P<0.0001; I2=61.5%), the retreatment rate was 6.59% (P<0.4260; I2=1%), and the pooled GFO rate was 83.99% (P<0.0001; I2=76%). Subgroup analysis revealed that fusiform-dolichoectatic had a complete occlusion rate of 48.29% (P<0.3223; I2=11.7%).

CONCLUSION

FDs for PC aneurysms achieve generally adequate occlusion rates, except in dolichoectatic-fusiform subtypes. Despite achieving adequate occlusion rates, FD use was associated with higher thromboembolic events, mortality, and retreatment rates, which necessitates careful patient selection.

Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment of Compensative-Flow-Related Posterior Circulation Aneurysms With Anterior Circulation Artery Occlusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to delineate the reconstructive endovascular treatment and periprocedural management of compensative-flow-related posterior circulation aneurysms with anterior circulation artery occlusion.

METHODS

A total of 87 patients were enrolled in this retrospective double-center cohort study from May 2011 to November 2023. The baseline demographics, aneurysm characteristics, etiology and status of anterior circulation artery occlusion, treatment modalities, anesthesia management, complications, and clinical and angiographic outcomes of the patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Atherosclerosis and moyamoya disease were found to be the two main etiologies of anterior circulation artery occlusion. The mean American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology scores were significantly higher in patients with posterior communicating artery trunk collaterals than those with posterior cerebral artery pial collaterals ( P < .05). Treatment strategies included stent-assisted coiling (55, 63.2%), standard coiling (22, 25.3%), and flow diversion or flow diversion-assisted coiling (8, 9.2%). The overall rate of procedure-related ischemic and hemorrhagic complications (10.3%) was considered acceptable. The ischemic complication was significantly associated with a >20% drop in mean arterial pressure ( P < .05) during the procedure. Finally, 86.2% of all patients showed a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at the final clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that reconstructive endovascular treatments are feasible and effective strategies for compensative-flow-related posterior circulation aneurysms with anterior circulation artery occlusion. However, these treatments are associated with a risk of periprocedural ischemic complications, which can be reduced by collateral arterial assessment, appropriate periprocedural anesthesia management, and antiplatelet treatment.

Treatment strategies and outcomes for intracranial fusiform aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fusiform aneurysms are a distinct subgroup of intracranial aneurysms with unique characteristics and pose a treatment challenge compared to common saccular aneurysms. Traditionally, surgery was the main treatment; however, endovascular techniques are gaining favor.

METHODS

We searched major databases for studies on treatment, clinical outcomes, and radiological outcomes of intracranial fusiform aneurysms published before May 31st, 2023 in order to compare surgical Vs endovascular treatment strategies. Pooled data analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed 1704 patients with 1737 fusiform aneurysms from 63 studies. Endovascular treatment, particularly stent-assisted coiling and stenting, emerged as the preferred approach with lower mortality and complication rates compared to surgery. Aneurysm location played a role in outcomes, with anterior circulation aneurysms generally faring better. Deconstructive strategies, designed to occlude the parent artery, carried a doubled risk of complications compared to reconstructive approaches, which aim to preserve blood flow (OR: 2.188; 95% CI: 1.474-3.248; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular techniques are becoming the mainstay of treatment for fusiform aneurysms, offering improved safety and efficacy compared to surgery. Anterior circulation location and reconstructive strategies are associated with better outcomes. However, no significant differences in OR for early complete occlusion were found between surgery and endovascular techniques at discharge and follow-up with very low heterogeneity among studies.

Comparison of pipeline embolization device and tubridge flow diverter for posterior circulation aneurysms: A multicentre propensity score matched study

Rationale and objectives

The off-label use of flow diverters (FDs) has broadened to include treating aneurysms in posterior circulation (PC). A novel flow diverter, the Tubridge flow diverter (TFD), has been created in China specifically for treating PC aneurysms. However, studies comparing between pipeline embolization device (PED) and TFD are rare. Thus, our study aimed to explore the effectiveness of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms using a propensity score matched cohort design.

Methods

Retrospective data collection was conducted on patients who underwent treatment with either PED or TFD over the period from 2015 through 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to calibrate for patient age; history of ischemic stroke; aneurysm size; morphology; location and neck; number of FDs; parent vessel diameter; and the employment of assisted coiling and balloon techniques. Data on previously ruptured aneurysms was not included in the analysis. A comparison was conducted between the two devices to assess perioperative complications, aneurysm occlusion rates, and functional outcomes.

Results

A total of 252 PC aneurysms were treated in 248 patients. Clinical and imaging follow-ups were lost in 26 and 47 patients, respectively. Major perioperative complications occurred in 7.5% of the cases, with favorable clinical outcomes in 91.0% and complete occlusion in 79.1%. Eighty-two (32.5%) aneurysms were treated with TFD, while 170 (67.5%) aneurysms were treated with PED. PSM was used to account for these significant variations, producing 82 matched pairs of unruptured aneurysms treated with PED or TFD. In terms of functional and angiographic outcomes, no significant differences were found between PED and TFD (functional outcome, p = 0.594 and angiographic outcome, p = 0.415). However, more perioperative major complications were found in patients treated with TFD (p = 0.005) compared with those receiving PED.

Conclusion

The comparative study of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms resulted in positive clinical results and sustained occlusion rates, with acceptable perioperative complications. However, higher quality studies are needed to enhance our understanding of the use of FDs for treating of PC aneurysms.

Flow diversion for basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Flow-diverting devices (FDDs), such as the Pipeline Embolization Device, have been gaining traction for treating challenging posterior circulation aneurysms. Few previous studies have focused on using FDDs to treat aneurysms of the basilar quadrifurcation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the use of FDDs to treat patients with basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms. Patients were assessed for aneurysm type, previous aneurysm treatment, technical success, periprocedural complications, and long-term aneurysm occlusion.

RESULTS

34 patients were assessed; aneurysms of the basilar apex (n=23) or superior cerebellar artery (SCA) (n=7), or both (n=1), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) (n=3). The mean (SD) largest aneurysm dimension was 8.7 (6.1) mm (range 1.9-30.8 mm). 14 aneurysms were previously surgically clipped or endovascularly coiled. All aneurysms had a saccular morphology. Complete or near-complete occlusion was achieved in 30 of 34 patients (88%) at final angiographic follow-up, a mean (SD) of 6.6 (5.4) months (range 0-19 months) postoperatively. No patient experienced postoperative symptomatic occlusions of the SCA or PCA; 4 patients developed asymptomatic posterior communicating artery occlusions; 28 patients (82%) experienced no complications; whereas 3 (9%) experienced major complications and 3 (9%) experienced minor complications; and 1 patient died as a result of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Flow diversion may be a safe and effective option to treat basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms. Previously treated basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms with recurrence or residual lesion may benefit from additional treatment with an FDD. Further prospective studies should be directed toward validating these findings.

Visual Morbidity in Patients With Ophthalmic Segment Aneurysms Treated With Flow Diverters: A Dual-Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Flow diverter (FD) treatment for aneurysms of the ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA) may raise concerns about visual morbidity related to coverage of the ophthalmic artery by the device. Our objective was to evaluate clinical and angiographic outcomes associated with FD treatment of these aneurysms, with particular emphasis on visual morbidity.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the endovascular databases at 2 US centers to identify consecutive patients with aneurysms along the ophthalmic segment of the ICA that were treated with FDs between January 2010 and December 2022. Baseline demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and periprocedural and postprocedural data, including the occurrence of visual complications, were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen patients with 113 aneurysms were identified for inclusion in this study. The mean age of the patients was 59.5 ± 12.4 years, and 103 (91.2%) were women. The ophthalmic artery origin was involved in 40 (35.4%) aneurysms, consisting of a neck origin in 33 (29.2%) and a dome origin in 7 (6.2%). New transient visual morbidity during the hospital stay included impaired visual acuity or blurriness in 1 (0.9%) patient, diplopia in 1 (0.9%), and floaters in 1 (0.9%). New transient visual morbidity during follow-up included impaired visual acuity or blurriness in 5 patients (4.4%), diplopia in 3 (2.7%), ipsilateral visual field defect in 1 (0.9%), and floaters in 6 (5.3%). Permanent visual morbidity occurred in 1 patient (0.9%). Among the 101 patients who had angiographic follow-up, the Raymond-Roy occlusion classifications were I (complete aneurysm occlusion) in 85 (84.2%), II (residual neck) in 11 (10.9%), and III (residual aneurysm) in 5 (4.9%).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, flow diversion for ICA ophthalmic segment aneurysms resulted in low rates of visual morbidity, which was mostly transient in occurrence.

