Prognosis in patients presenting with brain metastasis from an undiagnosed primary tumor

Neuro-Ophthalmic Manifestations of Intracranial Malignancies

BACKGROUND

To describe the various neuro-ophthalmic presentations, key exam features, and clinical findings associated with 5 common primary and secondary intracranial malignancies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Retrospective PubMed search and review of published case reports, case series, observational studies, book chapters, and review articles examining the neuro-ophthalmic features of intracranial malignancies including primary glial neoplasms (e.g., glioblastoma multiforme), primary and secondary lymphoma, intracranial metastases, carcinomatous/lymphomatous meningitis, and intracranial germ cell tumors. The search strategy used to perform the retrospective review included the aforementioned tumor type (e.g., glioblastoma multiforme) and the following terms and Boolean operators: AND ("visual loss" OR "papilledema" OR "diplopia" OR "ophthalmoplegia" or "neuro-ophthalmology" OR "proptosis").

RESULTS

The rate of growth and the location of an intracranial tumor are essential factors in determining the neuro-ophthalmic presentation of certain intracranial malignancies. Primary malignant brain glial neoplasms commonly present with visual afferent complaints (e.g., unilateral or bilateral visual acuity or visual field defects, bitemporal or homonymous hemianopsia), pupil abnormalities (relative afferent pupillary defect), and optic atrophy or papilledema. Primary intraocular lymphoma (with or without central nervous system lymphoma) typically presents as a painless bilateral vitritis. Secondary intracranial malignancies have variable afferent and efferent visual pathway presentations. Carcinomatous/lymphomatous meningitis is associated with diplopia (e.g., multiple ocular motor cranial neuropathies with or without vision loss from papilledema or compressive/infiltrative optic neuropathy). Intracranial germ cell tumors can present with a chiasmal syndrome or dorsal midbrain syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Intracranial malignancies can present with neuro-ophthalmic symptoms or signs depending on topographical localization. Specific neuro-ophthalmic presentations are associated with different malignant intracranial tumors. Clinicians should be aware of the common malignant intracranial tumors and their associated clinical presentations in neuro-ophthalmology.

Prognosis of patients treated in a single neurosurgical reference centre for brain metastasis caused by dormant disseminated cells

Brain metastasis (BM) is a frequent complication of systemic cancer usually associated with poor prognosis. Survival depends on numerous factors, which complicates prognosis and treatment. It has been suggested that BM growing from previously dormant disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) may exhibit a milder phenotype than BM derived from continuously progressing metastatic cells; however, to the best of our knowledge, the prognosis of patients presenting with BM from dormant DTCs is unknown. The present study retrospectively compared survival data, collected from a single neurosurgical centre, between patients presenting with BM from previously dormant DTCs and patients with non-dormant BM. A total of 262 medical records were reviewed. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, the median survival of the dormant BM group was statistically longer than that of the non-dormant group (P=0.048); a trend towards a longer survival persisted after correcting for age, presence of breast cancer and treatment options (P=0.057), which are all factors known to influence outcome. The improved outcome of these patients could be considered in models for prognostication. Moreover, the development of therapies able to eradicate dormant DTCs could provide a new promising strategy to prolong the survival of patients with a favourable prognosis.

Brain Metastasis from Unknown Primary Tumour: Moving from Old Retrospective Studies to Clinical Trials on Targeted Agents

Simple Summary

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumours in adults and occur up to 3–10 times more frequently than primary brain tumours. In up to 15% of patients with BM, the primary tumour cannot be identified. These cases are known as BM of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) (BM-CUP). The understanding of BM-CUP, despite its relative frequency and unfavourable outcome, is still incomplete and clear indications on management are missing. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of BM-CUP.

Abstract

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumours in adults and occur up to 3–10 times more frequently than primary brain tumours. BMs may be the cause of the neurological presenting symptoms in patients with otherwise previously undiagnosed cancer. In up to 15% of patients with BMs, the primary tumour cannot be identified. These cases are known as BM of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) (BM-CUP). CUP has an early and aggressive metastatic spread, poor response to chemotherapy, and poor prognosis. The pathogenesis of CUP seems to be characterized by a specific underlying pro-metastatic signature. The understanding of BM-CUP, despite its relative frequency and unfavourable outcome, is still incomplete and clear indications on management are missing. Advances in diagnostic tools, molecular characterization, and target therapy have shifted the paradigm in the approach to metastasis from CUP: while earlier studies stressed the importance of finding the primary tumour and deciding on treatment based on the primary diagnosis, most recent studies focus on the importance of identifying targetable molecular markers in the metastasis itself. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on BM-CUP, from the diagnosis and pathogenesis to the treatment, with a focus on available studies and ongoing clinical trials.

