Predictors for cervical kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

K-Line Tilt May Influence the Short-Term Surgical Outcomes After Laminoplasty in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Study DesignA retrospective study.ObjectivesTo explore the relationship between K-line tilt and short-term surgical outcomes following laminoplasty in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), and to evaluate the potential of K-line tilt as a reliable preoperative predictor.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for 125 consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for multilevel DCM. The radiographic parameters utilized in this study encompassed T1 slope (T1S), C2-C7 lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis (T1S-CL), C2-C7 range of motion (ROM), and K-line tilt. The neurological recovery was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between K-line tilt and other classical cervical parameters. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the association between K-line tilt and surgical outcomes.ResultsOf the 125 patients, 89 were men. The mean age of the patients was 61.74 ± 11.31 years. The results indicated a correlation between the K-line tilt and the cSVA (r = 0.628, P < 0.001), T1S (r = 0.259, P = 0.004), and T1S-CL (r = 0.307, P < 0.001). The K-line tilt showed an association with the failure of the JOA recovery rate (RR) to reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the occurrence of postoperative kyphotic deformity. We identified cutoff values for the K-line tilt which predict the failure of the JOA RR to reach the MCID and postoperative kyphotic deformity as 10.13° and 9.93°, respectively.ConclusionsThe K-line tilt is an independent preoperative risk factor associated with both the failure of the JOA RR to reach the MCID and the occurrence of postoperative kyphotic deformity in patients with multilevel DCM after laminoplasty.

Risk factors analysis for spinal deformity following resection of intradural spinal cord tumors from posterior approach: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The presented study aimed to identify risk factors for spinal deformity (SD) following resection of intradural spinal cord tumors via posterior approach.

METHODS

Articles of interest were found in accordance with PRISMA guidelines utilizing the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Keywords such as "laminoplasty","laminotomy","laminectomy","tumor","resection","spinal deformity","kyphosis","intradural","intramedullary","extramedullary" were applied. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated for dichotomous variables.

RESULTS

From eleven retrospective studies comprising 715 patients, with mean age 17.1 years, 183 developed postoperative SD. Younger age (25 years or below; OR 4.03; p < 0.0001;13 years and below; OR 3.72; p = 0.003) was associated with an elevated risk of SD development. Patients in the age group of > 5 and ≤ 21 years old showed increased risk in the non-fusion subgroup only (OR 9.36; p = 0.02). Preoperative SD was a strong predictor of postoperative SD (OR 12.19; p = 0.0007), particularly accentuated in the non-fusion subgroup (OR 22.14; p < 0.00001). In the non-fusion subgroup, intramedullary tumor location emerged as a significant risk factor for SD (OR 3.67; p = 0.04). Involvement of the thoracolumbar junction increased the risk of postoperative SD (OR 3.11; p = 0.04). In the fusion subgroup, surgery encompassing at least 3 spinal levels elevated the risk of SD (OR 9.18; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for postoperative spinal deformity include younger age, preoperative SD, thoracolumbar junction involvement, extensive decompression, and intramedullary tumor location. These findings provide insights for clinicians in strategizing optimal surgical strategies for patients with high risk of SD development. PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42024517309 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ).

Efficacy and Safety of C3 Laminectomy Combined with Open-Door Laminoplasty versus Open-Door Laminoplasty Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate efficacy and safety between C3 laminectomy + open-door laminoplasty and open-door laminoplasty alone.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched up to January 2024. Review Manager 5.4 was applied to manage the data and perform the review. Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing C3 laminectomy + open-door laminoplasty and open-door laminoplasty alone. Forest plots were constructed for each analysis group.

RESULTS

After selection, 9 eligible articles included 10 comparison groups, with a combined 320 patients who underwent C3 laminectomy + open-door laminoplasty and 355 who underwent open-door laminoplasty alone. There was no difference in operative time, blood volume, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association recovery score, visual analog scale score, Neck Disability Index, complications, axial symptoms, T1 slope, range of motion, and cervical sagittal vertical axis. C3 laminectomy + open-door laminoplasty was superior in C2-C7 Cobb angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Although C3 laminectomy + open-door laminoplasty has theoretic advantages, meta-analysis results show that the 2 surgical procedures are similar in terms of clinical symptoms improvement, sagittal balance, and complications. C3 laminectomy combined + open-door laminoplasty is superior only in the preservation of cervical lordosis. The limited number of studies may affect the reliability and generalizability of the results. Future high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to verify efficacy and safety.

