Comparative study of multilevel posterior interbody fusion plus anterior longitudinal ligament release versus classic multilevel posterior interbody fusion in the treatment of adult spinal deformities

A novel technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion to obtain a good local lordosis angle: anterior-release posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Herein, we describe a novel posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) technique with annulus fibrosus (AF) release and the use of expandable cages (called "anterior-release PLIF" [ARPLIF]). In this technique, posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and AF release provide excellent intervertebral mobility. AF release involves circumferentially peeling off the AF above or below the endplate between the fixed vertebrae under radiographic guidance without cutting the AF and anterior longitudinal ligament. Subsequently, high-angle variable-angle expandable cages are used to simultaneously expand both sides before inserting the percutaneous pedicle screws and correcting to achieve good local lumbar lordosis. PCO and AF release achieve excellent intervertebral mobility. Intervertebral mobility and simultaneous expansion of both cages disperse the force on the endplates, reducing cage subsidence, and the high-angle cages facilitate high intervertebral angle creation. The novel ARPLIF intervertebral manipulation technique can promote good local lumbar lordosis formation.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with or without release of the anterior longitudinal ligament: A single-center, retrospective observational cohort study

Background

Transforaminal anterior release (TFAR) is a technical extension of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure with deliberate release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL).

Methods

In a retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, consecutive adult patients undergoing TLIF surgery at L4/L5 and/or L5/S1 between 01/2018 and 12/2022 for degenerative disc disease or deformity were considered. The TFAR group (with ALL release) was compared to a standard TLIF group (without ALL release), matched in a 1:3 ratio. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were built to estimate the likelihood of any adverse event (AE), reoperation, and excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months.

Results

Of 438 patients, 18 undergoing TFAR were matched to 53 undergoing standard TLIF. TFAR procedures were frequently part of extensive, anterior-posterior or multilevel fusion procedures with longer surgery time and higher blood loss. The rates of intraoperative surgical AEs were similar (16.7 vs. 11.3%, p=.789). The rates and severities of surgical AEs, as well as reoperation rates and clinical outcomes were similar at time of discharge, 90 days, and 12 months postoperatively (all p>.05). TFAR allowed for an increase in total lumbar lordosis of 16.1° and in lumbar lordosis between L4 and S1 of 16.3° at discharge, which was maintained during follow-up. In both the uni- and multivariable models, patients undergoing TFAR were as likely as patients undergoing standard TLIF to experience any AE (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.21-2.94), any reoperation (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11-1.90) or excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 0.52-7.74).

Conclusions

The TFAR technique has a safety profile which is comparable to the standard TLIF procedure, but it allows for a greater restoration of lumbar lordosis at L4-S1. We suggest considering the TFAR technique in selected patients with sagittal imbalance and mobile segments for restoration of lumbar lordosis.

The Influence of Multilevel Spinal Deformity Surgery on the EuroQol 5 Dimensions' (EQ-5D) Questionnaire and Residential Status in the Elderly: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, international prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the clinical outcome up to 2 years after multi-level spinal deformity surgery in the elderly by reporting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of EuroQol 5-dimensions (EQ-5D), EQ-VAS, and residential status.

METHODS

As an ancillary study of 219 patients ≥60 years with spinal deformity undergoing primary instrumented fusion surgery of ≥5 levels, this study focuses on EQ-5D (3-L) as the primary outcome and EQ-VAS and residential status as secondary outcomes. Data on EQ-5D were compared between pre-operatively and postoperatively at 10 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. An anchor-based approach was used to calculate the MCID.

RESULTS

The EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS, respectively, improved significantly at each time point compared to pre-operatively (from .53 (SD .21) and 55.6 (SD 23.0) pre-operatively to .64 (SD .18) and 65.8 (SD 18.7) at 10 weeks, .74 (SD .18) and 72.7 (SD 18.1) at 12 months, and .73 (SD .20) and 70.4 (SD 20.4) at 24 months). 217 (99.1%) patients lived at home pre-operatively, while 186 (88.6%), 184 (98.4%), and 172 (100%) did so at 10 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months, respectively. Our calculated MCID for the EQ-5D index at 1 year was .22 (95% CI .15-.29).

CONCLUSIONS

The EQ-5D index significantly increased at each time point over 24 months after ≥5 level spinal deformity surgery in elderly patients. The MCID of the EQ-5D-3 L was .22. Patients living at home pre-operatively can expect to be able to live at home 2 years postoperatively.

