Clinical outcomes of pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia implanted using intraoperative MRI

Taking the knife to neurodegeneration: a review of surgical gene therapy delivery to the CNS

Gene supplementation and editing for neurodegenerative disorders has emerged in recent years as the understanding of the genetic mechanisms underlying several neurodegenerative disorders increases. The most common medium to deliver genetic material to cells is via viral vectors; and with respect to the central nervous system, adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are a popular choice. The most successful example of AAV-based gene therapy for neurodegenerative disorders is Zolgensma© which is a transformative intravenous therapy given to babies with spinal muscular atrophy. However, the field has stalled in achieving safe drug delivery to the central nervous system in adults for which treatments for disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are desperately needed. Surgical gene therapy delivery has been proposed as a potential solution to this problem. While the field of the so-called regenerative neurosurgery has yielded pre-clinical optimism, several challenges have emerged. This review seeks to explore the field of regenerative neurosurgery with respect to AAV-based gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases, its progress so far and the challenges that need to be overcome.

A Technique of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Interna for Dystonia Under General Anesthesia With Sevoflurane

Background Globus pallidus interna (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established surgical procedure that confers a benefit in medication refractory dystonia. Patients with generalized dystonia require general anesthesia (GA) for the surgery as their movements may hinder the surgical procedure. General anesthetics tend to dampen the microelectrode recordings (MERs) from the GPi. Methods We describe our experience with a series of consecutive patients with dystonia who underwent bilateral GPi DBS using standard DBS and MER under GA using sevoflurane as the maintenance general anesthetic drug. All patients had Medtronic 3,387 leads implanted and connected to an RC battery. Patients underwent sequential programming of the DBS after the surgery. Results The mean age of the 13 patients who underwent DBS of the GPi for dystonia was 46.5 years with a range from 29 to 71 years. Every patient in our case series received various doses of (1.37% to 2.11%) inhaled sevoflurane for anesthesia maintenance. Sevoflurane provided adequate anesthesia and allowed accurate MERs from the GPi. No adverse effects were encountered. On follow-up and sequential DBS programming, patients had significant improvements in dystonia attesting to the accuracy of the electrode placements. Conclusions We report our experience using sevoflurane for maintenance of GA for bilateral GPi DBS for dystonia. The main benefits identified have been adequate anesthesia and reduction of dystonia-related movements to allow the performance of the DBS surgery. The MER signals from the GPi were not suppressed by sevoflurane. This allowed accurate mapping and placement of the DBS implants in the GPi.

Pallidal deep brain stimulation for tardive dystonia: meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Tardive dystonia (TD) is a disabling complication of pharmacological therapy with dopaminergic receptor antagonists, usually resistant to oral medications. Several reports have shown that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) might be effective in TD, but the overall level of evidence remains limited to case reports or small case series.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to summarize the collective evidence in support of GPi-DBS for TD using a meta-analytic approach.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for human studies reporting tardive dystonia cases treated with GPi-DBS that reported the validated Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) as outcome measure. Data extracted were reviewed for risk of bias. Then, through linear mixed effects modeling of the percent improvement seen on an individual level, we estimated the average improvement effect varying by study.

RESULTS

The searching strategy resulted in a total of n = 78 studies, which were screened for eligibility criteria resulting in the inclusion of n = 14 studies, yielding 134 TD patients for the final analyses. The overall estimate improvement in the BFMDRS after GPi-DBS was 66.88 ± 11.96%. The review of individual case reports indicated rare worsening (n = 4) or lack of improvement (n = 3) following GPi-DBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral GPi-DBS can be an effective therapeutic option for severe cases of TD resistant to oral pharmacological therapies, even though rare cases of symptom worsening or lack of improvement have also been reported.

Estimating the Risk of Deep Brain Stimulation in the Modern Era: 2008 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was first approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1997. Although the fundamentals of DBS remain the same, hardware, software, and imaging have evolved significantly.

OBJECTIVE

To test our hypothesis that the aggregate complication rate in the medical literature in the past 12 years would be lower than what is often cited based on early experience with DBS surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were queried for studies from 2008 to 2020 that included patients treated with DBS from 2007 to 2019. This yielded 34 articles that evaluated all complications of DBS surgery, totaling 2249 patients.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate in this study was 16.7% per patient. There was found to be a systemic complication rate of 0.89%, intracranial complication rate of 2.7%, neurological complication rate of 4.6%, hardware complication rate of 2.2%, and surgical site complication rate of 3.4%. The infection and erosion rate was 3.0%.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that surgical complication rates have decreased since the first decade after DBS was first FDA approved. Understanding how to minimize complications from the inception of a technique should receive more attention.

Non-staged bilateral Globus Pallidus Internus deep brain stimulation lead revision using intraoperative MRI: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead revision due to suboptimal therapy is common but there is no standardised protocol. We describe a novel technique using iMRI to perform concurrent new Globus Pallidus Internus (GPi) DBS lead implantation and old lead removal in a dystonia patient.Case-description: A 60-year-old woman with medication and neurotoxin-refractory isolated cervical dystonia underwent awake bilateral GPi DBS surgery with MER-guided lead implantation. She initially had a favourable response but later reported suboptimal benefit despite reprogramming. MRI demonstrated suboptimal lead placement and MRI-guided revision surgery under general anesthesia was planned. The goal was to place new leads superior and medial to the existing leads. Using a 1.5 T iMRI and the ClearPoint^® NeuroNavigation system, new leads were placed through the existing burr holes, into the new targets with radial errors < 0.08mm bilaterally without crossing the old leads. The old leads were then removed and the new leads connected to the existing pulse generator. The patient tolerated the procedure well and had improved side-effect profile at all contacts at 1-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-staged iMRI-guided DBS revision surgery under general anesthesia is technically feasible and is an alternative strategy to a staged iMRI-guided revision surgery or an awake MER-guided revision surgery in select patients.