Evaluation of Postoperative Kyphotic Changes in Patients Who Underwent Cervical Laminectomy

BACKGROUND

The stenosis of the cervical canal due to spondylotic changes is one of the common causes of spinal cord compression. Without adequate treatment, it results in progressive neurological deterioration. However, despite the wide acceptance of newer techniques, such as laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion, in most situations, especially in resource-constraint situations, the role of laminectomy alone is pertinent. The following study reviews the effectiveness and safety of laminectomy alone in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Par Private Hospital, Erbil, including 46 patients diagnosed with cervical canal stenosis. All patients underwent laminectomy without fusion or laminoplasty, and postoperative outcomes were assessed using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and radiographic evaluations of cervical alignment. The relationship between preoperative and postoperative cervical alignment, kyphosis progression, and clinical outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

Most patients showed significant neurological improvement in accordance with the improvement of scores of both mJOA and NDI. Among them, radiographic kyphosis progression occurred in 40% of patients, which was not associated with clinical deterioration. This showed a remarkable correlation between preoperative cervical alignment and postoperative outcomes, with R² = 0.733 and p < 0.001. No major complications like C5 palsy or wound infection were recorded throughout the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Laminectomy alone constitutes a proper and safe surgical alternative for cervical canal stenosis, especially in resource-poor countries. Although kyphosis progression occurred in some cases, there was no clinical impairment. Careful selection of patients by preoperative alignment is important for favorable outcomes. Comparing laminectomy alone with other techniques in longer follow-up will provide the final result in larger, multi-institutional groups.

Global Tendencies and Frontier Topics in Cervical Laminoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1982 to 2023

BACKGROUND

This bibliometric analysis aimed to map the knowledge network of laminoplasty research.

METHODS

Studies on laminoplasty published from 1982 to 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The contributions of countries, institutions, authors, and journals were identified using VOSviewer, Scimago Graphica, and Microsoft Excel. Tendencies, hotspots, and knowledge networks were analyzed and visualized using VOSviewer and CiteSpace.

RESULTS

We identified 2577 publications on laminoplasty. The annual number of publications exhibited an overall increasing trend since 2004. Among these, Japan, China, and the United States were the 3 major contributing countries. Keio University, Nagoya University, and Tokyo Medical & Dental University were the 3 most productive institutions. Shiro Imagama ranked first among authors regarding the number of articles, while K Hirabayashi was first among co-cited authors. Spine was the top journal in terms of the number of publications, citations, and co-citations. In addition, the research topics can be divided into 3 clusters: (1) Comparison between laminoplasty and other surgery in outcomes and complications; (2) Axial symptoms in laminoplasty; (3) Sagittal alignment and sagittal balance in laminoplasty. Emerging topics sagittal alignment and sagittal balance in degenerative cervical spondylosis are identified as current research frontiers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study drew a knowledge map of the top countries, institutions, authors, publications, and journals on laminoplasty over the past 4 decades. The current and future hotspots of laminoplasty focus on sagittal balance, comparison between other surgery in outcomes and complication, and axial symptoms in laminoplasty.

The preservation of cervical flexibility helps maintain cervical sagittal alignment after laminoplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical spine range of motion (ROM) is a critical factor in changes in cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and clinical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty (LMP). However, the impact of postoperative cervical ROM on CSA after cervical LMP is still unclear.

PURPOSE

Evaluating the imaging and symptomatic data from patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to identify the influence of postoperative cervical ROM on post-LMP CSA and surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Eighty-six patients undergoing LMP due to multilevel CSM.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic parameters were measured before surgery and at follow-up: cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), CL in flexion (Flex CL), CL in extension (Ext CL), total cervical spine range of motion (ROM), cervical spine range of flexion (Flex ROM), and cervical spine range of extension (Ext ROM). Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assessed clinical outcomes. Other parameters included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), follow-up time, number of surgical segments, proximal level, distalis level, and collar wear time.

METHODS

We divided patients according to the changes in CSA (loss of cervical lordosis (LCL)>10°, or ≤10°; an increase in cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) >10mm, or ≤10mm). A receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was constructed to identify the optimal cut-off value to discriminate the patients with and without postoperative deterioration of CSA.

