1
|
Ohtakara K, Suzuki K. Proposal of an Alternative Near-Minimum Isodose Surface DV-0.01 cc Equally Minimizing Gross Tumor Volume Below the Relevant Dose as the Basis for Dose Prescription and Evaluation of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases. Cureus 2024; 16:e57580. [PMID: 38707120 PMCID: PMC11069632 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis (BM), the prescribed dose is generally reported as a minimum dose to cover a specific percentage (e.g. D98%) of the gross tumor volume (GTV) with or without a margin or an unspecified intended marginal dose to the GTV boundary. In dose prescription to a margin-added planning target volume (PTV), the GTV marginal dose is likely variable and unclear. This study aimed to reveal major flaws of dose prescription to a fixed % coverage of a target volume (TV), such as GTV D98% or PTV D95%, and to propose an alternative. Materials and methods Seven quasi-spherical models with volumes ranging from 1.00 to 15.00 cc were assumed as GTVs. The GTVs and the volumes generated by adding isotropic 1- and 2-mm margins to the GTV boundaries (GTV + 1 and 2 mm) were used for SRS planning, dose prescription, and evaluation. Volumetric-modulated arcs with a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator were used to optimize each SRS plan to ensure the steepest dose gradient outside each TV boundary. In dose prescription to the GTV D98%, 0.02-0.3 cc of the GTV is below the prescribed dose, and the volume increases with larger GTVs. The volume below the prescribed dose should be less than the equivalent of a 3-mm-diameter lesion, i.e. 0.01 cc. Therefore, DV-0.01 cc was defined as an alternative near-minimum dose for which the TV below a relevant dose is less than 0.01 cc. Four different dose prescriptions, including the GTV DV-0.01 cc, were compared using specific doses in 1, 3, and 5 fractions, equivalent to 80, 60, and 50 Gy, respectively, as biologically effective doses (BEDs) to the boundaries of GTV, GTV + 1 mm, and GTV + 2 mm, respectively. Results Dose prescription to the GTV DV-0.01 cc corresponds to 95.0, 98.0, and 99.0-99.93% coverages for the GTV of 0.20, 0.50, and 1.00-15.00 cc, respectively. The GTV DV-0.01 cc varied substantially and decreased significantly as the GTV increased in dose prescriptions to the GTV D98%, GTV + 1 mm D95%, and GTV + 2 mm D95%. The GTV + 2 mm DV-0.01 cc increased significantly as the GTV increased, except for the dose prescription to the GTV + 2 mm D95% with a decreasing tendency. When comparing BED-based specific dose prescriptions, dose prescription to the GTV DV-0.01 cc was optimal in terms of the following: 1) consistency of the near-minimum dose of GTV; 2) the highest BED at 2 mm outside the GTV, except for 1.00 cc GTV, and the rational increase with increasing GTV; and 3) the highest BED at 2 mm inside the GTV. In dose prescription with the BED of 80 Gy in 1 fraction and 5 fractions to the GTV DV-0.01 cc, the GTV limits were ≤1.40 and ≤8.46 cc, respectively, in order for the irradiated isodose volume not to exceed the proposed thresholds for minimizing the risk of brain radionecrosis. Conclusions Dose prescription to a fixed % coverage of a GTV with or without a margin leads to the substantially varied near-minimum dose at the GTV boundary, which significantly decreases with increasing GTV. Alternatively, GTV DV-0.01 cc with a variable coverage (D>95%) for >0.20 cc GTV and fixed D95% for ≤0.20 cc GTV is recommended as the basis for dose prescription and evaluation, along with supplemental evaluation of the marginal dose of the GTV plus a margin (e.g. GTV + 2 mm) to demonstrate the appropriateness of dose attenuation outside the GTV boundary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Ohtakara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Yatomi, JPN
- Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
| | - Kojiro Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Chen H, Chen Q, Zhu Y, Bai Z, Li M, Zhang W. Efficacy and safety of a "sandwich therapy" based on staged stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab for large brainstem metastases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 233:107911. [PMID: 37541158 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective therapeutic option for unresectable brainstem metastases. Currently, staged stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) has become available for large brainstem metastases(≥ 1 cm3) despite the limitation of peritumoral edema. The authors developed the so-called "sandwich therapy" which integrated 2-stage stereotactic radiosurgery (2-SSRS) with bevacizumab for peritumoral edema reduction and local control of large brainstem metastases. METHODS 42 patients with large brainstem metastases ≥1 cm3 who received 2-SSRS simultaneously with bevacizumab were screened from 2019 to 2021 retrospectively. The first SRS margin doses were 13 Gy (range 11-15) and the second SRS margin doses were 12 Gy (range 11-13), one-time vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor (bevacizumab) of 3.5-5 mg/kg was administrated intravenously the next day after the first SRS. The median interval between the two sessions of SRS was 6 days. Baseline demographics, clinical and radiology imaging follow-ups were recorded to determine symptomatic improvement, peritumoral edema reduction, local control, and disease progression. Median survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS The "sandwich therapy" was applied to 42 lesions. Significant reductions of tumor volume (p < 0.05) and peritumoral edema volume (p < 0.01) were achieved at the second SRS in comparison to those at the first SRS. The proportion of favorable Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) (≥80 %) increased significantly at early follow-up time points and reached the highest value of 85.7 %. The median survival time was 9.7 months, the median local control duration was 11.3 months. 