Survival outcomes following craniotomy for intracranial metastases from an unknown primary

Introduction

Management of patients with intracranial metastases from an unknown primary tumor (CUP) varies compared to those with metastases of known primary tumor origin (CKP). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recognizes the current lack of research to support the management of CUP patients with brain metastases. The primary aim was to compare survival outcomes of CKP and CUP patients undergoing early resection of intracranial metastases to understand the efficacy of surgery for patients with CUP.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed, wherein patients were identified using a pathology database. Data was collected from patient notes and trust information services. Surgically managed patients during a 10-year period aged over 18 years, with a histological diagnosis of intracranial metastasis, were included.

Results

298 patients were identified, including 243 (82.0%) CKP patients and 55 (18.0%) CUP patients. Median survival for CKP patients was 9 months (95%CI 7.475–10.525); and 6 months for CUP patients (95%CI 4.263–7.737, p = 0.113). Cox regression analyses suggest absence of other metastases (p = 0.016), age (p = 0.005), and performance status (p = 0.001) were positive prognostic factors for improved survival in cases of CUP. The eventual determination of the primary malignancy did not affect overall survival for CUP patients.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. Surgical management of patients with CUP brain metastases is an appropriate treatment option. Current diagnostic pathways specifying a thorough search for the primary tumor pre-operatively may not improve patient outcomes.

90-gene signature assay for tissue origin diagnosis of brain metastases

Background

Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial tumors. 2–14% of BM patients present with unknown primary site despite intensive evaluations. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a 90-gene expression signature in determining the primary sites for BM samples.

Methods

The sequence-based gene expression profiles of 708 primary brain tumors (PBT) collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were analyzed by the 90-gene expression signature, with a similarity score for each of 21 common tumor types. We then used Optimal Binning algorithm to generate a threshold for separating PBT from BM. Eighteen PBT samples were analyzed to substantiate the reliability of the threshold. In addition, the performance of the 90-gene expression signature for molecular classification of metastatic brain tumors was validated in a cohort of 48 BM samples with the known origin. For each BM sample, the tumor type with the highest similarity score was considered tissue of origin. When a sample was diagnosed as PBT, but the similarity score below the threshold, the second prediction was considered as the primary site.

Results

A threshold of the similarity score, 70, was identified to discriminate PBT from BM (PBT: > 70, BM: ≤ 70) with an accuracy of 99% (703/708, 95% CI 98–100%). The 90-gene expression signature was further validated with 18 PBT and 44 BM samples. The results of 18 PBT samples matched reference diagnosis with a concordance rate of 100%, and all similarity scores were above the threshold. Of 44 BM samples, the 90-gene expression signature accurately predicted primary sites in 89% (39/44, 95% CI 75–96%) of the cases.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrated the potential that the 90-gene expression signature could serve as a powerful tool for accurately identifying the primary sites of metastatic brain tumors.

Advances in the management of brain metastases from cancer of unknown primary

Cancer of unknown primary accounts for 3-5% of all cancers for which an adequate investigation does not identify the primary tumor. The particular subset of brain metastasis in cancer of unknown primary (BMCUP) is a clinical challenge that lacks standardized diagnostic and therapeutic options. It is diagnosed predominantly in male patients in the sixth decade of age with complaints of headache, neurological dysfunction, cognitive and behavioral disturbances and seizures. The therapeutic approach to patients with BMCUP relies on local control and systemic treatment. Surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery and/or whole brain radiation therapy seems to be the cornerstone of the treatment approach to BMCUP. Systemic therapy remains essential as cancers of unknown primary are conceptually metastatic tumors. The benefits of chemotherapy were disappointing whereas those of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors remain to be evaluated. In this Review, we address the advances in the diagnosis and treatment of BMCUP.