RESULTS

The postoperative total and Flex ROM were significantly lower in the LCL>10° and I-cSVA>10mm groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low post-Flex ROM was significant risk factor for postoperative deterioration of CSA. ROC showed that the cut-off value for postoperative Flex ROM was 15.60°. Improvements in JOA recovery rate and neck pain were more significant in the flexibility group (post-Flex ROM ≥15.6°) after surgery. Patients in the stiffness group (post-Flex ROM <15.6°) wore a collar longer.

CONCLUSIONS

The preservation of cervical flexibility can maintain CSA after cervical LMP. Postoperative cervical stiffness is related to poor surgical outcomes because significant cervical kyphotic change and sagittal imbalance are likely to occur after surgery. Prolonged wearing of cervical collar is correlated with cervical stiffness following cervical LMP.

Efficacy and safety of laminoplasty combined with C3 laminectomy for patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Laminoplasty (LP) combined with C3 laminectomy (LN) can effectively achieve spinal cord decompression while maintaining the integrity of the posterior ligament-muscle complex, thereby minimizing cervical muscle damage. However, its necessity and safety remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of LP and LP combined with C3 LN in the treatment of patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (DCM).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed. A search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception through December 2023 and updated in February 2024. Search terms included laminoplasty, laminectomy, C3 and degenerative cervical spondylosis. The literature search yielded 14 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Outcomes included radiographic results, neck pain, neurologic function, surgical parameters, and postoperative complications. We also assessed methodologic quality, publication bias, and quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified, including 590 patients who underwent LP combined with C3 LN (modified group, MG) compared to 669 patients who underwent LP (traditional group, TG). The results of the study indicated a statistically significant improvement in cervical range of motion (WMD = 3.62, 95% CI: 0.39 to 6.85) and cervical sagittal angle (WMD = 2.07, 95% CI: 0.40 to 3.74) in the MG compared to the TG at the last follow-up (very low-level evidence). The TG had a higher number of patients with complications, especially C2-3 bone fusion. There was no significant difference found in improvement of neck pain, JOA, NDI, cSVA, T1 slope at latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LP combined with C3 LN is an effective and necessary surgical method for multilevel DCM patients to maintain cervical sagittal balance. However, due to the low quality of evidence in existing studies, more and higher quality research on the technology is needed in the future.

Using Finite Element Models to Assess Spinal Cord Biomechanics after Cervical Laminoplasty for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Cervical laminoplasty is an established motion-preserving procedure for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). However, patients with pre-existing cervical kyphosis often experience inferior outcomes compared to those with straight or lordotic spines. Limited dorsal spinal cord shift in kyphotic spines post-decompression and increased spinal cord tension may contribute to poor neurological recovery and spinal cord injury. This study aims to quantify the biomechanical impact of cervical sagittal alignment on spinal cord stress and strain post-laminoplasty using a validated 3D finite element model of the C2-T1 spine. Three models were created based on the C2-C7 Cobb angle: lordosis (20 degrees), straight (0 degrees), and kyphosis (-9 degrees). Open-door laminoplasty was simulated at C4, C5, and C6 levels, followed by physiological neck flexion and extension. The results showed that spinal cord stress and strain were highest in kyphotic curvature compared to straight and lordotic curvatures across all cervical segments, despite similar segmental ROM. In flexion, kyphotic spines exhibited 103.3% higher stress and 128.9% higher strain than lordotic spines and 16.7% higher stress and 26.8% higher strain than straight spines. In extension, kyphotic spines showed 135.4% higher stress and 241.7% higher strain than lordotic spines and 21.5% higher stress and 43.2% higher strain than straight spines. The study shows that cervical kyphosis leads to increased spinal cord stress and strain post-laminoplasty, underscoring the need to address sagittal alignment in addition to decompression for optimal patient outcomes.

Change of cervical flexion range of motion influences postoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

The relationships between preoperative cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty (LMP) have been widely studied. However, the impact of ROM changes on postoperative CSA and clinical outcomes after LMP remains unclear. Herein, patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were retrospectively analyzed to explore the association between postoperative cervical ROM changes and CSA and surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent cervical LMP at our hospital between January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. CSA parameters were measured before the surgery and at the final follow-up. Loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was defined as preoperative cervical lordosis (CL) - postoperative CL. An increase in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) was defined as postoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) - preoperative cSVA. We defined the changes in cervical flexion range of motion (△Flex ROM, preoperative Flex ROM minus postoperative Flex ROM) > 10° as L- Flex ROM group, and △Flex ROM ≤ 10° as S- Flex ROM group. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assess the surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

The study comprised 74 patients and the average follow-up period was 31.83 months. CL, total ROM, and Flex ROM decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were positively correlated with △Flex. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that a decrease in the Flex ROM was a risk factor for LCL and I-cSVA after LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were higher in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. Postoperative JOA and the JOA recovery rate were worse in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical total and Flex ROM decreased after cervical LMP. The reduction of Flex ROM was associated with LCL and I-cSVA after surgery. The preservation of cervical Flex ROM helps maintain CSA after LMP. Therefore, more attention should be paid to maintaining cervical ROM to obtain good CSA and surgical effects after cervical LMP.