Safety and Efficacy of Low-Profile Braided Stents versus Flow Diverters in the Reconstructive Technique in the Treatment of Patients with Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia Aneurysms: A Cohort of 47 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysm is a rare type of cerebrovascular disorder with a poor natural history, and endovascular treatment is widely accepted. Whether a high-profile braided stent (flow diverter) could promote occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysm without increasing the complications rather than a low-profile braided stent remains uncertain. The aim of the study was to present a single-center experience of the safety and efficacy of a low-profile braided stent versus a flow diverter in treating patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective review was conducted on a total of 432 consecutive patients diagnosed with posterior circulation aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment in our center from August 2013 to December 2021. Among these patients, 47 individuals with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms who were treated with low-profile braided stents or flow diverters were included. Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms involving only the vertebral artery were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the low-profile braided stent group and the flow diverter group based on the device used. Safety and efficacy outcomes were subsequently analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 25 total patients enrolled in low-profile braided stent group and 22 patients in flow diverter group. The safety of low-profile braided stents and flow diverters in the treatment of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms was evaluated by clinical outcome, a new neurologic deficit due to procedural complications, and neurologic death. The rates of good clinical outcome were similar between the 2 groups (low-profile braided stent, 56%, versus flow diverter, 59.1%; P = .831), and the rates of neurologic death were also similar (low-profile braided stent, 12%, versus flow diverter, 9.1%; P = .747). Higher rates of new neurologic deficits due to procedural complications were observed in the flow diverter group, but the difference was not significant (low-profile braided stent, 24%, versus flow diverter, 40.9%; P = .215). The efficacy was evaluated by angiographic occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms and progression of mass effect resulting from these aneurysms. Significantly higher rates of complete occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms were shown in the flow diverter group (41.2%; P = .028) than in the low-profile braided stent group (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both low-profile braided stents and flow diverters have similar high risks in reconstructive techniques in the treatment of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms, while a flow diverter is more effective in promoting complete occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysm than a low-profile braided stent. A flow diverter may be a better alternative for carefully selected patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms.

In situ interposition bypass for complex intracranial aneurysms: A single-center experience and efficacy analysis

The purpose of this study was to investigate the application and efficacy analysis of in situ interposition bypass in complex intracranial aneurysms. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 21 patients with complex intracranial aneurysms treated with in situ interposition bypass grafting in the Department of Neurosurgery at Tianjin Huanhu Hospital from June 2015 to December 2022. The aneurysms were located in the middle cerebral artery in 16 cases, the anterior cerebral artery in 3 cases, the posterior cerebral artery in 1 case, and the posterior inferior cerebellar artery in 1 case. The interposition graft vessels were taken from the radial artery in 15 cases, the superficial temporal artery in 5 cases, and the occipital artery in 1 case. All patients underwent end-to-end anastomosis with in situ interposition bypass after aneurysm resection, including 13 cases of "I-shaped" type, 5 cases of "V-shaped" type, and 3 cases of "Y-shaped" type. Postoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) reviews were performed for all the patients, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used to assess patient prognosis. Three patients developed postoperative basal ganglia infarction and two of them recovered well. One case developed transient incomplete aphasia and one case developed mild hemiparesis, which recovered well after 3 months. The remaining 16 patients did not develop new neurological deficits. Postoperative DSA or CTA showed that the anastomosis of the bypass graft and the graft vessels were patent, and all aneurysms were completely eliminated. Regular postoperative follow-up ranged from 3 to 89 months, and no aneurysm recurred. The percentage of patients with mRS ≤ 2 at the final follow-up was 90.5%. Based on the experience of surgical treatment in our center, in situ interposition bypass technique is a safe and effective option for the treatment of some complex intracranial aneurysms.

AneuGuide™ software-assisted vs. manual measurements in sizing for pipeline embolization device: An agreement study

Sizing of flow diverters (FDs) is a challenging task in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms due to their foreshortening behavior. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference between the sizing results from the AneuGuide™ software and from conventional 2D measurement. Ninety-eight consecutive patients undergoing pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment between October 2018 and April 2023 in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China) were retrospectively analyzed. For all cases, the optimal PED dimensions were both manually determined through 2D measurements on pre-treatment 3D-DSA and computed by AneuGuide™ software. The inter-rater reliability between the two sets of sizing results for each methodology was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The degree of agreement between manual sizing and software sizing were analyzed with the Bland-Altman plot and Pearson's test. Differences between two methodologies were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. There was better inter-rater reliability between AneuGuide™ measurements both for diameter (ICC 0.92, 95%CI 0.88-0.95) and length (ICC 0.93, 95%CI 0.89-0.96). Bland-Altman plots showed a good agreement for diameter selection between two methodologies. However, the median length proposed by software group was significantly shorter (16 mm versus 20 mm, p < 0.001). No difference was found for median diameter (4.25 mm versus 4.25 mm). We demonstrated that the AneuGuide™ software provides highly reliable results of PED sizing compared with manual measurement, with a shorter stent length. AneuGuide™ may aid neurointerventionalists in selecting optimal dimensions for FD treatment.

Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Aneurysms: A Novel Classification of Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Origin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Flow diversion (FD) for posterior circulation aneurysms, such as proximal posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms, remains "off-label" and controversial. Although there are reports of using FD in the vertebral artery (VA) to treat PICA aneurysms, the differences between structural PICA-origin variants have not been explored. We analyzed PICA aneurysms treated with FD, assessed radiographic and clinical outcomes, and presented a novel classification of the PICA origin in relationship to aneurysm anatomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of prospective data for intracranial aneurysms treated with FD at a major academic institution from 2013 to 2022. Proximal PICA aneurysms that underwent FD placement in the V4 segment of the vertebral artery were included for analysis. A literature review was performed on PubMed to evaluate previously published cases. The PICA origin was characterized by 4 distinct subtypes. Type 1 describes the PICA originating adjacent/separate to the aneurysm neck, Type 2 with the PICA originating from the aneurysm neck, Type 3 with the PICA originating from the aneurysm dome, and Type 4 (True PICA aneurysm) with the aneurysm located proximally on PICA, distal to the PICA-VA junction.

RESULTS

Thirteen proximal PICA aneurysms were identified and included in the analysis. Patients were primarily female (76.9%), with a median age of 62 years. The aneurysm median maximum diameter was 5.8 mm. From the total sample (institutional and literature review cases), type 1 had a 100% complete and near-complete occlusion rate, type 2 had 75.0%, type 3 had 88.9%, and type 4 had 75%. The overall complete and near-complete occlusion rate was 83.3% (20/24).

CONCLUSION

FD in the V4 VA segment is an effective way to treat proximal PICA aneurysms. Exploring the relationship between PICA origin is a helpful method in predicting occlusion rates for proximal PICA aneurysms and may lead to improved treatment considerations.

Endovascular treatment for anterior inferior cerebellar artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA-PICA) common trunk variant aneurysms: Technical note and literature review

The Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (AICA-PICA) common trunk is a rare variant of cerebral posterior circulation in which a single vessel originating from either the basilar or vertebral arteries supplies both cerebellum and brainstem territories. We present the first case of an unruptured right AICA-PICA aneurysm treated with flow diversion using a Shield-enhanced pipeline endovascular device (PED, VANTAGE Embolization Device with Shield Technology, Medtronic, Canada). We expand on this anatomic variant and review the relevant literature. A 39-year-old man presented to our treatment center with vertigo and right hypoacusis. The initial head CT/CTA was negative, but a 4-month follow-up MRI revealed a 9 mm fusiform dissecting aneurysm of the right AICA. The patient underwent a repeat head CTA and cerebral angiogram, which demonstrated the presence of an aneurysm on the proximal portion of an AICA-PICA anatomical variant. This was treated with an endovascular approach that included flow diversion via a PED equipped with Shield Technology. The patient's post-procedure period was uneventful, and he was discharged home after two days with an intact neurological status. The patient is still asymptomatic after a 7-month follow-up, with MR angiogram evidence of stable aneurysm obliteration and no ischemic lesions. Aneurysms of the AICA-PICA common trunk variants have a high morbidity risk due to the importance and extent of the territory vascularized by a single vessel. Endovascular treatment with flow diversion proved to be both safe and effective in obliterating unruptured cases.