8 acute adverse events of CTCAE grade 2 and 3 were observed in 6 patients and resolved with palliative treatment. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment was identified as a predictive factor for longer survival. CONCLUSION The "sandwich therapy" which integrates 2-SSRS with bevacizumab is a safe and effective option for large brainstem metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Wang
- Cancer Center, Department of Gamma Knife Treatment, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Haining Chen
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Anhui Provincial Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China
| | - Qun Chen
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center. Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Yucun Zhu
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Ming ji Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Zhennan Bai
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First People 's Hospital of Aksu Region, Aksu, Xinjiang, China
| | - Min Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Gamma Knife Treatment, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weihua Zhang
- Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carconi C, Cerreti M, Roberto M, Arrivi G, D'Ambrosio G, De Felice F, Di Civita MA, Iafrate F, Lucatelli P, Magliocca FM, Picchetto A, Picone V, Catalano C, Cortesi E, Tombolini V, Mazzuca F, Tomao S. The Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Present Strategies and Future Perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:103990. [PMID: 37061075 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease has been described as an intermediate clinical state between localized cancer and systemically metastasized disease. Recent clinical studies have shown prolonged survival when aggressive locoregional approaches are added to systemic therapies in patients with oligometastases. The aim of this review is to outline the newest options to treat oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), also considering its molecular patterns. We present an overview of the available local treatment strategies, including surgical procedures, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), thermal ablation, as well as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Moreover, since imaging methods provide crucial information for the early diagnosis and management of oligometastatic CRC, we discuss the role of modern radiologic techniques in selecting patients that are amenable to potentially curative locoregional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catia Carconi
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Micaela Cerreti
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | - Giulia Arrivi
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo D'Ambrosio
- Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialties and Organ Transplantation, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Alberto Di Civita
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Massimo Magliocca
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Picchetto
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picone
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shiue K, Sahgal A, Lo SS. Precision Radiation for Brain Metastases With a Focus on Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:114-128. [PMID: 36990629 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
There are multiple published randomized controlled trials supporting single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) for patients presenting with 1 to 4 brain metastases, with the benefit of minimizing radiation-induced neurocognitive sequelae as compared to whole brain radiotherapy . More recently, the dogma of SF-SRS as the only means of delivering an SRS treatment has been challenged by hypofractionated SRS (HF-SRS). The ability to deliver 25-35 Gy in 3-5 HF-SRS fractions is a direct consequence of the evolution of radiation technologies to allow image guidance, specialized treatment planning, robotic delivery and/or patient positioning corrections in all 6 degrees-of-freedom, and frameless head immobilization. The intent is to mitigate the potentially devastating complication of radiation necrosis and improve rates of local control for larger metastases. This narrative review provides an overview of outcomes specific to HF-SRS in addition to the more recent developments of staged SRS, preoperative SRS, and hippocampal avoidance-whole brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ohtakara K, Nakao M, Muramatsu H, Suzuki K. Five-Year Sustained Complete Remission With Minimal Adverse Effects Following Radiosurgery for 2-cm Brain Metastasis With Deep Eloquent Location From Lung Adenocarcinoma Despite Low Marginal Dose and High 12 Gy Volume. Cureus 2023; 15:e36680. [PMID: 37113354 PMCID: PMC10126149 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In single-fraction (sf) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) from lung adenocarcinoma (LAC), a marginal