Brain metastases as first manifestation of advanced cancer: exploratory analysis of 459 patients at a tertiary care center

Symptomatic brain metastases (BM) are a frequent and late complication in cancer patients. However, a subgroup of cancer patients presents with BM as the first symptom of metastatic cancer. Here we aimed to analyze the clinical course and prognostic factors of this particular BM patient population. Patients presenting with newly diagnosed BM without a history of metastatic cancer were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry. Clinical characteristics and overall survival were retrieved by chart review. 459/2419 (19.0%) BM patients presented with BM as first symptom of advanced cancer. In 374/459 (81.5%) patients, an extracranial primary tumor, most commonly lung cancer, could be identified within 3 months after BM diagnosis. In 85/459 (18.5%) patients no extracranial primary tumor could be identified despite comprehensive diagnostic workup within the first 3 months after diagnosis of BM. Survival of patients with identified extracranial tumor differed only numerically from patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP), however patients receiving targeted therapy after molecular workup showed significantly enhanced survival (20 months vs. 7 months; p = 0.003; log rank test). The GPA score showed a statistically significant association with median overall survival times in the CUP BM patients (class I: 46 months; class II: 7 months; class III: 4 months; class IV: 2 months; p < 0.001; log rank test). The GPA score has a strong prognostic value in patients with CUP BM and may be useful for patient stratification in the clinical setting. Comprehensive diagnostic workup including advanced imaging techniques and molecular tissue analyses appears to benefit patients by directing specific molecular targeted therapies.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Metastatic Brain Tumors from Cancer of Unknown Primary

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively analyzed treatment efficacy and identified prognostic factors impacting tumor control and survival in patients with brain metastases from cancer of unknown primary (CUP) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 87 patients with 520 tumors who underwent GKRS for brain metastases from CUP.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time after initial GKRS was 6 months. The 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 79.3% and 14.9%, respectively. Older age (P = 0.002), lower Karnofsky Performance Status Index score (P = 0.026), extracranial metastases (P = 0.013), and multiple brain metastases (P = 0.007) were significantly correlated with shorter survival periods. The 6- and 12-month neurologic death rates were 25.3% and 32.2%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month neurologic deterioration rates were 24.1% and 27.6%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month distant brain control failure rates were 21.8% and 24.1%, respectively. The median tumor volume was 1.7 cm³. The median marginal prescription dose was 18 Gy. The 6- and 12-month tumor recurrence rates were 5.1% and 15.7%, respectively. Larger tumor volume (P < 0.0001) and lower prescription dose (P = 0.001) were significantly correlated with local tumor control failure. Seven patients had symptomatic radiation injury. The 6- and 12-month GKRS-related complication rates were both 6.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that GKRS is a relatively effective and safe treatment for control of tumor progression in patients with brain metastases from CUP. Overall and neurologic survivals were short, but we recommend GKRS treatment to prevent early neurologic dysfunction and death in patients with CUP.

CSF-ctDNA SMSEQ Analysis to Tailor the Treatment of a Patient with Brain Metastases: A Case Report

Brain metastases are the most common neurological complications of adult cancers, accounting for more than half of brain tumors. The incidence of brain metastases may be increasing due to improved detection of small lesions by advanced imaging technologies. Given the fast evolution of targeted and immunotherapy regimens, it is essential to serially assess brain malignancies during the disease course for disease monitoring and tailoring of the therapeutic management. For such serial and repetitive assessment, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could be the biological fluid of choice to supplement cytology examination for the presence or absence of CNS malignancy, as well as provide extensive information on tumor mutational profile for personalization of treatment. The case described here emphasizes the importance of CSF-ctDNA analysis with the CellMax SMSEQ technology that led to treatment adjustment resulting in clinical remission of the patient.

Primary Germinoma Originating from the Insular Lobe: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Primary intracranial germinomas occurring in the cerebral hemisphere are extremely rare, with only a few reported cases in the literature. We describe an unusual case of a primary germinoma that developed in the insular lobe, with little involvement in the basal frontal lobe.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 19-year-old man presented with headache and vomiting. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a solitary, ring-like enhanced lesion in the left hemisphere, and a preliminary diagnosis of glioma was made. Surgery was performed, and the diagnosis of germinoma was made based on the histopathologic results.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes of ectopic germinomas of the midline structures of the brain are still unclear, but the theory of misplacement may partially clarify this phenomenon. Reflecting a lack of definitive management guidelines for atypical germinoma, the present patient was treated with focal radiotherapy around the lesion after surgery and achieved remission by 34 months postoperatively.