Pipeline versus Tubridge in the treatment of unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge flow diverter (TFD) for unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms.

METHODS

Posterior aneurysm patients treated with PED or TFD between January, 2019, and December, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment details, complications, and follow-up information were collected. The procedural-related complications and angiographic and clinical outcome were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were involved; PED was applied for 55 patients and TFD for 52 patients. A total of 9 (8.4%) procedural-related complications occurred, including 4 (7.3%) in PED group and 5 (9.6%) in TFD group. During a mean of 10.3-month angiographic follow-up for 81 patients, complete occlusion was achieved in 35 (85.4%) patients in PED group and 30 (75.0%) in TFD group. The occlusion rate of PED group is slightly higher than that of TFD group. A mean of 25.0-month clinical follow-up for 107 patients showed that favorable clinical outcome was achieved in 53 (96.4%) patients in PED group and 50 (96.2%) patients in TFD group, respectively. No statistical difference was found in terms of procedural-related complications (p = 0.737), occlusion rate (p = 0.241), and favorable clinical outcome (0.954) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found no difference in complication, occlusion, and clinical outcome between PED and TFD for unruptured PCAs.

External carotid artery-radial artery graft-posterior cerebral artery bypass for complex vertebrobasilar aneurysms: efficacy and analysis of outcome in a single center

The purpose of this research was to demonstrate the effectiveness and clinical outcome of an external carotid artery-radial artery graft-posterior cerebral artery (ECA-RAG-PCA) bypass in the treatment of complex vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms (VBANs) in a single-center retrospective study. An ECA-RAG-PCA bypass may be a last and very important option in the treatment of complex VBANs when conventional surgical clipping or endovascular interventions fail to achieve the desired outcome. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical presentation, case characteristics, aneurysm location, size and morphology, choice of surgical strategy, complications, clinical follow-up, and prognosis of the patients enrolled. The data involved were analyzed by the appropriate statistical methods. A total of 24 patients with complex VBANs who met the criteria were included in this study. Eighteen (75.0%) were male and the mean age was 54.1 ± 8.83 years. The aneurysms were located in the vertebral artery, the basilar artery, and in the vertebrobasilar artery with simultaneous involvement. All patients underwent ECA-RAG-PCA bypass surgery via an extended middle cranial fossa approach, with 8 (33.3%) undergoing ECA-RAG-PCA bypass only, 3 (12.5%) undergoing ECA-RAG-PCA bypass combined with aneurysm partial trapping, and 12 (50.0%) undergoing ECA-RAG-PCA bypass combined with proximal occlusion of the parent artery. The average clinical follow-up was 22.0 ± 13.35 months. The patency rate of the high-flow bypass was 100%. At the final follow-up, 15 (62.5%) patients had complete occlusion of the aneurysm, 7 (29.2%) patients had subtotal occlusion of the aneurysm, and 2 (8.3%) patients had stable aneurysms. The rate of complete and subtotal occlusion of the aneurysm at the final follow-up was 91.7%. The clinical prognosis was good in 21 (87.5%) patients and no procedure-related deaths occurred. Analysis of the good and poor prognosis groups revealed a statistically significant difference in aneurysm size (P = 0.034, t-test). Combining the results of this study and the clinical experience of our center, we propose a surgical algorithm and strategy for the treatment of complex VBANs.The technical approach of ECA-RAG-PCA bypass for complex VBANs remains important, even in an era of rapid advances in endovascular intervention. When conventional surgical clipping or endovascular intervention has failed, an ECA-RAG-PCA bypass plays a role that cannot be abandoned and is a very important treatment option of last resort.

Multiple telescoping flow diverter technique in endovascular treatment of a vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm: case report

A 64-year-old man presented with headache and dizziness. A vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm was identified via computed tomography angiography and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Perioperatively, standard oral dual antiplatelet drugs were given. Two flow diverters were telespcoped for endovascular treatment of the aneurysm. Postoperatively, there were no signs of cerebral infarction and no new symptoms. At the 6-month follow-up, digital subtraction angiography showed that the aneurysm was almost completely occluded, with no other complications. This case serves as a reference for using the multiple telescoping flow diverter technique to treat vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm.

Flow diversion for posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms is approximately 3% worldwide. Posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms have a higher risk of treatment complications than anterior circulation aneurysms. Improving the survival rate and quality of life of patients with PC aneurysms remains one of the most important issues in the field.

Objectives

Flow diverter (FD) treatment of PC aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the effects of FD treatment and analyze differences among different application methods or aneurysm types in PC aneurysms.

Design

This is a multicenter retrospective study.

Methods

Patients with PC aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED) or Tubridge embolization device (TED) between 2015 and 2020 in five neurovascular centers were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes were major perioperative complication, clinical outcome, and aneurysm occlusion rates. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of each outcome.

Results

In total, 252 aneurysms were included. Major perioperative complication, favorable clinical outcome, and complete occlusion rates were 7.5%, 91.0%, and 79.1%, respectively. Compared with other types of aneurysms, dissecting aneurysms had the best clinical outcome and highest occlusion rate. Both clinical and angiographic outcomes were independently associated with the aneurysm location at the basilar artery. Aneurysm size was not associated with any outcome. TED had similar clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with PED but more perioperative major complications. Tandem treatment and coiling assistance may have poorer clinical outcomes but similar occlusion rates. Single- and multiple-stent treatments had similar outcomes.

Conclusion

FD treatment of PC aneurysms achieved favorable clinical outcomes and long-term aneurysm occlusion rates with acceptable perioperative complication rates, especially in dissecting and non-basilar artery aneurysms. There was no additional improvement in outcomes with coiling assistance, multi-stent application, or tandem treatment. Therefore, the use of PC aneurysms should be carefully considered.

Treatment of fusiform aneurysms with a pipeline embolization device: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Intracranial fusiform aneurysms are less common than saccular aneurysms, but are associated with higher mortality and morbidity. We conducted this study to determine the safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device (PED) to treat intracranial fusiform aneurysms.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective, and observational study. Data for this study came from the PLUS study conducted from 2014 to 2019 across 14 centers in China. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of the occlusion rate and complication.

RESULTS

A total of 1171 consecutive patients with 1322 intracranial aneurysms participated in this study. Among the participants, 104 patients with 109 fusiform aneurysms were eligible for this analysis (mean age 49 years, 36.5% women, aneurysm mean size 14.7 mm, 55% in the posterior circulation, and 6% in the basilar artery). Mean follow-up time was 9.0 months (range 3-36 months). The last DSA angiographic follow-up was available for 85 patients, and 58 aneurysms (68.2%) were completely occluded. The overall complication rate and mortality were 17.3% and 2.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (OR=1.007, p=0.037) and cerebral atherosclerosis (OR=1.441, p=0.002) were associated with incomplete occlusion of fusiform aneurysms after PED treatment.

CONCLUSION

PEDs may be an effective treatment for intracranial fusiform aneurysms, with a favorable occlusion rate. However, because these treatments have a relatively high rate of complications, PED treatment for fusiform aneurysms should be carefully and strictly controlled. Our analysis showed that PEDs with adjunctive coiling did not significantly improve the occlusion rate of fusiform aneurysms.

Predictive Factors of Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Vertebrobasilar Fusiform Aneurysms

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of recurrence after endovascular treatment (EVT) for unruptured vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms (VBFA).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated 36 patients who underwent EVT of unruptured VBFA between 2008 and 2020. Variables influencing recurrence, such as size, type, thrombus, preoperative symptoms, and treatment methods, were analyzed. All patients were followed up using vessel imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 7 of 36 patients (19.4%) developed recurrence. The mean time from EVT to recurrence was 9.2 months (range 2-26.9 months). Maximum aneurysmal diameter on magnetic resonance imaging was decreased, increased, and remained unchanged in 1, 7, and 28 patients, respectively. Transitional type VBFA, brain compression symptoms, large aneurysmal diameter and length, preoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 2, sole stenting technique, and intra-aneurysmal thrombus significantly influenced the risk of recurrence. Post-EVT, 7 (19.4%) patients showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm on the immediate postoperative angiogram, and 22 (61.1%) patients showed complete occlusion on the 1‑year follow-up imaging. Good outcomes were observed in 32 patients (88.9%) at the last follow-up, with a mRS score of 0-1 after EVT.