dose of ≥22-24 Gy is generally deemed desirable for achieving long-term local tumor control, whereas symptomatic brain radionecrosis significantly increases when the surrounding brain volume receiving ≥12 Gy (V12 Gy) exceeds >5-10 cm3, especially in a deep location. Here, we describe a 75-year-old male with a single LAC-BM of 20 mm in diameter, with a deep eloquent location, which was treated with sfSRS followed by erlotinib, resulting in sustained local complete remission (CR) with minimal adverse radiation effect at nearly five years after sfSRS. The LAC harbored epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) alone. sfSRS was implemented 11 days after planning CECT acquisition. The original GTV had some under- and over-coverage of the enhancing lesion. The D98% values of corrected GTV (cGTV) (3.08 cm3) and 2-mm outside the cGTV were 18.0 Gy with 55% isodose and 14.8 Gy, respectively. The irradiated isodose volumes, including the GTV, receiving ≥22 Gy and ≥12 Gy were 2.18 cm3 and 14.32 cm3, respectively. Erlotinib was administered 13 days after sfSRS with subsequent dose adjustments over 22 months. There was a remarkable tumor response and subsequent nearly CR of the BM were observed at 2.7 and 6.3 months, respectively, with the tumor remnant being visible as a tiny cavitary lesion located in the cortex of the post-central gyrus at 56.4 months. The present case suggests the existence of: (i) extremely radio- and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive LAC-BM for which sfSRS of ≤18 Gy combined with EGFR-TKI is sufficient for attaining long-term CR; and (ii) long-term brain tolerance following sfSRS despite high 12 Gy volume and deep eloquent location in the late 70s The moderate marginal dose of the GTV, the main location of the BM in the cerebral cortex, and the excellent tumor responses with sufficient extrication from the mass effect may render the BM immune to late adverse radiation effect.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ohtakara K, Suzuki K. An Extremely Inhomogeneous Gross Tumor Dose is Suitable for Volumetric Modulated Arc-Based Radiosurgery with a 5-mm Leaf-Width Multileaf Collimator for Single Brain Metastasis. Cureus 2023; 15:e35467. [PMID: 36999102 PMCID: PMC10043638 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Single or multi-fraction (mf) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an indispensable treatment option for brain metastases (BMs). The integration of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) into linac-based SRS is expected to further enhance efficacy and safety and to expand the indications for the challenging type of BMs. However, the optimal treatment design and relevant optimization method for volumetric modulated arc-based radiosurgery (VMARS) remain unestablished with substantial inter-institutional differences. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the optimal dose distribution suitable for VMARS of BMs, especially regarding dose inhomogeneity of the gross tumor volume (GTV). The GTV boundary, not margin-added planning target volume, was regarded as a basis for planning optimization and dose prescription. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM. Eight sphere-shaped objects with diameters of 5-40 mm in 5-mm increments were assumed as GTVs. The treatment system included a 5-mm leaf width multileaf collimator (MLC) Agility® (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and a dedicated planning system Monaco® (Elekta AB). The prescribed dose (PD) was uniformly assigned to just cover 98% of the GTV (D98%). Three VMARS plans with different dose inhomogeneities of the GTV were generated for each GTV: the % isodose surfaces (IDSs) of GTV D98%, normalized to 100% at the maximum dose (Dmax), were ≤70% (extremely inhomogeneous dose, EIH); ≈80% (inhomogeneous dose, IH); and ≈90% (rather homogeneous dose, RH). VMARS plans were optimized using simple and similar cost functions. In particular, no dose constraint to the GTV Dmax was assigned to the EIH plans. Results Intended VMARS plans fulfilling the prerequisites were generated without problems for all GTVs of ≥10 mm, whereas 86.4% was the lowest IDS for the D98% for 5-mm GTV. Therefore, additional plans for 9- and 8-mm GTVs were generated, which resulted in 68.6% and 75.1% being the lowest IDSs for the D98% values of 9- and 8-mm GTVs, respectively. The EIH plans were the best in terms of the following: 1) dose conformity, i.e., minimum spillage of PD outside the GTV; 2) moderate, not too excessive, dose attenuation outside the GTV, i.e., appropriate marginal dose 2-mm outside the GTV boundary as a function of GTV size; and 3) lowest dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV. In contrast, the RH plans were the worst based on all of the aforementioned measures. Conclusions On the assumption of uniform dose assignment to the GTV margin, a very inhomogeneous GTV dose is basically the most suitable for SRS of BMs in terms of 1) superior dose conformity; 2) minimizing the dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV; and 3) moderate dose spillage margin outside the GTV with a tumor volume-dependent rational increase, i.e., appropriate dose of the common PTV boundary. The concentrically laminated steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary for the EIH plan may also be advantageous for achieving superior tumor response, although early and excessive GTV shrinkage caused by the EIH plan during mfSRS can lead to surrounding brain injury.
