1
|
Hiyama A, Sakai D, Katoh H, Sato M, Watanabe M. Quantifying Satisfaction of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients in Post-lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: Establishing Critical JOABPEQ Cutoff Scores. World Neurosurg 2024; 186:e461-e469. [PMID: 38580092 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This retrospective study aimed to determine the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) cutoff scores for assessing patient satisfaction postlateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) patients. METHODS Analyzing 136 DLSS patients (83 males, 53 females), the study evaluated demographics, pain (Numeric Rating Scale), and JOABPEQ outcomes (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life, mental health). Patient satisfaction was surveyed, and based on their responses, patients were categorized into "Beneficial" and "Nonbeneficial" groups. Statistical analysis encompassed the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for JOABPEQ cutoff determination. RESULTS Postoperative improvements in JOABPEQ scores, especially in walking ability, social life function, and mental health, were significant. Pain intensity, assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale, also showed notable reductions. The Δ walking ability cutoff was set at 25.00, indicating substantial mobility improvement. This domain's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.726-0.903), demonstrating high effectiveness in assessing patient satisfaction postsurgery. The study also found no significant differences in complication rates between groups for conditions like transient motor weakness, thigh pain/numbness, and revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study underscores the value of patient-centered outcomes in evaluating LLIF surgery success for DLSS. The identified JOABPEQ cutoff values provide a quantitative tool for assessing patient satisfaction, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive postoperative evaluations beyond traditional clinical metrics for improved patient care and life quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Hiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Katoh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Sato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hiyama A, Katoh H, Sakai D, Sato M, Watanabe M. Minimally Invasive Approach for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Lateral Single-Position Surgery with Intraoperative Computed Tomography Navigation and Fluoroscopy: A Technical Note. World Neurosurg 2023; 179:e500-e509. [PMID: 37683916 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a prevalent condition that leads to low back pain and neurological symptoms. This technical note presents a novel surgical strategy for treating DS using lateral single-position surgery (SPS) in combination with intraoperative computed tomography navigation and fluoroscopy. METHODS Fifteen patients (5 males and 10 females, mean age 70.2 years) diagnosed with DS with a slip of 5 mm or more underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation using this technique. The procedure involved slip reduction using an upside PPS and rod fixation, followed by LLIF performed in the same lateral position. The term "upside PPS" refers to a PPS that is inserted on the ceiling side of the patient's surgical field. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic assessments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the lateral SPS. RESULTS The results demonstrated significant improvements in various parameters, including spondylolisthesis reduction, segmental lordosis, disc height, and spinal canal dimensions. The lateral-SPS procedure exhibited several advantages over traditional flip LLIF approaches for slip reduction. Additionally, the technique provided accurate intraoperative navigation guidance through computed tomography imaging, ensuring precise implant placement and slip reduction. CONCLUSIONS Combining LLIF and PPS fixation in a single procedure presents a precise, efficient approach for DS treatment, minimizing repositioning needs. This technique enables effective lumbar reconstruction, restoration of spinal stability, and improved patient outcomes. Although further investigation is warranted, lateral SPS surgery may hold promise as an innovative solution for managing DS by reducing surgical invasiveness and optimizing surgical efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Hiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Katoh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Sato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hiyama A, Sakai D, Katoh H, Sato M, Watanabe M. Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231204254. [PMID: 37750358 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231204254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinical outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) as an indirect decompression technique for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and concomitant degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) patients. We utilized the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) to assess treatment success and its impact on patient's quality of life (QOL). METHODS We included 124 patients who underwent LLIF. Pre- and postoperative JOABPEQ evaluations indicated treatment success. Subgroup analysis categorized patients' perceptions of surgery as beneficial or non-beneficial. RESULTS 89% of patients (110/124) reported satisfaction with LLIF. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion achieved successful indirect decompression, increasing canal diameter and central canal area. Significant improvements occurred across all JOABPEQ domains, notably for low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health. Patients who perceived the surgery as beneficial experienced fewer postoperative complications, lower numeric rating scale scores for pain relief, and greater functional outcome improvements compared to non-beneficial patients. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the utility of JOABPEQ as a valuable and sensitive tool for assessing treatment effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes in DS and concomitant DLSS patients. Patients undergoing LLIF. The results affirm the favorable outcomes of LLIF as a surgical option for DLSS patients and emphasize the importance of considering patient perspectives when evaluating overall treatment success. The study provides valuable insights into the impact of indirect decompression on patients' QOL, supporting the effectiveness of LLIF as a minimally invasive technique for DLSS and DS management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Hiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Katoh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masato Sato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rangwalla K, Filley A, El Naga A, Gendelberg D, Baldwin A, Maziad A, Arora A, Wague A, O'Donnell J, Chryssikos T, Kasir R, Shah J, Theologis A, Tan L, Mummaneni P, Alamin T, Berven SH. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: review of current classifications and proposal of a novel classification system. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023:10.1007/s00586-023-07818-x. [PMID: 37543967 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07818-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review existing classification systems for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), propose a novel classification designed to better address clinically relevant radiographic and clinical features of disease, and determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of this new system for classifying DS. METHODS The proposed classification system includes four components: 1) segmental dynamic instability, 2) location of spinal stenosis, 3) sagittal alignment, and 4) primary clinical presentation. To establish the reliability of this system, 12 observers graded 10 premarked test cases twice each. Kappa values were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for each of the four components separately. RESULTS Interobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation was 0.94, 0.80, 0.87, and 1.00, respectively. Intraobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation were 0.91, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively. CONCLUSION The UCSF DS classification system provides a novel framework for assessing DS based on radiographic and clinical parameters with established implications for surgical treatment. The almost perfect interobserver and intraobserver reliability observed for all components of this system demonstrates that it is simple and easy to use. In clinical practice, this classification may allow subclassification of similar patients into groups that may benefit from distinct treatment strategies, leading to the development of algorithms to help guide selection of an optimal surgical approach. Future work will focus on the clinical validation of this system, with the goal of providing for more evidence-based, standardized approaches to treatment and improved outcomes for patients with DS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khuzaima Rangwalla
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anna Filley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ashraf El Naga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Gendelberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Avionna Baldwin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ali Maziad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ayush Arora
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aboubacar Wague
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer O'Donnell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Chryssikos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rafid Kasir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jay Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alekos Theologis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lee Tan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Praveen Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Todd Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Sigurd H Berven
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Petrone S, Ajello M, Marengo N, Bozzaro M, Pesaresi A, Allevi M, Fiumefreddo A, Denegri F, Cogoni M, Garnero A, Tartara F, Di Perna G, Armocida D, Pesce A, Frati A, Zenga F, Garbossa D, Cofano F. Clinical outcomes, MRI evaluation and predictive factors of indirect decompression with lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter experience. Front Surg 2023; 10:1158836. [PMID: 37077862 PMCID: PMC10106706 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1158836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionEvaluating the effects of indirect decompression obtained through lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) by clinical improvements and radiological parameters on MRI scans. Identifying predictors of better decompression and clinical outcome.Materials and methodsFrom 2016 to 2019, patients who underwent single- or double-level indirect decompression LLIF were consecutively reviewed. Radiological signs of indirect decompression were evaluated in preoperative and follow-up MRI studies and were subsequently correlated to clinical data, expressed as axial/radicular pain (VAS back/leg), index of disability (Oswestry Disability Index) and clinical severity of lumbar stenosis (Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire).Results72 patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up was 24 months. Differences in vertebral canal area (p < 0.001), height of the foramina (p < 0.001), thickness of the yellow ligament (p = 0.001) and anterior height of the interbody space (p = 0.02) were observed. Older age (p = 0.042), presence of spondylolisthesis (p = 0.042), presence of intra-articular facet effusion (p = 0.003) and posterior height of the implanted cage (p = 0.020) positively affected the increase of the canal area. Change in root canal area (p < 0.001), height of the implanted cage (p = 0.020) and younger age (p = 0.035) were predictive factors of root pain relief, while increased vertebral canal area (p = 0.020) and height of the interbody fusion cage (p = 0.023) positively affected the severity of clinical stenosis.ConclusionsLLIF indirect decompression showed both clinical and radiological improvements. Presence and degree of spondylolisthesis, presence of intra-articular facet effusion, age of the patient and height of the cage were predictive factors of major clinical improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Petrone
- Spine Surgery Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo Turin, Turin, Italy
- Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin Department of Neurosciences Rita Levi Montalcini, Turin, Italy
- Correspondence: Salvatore Petrone
| | - Marco Ajello
- Neurosurgery Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicola Marengo