CONCLUSION

EVT achieves good outcomes in unruptured VBFA. Transitional type VBFA, brain compression symptoms, large aneurysmal diameter and length, preoperative mRS score ≥ 2, sole stenting technique, and intra-aneurysmal thrombus are risk factors for aneurysm recurrence after EVT.

Single-Center Case Series of Simple Proximal Clipping for Large Thrombosed Vertebral Artery Aneurysms: Preservation of Perforating Arteries and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgical proximal parent artery occlusion (PAO) is one of the treatments for partially thrombosed vertebral artery aneurysms (PTVAs). However, whether long-term changes in size and perforating arteries through the blind end can be truly preserved remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgical proximal PAO for PTVAs, focusing on the transition in size and preservation of perforating arteries.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 14 consecutive cases of unruptured large PTVAs. The cases were treated with surgical proximal PAO without trapping or thrombectomy. Preservation of the perforating arteries was confirmed through intraoperative indocyanine green video angiography. The aneurysm size was evaluated by measuring the maximum diameter on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Post-treatment outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at the last follow-up examination.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (excluding 1 with morbidity) had a mean follow-up time of 33.2 months (range, 12-60 months) and a mean reduction rate of 71% (range, 32%-95%). Only 1 patient (7.2%) experienced postoperative stroke, and 13 patients (92.8%) showed no worsening of the modified Rankin Scale score at the final follow-up examination. The symptoms were improved in 5 of the 6 symptomatic patients (83.3%). In 10 patients (71.4%), a perforating branch that could not be identified on preoperative imaging was identified intraoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical proximal PAO without trapping or thrombectomy for PTVAs allows long-term reduction of aneurysm size and improves treatment safety by preserving the perforating artery, especially in cases wherein direct reconstruction is not feasible.

The Pipeline Embolization Device: a decade of lessons learned in the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms in a multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVE

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has prompted a paradigm shift in the approach to posterior circulation aneurysms. The year 2021 marks a decade since FDA approval of this flow diverter, and during this time operators have adapted to its off-label uses. The authors examined whether case selection, practice trends, and patient outcomes have changed over this 10-year period.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of consecutive posterior circulation aneurysms managed with the PED at four academic institutions in the US between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2021. Factors related to case selection, rates of aneurysm occlusion, or complications were identified and evaluated. Angiographic outcomes as well as thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications were investigated.

RESULTS

This study included 117 patients (median age 60 years). At a median follow-up of 12 months, adequate occlusion (> 90%) was attained in 73.2% of aneurysms. Aneurysm occlusion rates were similar over the study interval. Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications were reported in 12.0% and 6.0% of the procedures, respectively. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a decline in the rate of thromboembolic (14.1% in 2011-2015 vs 9.4% in 2016-2021, p = 0.443) and hemorrhagic (9.4% in 2011-2015 vs 1.9% in 2016-2021, p = 0.089) complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors observed a trend toward a decline in the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications with improved operator experience in using the PED for posterior circulation aneurysms. The use of single-device PED flow diversion significantly increased, as did the tendency to treat smaller aneurysms and observe large unruptured fusiform/dolichoectatic lesions. These findings reflect changes attributable to evolving judgment with maturing experience in PED use.

Learning Curve for Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Long-Term International Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion has gradually become a standard treatment for intracranial aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Recently, the off-label use of the flow diverters to treat posterior circulation aneurysms has also increased despite initial concerns of rupture and the suboptimal results. This study aimed to explore the change in complication rates and treatment outcomes across time for posterior circulation aneurysms treated using flow diversion and to further evaluate the mechanisms and variables that could potentially explain the change and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review using a standardized data set at multiple international academic institutions was performed to identify patients with ruptured and unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms treated with flow diversion during a decade spanning January 2011 to January 2020. This period was then categorized into 4 intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 378 procedures were performed during the study period. Across time, there was an increasing tendency to treat more vertebral artery and fewer large vertebrobasilar aneurysms (P = .05). Moreover, interventionalists have been increasingly using fewer overlapping flow diverters per aneurysm (P = .07). There was a trend toward a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic complications from 15.8% in 2011-13 to 8.9% in 2018-19 (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter experience revealed a trend toward treating fewer basilar aneurysms, smaller aneurysms, and increased usage of a single flow diverter, leading to a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.

The optimal management of ruptured basilar artery dissecting aneurysms: a case series and scoping review

The natural history of ruptured basilar artery dissecting aneurysms (BADAs) remains unclear compared to that of ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). In this study, we investigated the natural history and optimal management of ruptured BADAs. We identified 17 patients with ruptured BADA among 4586 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated in seven participating hospitals. A scoping literature review was undertaken to investigate prognostic factors. Six patients among the profiled patients (35.3%) died, all with poor SAH grades (World Federation of Neurological Societies Grade IV and V). Rebleeding after admission was observed in three patients (17.6%) with poor SAH grades. Aggressive treatment and conservative management were initiated in seven and ten patients, respectively. Patients with good SAH grades had significantly higher favorable treatment outcomes than those with poor grades (83.3% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.005). Moreover, based on a scoping review of 158 cases with ruptured BADA, including the patients from our series, approximately 90% of patients with good SAH grades had favorable outcomes. A good SAH grade and no rebleeding after admission were favorable prognostic factors (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The rebleeding rates were 20.2%, 13.3%, and 6.3% for dilated, pearl and string, and stenotic lesions, respectively. We concluded that the natural history of isolated ruptured BADAs may be better than that of VADAs. Although definitive treatment, if possible, is undoubtedly important, conservative management with careful radiological follow-up for morphological changes might be a viable option for patients in good clinical condition and with non-dilated lesions.

Triple therapy versus dual-antiplatelet therapy for dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms treated with flow diverters

Background

Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms (DVBFAs) have poor natural history when left untreated and high morbimortality when treated with microsurgery. Flow diversion (FD) with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is feasible but carries high risk of perforator occlusion and progression of brainstem compression. Elaborate antithrombotic strategies are needed to preserve perforator patency while vessel remodeling occurs. We compared triple therapy (TT (DAPT plus oral anticoagulation)) and DAPT alone in patients with DVBFAs treated with FD.

Methods

Retrospective comparison of DAPT and TT in patients with DVBFAs treated with FD at eight US centers.

Results

The groups (DAPT=13, TT=14) were similar in age, sex, clinical presentation, baseline disability, and aneurysm characteristics. Radial access use was significantly higher in the TT group (71.4% vs 15.3%; P=0.006). Median number of flow diverters and adjunctive coiling use were non-different between groups. Acute ischemic stroke rate during the oral anticoagulation period was lower in the TT group than the DAPT group (7.1% vs 30.8%; P=0.167). Modified Rankin Scale score decline was significantly lower in the TT group (7.1% vs 69.2%; P=0.001). Overall rates of hemorrhagic complications (TT, 28.6% vs DAPT, 7.7%; P=0.162) and complete occlusion (TT, 25% vs DAPT, 54.4%; P=0.213) were non-different between the groups. Rate of moderate-to-severe disability at last follow-up was significantly lower in the TT group (21.4% vs 76.9%; P=0.007).

Conclusions

Patients with DVBFAs treated with FD in the TT group had fewer ischemic strokes, less symptom progression, and overall better outcomes at last follow-up than similar patients in the DAPT group.

Outcomes of reconstructive endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms with intramural hematoma

Background

Vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (VBDAs) with an intramural hematoma (IMH) usually cause symptoms because of mass effect and grow in size over time. Clinical outcomes are generally poor.

Objective

This study aimed to examine outcomes of reconstructive endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with VBDAs with IMH. Safety and effectiveness were compared between flow diverters (FDs) and conventional stents.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological data of 36 VBDAs with IMH in 36 patients who underwent EVT with either FDs or conventional stents from January 2012 to December 2020 at our institution.