Collapse
|
7
|
Dosimetric and clinical analysis of pseudo-progression versus recurrence after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:30. [PMID: 36788610 PMCID: PMC9930329 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02214-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main challenge in follow-up duration of patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy is to distinguish between pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence. The objective of this study is to retrospectively analyze the predictive factors. METHODS The study included 123 patients with enlarged brain metastases after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in our center from March 2009 to October 2019, and the baseline clinical features, radiotherapy planning parameters, and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging before and after radiation therapy were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to compare the differences between groups. Independent risk factors with P < 0.05 and associated with recurrence were used to establish a nomogram prediction model and validated by Bootstrap repeated sampling, which was validated in an internal cohort (n = 23) from October 2019 to December 2021. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 68.4 months (range, 8.9-146.2 months). A total of 76 (61.8%) patients were evaluated as pseudo-progression, 47 patients (38.2%) were evaluated as tumor recurrence. The median time to pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence were 18.3 months (quartile range, 9.4-27.8 months) and 12.9 months (quartile range, 8.7-19.6 months) respectively. Variables associated with tumor recurrence included: gross tumor volume ≥ 6 cc, biological effective dose < 60 Gy, target coverage < 96% and no targeted therapy. The area under curve values were 0.730 and 0.967 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Thirty-one patients received salvage therapy in the tumor recurrence group. The survival time in pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence groups were 66.3 months (95% CI 56.8-75.9 months) and 39.6 months (95% CI 29.2-50.0 months, respectively; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Clinical and dosimetry features of hypo-fractionated radiation therapy based on enhanced brain magnetic resonance can help distinguish pseudo-progression from tumor recurrence after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases. Gross tumor volume, biological effective dose, target coverage, and having received targeted therapy or not were factors associated with the occurrence of tumor recurrence, and the individual risk could be estimated by the nomogram effectively.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ohtakara K, Suzuki K. Modified Dynamic Conformal Arcs With Forward Planning for Radiosurgery of Small Brain Metastasis: Each Double Arc and Different To-and-Fro Leaf Margins to Optimize Dose Gradient Inside and Outside the Gross Tumor Boundary. Cureus 2023; 15:e34831. [PMID: 36919061 PMCID: PMC10008411 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) are a widely used technique for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) using a micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC), while the planning design and method considerably vary among institutions. In the usual forward planning of DCA, the steepness of the dose gradient outside and inside the gross tumor volume (GTV) boundary is simply defined by the leaf margin (LM) setting to the target volume edge. The dose fall-off outside the small GTV tends to be excessively precipitous, especially with an MLC of 2.5-mm leaf width, which is predisposed to the insufficient coverage of microscopic brain invasion and other inherent inaccuracies. Meanwhile, insufficient dose increase inside the GTV boundary, i.e., less inhomogeneous GTV dose, likely leads to inferior and less sustainable tumor response. The more inhomogeneous GTV dose is prone to the steeper dose gradient outside the GTV and vice versa. Herein, we describe an alternative simply modified DCA (mDCA) planning that was uniquely devised to optimize the dose gradient outside and inside the GTV boundary for further enhancing and consolidating local control of small BM. For a succinct exemplification, a 10-mm spherical target was assumed as a GTV for DCA planning using a 2.5-mm mMLC. The benchmark plan was generated by adding a 0-mm LM to the GTV edge by assigning a single fraction of 30 Gy to the isocenter, in which the GTV coverage by 24 Gy with 80% isodose surface (IDS) was 96%, i.e., D96%, while the coverage of GTV + isotropic 2 mm volume by 18 Gy with 60% IDS was 70%, with the D98% being 12 Gy with 40% IDS, viz., too steep dose fall-off outside the GTV boundary. Alternatively, the increase of LM with or without decreasing the isocenter dose enables the increase of the GTV + 2 mm coverage by 18 Gy while resulting in an inadequate GTV dose with either a less inhomogeneous dose or an excessive marginal dose. Meanwhile, in the newly devised mDCA planning, every single arc was converted to a double to-and-fro arc with different LM settings under the same spatial arrangement, which enabled GTV + 2 mm volume coverage with 18 Gy while preserving the GTV marginal dose and inhomogeneity similar to those for the benchmark plan. Additionally, the different collimator angle (CA) setting for the to-and-fro arcs led to further trimming of the dose conformity. The limitations of general forward planning with only adjusting the LM for every single arc were demonstrated, which can be a contributing factor for local tumor progression of small BM. Alternatively, the mDCA with each double to-and-fro arc and different LM and CA settings enables optimization of the dose gradient both outside and inside the GTV boundary according to the planners' intent, e.g., moderate dose spillage margin outside the GTV and steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Ohtakara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Yatomi, JPN.,Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