- Neurosurgery Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Bozzaro
- Spine Surgery Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pesaresi
- Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin Department of Neurosciences Rita Levi Montalcini, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Allevi
- Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin Department of Neurosciences Rita Levi Montalcini, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Federica Denegri
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cogoni
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Garnero
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvio Tartara
- Spine Surgery Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Perna
- Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin Department of Neurosciences Rita Levi Montalcini, Turin, Italy
- Spine Surgery Unit, Casa di Cura Città di Bra, Bra, Italy
| | - Daniele Armocida
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Human Neuroscience, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Frati
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Human Neuroscience, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Zenga
- Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery Unit, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Diego Garbossa
- Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin Department of Neurosciences Rita Levi Montalcini, Turin, Italy
- Neurosurgery Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabio Cofano
- Spine Surgery Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo Turin, Turin, Italy
- Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin Department of Neurosciences Rita Levi Montalcini, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Predictors and tactics for revision surgery in lateral lumbar interbody fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:1101. [PMID: 36528567 PMCID: PMC9758827 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06052-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the revision of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and to summarize the complications and decision-making strategies for revision surgery after LLIF. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 21 cases suffered from a revision surgery after LLIF in our department from May 2017 to June 2020, with a mean follow-up of 14 months (12-25months). We collected X-ray plain films, CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and medical records of all patients undergoing LLIF surgery, then analyzed the reasons for revision and summarized the revision strategies in different situations. We analysed correlations between revision surgery and several factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), sex, bone quality, mode of internal fixation, spinal stenosis, postperative foraminal stenosis, disc height. Then we brought the different indicators into logistic regression to find out the risk factors of revision after LLIF. All these patients were evaluated by Quality-of-life outcomes. Univariate statistical analysis was performed using T-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and Chi square tests. RESULTS Of the 209 cases of LLIF, 21 patients underwent postoperative revision. All revision surgeries were successfully completed. The reasons for revision included vascular injury, unsatistactory implant placement, internal spinal instrumentation failure, cage migration, indirect decompression failure and infection. Indirect decompression failure was the most common indications for revision. Clinical status was apparently improved in ODI scores and VAS scores. Revision surgery did not impact long-term effect and satisfaction. Postoperative foraminal stenosis is a positive predictor for a revision surgical procedure. CONCLUSION Patients with postoperative foraminal stenosis are at higher risk of undergoing revision surgery after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. The correct choice of revision surgery can achieve satisfactory clinical results.
Collapse
|
7
|
Li J, Xu TZ, Zhang N, Chen QX, Li FC. Predictors for second-stage posterior direct decompression after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of five hundred fifty-seven patients in the past five years. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2022; 46:1101-1109. [PMID: 35132497 PMCID: PMC9001245 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05313-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the predictors for second-stage posterior direct decompression (PDD) after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedure. METHODS We studied patients who underwent LLIF for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the last five years, from July 2016 to June 2021. All surgical levels were grouped according to Schizas' central canal stenosis (CCS) classification, Pathria's facet joint degeneration (FJD) classification, Bartynski's lateral recess stenosis (LRS) classification, and Lee's foraminal stenosis (FS) classification. Second-stage PDD rates of each subgroup and their annual change were analyzed. Evaluation of risk factors associated with PDD was investigated. RESULTS A total of 901 segments from 557 patients were included. The overall PDD rate was 29.97%. An overall PDD rate of 75.21% for grade D CCS, 29.74% for grade C CCS, 41.67% for grade 3 FJD, 37.61% for grade 3 LRS, and 40.70% for grade 3 FS was shown. While there was a continuous decline in annual PDD rate in the past four years, the annual PDD rate for grade D remained at very high levels. Logistic regression analysis had shown grade D CCS as the utmost risk factor for PDD (OR = 17.77). And grade 3 LRS (OR = 4.63), grade 3 FS (OR = 2.42), grade C CCS (OR = 2.41), and grade 3 FJD (OR = 2.04) were also moderately correlated with PDD, which meant they only moderately increased the risk of PDD. CONCLUSION Extreme severe lumbar CCS (grade D) is the greatest determinant to perform the second-stage PDD procedure after LLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No.88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Tian-Zhen Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No.88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No.88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qi-Xin Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No.88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Fang-Cai Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No.88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|