Results

Among the 36 study patients, 20 were treated with FDs and 16 with conventional stents. Incidence of procedure-related complications did not significantly differ between the two stents. IMH growth occurred after EVT in a significantly higher proportion of conventional stent group aneurysms (zero vs. 31.3% [5/16]; p = 0.012). Among the five aneurysms with IMHs that grew, all recurred. Change in IMH size after EVT was significantly lower in the FD group (−2.7 vs. +8.1%, p = 0.036). However, after the recurrent aneurysms were removed from the conventional stent group, change in IMH size did not significantly differ between the two groups (−2.7 vs. +1.0%, p = 0.332). The proportion of patients who experienced an improvement in mRS score after EVT was significantly higher in the FD group (60 vs. 25%, p = 0.036).

Conclusion

IMHs in VBDAs stop growing after successful reconstructive EVT. Although both FD and conventional stent treatment are effective, FD treatment may be superior based on clinical outcomes and effect on IMH size.

Multiple Pipeline Embolization Devices for the Treatment of Complex Intracranial Aneurysm: A Multi-Center Study

Background

The Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial primarily demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the implantation of multiple pipeline embolization devices (multi-PEDs) for large/giant intracranial aneurysms. However, no study has focused on when, why, or how to apply multi-PEDs.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the indications and strategies of using multi-PEDs for complex intracranial aneurysms.

Methods

Patients who had been treated with two or more PEDs were included in the post-market multicenter registry study from 2014 to 2019, across 14 centers in China. Indications, strategies, perioperative safety, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes comprehensively, and the O’Kelly–Marotta (OKM) grading scale was used to evaluate aneurysm healing results.

Results

A total of 55 intracranial aneurysms were treated with multi-PEDs. There were 20 fusiform aneurysms with a large range, 25 large/giant saccular aneurysms, six aneurysms with failed treatment, and four aneurysms with greatly varied diameters of the parent artery. The strategies included telescope techniques in 40 patients and overlap techniques in 15 patients. In total, 120 stents were deployed in 55 patients. The operation styles included 25 patients (55.6%) with two PEDs, 21 patients (38.2%) with two PEDs combined with coiling, four patients (7.3%) with three PEDs, four patients (7.3%) with three PEDs combined with coiling, and one patient (1.8%) with four PEDs. Angiography revealed OKM D in two, OKM C in seven, and OKM A and B in 46 cases after surgery. During the perioperative period, eight patients developed neurological dysfunction, three of whom died. A total of thirty-four patients were followed up with digital subtraction angiography for 2–45 (8.2 ± 8.0) months. Angiography revealed OKM D in 26, OKM C in five, and OKM B in three. At the last follow-up, the mRS score was 0–1 in 52 patients.

Conclusion

The treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms with multi-PEDs is safe and effective. The implantation of multi-PEDs could be considered for large-scale fusiform aneurysms, large/giant saccular aneurysms with a jet-sign, salvage of failed PED treatments, and in cases where the diameter of the parent artery varies greatly.

Anterior Circulation Fusiform Aneurysms Have a Lower Occlusion Rate After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment Than Posterior Circulation Fusiform Aneurysms: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Objective:

Intracranial fusiform aneurysms are uncommon and can occur in vessels of the anterior circulation (AC) or posterior circulation (PC). While flow diversion is one treatment option, research into Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) treatment is lacking. This study explored the efficacy and safety of PED treatment for intracranial fusiform aneurysms, and compared therapeutic effects between AC and PC aneurysms.

Methods

In the post-market multi-center cohort study of embolization of intracranial aneurysms with PED in China (PLUS) registry study, we retrospectively analyzed 71 fusiform aneurysms in 67 patients among 1,171 patients treated with a PED from November 2014 to October 2019. The general characteristics, perioperative status, aneurysm occlusion rate at the last follow-up angiography, and changes in modified Rankin Scale scores were analyzed. Aneurysms were divided into AC and PC groups, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

Results

The study included 26 AC (25 patients) and 45 PC (42 patients) aneurysms. A total of 75 PEDs were used, an average of 1.1 PEDs were used, and the median follow-up was 6.7 months. Fifty aneurysms (71.4%) were occluded and twenty (28.5%) were incompletely occluded. There were significantly more occluded aneurysms in the PC group than in the AC group (12 vs. 38; P = 0.001). Risk factors for incomplete occlusion were AC aneurysms (P = 0.001) and a perforating artery originating from the aneurysm (P = 0.006). The mean modified Rankin Scale score was significantly lower at the last follow up than preoperatively (0.58 vs. 0.21; P = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Non-overlapping PED is a safe and effective treatment for both AC and PC fusiform aneurysms. The occlusion rate of AC fusiform aneurysms is lower than that of PC.

Overlapping stents-assisted coiling for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm: LVIS stent within Neuroform EZ stent

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Safety and Efficacy of the Off-Label Use of Pipeline Embolization Device Based on the 2018 Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The pipeline embolization device (PED; ev3/Covidien) has proven safe and effective for treating selected intracranial aneurysms. This device's versatility and popularity have driven increased interest in expanding the latest 2018 Food and Drug Administration-approved indications.

OBJECTIVE

To compare "off-label" and "on-label" PED treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with PED at a single center from 2013 to 2019. Comparisons were made based on the 2018 Food and Drug Administration-approved indications.

RESULTS

A total of 492 treated aneurysms were included (65.2% on-label and 34.8% off-label). Aneurysm complete and near-complete occlusion rate was nonsignificantly lower in the off-label group (80.9% vs 85.7%; P = .19). Off-label treatment had higher rate of poor functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >2: 10.3% vs 3.5%; P = .002). Although pretreatment mRS was already higher in the off-label group (5.3% vs 0.3%; P < .001) and there were no differences in mRS worsening during follow-up (5.5% vs 2.9%; P = .15). We also found a trend to a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhagic complications in the off-label group (4.7% vs 1.6%; P = .05), but there were no differences in hemorrhages requiring surgical intervention (1.8% vs 1.3%; P = .65). There were no differences in retreatment, thromboembolic complications, and mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

Off-label PED treatment may be considered for select aneurysms, which are challenging to treat with other techniques. These cases have similar complete and near-complete occlusion rates compared with on-label cases. There are, however, higher risks of poor functional outcomes despite similar rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. This is partly explained by the significantly higher pretreatment mRS score in the off-label group.

Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Basilar Artery Aneurysms Using the Pipeline Embolization Device: Complications and Outcomes

Background

This study aimed to investigate clinical and angiographic outcomes of Pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment of large or giant basilar artery (BA) aneurysms and examine associated factors.

Methods

Clinical and angiographic data of 29 patients (18 men, 11 women) with large or giant BA aneurysms were retrospectively examined. Mean age was 44.1 ± 21.2 years (range, 30–68). Mean aneurysm size was 22.2 ± 8.3 mm (range, 12.0–40.1).

Results

Mean angiographic follow-up was 18.3 ± 3.4 months (range, 4.5–60). The rate of adequate aneurysmal occlusion (O'Kelly–Marotta grade C–D) was 87%. The overall complication rate was 44.8%; most complications (84.6%) occurred in the periprocedural period. Univariable comparison of patients who did and did not develop complications showed significant differences in aneurysm size (p < 0.01), intra-aneurysmal thrombus (p = 0.03), and mean number of PEDs used (p = 0.02). Aneurysm size (odds ratio, 1.4; p = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for periprocedural complications in multivariable analysis. Mean clinical follow-up was 23.5 ± 3.2 months (range, 0.1–65). Nine patients (31%) had a poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score ≥3) at last follow-up, including 7 patients who died. Univariable comparisons between patients with favorable and unfavorable clinical outcomes showed that aneurysm size (p = 0.009) and intra-aneurysmal thrombus (p = 0.04) significantly differed between the groups. Multivariable analysis showed that aneurysm size (odds ratio, 1.1; p = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for poor clinical outcome.

Conclusion

PED treatment of large or giant BA aneurysms is effective and can achieve a satisfactory long-term occlusion rate. However, the treatment complications are not negligible. Aneurysm size is the strongest predictor of perioperative complications and poor clinical outcome.