| | - Kojiro Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rades D, Delikanli C, Schild SE, Kristiansen C, Tvilsted S, Janssen S. The First Survival Score for Patients Aged ≥80 Years Irradiated for Brain Metastases. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11101434. [PMID: 36290338 PMCID: PMC9598105 DOI: 10.3390/biology11101434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Survival scores facilitate personalized cancer treatment. Due to demographic changes, very elderly patients are more prevalent than in the past. A score was developed in 94 patients aged ≥ 80 years undergoing whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases. Dose fractionation, treatment period, age, sex, performance score (ECOG-PS), tumor type, count of lesions, metastases outside the brain, and interval tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. Independent predictors of survival were used for the score. Based on individual scoring points obtained from 3-month survival rates, prognostic groups were designed. Additionally, the score was compared to an existing tool developed in patients ≥ 65 years. ECOG-PS, count of lesions, and extra-cranial metastases were independent prognostic factors. Three groups were created (7, 10, and 13−16 points) with 3-month survival of 6%, 25%, and 67% (p < 0.001), respectively. Positive predictive values (PPVs) regarding death ≤ 3 and survival ≥ 3 months were 94% and 67% (new score) vs. 96% and 48% (existing tool), respectively. PPVs for survival ≥1 and ≥2 months were 88% and 79% vs. 63% and 58%, respectively. Both tools were accurate in predicting death ≤2, ≤3, and ≤6 months. The new score was more precise regarding death ≤1 month and survival (all time periods) and appeared preferable. However, it still needs to be validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-451-500-45401
| | - Cansu Delikanli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Charlotte Kristiansen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
| | - Søren Tvilsted
- Research Department, Zealand University Hospital, 4600 Køge, Denmark
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
- Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 30161 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Deraniyagala R, Ding X, Alonso-Basanta M, Li T, Rong Y. It is beneficial to invest resources to implement proton intracranial SRS. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13701. [PMID: 35713887 PMCID: PMC9278676 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Deraniyagala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Taoran Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ganz JC. Cerebral metastases. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2022; 268:229-258. [PMID: 35074082 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases are common and deadly. Over the last 25 years GKNS has been established as an invaluable treatment. It may be used as a primary treatment or after either surgery or WBRT. Patients are assessed using one of a number of available scales. GKNS may be repeated for new metastases and for unresponsive tumors. Prescription doses are usually between 18 and 20Gy. The use of advanced MR techniques to highlight sensitive structures like the hippocampi have extended the efficacy of the treatment. More recently GKNS has been used with different target therapies with improved results. More recently frameless treatments have become more popular in this group of very sick patients. GKNS controls tumors in between 80% and over 95% of cases and may even be used for brainstem tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Ganz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vogelbaum MA, Brown PD, Messersmith H, Brastianos PK, Burri S, Cahill D, Dunn IF, Gaspar LE, Gatson NTN, Gondi V, Jordan JT, Lassman AB, Maues J, Mohile N, Redjal N, Stevens G, Sulman E, van den Bent M, Wallace HJ, Weinberg JS, Zadeh G, Schiff D. Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:492-516. [PMID: 34932393 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Stuart Burri
- Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - Dan Cahill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO
| | - Na Tosha N Gatson
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,Geisinger Neuroscience Institute. Danville, PA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | | | | | - Julia Maues
- Georgetown Breast Cancer Advocates, Washington, DC
| | - Nimish Mohile
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Navid Redjal
- Capital Health Medical Center - Hopewell Campus, Princeton, NJ
| | | | | | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kessel KA, Deichl A, Gempt J, Meyer B, Posch C, Diehl C, Zimmer C, Combs SE. Outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases in patients with malignant melanoma and validation of the melanoma molGPA. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:2020-2029. [PMID: 33993415 PMCID: PMC8390419 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02607-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant melanoma is the third most common primary in the diagnosis of brain metastases. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment option in limited brain disease. We analyzed outcomes of SRS with a particular focus on the graded prognostic assessment (GPA, melanoma molGPA), prognostic factors, and toxicity. METHODS We evaluated 173 brain metastases in 83 patients with malignant melanoma. All were treated with SRS median dose of 20 Gy prescribed to the 80 or 100% isodose line between 2002 and 2019. All patients were followed-up regularly, including contrast-enhanced brain imaging as well as clinical examination, initially 6 weeks after treatment, then in quarterly follow-up. RESULTS The median age was 61 years (range 27-80); 36 female and 47 male patients were treated. After a median follow-up of 5.7 months, median OS (overall survival) was 9.7 months 95%-KI 4.7-14.7). LC (local control) at 6 months, 12, 24 months was 89%, 86%, and 72%, respectively (median was not reached). Median DBC (distant brain control) was 8.2 months (95%-KI 4.7-11.7). For OS, a KPS ≥ 80%, a positive BRAF mutation status, a small PTV (planning target volume), the absence of extracranial metastases, as well as a GPA and melanoma molGPA > 2 were prognostic factors. In the MVA, a small PTV and a melanoma molGPA > 2 remained significant. CONCLUSION The present survival outcomes support the use of the disease-specific melanoma molGPA as reliable prognostic score. Favorable outcomes for SRS compared to other studies were observed. In the treatment of brain metastases of malignant melanoma patients, a multidisciplinary approach consisting of surgery, SRS, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Deichl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - J Gempt