Optimal Treatment Decision for Brain Metastases of Unknown Primary Origin: The Role and Timing of Radiosurgery

Background

Up to 15% of all patients with brain metastases have no clearly detected primary site despite intensive evaluation, and this incidence has decreased with the use of improved imaging technology. Radiosurgery has been evaluated as one of the treatment modality for patients with limited brain metastases. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of radiosurgery for brain metastases from unknown primary tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 540 patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for brain metastases radiologically diagnosed between August 1992 and September 2007 in our institution. First, the brain metastases were grouped into metachronous, synchronous, and precocious presentations according to the timing of diagnosis of the brain metastases. Then, synchronous and precocious brain metastases were further grouped into 1) unknown primary; 2) delayed known primary; and 3) synchronous metastases according to the timing of diagnosis of the primary origin. We analyzed the survival time and time to new brain metastasis in each group.

Results

Of the 540 patients, 29 (5.4%) presented precocious or synchronous metastases (34 GKRS procedures for 174 lesions). The primary tumor was not found even after intensive and repeated systemic evaluation in 10 patients (unknown primary, 34.5%); found after 8 months in 3 patients (delayed known primary, 1.2%); and diagnosed at the same time as the brain metastases in 16 patients (synchronous metastasis, 55.2%). No statistically significant differences in survival time and time to new brain metastasis were found among the three groups.

Conclusion

Identification of a primary tumor before GKRS did not affect the patient outcomes. If other possible differential diagnoses were completely excluded, early GKRS can be an effective treatment option for brain metastases from unknown primary tumor.

Current advances in understanding and managing secondary brain metastasis

Metastatic brain tumors are the number one cause of intracranial neoplasms in adults and are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. The frequency of metastatic brain tumors is increasing because of improved survival in cancer patients. The molecular mechanism of brain metastasis is complex and not completely known. Vasogenic edema produced by tumor-derived VEGF is responsible for clinical symptoms. Dexamethasone remains the mainstay of medical management with not completely known mechanisms of action. Surgery and radiation are the main treatment modalities for metastatic brain tumors. Systemic chemotherapy has a very limited role in treatment of these tumors. Leptomeningeal metastasis is associated with extremely poor outcome.

Cerebral metastasis from a previously undiagnosed appendiceal adenocarcinoma

Brain metastases arise in 10%–40% of all cancer patients. Up to one third of the patients do not have previous cancer history. We report a case of a 67-years-old male patient who presented with confusion, tremor, and apraxia. A brain MRI revealed an isolated right temporal lobe lesion. A thorax-abdomen-pelvis CT scan showed no primary lesion. The patient underwent a craniotomy with gross-total resection. Histopathology revealed an intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. A colonoscopy found no primary lesion, but a PET-CT scan showed elevated FDG uptake in the appendiceal nodule. A right hemicolectomy was performed, and the specimen showed a moderately differentiated mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Whole brain radiotherapy was administrated. A subsequent thorax-abdomen CT scan revealed multiple lung and hepatic metastasis. Seven months later, the patient died of disease progression. In cases of undiagnosed primary lesions, patients present in better general condition, but overall survival does not change. Eventual identification of the primary tumor does not affect survival. PET/CT might be a helpful tool in detecting lesions of the appendiceal region. To the best of our knowledge, such a case was never reported in the literature, and an appendiceal malignancy should be suspected in patients with brain metastasis from an undiagnosed primary tumor.

Radiosurgery for brain metastases from unknown primary cancers

PURPOSE

We evaluated the role of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery in the multidisciplinary management of brain metastases from an undiagnosed primary cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-nine patients who had solitary or multiple brain metastases without a detectable primary site underwent stereotactic radiosurgery between January 1990 and March 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh. The median patient age was 61.7 years (range, 37.9-78.7 years). The median target volume was 1.0 cc (range, 0.02-23.6 cc), and the median margin radiosurgical dose was 16 Gy (range, 20-70 Gy).

RESULTS

After radiosurgery, the local tumor control rate was 88.5%. Twenty four patients died and 5 patients were living at the time of this analysis. The overall median survival was 12 months. Actuarial survival rates from stereotactic radiosurgery at 1 and 2 years were 57.2% and 36.8%, respectively. Factors associated with poor progression-free survival included large tumor volume (3 cc or more) and brainstem tumor location.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiosurgery is an effective and safe minimally invasive option for patients with brain metastases from an unknown primary site.