Pipeline embolization of proximal middle cerebral artery aneurysms: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion of aneurysms located in the M1 segment and middle cerebral artery bifurcation with Pipeline embolization device is sometimes performed, but further study is needed to support its regular use in aneurysm treatment. Here, we report measures of safety and efficacy for Pipeline embolization in the proximal middle cerebral artery in a multi-center cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and angiographic data of eligible patients were retrospectively obtained from participating centers and assessed for key clinical and angiographic outcomes. Additional details were extracted for patients with complications.

RESULTS

In our multi-center cohort, complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 71% (17/24) of treated aneurysms. There were no deaths or disabling strokes, but non-disabling ischemic strokes occurred in 8% (2/24) of patients. For aneurysms in the M1 segment, complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 75% (12/16) of aneurysms, aneurysm volume reduction was observed in 100% (16/16) of aneurysms, and non-disabling ischemic strokes occurred in 13% (2/16) of patients. For aneurysms at the middle cerebral artery bifurcation, complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 63% (5/8) of aneurysms, aneurysm volume reduction occurred in 88% (7/8) of aneurysms, and ischemic or hemorrhagic complications occurred in 0% (0/8) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms in the M1 segment and middle cerebral artery bifurcation demonstrated a 71% rate of complete aneurysm occlusion. There were no deaths or disabling strokes, but there was an 8% rate of non-disabling ischemic strokes.

Can Endovascular Treatment of Fusiform Intracranial Aneurysms Restore the Healthy Hemodynamic Environment?–A Virtual Pilot Study

Numerous studies assess intracranial aneurysm rupture risk based on morphological and hemodynamic parameter analysis in addition to clinical information such as aneurysm localization, age, and sex. However, intracranial aneurysms mostly occur with a saccular shape located either lateral to the parent artery or at a bifurcation. In contrast, fusiform intracranial aneurysms (FIAs), i.e., aneurysms with a non-saccular, dilated form, occur in approximately 3–13% of all cases and therefore have not yet been as thoroughly studied. To improve the understanding of FIA hemodynamics, this pilot study contains morphological analyses and image-based blood flow simulations in three patient-specific cases. For a precise and realistic comparison to the pre-pathological state, each dilation was manually removed and the time-dependent blood flow simulations were repeated. Additionally, a validated fast virtual stenting approach was applied to evaluate the effect of virtual endovascular flow-diverter deployment focusing on relevant hemodynamic quantities. For two of the three patients, post-interventional information was available and included in the analysis. The results of this numerical pilot study indicate that complex flow structures, i.e., helical flow phenomena and the presence of high oscillating flow features, predominantly occur in FIAs with morphologically differing appearances. Due to the investigation of the individual healthy states, the original flow environment could be restored which serves as a reference for the virtual treatment target. It was shown that the realistic deployment led to a considerable stabilization of the individual hemodynamics in all cases. Furthermore, a quantification of the stent-induced therapy effect became feasible for the treating physician. The results of the morphological and hemodynamic analyses in this pilot study show that virtual stenting can be used in FIAs to quantify the effect of the planned endovascular treatment.

A Case Report on the Progressive Hunterian Ligation of an Intracranial Aneurysm by Flow Diversion: The Endovascular Selverstone Clamp

Proximal Hunterian ligation remains a treatment option for select complex brain aneurysms. Progressive occlusion over time (as accomplished with Selverstone clamping) can enable collateral flow to develop while the aneurysm regresses or occludes.

A 50-year-old woman presented with an unruptured 16-mm posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm. The aneurysm was located 4 mm distal to the PICA origin. It was bilobed, incorporating the PICA. The PICA inflow and outflow zone orientation prevented direct stent reconstruction. Surgical clipping with bypass was considered. Alternatively, an attempt at proximal ligation of the PICA via flow-diverting stents was offered. After extensive counseling, the patient decided to proceed with endovascular treatment.

Two overlapping pipeline embolization devices (PED) were placed into the vertebral artery, covering the PICA origin. The one-year follow-up angiography demonstrated flow reduction within the aneurysm and the distal PICA. A de novo (previously not opacified) accessory PICA collateral had developed, partially taking over the arterial supply of the PICA territory. The newly established accessory PICA originated from the vertebral artery 8 mm distal to the PICA origin. After two years, the aneurysm was fully obliterated, and the true PICA was occluded and functionally replaced by the accessory PICA.

The current case suggests that progressive Hunterian ligation via endovascular flow diversion can be an effective treatment strategy for true PICA aneurysms. However, this strategy should only be considered if no immediate aneurysm occlusion is required or if all alternative methods are associated with substantial risk.

Endovascular Management of Hemorrhagic Stroke

Significant advances in endovascular neurosurgery tools, devices, and techniques are changing the approach to the management of acute hemorrhagic stroke. The endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms emerged in the early 1990s with Guglielmi detachable coils, and since then, it gained rapid popularity that surpassed open surgery. Stent-assisted coiling and balloon remodeling techniques have made the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms more durable. With the introduction of flow diverters and flow disrupters, many aneurysms with complex geometrics can now be reliably managed. Arteriovenous malformations and fistulae can also benefit from endovascular therapy by embolization using n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA), Onyx, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and coils. In this article, we describe the role of endovascular treatment for the most common causes of intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhages, particularly ruptured aneurysms and vascular malformations.

Comprehensive review of the recent advances in devices for endovascular treatment of complex brain aneurysms

The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) showed superiority for endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms and technology has since moved on rapidly. Many approaches and technology now exist for the endovascular management of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, which reflects their varied nature - there is no one-size-fits-all technique. We aim to provide an overview of the various classes of device and the major developments over the past decade. Coiling is the oldest of the technology and continues to demonstrate high levels of occlusion and acceptable risks, making it the default treatment choice, particularly in the acutely ruptured aneurysm setting. Advances on coiling include the use of adjuncts such as balloons, stents and fully retrievable temporary neck-bridging devices, which have facilitated the treatment of more complex aneurysms. Flow divertors have also revolutionised complex aneurysm treatment with small added risk in acute aneurysm treatment and seek to remodel the aneurysm-vessel interface without accessing the aneurysm sac. The latest development and most promising avenue appears to be intrasaccular flow disrupting devices like WEB, Contour and Neqstent that provide excellent opportunities to treat wide neck complex aneurysm with minimal mortality and morbidity and good occlusion rates and may in future replace a significant number of stent-assisted coiling too.

Pipeline embolization of MCA aneurysms in the M2-M4 segment: Dual center study and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Flow diversion of distal MCA aneurysms in the M2-M4 segments with Pipeline embolization device is promising, but further study is needed. Here, we seek to quantify the safety and efficacy of Pipeline embolization in the M2-M4 region in a dual-center cohort and comprehensive meta-analysis.

METHODS

Clinical and angiographic data of eligible patients was obtained from participating centers. A systematic review was performed with searches of Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles from inception to May 2021. 86 studies were identified in systematic review. Of these, 7 studies with 46 aneurysms met the inclusion criteria and were aggregated with 8 aneurysms from our dual-center cohort for analysis.

RESULTS

In our dual-center cohort, complete occlusion was observed in 88% (7/8) of aneurysms, and no patients experienced hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications. Clinical outcomes were reported for 100% (54/54) of aneurysms included in meta-analysis and angiographic follow-up was available for 91% (49/54). The overall rate of complete aneurysm occlusion was 80% (95% CI, 69-91%), and the overall rate of clinical complication was 9% (95% CI, 2-16%).

CONCLUSION

Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms of the M2-M4 segments of the MCA was reasonably effective and safe in a small group of selected patients, but further study is needed to validate these preliminary results.

Pipeline embolization of distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion is commonly used to treat intracranial aneurysms in various regions of the cerebral vasculature, but is only approved for use in the internal carotid arteries. Treatment of distal PICA aneurysms with PED is sometimes performed but has not been well studied. Here, we report our experience with flow diversion of distal PICA aneurysms with PED.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and angiographic data of eligible patients was retrospectively obtained and assessed for key demographic characteristics and clinical and angiographic outcomes. Principal outcomes included rates of aneurysm occlusion, ischemic or hemorrhagic complication, technical complication, and in-stent stenosis.

RESULTS

Three female and 2 male patients underwent placement of PED in the PICA for treatment of 5 distal PICA aneurysms. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was obtained for all patients. Complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 100% (5/5) of treated aneurysms at 6 month and longest angiographic follow-up. While there were no ischemic or device-related complications, delayed hemorrhagic complications occurred in 20% (1/5) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Pipeline embolization of distal PICA aneurysms can be performed in select patients. Further study is necessary in larger cohorts to better define clinical scenarios in which flow diversion in the distal PICA should be considered.