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - B Meyer
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - C Posch
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Zimmer
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - S E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Azevedo Rosas F, Favareto SL, de Castro DG. Local ablative therapy of brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer: benefits and limitations. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:3289-3294. [PMID: 34164221 PMCID: PMC8182539 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-19-3321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumors and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are responsible for BM more than any other solid tumor. Its frequency is increasing due to of the availability of new imaging techniques, earlier diagnosis and improvement in treatment techniques and survival rates. NSCLC patients with BM represent heterogeneous prognostic group. The possibility of better prognostic stratification associated with more systemic therapy options and imaging and radiation technology advances have led to an increment of evaluation and indication of local ablative radiotherapy. The definite increment in quality of life and the potential overall survival (OS) benefit of its indication must be balanced with eventual higher risk of brain disseminated disease when whole brain irradiation is postponed. Therefore, a multidisciplinary evaluation is recommended to refine and personalize the therapeutic approach. The development of clinical nomograms or evaluation of circulating tumor cells/tumoral DNA that predict the survival free of new lesions may be the tools that will warranty further optimization of the treatment of NSCLC patients with BM. In this review, we report the main aspects of diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic options and dilemmas evolving local ablative radiotherapy essentially based on seminal, updated prospective studies and ongoing trials.
Collapse
|
15
|
Milano MT, Chiang VLS, Soltys SG, Wang TJC, Lo SS, Brackett A, Nagpal S, Chao S, Garg AK, Jabbari S, Halasz LM, Gephart MH, Knisely JPS, Sahgal A, Chang EL. Executive summary from American Radium Society's appropriate use criteria on neurocognition after stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1728-1741. [PMID: 32780818 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria brain malignancies panel systematically reviewed (PRISMA [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses]) published literature on neurocognitive outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with multiple brain metastases (BM) to generate consensus guidelines. METHODS The panel developed 4 key questions (KQs) to guide systematic review. From 11 614 original articles, 12 were selected. The panel developed model cases addressing KQs and potentially controversial scenarios not addressed in the systematic review (which might inform future ARS projects). Based upon quality of evidence, the panel confidentially voted on treatment options using a 9-point scale of appropriateness. RESULTS The panel agreed that SRS alone is usually appropriate for those with good performance status and 2-10 asymptomatic BM, and usually not appropriate for >20 BM. For 11-15 and 16-20 BM there was (between 2 case variants) agreement that SRS alone may be appropriate or disagreement on the appropriateness of SRS alone. There was no scenario (among 6 case variants) in which conventional whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was considered usually appropriate by most panelists. There were several areas of disagreement, including: hippocampal sparing WBRT for 2-4 asymptomatic BM; WBRT for resected BM amenable to SRS; fractionated versus single-fraction SRS for resected BM, larger targets, and/or brainstem metastases; optimal treatment (WBRT, hippocampal sparing WBRT, SRS alone to all or select lesions) for patients with progressive extracranial disease, poor performance status, and no systemic options. CONCLUSIONS For patients with 2-10 BM, SRS alone is an appropriate treatment option for well-selected patients with good performance status. Future study is needed for those scenarios in which there was disagreement among panelists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Veronica L S Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CT
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Alexandria Brackett
- Cushing/Whitney Medical Library, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CT
| | - Samuel Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Amit K Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Siavash Jabbari
- Laurel Amtower Cancer Institute and Neuro-oncology Center, Sharp Healthcare, San Diego, CA