Multisegment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) combined with Ponte osteotomy in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) surgery: a minimum of five years' follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with the administration of multisegment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) combined with Ponte osteotomy long-level fixation fusion, as well as to identify the factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-centre study involving comprehensive clinical data. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) outcomes, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) questionnaire were recorded to assess HRQOL. A correlation analysis was performed to determine the association between HRQOL and radiographic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 41 consecutive patients (15 males and 26 females) met the inclusion criteria with a follow-up of 8.62 ± 1.20 years. Factors associated with HRQOL were significantly improved post-operation. Global sagittal parameters, including the sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) and T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and local parameters, including apical vertebral translation (AVT) and apical vertebral rotation (AVR), were significantly improved at the last follow-up. Significantly strong correlations between each clinical and radiographic parameter were demonstrated. Moreover, a multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the differences in AVT and AVR were significantly correlated with the difference in lumbar lordosis (LL), which was significantly correlated with the differences in SVA and TPA.

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment of DLS with multisegment TLIF accompanied by Ponte osteotomy and long-level fixations improved the quality of life of patients with a long-term effect. AVR correction is an important factor for LL restoration that significantly correlates with improvements in the sagittal balance parameters SVA and TPA, which are key factors for guaranteeing good HRQOL.

Revisiting anterior longitudinal ligament release: Are we ready for an endoscopic approach?

Anterior longitudinal ligament release is a proven method for restoring spinopelvic parameters. This technique is mostly described using either lateral or anterior approaches with paucity regarding a posterior method. This paper is the first to provide descriptive analysis of the neurovascular anatomy in the context of planning for a posterior endoscopic ALL release. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients underwent any lumbar surgery by a single surgeon. Anatomical data was obtained from pre-operative CT to describe the location of key neurovascular structures in relation to the ALL with focus on posterior approach. A total of 20 patients were included in data analysis. A posterior approach with endoscopic assistance would be feasible at L4/5 and L5/S1, where the bifurcation of the abdominal aorta has occurred with a vessel window that ranges from 18.85 mm to 33.45 mm with at least 2 mm space between the vessels and the corresponding disc spaces in the anterior-posterior dimension with slight predilection of the left side at the L5/S1 level to avoid any neurovascular structures. Our study confirmed the findings of previous studies examining the vascular anatomy associated with the lumbar spine. Interestingly, we found that direct midline would likely not be the best location for a posterior annulotomy, and that both the window between the iliac vessels as well as the distance in AP dimension between the spine and vessels increases as you descend the lumbar spine. This information will help guide future efforts to fully develop a safe and reproducible posterior endoscopic ALL release.

Limited Cost Benefit of Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the utility and cost-effectiveness of multilevel lateral interbody fusion (LIF) combined with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) (L group) and conventional PSF (with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) (P group) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of multilevel LIF for ASD have been reported favorable; however, the cost benefit of LIF in conjunction with PSF is still controversial.

METHODS

Retrospective comparisons of 88 surgically treated ASD patients with minimum 2-year follow-up from a multicenter database (L group [n = 39] and P group [n = 49]) were performed. Demographic and radiographic data, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the direct hospitalization cost for the initial surgery and 2-year total hospitalization cost were analyzed.

RESULTS

Analyses of sagittal spinal alignment showed no significant difference between the two groups at baseline and 2 years post-operation. Surgical time was longer in the L group (L vs. P: 354 vs. 268 minutes, P < 0.01), whereas the amount of blood loss was greater in the P group (494 vs. 678 mL, P = 0.03). The HRQoL was improved similarly at 2 years post-operation (L vs. P: SRS-22 total score, 3.86 vs. 3.80, P = 0.54), with comparable revision rates (L vs. P: 18% vs. 10%, P = 0.29). The total direct cost of index surgery was significantly higher in the L group (65,937 vs. 49,849 USD, P < 0.01), which was mainly due to the operating room cost, including implant cost (54,466 vs. 41,328 USD, P < 0.01). In addition, the 2-year total hospitalization cost, including revision surgery, was also significantly higher in the L group (70,847 vs. 52,560 USD, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LIF with PSF is a similarly effective surgery for ASD when compared with conventional PSF. However, due to the significantly higher cost, additional studies on the cost-effectiveness of LIF in different ASD patient cohorts are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.