Repeat Flow Diversion for Cerebral Aneurysms Failing Prior Flow Diversion: Safety and Feasibility From Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aneurysmal persistence after flow diversion (FD) occurs in 5% to 25% of aneurysms, which may necessitate retreatment. There are limited data on safety/efficacy of repeat FD-a frequently utilized strategy in such cases.

METHODS

A series of consecutive patients undergoing FD retreatment from 15 centers were reviewed (2011-2019), with inclusion criteria of repeat FD for the same aneurysm at least 6 months after initial treatment, with minimum of 6 months post-retreatment imaging. The primary outcome was aneurysmal occlusion, and secondary outcome was safety. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify predictors of incomplete occlusion (90%-99% and <90% occlusion) versus complete occlusion (100%) after retreatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients (median age, 57 years; 81% women) harboring 95 aneurysms underwent 198 treatment procedures. Majority of aneurysms were unruptured (87.4%), saccular (74.7%), and located in the internal carotid artery (79%; median size, 9 mm). Median elapsed time between the first and second treatment was 12.2 months. Last available follow-up was at median 12.8 months after retreatment, and median 30.6 months after the initial treatment, showing complete occlusion in 46.2% and near-complete occlusion (90%-99%) in 20.4% of aneurysms. There was no difference in ischemic complications following initial treatment and retreatment (4.2% versus 4.2%; P>0.99). On multivariable regression, fusiform morphology had higher nonocclusion odds after retreatment (odds ratio [OR], 7.2 [95% CI, 1.97-20.8]). Family history of aneurysms was associated with lower odds of nonocclusion (OR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.04-0.78]). Likewise, positive smoking history was associated with lower odds of nonocclusion (OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.1-0.86]). History of hypertension trended toward incomplete occlusion (OR, 3.10 [95% CI, 0.98-6.3]), similar to incorporated branch into aneurysms (OR, 2.78 [95% CI, 0.98-6.8]).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat FD for persistent aneurysms carries a reasonable success/safety profile. Satisfactory occlusion (100% and 90%-99% occlusion) was encountered in two-thirds of patients, with similar complications between the initial and subsequent retreatments. Fusiform morphology was the strongest predictor of retreatment failure.

Microsurgical Treatment Strategy of Vertebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysm-From the Standpoint of Hemodynamic Integrity and Perforator Preservation

During treatment of vertebral artery (VA) fusiform aneurysms, it is critical to preserve peripheral perforators and anterograde blood flow of the VA and to reduce hemodynamic load to the contralateral VA. Even in the era of endovascular treatment, there are still many benefits to using microsurgical treatments with appropriate clip application and preservation of the perforators around the aneurysm, in conjunction with various bypass techniques. The ideal microsurgical technique involves reconstructive clipping that obliterates the aneurysm but preserves anterograde blood flow of the VA, followed by isolation of the aneurysm and VA reconstruction. If these two methods are unavailable, proximal clipping of the aneurysm combined with flow-augmentation bypass to the distal branch can be considered as an alternative surgical management. We discuss the microsurgical treatment of unruptured VA fusiform aneurysms in our surgical cases on the basis of a review of the current literature.

Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: Systematic Review of Disaggregated Individual Patient Data

BACKGROUND

Experience with endoluminal flow diversion for the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms is limited.

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate factors associated with the safety and efficacy of this treatment by collecting disaggregated patient-level data from the literature.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid were searched up through 2019 for articles reporting flow diversion of posterior circulation aneurysms.

STUDY SELECTION

Eighty-four studies reported disaggregated data for 301 separate posterior circulation aneurysms.

DATA ANALYSIS

Patient, aneurysm, and treatment factors were collected for each patient. Outcomes included the occurrence of major complications, angiographic occlusion, and functional outcomes based on the mRS.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Significant differences in aneurysm and treatment characteristics were seen among different locations. Major complications occurred in 22%, angiographic occlusion was reported in 65% (11.3 months of mean follow-up), and good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) were achieved in 67% (13.3 months of mean follow-up). Multivariate analysis identified age, number of flow diverters used, size, and prior treatment to be associated with outcome measures. Meta-analysis combining the current study with prior large nondisaggregated series of posterior circulation aneurysms treated with flow diversion found a pooled incidence of 20% (n = 712 patients) major complications and 75% (n = 581 patients) angiographic occlusions.

LIMITATIONS

This study design is susceptible to publication bias. Use of antiplatelet therapy was not uniformly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoluminal flow diversion is an important tool in the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. Patient age, aneurysm size, prior treatment, and the number of flow diverters used are important factors associated with complications and outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of flow diverters in posterior circulation aneurysms and comparison with their efficacy in anterior circulation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of flow-diverter stents (FDs) in the management of posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms and compare FD efficacy between anterior and posterior circulation aneurysms.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies through March 2020. Studies assessing FDs for posterior circulation aneurysms that included ≥20 treated aneurysms were included. Moreover, the studies compared FD efficacy between anterior and posterior circulation aneurysms were included. Data regarding angiographic aneurysmal occlusion, procedural complications, mortality, and morbidity were extracted and pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 659 patients and 676 posterior circulation aneurysms were included. The pooled rate of aneurysmal occlusion at long-term angiographic follow-up was 78% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71-85]. The pooled rates of intraparenchymal hemorrhage, ischemia, and procedure-related mortality and neurological morbidity were 2%, 8%, 7%, and 6%, respectively. Complete occlusion occurred in 82.4% of the posterior circulation aneurysm subgroup and 77.5% of the anterior circulation aneurysm subgroup. The difference was not significant (relative risk 1.01; 95% CI, 0.86-1.19; p = 0.91). Regression analysis showed that elderly patients and females had higher morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Posterior circulation aneurysms can be effectively treated with FDs with comparable occlusion rates to those in anterior circulation aneurysms. However, periprocedural complications are not negligible.

Selection of approach and bypass for fetal-type posterior cerebral artery aneurysm: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Unlike in aneurysms of the adult-type posterior cerebral artery (PCA), in aneurysms of the fetal-type PCA, parent artery occlusion (PAO) results in vascular insufficiency and major ischemic strokes. Preservation or reconstruction of fetal-type PCAs is necessary to prevent these complications. Furthermore, it is necessary to select an appropriate bypass method and approach for revascularization of the PCA.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors report 2 cases of aneurysms of fetal-type PCAs that were successfully treated with PAO with revascularization. A 38-year-old man with a large unruptured right PCA aneurysm at the postcommunicating (P2) segment underwent trapping with superficial temporal artery–PCA bypass via the anterior temporal and subtemporal approaches. In addition, a 45-year-old woman with a left PCA aneurysm at the quadrigeminal (P3)–cortical (P4) segments resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage underwent proximal clipping of the P3 segment via the occipital interhemispheric approach with an occipital artery–PCA bypass. Although she had perforator infarction, major ischemic stroke was prevented, and aneurysm occlusion was accomplished in both cases.

LESSONS

Aneurysms of fetal-type PCAs pose a risk of ischemia due to PAO. The combined use of bypass and revascularization should be considered to prevent major ischemic stroke after occlusion of the fetal-type PCA. However, perforator infarction is a concern.