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Jonathan P S Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alongi F, Nicosia L, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Vitale C, De Simone A, Naccarato S, Sicignano G, Gurrera D, Corradini S, Ruggeri R. Long-term disease outcome and volume-based decision strategy in a large cohort of multiple brain metastases treated with a mono-isocentric linac-based Stereotactic Radiosurgery technique. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1561-1570. [PMID: 33570720 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02550-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option for brain metastases (BMs). Long-term results of the first worldwide experience with a mono-isocentric, non-coplanar, linac-based stereotactic technique in the treatment of multiple BMs are reported. METHODS patients with multiple BMs, life expectancy > 3 months, and good performance status (≤ 2) were treated with simultaneous SRS with volumetric modulated arc technique. Data were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS 172 patients accounting for 1079 BMs were treated at our institution from 2017 to 2020. The median number of treated metastases was 4 (range 2-22). Primary tumor histology was: lung (44.8%), breast (32%), and melanoma (9.4%). The 2-year LPFS was 71.6%, respectively. A biological effective dose (BED) ≥ 51.3 Gy10 correlated with higher local control. Uncontrolled systemic disease and melanoma histology were independent prognostic factors correlated with decreased iPFS. Patients with > 10 BMs had a trend towards shorter iPFS (p = 0.055). 31 patients received multiple SRS courses (2-7) in case of intracranial progression. The median iOS was 22.4 months. Brainstem metastases and total PTV > 7.1 cc correlated with shorter iOS. The 1- and 2-year WBRT-free survival was 83.2% and 61.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION Long-term results in a large patient population treated with a mono-isocentric, dedicated technique demonstrated its effectiveness and safety also in the case of multiple courses. The shortened treatment time and the possibility to safely spare healthy brain tissue allows the safe treatment of patients with a large number of metastases and to deliver multiple courses of SRS. In selected cases, the administration of WBRT can be delayed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - L Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
| | - V Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - N Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - F Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - R Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - F Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - M Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - C Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - A De Simone
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - S Naccarato
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - G Sicignano
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - D Gurrera
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - S Corradini
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - R Ruggeri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Venur VA, Chukwueke UN, Lee EQ. Advances in Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2020; 20:26. [PMID: 32506161 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-020-01039-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases has changed significantly over the past decade. RECENT FINDINGS Historically, radiation therapy had been the mainstay of treatment. Several strategies to limit toxicities with radiation have been developed in the recent years. Increasingly systemic therapy options are being considered an important therapeutic option for CNS metastases. Numerous novel small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapy agents have intracranial activity to varying degrees, in addition to good extracranial disease control. Overall, the prognosis of select patients with CNS metastases has improved over the past several years with advent of new therapeutic strategies. Systemic therapy options with CNS benefit should be considered in select patients with small and asymptomatic CNS metastases. Further areas of research focus on molecular alterations predisposing to CNS metastases, identification of small molecule inhibitors with CNS activity, and the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vyshak Alva Venur
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bowden GN, Kim JO, Faramand A, Fallon K, Flickinger J, Lunsford LD. Clinical dose profile of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for extensive brain metastases. J Neurosurg 2020; 134:1430-1434. [PMID: 32384280 DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.jns193369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) for the treatment of extensive intracranial metastases has been expanding due to its superior dosimetry and efficacy. However, there remains a dearth of data regarding the dose parameters in actual clinical scenarios. The authors endeavored to calculate the radiation dose to the brain when treating ≥ 15 brain metastases with GKSRS. METHODS This retrospective analysis reviewed dosage characteristics for patients requiring single-session GKSRS for the treatment of ≥ 15 brain metastases. Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria between 2008 and 2017. The median number of tumors at the initial GKSRS procedure was 20 (range 15-39 tumors), accounting for 865 tumors in this study. The median aggregate tumor volume was 3.1 cm3 (range 0.13-13.26 cm3), and the median marginal dose was 16 Gy (range 14-19 Gy). RESULTS The median of the mean brain dose was 2.58 Gy (range 0.95-3.67 Gy), and 79% of patients had a dose < 3 Gy. The 12-Gy dose volume was a median of 12.45 cm3, which was equivalent to 0.9% of the brain volume. The median percentages of brain receiving 5 Gy and 3 Gy were 6.7% and 20.4%, respectively. There was no correlation between the number of metastases and the mean dose to the brain (p = 0.8). A greater tumor volume was significantly associated with an increased mean brain dose (p < 0.001). The median of the mean dose to the bilateral hippocampi was 2.3 Gy. Sixteen patients had supplementary GKSRS, resulting in an additional mean dose of 1.4 Gy (range 0.2-3.8 Gy) to the brain. CONCLUSIONS GKSRS is a viable means of managing extensive brain metastases. This procedure provides a relatively low dose of radiation to the brain, especially when compared with traditional whole-brain radiation protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Neil Bowden
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jong Oh Kim
- Departments of2Radiation Oncology (Medical Physics) and
| | - Andrew Faramand
- 3Neurological Surgery and the Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Kevin Fallon