Predictors for spinal deformity following resection of intramedullary tumor via posterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to identify the clinical predictive factors for worsened spinal deformity (SD) following surgical resection via posterior approach for primary intramedullary tumors.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to extract potential references. Observational studies reporting predictive factors for worsened SD following surgical resection via posterior approach for primary intramedullary tumors were included. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated for dichotomous parameters.

RESULTS

Four retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. They were comprised of two groups of patients; those who developed SD (n = 87) and those who did not (n = 227). For patients with IMSCTs, age under 25 years as well as age under 13 years were the demographic variables associated with postoperative SD (odds ratio [OR] 3.92; p = 0.0002 and OR 4.22; p = 0.003). In both the fusion and the non-fusion subgroups, preoperative spinal deformity strongly predicted postoperative SD (OR 11.94; p < 0.001), with the risk highly elevated among the non-fusion patients (OR 24.64; p < 0.0002). Thoracolumbar junction involvement was also found to be a predictor of postoperative SD for patients with IMSCT (OR 2.89; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of considering age, preoperative spinal deformity, and thoracolumbar junction involvement as predictors of postoperative spinal deformity following surgical resection for IMSCT. These findings may provide guidance for the management of these patients, including the development of preoperative planning strategies and the selection of the most appropriate surgical approach for high-risk patients.

Investigation of the Efficacy of Bilateral Osteoligamentous Decompression via Hemilaminectomy in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Clinical Study

OBJECTIVE

Cervical stability may deteriorate and kyphotic spinal deformities may develop in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after laminectomy or laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of the "bilateral osteoligamentous decompression via unilateral hemilaminectomy approach (UHBOLD)" technique in CSM patients.

METHODS

The study included 34 adult patients who underwent UHBOLD surgery for CSM between 2016 and 2022. A record was made for all patients of age, gender, number of operated levels, preoperative and postoperative long-term follow-up VAS scores, Nurick grade values and mJOA scores, kyphosis angles measured on X-ray, and spinal canal areas measured on T2-weighted MR axial images.

RESULTS

Preoperative VAS scores of the patients were 6 (4-9), Nurick grade values were 3 (2-5), mJOA scores were 10.50 ± 3.42, kyphosis angles were -13.34 ± 13.69° and spinal canal areas were 87.11 ± 28.30 mm2. In postoperative long-term follow-up of these patients, VAS scores were 2 (1-5), Nurick grade values were 1 (0-5), mJOA scores were 13.94 ± 3.09, kyphosis angles were -15.07 ± 12.78° and spinal canal areas were 149.65 ± 42.57 mm2. A statistically significant difference was determined between the preoperative and the postoperative long-term follow-up VAS scores, Nurick grade values, mJOA scores, and spinal canal areas (P < 0.001). Kyphosis angles were not different (P = 0.198), and no instability was observed in any patient in long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The UHBOLD technique performed in multilevel CSM patients did not cause any change in cervical lordosis angle in long-term follow-up, did not cause cervical kyphotic deformity or cervical instability, and significantly improved Nurick grade values, and VAS and mJOA scores.

Impact of C3 laminectomy on cervical sagittal alignment in cervical laminoplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty and C3-C6 laminoplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty is a modified laminoplasty technique that can preserve the semispinalis cervicis muscle attached to the C2 spinous process. Several previous studies have shown that this technique can lead to better outcomes of postoperative axial neck pain and C2-C3 range of motion (ROM) than conventional cervical laminoplasty. However, there is still a lack of understanding of total and proportional postoperative cervical sagittal alignment outcomes.