Treatment of posterior circulation fusiform aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Perforator arteries, the absence of an aneurysm discrete neck, and the often-extensive nature of posterior circulation fusiform aneurysms present treatment challenges. There have been advances in microsurgical and endovascular approaches, including flow diversion, and the authors sought to review these treatments in a long-term series at their neurovascular referral center.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective chart review from 1990 to 2018. Primary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores at follow-up. The authors also examined neurological complication rates. Using regression techniques, they reviewed independent and dependent variables, including presenting features, aneurysm location and size, surgical approach, and pretreatment and posttreatment thrombosis.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 53 years, and 49 (58%) were female. Forty-one (49%) patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Aneurysms were located on the vertebral artery (VA) or posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) in 50 (60%) patients, basilar artery (BA) or vertebrobasilar junction (VBJ) in 22 (26%), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) in 12 (14%). Thirty-one (37%) patients were treated with microsurgical and 53 (63%) with endovascular approaches. Six aneurysms were treated with endovascular flow diversion. The authors found moderate disability or better (mRS score ≤ 3) in 85% of the patients at a mean 14-month follow-up. The GOS score was ≥ 4 in 82% of the patients. The overall neurological complication rate was 12%. In the regression analysis, patients with VA or PICA aneurysms had better functional outcomes than the other groups (p < 0.001). Endovascular strategies were associated with better outcomes for BA-VBJ aneurysms (p < 0.01), but microsurgery was associated with better outcomes for VA-PICA and PCA aneurysms (p < 0.05). There were no other significant associations between patient, aneurysm characteristics, or treatment features and neurological complications (p > 0.05). Patients treated with flow diversion had more complications than those who underwent other endovascular and microsurgical strategies, but the difference was not significant in regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior circulation fusiform aneurysms remain a challenging aneurysm subtype, but an interdisciplinary treatment approach can result in good outcomes. While flow diversion is a useful addition to the armamentarium, traditional endovascular and microsurgical techniques continue to offer effective options.

Endovascular treatment of vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms with low-profile visualized intraluminal support device

Background

The Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) device is a self-expanding, nitinol, single-braid, closed-cell device that was recently developed for endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms. However, current knowledge regarding the use of LVIS devices to treat vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms is limited. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the LVIS device for treating vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2017, patients with vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms treated using LVIS stents were enrolled in this study. We analyzed patients’ demographic, clinical and aneurysmal characteristics, procedural details, complications, and angiographic and clinical follow-up results.

Results

We identified 63 patients with 64 vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms who underwent treatment with (n = 59) or without (n = 5) LVIS stenting, including 10 patients with ruptured aneurysms. Forty-one aneurysms were located at the vertebral artery, and 23 at the basilar artery. Intraprocedural-related complications developed in three (4.8%) patients, while none of these patients developed morbidities or died during follow-up. Three patients developed post-procedural complications (4.8%). Two patients experienced ischemic events immediately post-procedure. A minor permanent morbidity developed in one of the two patients (1.6%). The mortality rate was 1.6%, for that the patient died of brainstem hemorrhage after 1 month of follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 12.5 months, 39/43 (90.7%) patients had stable or improved aneurysms, and four (9.3%) had recanalized.

Conclusions

LVIS device of vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms may be an acceptable safety profile and may represent a reasonable treatment option in the short-term. Long-term and larger cohort studies are necessary to validate our results.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02180-1.

Flow-related posterior cerebral artery aneurysms with internal carotid artery occlusions: An institutional series

BACKGROUND

Aneurysm formation after internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion has been described in animal models and human case series with alteration of cerebral blood flow dynamics considered an aetiological risk factor. Such de novo aneurysms have seldom been described in the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) with the majority observed in the anterior circulation collateral pathways.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database of posterior circulation aneurysms in patients with iatrogenic, atherosclerotic or congenital ICA occlusions. A comprehensive review of the online literature using the PubMed and Medline databases was performed to identify previous cases of PCA aneurysms that were considered 'flow-related'.

RESULTS

We present five patients with symptomatic or ruptured PCA aneurysms with ICA occlusions. Age at presentation ranged from 21-58 and aneurysm size from 3-12 mm. All cases had angiographic evidence of posterior-anterior flow via the ipsilateral posterior communicating artery (PComA). The clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging and management strategies are further discussed. A literature review identified only two previous reported cases.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this is the first single centre series of posterior circulation aneurysms in patients with ICA occlusions that are considered to be 'flow-related.' The natural history of these rare lesions is unclear and the best management and surveillance strategy requires a patient-tailored approach by an experienced neurovascular team.

Vertebral artery aneurysms and the risk of cord infarction following spinal artery coverage during flow diversion

OBJECTIVE

Coverage of the anterior spinal artery (ASA) ostia is a source of considerable consternation regarding flow diversion (FD) in vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms due to cord supply. The authors sought to assess the association between coverage of the ASA, posterior spinal artery (PSA), or lateral spinal artery (LSA) ostia when placing flow diverters in distal VAs and clinical outcomes, with emphasis on cord infarction.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study of 7 institutions in which VA aneurysms were treated with FD between 2011 and 2019 was performed. The authors evaluated the risk of ASA and PSA/LSA occlusion, associated thromboembolic complication, complications overall, aneurysm occlusion status, and functional outcome.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with 63 VA and posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms treated with FD were identified. The median aneurysm diameter was 7 mm and fusiform type was the commonest morphology (42.9%). During a procedure, 1 (61.7%) or 2 (33.3%) flow diverters were placed. Complete occlusion was achieved in 71.9%. Symptomatic thromboembolic complications occurred in 7.4% of cases and intracranial hemorrhage in 10.0% of cases. The ASA and PSA/LSA were identified in 51 (80.9%) and 35 (55.6%) complications and covered by the flow diverter in 29 (56.9%) and 13 (37.1%) of the procedures, respectively. Patency after flow diverter coverage on last follow-up was 89.2% for ASA and 100% for PSA/LSA, not significantly different between covered and noncovered groups (p = 0.5 and p > 0.99, respectively). No complications arose from coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

FD aneurysm treatment in the posterior circulation with coverage of ASA or PSA/LSA was not associated with higher rates of occlusion of these branches or any instances of cord infarction.

Junctional dilatation of the basilar tip: A Normal anatomical variant with a benign natural history

PURPOSE

The intracranial arterial vasculature has numerous anatomical variants, which vary from largely benign to having remarkable clinical implications. The significance of a lesser known variant described as a junctional dilatation of the basilar artery tip has not yet been described in the literature.

METHODS

Retrospective query of radiology imaging reports was performed for vascular specific imaging of the head, which included descriptions related to the basilar junctional dilatation variant from 2005 to 2019 at a single institution. Imaging studies were individually scrutinized for true presence of the variant, and were assessed for any change in appearance over time. Primary data-points collected included length of time between imaging studies with stable appearance, intracranial aneurysm incidence, and frequency of hemorrhage associated with aneurysm rupture.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with multiple vascular exams were found to have the typical appearance of the basilar junctional dilatation variant. The variant was found to be stable over time in all patients, without interval expansion or basilar tip aneurysm development. Interval follow-up ranged from 1 to 156 months, with a mean follow-up length of 3.83 years, and total patient-years of follow-up of 192. No adverse neurological events were found which could be attributed to the basilar junctional dilatation variant.

CONCLUSION

Junctional dilatation of the basilar artery tip is a benign, normal variant of the posterior intracranial arterial circulation. It is important for both radiologists and clinicians to recognize its characteristic appearance and benign nature, as misdiagnosis may lead to unnecessary work-up, imaging, and/or treatment.

Twisting: Incidence and Risk Factors of an Intraprocedural Challenge Associated With Pipeline Flow Diversion of Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic) "twisting" manifests with the appearance of a "figure 8" in perpendicular planes on digital subtraction angiography. This phenomenon has received little attention in the literature, requires technical precision to remediate, and has potential to cause ischemic stroke if not properly remediated.

OBJECTIVE

To report incidence, risk factors, and sequelae of PED twisting and to discuss techniques to remediate a PED twist.

METHODS

Case images were reviewed for instances of twisting from a prospectively-maintained, Institutional Review Board-approved cohort of patients undergoing flow diversion for cerebral aneurysm.

RESULTS

From August 2011 to December 2017, 999 PED flow diverting stents were attempted in 782 cases for 653 patients. A total of 25 PED twists were observed while treating 20 patients (2.50%, 25/999). Multivariate analysis revealed predictors of twisting to be: Large and giant aneurysms (odds ratio (OR) = 9.66, P = .005; OR = 27.47, P < .001), increased PED length (OR = 1.14, P < .001), and advanced patient age (OR = 1.07, P = .002). Twisted PEDs were able to be remediated 75% of the time, and procedural success was achieved in 90% of cases. PED twisting was not found to be a significant cause of major or minor complications. However, at long-term follow-up, there was a trend towards poor occlusion outcomes for the cases that encountered twisting.

CONCLUSION

Twisting is a rare event during PED deployment that was more likely to occur while treating large aneurysms with long devices in older patients. While twisting did not lead to major complications in this study, remediation can be challenging and may be associated with inferior occlusion outcomes.