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology (Medical Physics), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- 3Neurological Surgery and the Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ito D, Aoyagi K, Nagano O, Serizawa T, Iwadate Y, Higuchi Y. Comparison of two-stage Gamma Knife radiosurgery outcomes for large brain metastases among primary cancers. J Neurooncol 2020; 147:237-246. [PMID: 32026433 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03421-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is typically considered for patients who cannot undergo surgical resection for large (> 10 cm3) brain metastases (BMs). Staged SRS requires adaptive planning during each stage of the irradiation period for improved tumor control and reduced radiation damage. However, there has been no study on the tumor reduction rates of this method. We evaluated the outcomes of two-stage SRS across multiple primary cancer types. METHODS We analyzed 178 patients with 182 large BMs initially treated with two-stage SRS. The primary cancers included breast (BC), non-small cell lung (NSCLC), and gastrointestinal tract cancers (GIC). We analyzed the overall survival (OS), neurological death, systemic death (SD), tumor progression (TP), tumor recurrence (TR), radiation necrosis (RN), and the tumor reduction rate during both stages. RESULTS The median survival time after the first Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) procedure was 6.6 months. Compared with patients with BC and NSCLC, patients with GIC had shorter OS and a higher incidence of SD. Compared with patients with NSCLC and GIC, patients with BC had significantly higher tumor reduction rates in both sessions. TP rates were similar among primary cancer types. There was no association of the tumor reduction rate with tumor control. The overall cumulative incidence of RN was 4.2%; further, the RN rates were similar among primary cancer types. CONCLUSIONS Two-stage SRS should be considered for BC and NSCLC if surgical resection is not indicated. For BMs from GIC, staged SRS should be carefully considered and adapted to each unique case given its lower tumor reduction rate and shorter OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Ito
- Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 575 Tsurumai, Ichihara, Chiba, 2900512, Japan.
| | - Kyoko Aoyagi
- Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 575 Tsurumai, Ichihara, Chiba, 2900512, Japan
| | - Osamu Nagano
- Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 575 Tsurumai, Ichihara, Chiba, 2900512, Japan
| | - Toru Serizawa
- Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuo Iwadate
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Higuchi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li W, Yu H. Separating or combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC brain metastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019; 146:137-152. [PMID: 31813004 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-03094-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
With the advancement of imaging technology, systemic disease control rate and survival rate, the morbidity of brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been riding on a steady upward trend (40%), but management of BMs from NSCLC remains obscure. Systemic therapy is anticipated to offer novel therapeutic avenues in the management of NSCLC BMs, and radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy have their own advantages. Recently, it was confirmed that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and RT could mutually promote the efficacy in the treatment of BMs from NSCLC. In this paper, we provide a review on current understandings and practices of separating or combining ICIs and RT, which could provide a reference for the coming laboratory and clinical studies and contribute to the development of new approaches in NSCLC BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Li
- Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Yu
- Radiation Oncology Department of Thoracic cancer, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stereotactic radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases: comparison with non-elderly patients using database of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901-Elderly). J Neurooncol 2019; 144:393-402. [PMID: 31338786 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03242-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly used for elderly patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, no studies based on a large sample size have been reported. To compare SRS treatment results between elderly and non-elderly patients, we performed a subset study of elderly patients using our prospectively-accumulated multi-institution study database (JLGK0901 Study, Lancet Oncol 15:387-395, 2014). METHODS During the 2009-2011 period, 1194 eligible patients undergoing gamma knife SRS alone for newly diagnosed BMs were enrolled in this study from 23 gamma knife facilities in Japan. Observation was discontinued at the end of 2013. The 1194 patients were divided into the two age groups, 693 elderly ( ≥ 65 years) and 501 non-elderly ( < 65 years) patients. Our study protocol neither set an upper age limit nor required dose de-escalation. RESULTS Median post-SRS survival time was significantly shorter in the elderly than in the non-elderly patient group (10.3 vs 14.3 months, HR 1.380, 95% CI 1.218-1.563, p < 0.0001). However, regarding all secondary endpoints including neurological death, neurological deterioration, SRS-related complications, leukoencephalopathy, local recurrence, newly-developed tumors, meningeal dissemination, salvage SRS, whole brain radiotherapy and surgery and decreased mini-mental state examination scores, the elderly patient group was not inferior to the non-elderly patient group. In the 693 elderly patients, there was no post-SRS median survival time difference between those with 5-10 versus 2-4 tumors (10.8 vs 8.9 months, HR 0.936, 95% CI 0.744-1.167, p = 0.5601). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that elderly BM patients are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone treatment.
Collapse
|