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative cervical alignment and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A single-center, patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included consecutive 126 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) who were scheduled for cervical laminoplasty from March 2017 to January 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were C2-C7 Cobb angle (CA) and neck disability index (NDI). Secondary outcomes measures included other clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters including segmental Cobb angle and presence of C2-C3 interlaminar fusion.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to either the C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty group (LN group) or the C3-C6 laminoplasty group (LP group) at a 1:1 ratio. Laminoplasty was performed using a unilateral open-door technique and stabilized with titanium mini plates. A linear mixed model analysis was employed to examine the longitudinal data from postoperative 1-year through 3-year. Additional analysis between three types of cervical sagittal alignment morphology was done.

RESULTS

Among 122 patients who were randomly allocated to one of two groups (LN group, n=61; LP group, n=61), modified intent-to-treat analysis was done for 109 patients (LN group, n=51, LP group, n=58) who had available at least a year of postoperative data. Postoperative C2-C7 CA was not significantly different between the two groups. However, NDI was significantly different between the two groups (12.8±1.0 in the LN group vs 8.6±1.0 in LP group, p=.005), which exceeded the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). The postoperative C2-C3 CA was significantly greater in the LN group (7.1±0.5° in LN group vs 3.2±0.5° in LP group, p<.001) while C4-C7 CA was significantly smaller in the LN group (3.9±0.8° in LN group vs 7.7±0.7° in LP group, p<.001) with greater cSVA in the LN group (31.6±1.4 mm in LN group vs 25.5±1.3 mm in LP group at postoperative 3-year, p=.002). Postoperative Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), numerical rating scores for neck pain (NRS-N) were significantly better in the LP group than in the LN group (all p<.05) and only EQ-5D surpassed the MCID. The C2-C3 fusion rate was significantly different between the LN group (9.8%) and the LP group (44.8%) (p<.001). The LN group showed a higher prevalence of a specific cervical alignment morphology characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis (S curve). This S curve demonstrated significantly unfavorable outcomes across multiple outcome variables.

CONCLUSION

The impact of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative kyphosis among patients with CSM or OPLL did not significantly differ from that of C3-C6 laminoplasty. However, C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty might result in an unfavorable clinical outcome with an unbalanced cervical sagittal alignment characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis.

Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery

New innovations within spine surgery continue to propel the field forward. These technologies improve surgeons' understanding of their patients and allow them to optimize treatment planning both in the operating room and clinic. Additionally, changes in the implants and surgeon practice habits continue to evolve secondary to emerging biomaterials and device design. With ongoing advancements, patients can expect enhanced preoperative decision-making, improved patient outcomes, and better intraoperative execution. Additionally, these changes may decrease many of the most common complications following spine surgery in order to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. This article reviews some of these technological advancements and how they are projected to impact the field. As the field continues to advance, it is vital that practitioners remain knowledgeable of these changes in order to provide the most effective treatment possible.

Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor

OBJECTIVE

In most cases, complete resection of the intradural tumor is accompanied by long-term neurological complications. Postoperative spinal deformity is the most common complication after surgical resection of intradural tumors, and posterior longitudinal ligament complex (PLC) plays an important role in postoperative spinal deformity. In this study, we investigated the role of PLC in spinal deformity after the surgical treatment of intradural tumors.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 218 consecutive patients who underwent intradural tumor resection from 2000 to 2018 in this retrospective study. Before 2010, patients underwent laminoplasty without maintaining the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty group, n = 155). After 2010, patients performed single-port laminoplasty to maintain the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group, n = 63). The score of quality of life, painful cortex, spinal cord movement, progressive kyphosis or scoliosis, perioperative morbidity, and neurological results were analyzed in the laminoplasty group and laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The distributed variable was shown as mean ± standard deviation and an independent t-test or one-way analysis of variance was calculated.

RESULTS

There are 155 patients (71.1%) included in the laminoplasty group, and 63 patients (28.9%) in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The average age of patients was 42 ± 2.3 years, and the average modified McCormick score was 2. There were 158 (72.4%) patients with intramedullary tumors and 115 (52.7%) patients with extramedullary tumors. The length of hospital stays (8 days vs. 6 days; p = 0.023) and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation (48.4% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.012) were significantly lower in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group than the laminoplasty group. There was no significant difference in the risk of progressive deformity between the two groups at 18 months after surgery (relative risk 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.25; p = 0.258) and at 20 months after surgery (relative risk 0.24; 95% CI 0.21-2.1).

CONCLUSION

Laminoplasty retains posterior ligament complex showed no impact on the spinal deformities compared with laminoplasty, but significantly improved the postoperative spinal activity, alleviated pain symptoms, and reduced hospital recovery time.